Caledonian Railway 956 Class

The Caledonian Railway 956 Class were 3-cylinder 4-6-0 steam locomotives that were used on the Caledonian Railway from 1921. They were built to the design of William Pickersgill. At the time they were the largest design operated by a Scottish railway.

Caledonian Railway 956 class
Type and origin
Power typeSteam
DesignerWilliam Pickersgill
Build date1921
Total produced4
Specifications
Configuration:
​
 • Whyte4-6-0
 • UIC2'C
Gauge4 ft 8 1⁄2 in (1,435 mm) standard gauge
Driver dia.6 ft 1 in (1.854 m)
Loco weight81 long tons (82 t; 91 short tons)
Tender weight48 long tons (49 t; 54 short tons)
Fuel typeCoal
Firebox:
 • Firegrate area		28 square feet (2.6 m2)
Boiler pressure180 psi (1.24 MPa)
SuperheaterRobinson
CylindersThree
Cylinder size18.5 in × 26 in (470 mm × 660 mm)
Valve gearSee text
Performance figures
Tractive effort27,975 lbf (124.4 kN)
Career
OperatorsCR • LMS
ClassCR: 956
Power classLMS: 5P
NumbersCR 956–959;
LMS: 14800–14803
Withdrawn1931–1936
DispositionAll scrapped

Introduction

The class ran to four members:

CR no. LMS no. Built Works Withdrawn First allocation
956 14800 6/1921 St Rollox 8/1931 Glasgow (Balornock)
957 14801 7/1921 St Rollox 3/1934 Carlisle (Kingmoor)
958 14802 7/1921 St Rollox 1/1936 Carlisle (Kingmoor)
959 14803 8/1921 St Rollox 7/1933 Perth (South)

source: BritishSteam[1]

Dimensions
  • Taper boiler, maximum diameter 5 ft 9 in (1.75 m)
  • Cylinders (3), all 18.5-inch (470 mm) bore by 26-inch (660 mm) stroke, in line with the bogie centre
  • As built, Walschaerts valve gear was applied directly to the outside cylinders and a form of derived motion was used for the inside one.

Problems

The locomotives were large and visually very impressive, but they were not successful and never really got established in traffic. One author has described them as "that monumental flop of all time", another as "ineffectual giants".

Draughting was a problem from the beginning, and firemen had a lot of trouble keeping them up to pressure. There were other troubles thought to be a result of too small an ashpan causing choking of the grate. However, the chief problem was the failure of the unusual derived motion design. The valve gear was insufficiently robust and the valve spindle guides (originally cast iron) had to be replaced in cast steel, but this did not address the fundamental shortcomings of the design and the performance of these large locomotives remained woeful.[2]

By early 1922 management decided things could not be left alone and in April of that year No.s 957 and 958 were rebuilt to the strange arrangement of Walschaerts valve gears for the outside cylinders and Stephenson link motion for the inside one. At the same time No. 959 was given a modified version of the standard Caledonian equipment but with dashpots added to absorb stress that was thought to exist at some points. No. 956 was first given a different variation of the standard arrangement, then brought into line with No. 959, but by the end of 1922 both had been altered again, this time to the same mixed gear arrangement as 957/958. It would have been difficult to retrofit Walschaerts gear to the inside cylinder (because there would be no mounting-point for the combination lever) but it seems strange that a modified Walschaerts gear was not used. It would have been possible to add a second eccentric to drive the combination lever.

None of the changes seems to have achieved very much. Experienced locomotive engineers have expressed astonishment and disbelief at the "cacophony" that the mixed valve gear gave rise to, and many have stated that the whole idea was a disaster.

Withdrawal

Despite their larger size they were capable of no better work than the preceding 60 class (which did not have a sparkling reputation themselves), and the allocation of power class '5P' by the LMS was hardly deserved. Within a few years they had been relegated to freight traffic.[3] Being a non-standard class of only four locomotives the LMS showed no interest in rebuilding them further and they were all withdrawn between 1931 and 1936.

gollark: Prove it mathematically.
gollark: Thank you except ææææ it does this `Exception in map: (((meapiometics . #<procedure meapiometics at dilemma2.scm:1202>) (apiomemetics . #<procedure apiomemetics at dilemma2.scm:954>) (apl . #<procedure apl at dilemma2.scm:829>) (angry-tit-for-tat . #<procedure angry-tit-for-tat at dilemma2.scm:753>) (grudger . #<procedure grudger at dilemma2.scm:668>) (random-choice . #<procedure random-choice at dilemma2.scm:618>) ...) . #<procedure apiomemetics at dilemma2.scm:954>) is not a proper list` ææææ.
gollark: This will be less elegant.
gollark: Oh, that doesn't actually work.
gollark: `(set! strategies (cons apiomemetics strategies))` ← so elegant.

See also

References
  1. "BritishSteam locomotive information". BritishSteam.com. Archived from the original on 4 April 2013. Retrieved 26 May 2013.
  2. Atkins, C. P. (1976), The Scottish 4-6-0 Classes, Ian Allan, p.57
  3. Atkins, C. P. (1976), The Scottish 4-6-0 Classes, Ian Allan, p.58
  • Casserley, H. C. & Johnston, Stuart W. (1974) [1966]. Locomotives at the Grouping 3: London, Midland and Scottish Railway. Shepperton, Surrey: Ian Allan. p. 153. ISBN 0-7110-0554-0.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.