Bedellia somnulentella

Bedellia somnulentella, the sweet potato leaf miner, is a moth in the Bedelliidae family.

Sweet potato leaf miner
Scientific classification
Kingdom:
Animalia
Phylum:
Arthropoda
Class:
Insecta
Order:
Lepidoptera
Family:
Bedelliidae
Genus:
Bedellia
Species:
B. somnulentella
Binomial name
Bedellia somnulentella
(Zeller, 1847)
Synonyms
  • Lyonetia somnulentella Zeller, 1847
  • Bedellia orpheella Stainton, 1849
  • Bedellia convolvulella Fologne, 1860
  • Bedellia mnesileuca Meyrick, 1928
  • Bedellia ipomoeae Bradley, 1953
  • Bedellia staintoniella Clemens, 1860
  • Bedellia annuligera Meyrick, 1928
  • Bedellia autoconis Meyrick, 1930

Description

The wingspan is 8–10 mm.

The larvae feed on Calystegia pubescens, Calystegia sepium, Convolvulus althaeoides, Convolvulus arvensis, Convolvulus siculus, Convolvulus tricolour, Ipomoea batatas and Ipomoea purpurea. They mine the leaves of their host plant. The mine starts as a narrow tortuous corridor with a central frass line, that often cuts off part of the leaf. Later, larvae leave the mine and begin to make a series of full depth fleck mines. Pupation takes place outside the leaf. The pupa is attached to a leaf without a cocoon.

Distribution

It has a nearly cosmopolitan distribution and has been recorded from Russia, Ukraine, Georgia, southern Kazakhstan, Kirgizia, Uzbekistan, nearly all of Europe, the Middle East, Africa, India, Japan, North America, Australia, New Zealand and Oceania.

Bedellia somnulentella, morning-glory leaf miner, size: 4.8 mm
Sweetpotato leaf with leaf miner larvae, webbing, and frass
Sweet potato plant with leaf miner damage
gollark: > Heavpoot is much like pythohazardous unicode.<|endoftext|>The avioformic carriers are not to be tolerated, thus no.<|endoftext|>I see.<|endoftext|>Oh, I can't find the area to live.<|endoftext|>They're made of such their body and such too.<|endoftext|>I thought they had their own mass surveillance.<|endoftext|>Well, the UK rolled out a contact tracing app, so I actually have them disabled or something.<|endoftext|>The internet is really bad.<|endoftext|>Why? Did they not already have their own authentication mechanisms? That could be very hard, actually.<|endoftext|>I have a big SBC and it's not really a good one.<|endoftext|>I don't know exactly how it works, but it's nice for it.<|endoftext|>I'll look into it.<|endoftext|>I can't see any obvious ones in my website.<|endoftext|>The ones are mostly unrepairable.<|endoftext|>That would make it easier,
gollark: The law enforcement turtle is a thing, allegedly.
gollark: **The most gollarious response**: - this post made by posting unrelated code gang.<|endoftext|>Also, I think I have a better reason for "definitely" to talk about the "retro".<|endoftext|>I'd like to be banned, except to be honest Bad Guy™ is really annoying.<|endoftext|>That's actually... bad.<|endoftext|>Well, I think it's a really stupid rule.<|endoftext|>I mean, it's a good thing now.<|endoftext|>... no?<|endoftext|>You're saying that the rules don't apply.<|endoftext|>The law enforcement turtle is a thing.<|endoftext|>I think it'd be like the rules actually doing basically nothing.<|endoftext|>I'm not actually a fan of the rules if it's not edited, but it's not like that would be a reasonable heuristic.<|endoftext|>You can say "I'm exempt"?<|endoftext|>Well, you can, as he is somewhat tyrannical.<|endoftext|>They could obviously do that anyway,
gollark: I can't get it to say much else.
gollark: mgollark says:> The most gollarious response: Ǣ̡͐̍a̐̂̐c̢͐̊r͙͌ ͎ ̸̃͡ ̌ ͣ́̆ ́ ̴̤e͌̈́ ̐ť ͌ ͔̓̒c̡̯ͣe͐̌ ͐̋n̆̂͊ḙ̉̾ď̄o̒̂̂d̤͐̌


This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.