Byron, Maine

Byron is a town in Oxford County, Maine, United States. The population was 145 at the 2010 census. Home to Coos Canyon on the Swift River, Byron includes the village of Houghton.

Byron, Maine
Coos Canyon, in the center of Byron
Byron, Maine
Location within the state of Maine
Coordinates: 44°43′37″N 70°38′52″W
CountryUnited States
StateMaine
CountyOxford
Incorporated1833
Area
  Total52.56 sq mi (136.13 km2)
  Land51.81 sq mi (134.19 km2)
  Water0.75 sq mi (1.94 km2)
Elevation
948 ft (289 m)
Population
  Total145
  Estimate 
(2012[3])
144
  Density2.8/sq mi (1.1/km2)
Time zoneUTC-5 (Eastern (EST))
  Summer (DST)UTC-4 (EDT)
ZIP code
04275
Area code(s)207
FIPS code23-09550
GNIS feature ID0582381

History

It was settled as Township No. 8, then incorporated on January 24, 1833 as Byron, named for the English poet Lord Byron. Nicknamed Hop City, agriculture was the principal occupation. Crops included wheat, corn, potatoes and oats. Lumbering was extensive in winter, with two sawmills operating. The Rumford Falls & Rangeley Lakes Railroad was completed in 1896, carrying freight, tourists and "rusticators" from Rumford up the Swift River valley through Byron and Houghton to Mooselookmeguntic Lake.

The Swift River is a popular place to either pan for gold or swim at Coos Canyon, a 32-foot (10 meter) high gorge where the water depth occasionally exceeds 20 feet (6 meters). Just down river from the gorge is a small local beach, called Toby's Beach. And a 20-foot ledge, popular during the summer, for daring jumpers.

There is a camping area off state route 17, across from Coos Canyon.

In March 2013, the town sought to require all homes in the town to possess at least one firearm,[4] not unlike Kennesaw, Georgia's similar 1982-origin local ordnance.

Bryon is the home of Anthony Boucher, NCAA Division III Cross Country Runner.[5]

Geography

According to the United States Census Bureau, the town has a total area of 52.56 square miles (136.13 km2), of which, 51.81 square miles (134.19 km2) of it is land and 0.75 square miles (1.94 km2) is water.[1] Set on either side of a narrow, uneven intervale in the Western Maine Mountains, Byron is drained by the Swift River.

The town is crossed by state route 17. It borders the towns of Roxbury to the south, Andover to the west, and unincorporated townships to the north and east.

Demographics

Historical population
CensusPop.
1840219
185029635.2%
18603239.1%
1870242−25.1%
1880191−21.1%
1890180−5.8%
190020413.3%
1910187−8.3%
192021716.0%
193096−55.8%
194012530.2%
195096−23.2%
196010812.5%
197013222.2%
1980114−13.6%
1990111−2.6%
20001219.0%
201014519.8%
Est. 2014144[6]−0.7%
U.S. Decennial Census[7]

2010 census

As of the census[2] of 2010, there were 145 people, 58 households, and 35 families living in the town. The population density was 2.8 inhabitants per square mile (1.1/km2). There were 223 housing units at an average density of 4.3 per square mile (1.7/km2). The racial makeup of the town was 95.9% White and 4.1% from two or more races. Hispanic or Latino of any race were 0.7% of the population.

There were 58 households, of which 29.3% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 53.4% were married couples living together, 1.7% had a female householder with no husband present, 5.2% had a male householder with no wife present, and 39.7% were non-families. 24.1% of all households were made up of individuals, and 10.4% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.50 and the average family size was 3.11.

The median age in the town was 49.2 years. 25.5% of residents were under the age of 18; 2.1% were between the ages of 18 and 24; 15.1% were from 25 to 44; 42.7% were from 45 to 64; and 14.5% were 65 years of age or older. The gender makeup of the town was 55.2% male and 44.8% female.

2000 census

As of the census[8] of 2000, there were 121 people, 50 households, and 38 families living in the town. The population density was 2.3 people per square mile (0.9/km2). There were 199 housing units at an average density of 3.8 per square mile (1.5/km2). The racial makeup of the town was 95.87% White and 4.13% Asian.

There were 50 households, out of which 26.0% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 62.0% were married couples living together, 12.0% had a female householder with no husband present, and 24.0% were non-families. 18.0% of all households were made up of individuals, and 2.0% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.42 and the average family size was 2.79.

In the town, the population was spread out, with 21.5% under the age of 18, 4.1% from 18 to 24, 28.9% from 25 to 44, 31.4% from 45 to 64, and 14.0% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 43 years. For every 100 females, there were 105.1 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 111.1 males.

The median income for a household in the town was $34,375, and the median income for a family was $34,375. Males had a median income of $41,875 versus $16,250 for females. The per capita income for the town was $20,334. There were 12.1% of families and 9.3% of the population living below the poverty line, including 14.3% of under eighteens and none of those over 64.

Site of interest

gollark: Something like `{"tracks": [{"title": "bee movie full soundtrack", "start": 0, "end": 600000}] }`, while odd-looking, is valid JSON.
gollark: All the parser implementations around should accept that as valid, and you can use a fixed amount of size.
gollark: Okay, very hacky but technically workable: have an XTMF metadata block of a fixed size, and after the actual JSON data, instead of just ending it with a `}`, have enough spaces to fill up the remaining space then a `}`.
gollark: XTMF was not really designed for this use case, so it'll be quite hacky. What you can do is leave a space at the start of the tape of a fixed size, and stick the metadata at the start of that fixed-size region; the main problem is that start/end locations are relative to the end of the metadata, not the start of the tape, so you'll have to recalculate the offsets each time the metadata changes size. Unfortunately, I just realized now that the size of the metadata can be affected by what the offset is.
gollark: The advantage of XTMF is that your tapes would be playable by any compliant program for playback, and your thing would be able to read tapes from another program.

References

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.