Back Street Girl

"Back Street Girl" is a song by British rock and roll band The Rolling Stones written by Mick Jagger and Keith Richards. It first appeared on the UK version of their 1967 album Between the Buttons but was not included on the US version. It was first released in the US on the 1967 album Flowers.[1]

"Back Street Girl"
Song by The Rolling Stones
from the album Between the Buttons (UK)
Released20 January 1967 (UK)
RecordedAugust  November 1966
GenreBaroque pop, rock
Length3:27
LabelDecca/ABKCO (UK)
Songwriter(s)Mick Jagger/Keith Richards
Producer(s)Andrew Loog Oldham
Between the Buttons (UK) track listing
12 tracks
Side one
  1. "Yesterday's Papers"
  2. "My Obsession"
  3. "Back Street Girl"
  4. "Connection"
  5. "She Smiled Sweetly"
  6. "Cool, Calm & Collected"
Side two
  1. "All Sold Out"
  2. "Please Go Home"
  3. "Who's Been Sleeping Here?"
  4. "Complicated"
  5. "Miss Amanda Jones"
  6. "Something Happened to Me Yesterday"

Rolling Stone magazine, in their 100 Greatest Rolling Stones Songs article named "Back Street Girl" at number 85.[2] Mick Jagger in an interview with Rolling Stone magazine in 1968 was asked how he felt about the Between the Buttons. Of the album, he said: "I don't know, it just isn't any good. "Back Street Girl" is about the only [song] I like."[3]


The song is a waltz which showcases Brian Jones playing vibraphone and Rolling Stones contributor Jack Nitzsche on the harpsichord. Accordion was played by Nick de Caro.[4]

Personnel

Covers of the song appeared on Don Nix album Gone Too Long with George Harrison (1976), alt-country band Golden Smog's debut EP On Golden Smog, Social Distortion's album Prison Bound, Bobby Darin's album Inside Out, and Jennifer Warnes's second album See Me, Feel Me, Touch Me, Heal Me (1969).

gollark: Having better laws is better than randomly dropping laws when inconvenient.
gollark: Like the "online safety bill" and whatever policing things people are angry about here.
gollark: Yeeees, it seems like the particularly totalitarian stuff just gets shoved through without COVID-19 being hugely related.
gollark: But that seems inaccurate because politicians also probably look good/bad if they do well/badly against COVID-19 regardless.
gollark: If you were somewhat more cynical than me I guess you could think something like: updated vaccines aren't part of mainstream political discourse yet, they are unlikely to be unless there is deployment/development of them, and so politicians (who are optimizing for looking good according to said political discourse) don't care and don't do anything about the situation.

References

[1] [2]

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.