Artificial cell

An artificial cell or minimal cell is an engineered particle that mimics one or many functions of a biological cell. The term does not refer to a specific physical entity, but rather to the idea that certain functions or structures of biological cells can be replaced or supplemented with a synthetic entity. Often, artificial cells are biological or polymeric membranes which enclose biologically active materials. As such, nanoparticles, liposomes, polymersomes, microcapsules and a number of other particles have qualified as artificial cells. Micro-encapsulation allows for metabolism within the membrane, exchange of small molecules and prevention of passage of large substances across it.[1][2] The main advantages of encapsulation include improved mimicry in the body, increased solubility of the cargo and decreased immune responses. Notably, artificial cells have been clinically successful in hemoperfusion.[3]

Standard artificial cell (top) and drug delivery artificial cell (bottom).

In the area of synthetic biology, a "living" artificial cell has been defined as a completely synthetically made cell that can capture energy, maintain ion gradients, contain macromolecules as well as store information and have the ability to mutate.[4] Such a cell is not technically feasible yet, but a variation of an artificial cell has been created in which a completely synthetic genome was introduced to genomically emptied host cells.[5] Although not completely artificial because the cytoplasmic components as well as the membrane from the host cell are kept, the engineered cell is under control of a synthetic genome and is able to replicate.

Part of a series of articles on
Synthetic biology
Synthetic biological circuits
Genome editing
Artificial cells
Xenobiology
Other topics

History

The first artificial cells were developed by Thomas Chang at McGill University in the 1960s.[6] These cells consisted of ultrathin membranes of nylon, collodion or crosslinked protein whose semipermeable properties allowed diffusion of small molecules in and out of the cell. These cells were micron-sized and contained cell, enzymes, hemoglobin, magnetic materials, adsorbents and proteins.[1]

Later artificial cells have ranged from hundred-micrometer to nanometer dimensions and can carry microorganisms, vaccines, genes, drugs, hormones and peptides.[1] The first clinical use of artificial cells was in hemoperfusion by the encapsulation of activated charcoal.[7]

In the 1970s, researchers were able to introduce enzymes, proteins and hormones to biodegradable microcapsules, later leading to clinical use in diseases such as Lesch–Nyhan syndrome.[8] Although Chang's initial research focused on artificial red blood cells, only in the mid-1990s were biodegradable artificial red blood cells developed.[9] Artificial cells in biological cell encapsulation were first used in the clinic in 1994 for treatment in a diabetic patient[10] and since then other types of cells such as hepatocytes, adult stem cells and genetically engineered cells have been encapsulated and are under study for use in tissue regeneration.[11][12]

On December 29, 2011, chemists at Harvard University reported the creation of an artificial cell membrane.[13][14][15]

By 2014, self-replicating, synthetic bacterial cells with cell walls and synthetic DNA had been produced . In January of that year researchers produced an artificial eukaryotic cell capable of undertaking multiple chemical reactions through working organelles.[16][17]

In September 2018, researchers at the University of California developed artificial cells that can kill bacteria. The cells were engineered from the bottom-up — like Lego blocks — to destroy bacteria.[18][19][20]

Materials
Representative types of artificial cell membranes.

Membranes for artificial cells be made of simple polymers, crosslinked proteins, lipid membranes or polymer-lipid complexes. Further, membranes can be engineered to present surface proteins such as albumin, antigens, Na/K-ATPase carriers, or pores such as ion channels. Commonly used materials for the production of membranes include hydrogel polymers such as alginate, cellulose and thermoplastic polymers such as hydroxyethyl methacrylate-methyl methacrylate (HEMA- MMA), polyacrylonitrile-polyvinyl chloride (PAN-PVC), as well as variations of the above-mentioned.[2] The material used determines the permeability of the cell membrane, which for polymer depends on the molecular weight cut off (MWCO).[2] The MWCO is the maximum molecular weight of a molecule that may freely pass through the pores and is important in determining adequate diffusion of nutrients, waste and other critical molecules. Hydrophilic polymers have the potential to be biocompatible and can be fabricated into a variety of forms which include polymer micelles, sol-gel mixtures, physical blends and crosslinked particles and nanoparticles.[2] Of special interest are stimuli-responsive polymers that respond to pH or temperature changes for the use in targeted delivery. These polymers may be administered in the liquid form through a macroscopic injection and solidify or gel in situ because of the difference in pH or temperature. Nanoparticle and liposome preparations are also routinely used for material encapsulation and delivery. A major advantage of liposomes is their ability to fuse to cell and organelle membranes.

Preparation

Many variations for artificial cell preparation and encapsulation have been developed. Typically, vesicles such as a nanoparticle, polymersome or liposome are synthesized. An emulsion is typically made through the use of high pressure equipment such as a high pressure homogenizer or a Microfluidizer. Two micro-encapsulation methods for nitrocellulose are also described below.

High-pressure homogenization

In a high-pressure homogenizer, two liquids in oil/liquid suspension are forced through a small orifice under very high pressure. This process divides the products and allows the creation of extremely fine particles, as small as 1 nm.

Microfluidization

This technique uses a patented Microfluidizer to obtain a greater amount of homogenous suspensions that can create smaller particles than homogenizers. A homogenizer is first used to create a coarse suspension which is then pumped into the microfluidizer under high pressure. The flow is then split into two streams which will react at very high velocities in an interaction chamber until desired particle size is obtained.[21] This technique allows for large scale production of phospholipid liposomes and subsequent material nanoencapsulations.

Drop method

In this method, a cell solution is incorporated dropwise into a collodion solution of cellulose nitrate. As the drop travels through the collodion, it is coated with a membrane thanks to the interfacial polymerization properties of the collodion. The cell later settles into paraffin where the membrane sets and is finally suspended a saline solution. The drop method is used for the creation of large artificial cells which encapsulate biological cells, stem cells and genetically engineered stem cells.

Emulsion method

The emulsion method differs in that the material to be encapsulated is usually smaller and is placed in the bottom of a reaction chamber where the collodion is added on top and centrifuged, or otherwise disturbed in order to create an emulsion. The encapsulated material is then dispersed and suspended in saline solution.

Clinical relevance

Drug release and delivery

Artificial cells used for drug delivery differ from other artificial cells since their contents are intended to diffuse out of the membrane, or be engulfed and digested by a host target cell. Often used are submicron, lipid membrane artificial cells that may be referred to as nanocapsules, nanoparticles, polymersomes, or other variations of the term.

Enzyme therapy

Enzyme therapy is being actively studied for genetic metabolic diseases where an enzyme is over-expressed, under-expressed, defective, or not at all there. In the case of under-expression or expression of a defective enzyme, an active form of the enzyme is introduced in the body to compensate for the deficit. On the other hand, an enzymatic over-expression may be counteracted by introduction of a competing non-functional enzyme; that is, an enzyme which metabolizes the substrate into non-active products. When placed within an artificial cell, enzymes can carry out their function for a much longer period compared to free enzymes[1] and can be further optimized by polymer conjugation.[22]

The first enzyme studied under artificial cell encapsulation was asparaginase for the treatment of lymphosarcoma in mice. This treatment delayed the onset and growth of the tumor.[23] These initial findings led to further research in the use of artificial cells for enzyme delivery in tyrosine dependent melanomas.[24] These tumors have a higher dependency on tyrosine than normal cells for growth, and research has shown that lowering systemic levels of tyrosine in mice can inhibit growth of melanomas.[25] The use of artificial cells in the delivery of tyrosinase; and enzyme that digests tyrosine, allows for better enzyme stability and is shown effective in the removal of tyrosine without the severe side-effects associated with tyrosine depravation in the diet.[26]

Artificial cell enzyme therapy is also of interest for the activation of prodrugs such as ifosfamide in certain cancers. Artificial cells encapsulating the cytochrome p450 enzyme which converts this prodrug into the active drug can be tailored to accumulate in the pancreatic carcinoma or implanting the artificial cells close to the tumor site. Here, the local concentration of the activated ifosfamide will be much higher than in the rest of the body thus preventing systemic toxicity.[27] The treatment was successful in animals[28] and showed a doubling in median survivals amongst patients with advanced-stage pancreatic cancer in phase I/II clinical trials, and a tripling in one-year survival rate.[27]

Gene therapy

In treatment of genetic diseases, gene therapy aims to insert, alter or remove genes within an afflicted individual's cells. The technology relies heavily on viral vectors which raises concerns about insertional mutagenesis and systemic immune response that have led to human deaths[29][30] and development of leukemia[31][32] in clinical trials. Circumventing the need for vectors by using naked or plasmid DNA as its own delivery system also encounters problems such as low transduction efficiency and poor tissue targeting when given systemically.[2]

Artificial cells have been proposed as a non-viral vector by which genetically modified non-autologous cells are encapsulated and implanted to deliver recombinant proteins in vivo.[33] This type of immuno-isolation has been proven efficient in mice through delivery of artificial cells containing mouse growth hormone which rescued a growth-retardation in mutant mice.[34] A few strategies have advanced to human clinical trials for the treatment of pancreatic cancer, lateral sclerosis and pain control.[2]

Hemoperfusion

The first clinical use of artificial cells was in hemoperfusion by the encapsulation of activated charcoal.[7] Activated charcoal has the capability of adsorbing many large molecules and has for a long time been known for its ability to remove toxic substances from the blood in accidental poisoning or overdose. However, perfusion through direct charcoal administration is toxic as it leads to embolisms and damage of blood cells followed by removal by platelets.[35] Artificial cells allow toxins to diffuse into the cell while keeping the dangerous cargo within their ultrathin membrane.[7]

Artificial cell hemoperfusion has been proposed as a less costly and more efficient detoxifying option than hemodialysis,[1] in which blood filtering takes place only through size separation by a physical membrane. In hemoperfusion, thousands of adsorbent artificial cells are retained inside a small container through the use of two screens on either end through which patient blood perfuses. As the blood circulates, toxins or drugs diffuse into the cells and are retained by the absorbing material. The membranes of artificial cells are much thinner those used in dialysis and their small size means that they have a high membrane surface area. This means that a portion of cell can have a theoretical mass transfer that is a hundredfold higher than that of a whole artificial kidney machine.[1] The device has been established as a routine clinical method for patients treated for accidental or suicidal poisoning but has also been introduced as therapy in liver failure and kidney failure by carrying out part of the function of these organs.[1] Artificial cell hemoperfusion has also been proposed for use in immunoadsorption through which antibodies can be removed from the body by attaching an immunoadsorbing material such as albumin on the surface of the artificial cells. This principle has been used to remove blood group antibodies from plasma for bone marrow transplantation[36] and for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia through monoclonal antibodies to remove low-density lipoproteins.[37] Hemoperfusion is especially useful in countries with a weak hemodialysis manufacturing industry as the devices tend to be cheaper there and used in kidney failure patients.

Encapsulated cells
Schematic representation of encapsulated cells within artificial membrane.

The most common method of preparation of artificial cells is through cell encapsulation. Encapsulated cells are typically achieved through the generation of controlled-size droplets from a liquid cell suspension which are then rapidly solidified or gelated to provide added stability. The stabilization may be achieved through a change in temperature or via material crosslinking.[2] The microenvironment that a cell sees changes upon encapsulation. It typically goes from being on a monolayer to a suspension in a polymer scaffold within a polymeric membrane. A drawback of the technique is that encapsulating a cell decreases its viability and ability to proliferate and differentiate.[38] Further, after some time within the microcapsule, cells form clusters that inhibit the exchange of oxygen and metabolic waste,[39] leading to apoptosis and necrosis thus limiting the efficacy of the cells and activating the host's immune system. Artificial cells have been successful for transplanting a number of cells including islets of Langerhans for diabetes treatment,[40] parathyroid cells and adrenal cortex cells.

Encapsulated hepatocytes

Shortage of organ donors make artificial cells key players in alternative therapies for liver failure. The use of artificial cells for hepatocyte transplantation has demonstrated feasibility and efficacy in providing liver function in models of animal liver disease and bioartificial liver devices.[41] Research stemmed off experiments in which the hepatocytes were attached to the surface of a micro-carriers[42] and has evolved into hepatocytes which are encapsulated in a three-dimensional matrix in alginate microdroplets covered by an outer skin of polylysine. A key advantage to this delivery method is the circumvention of immunosuppression therapy for the duration of the treatment. Hepatocyte encapsulations have been proposed for use in a bioartifical liver. The device consists of a cylindrical chamber imbedded with isolated hepatocytes through which patient plasma is circulated extra-corporeally in a type of hemoperfusion. Because microcapsules have a high surface area to volume ratio, they provide large surface for substrate diffusion and can accommodate a large number of hepatocytes. Treatment to induced liver failure mice showed a significant increase in the rate of survival.[41] Artificial liver systems are still in early development but show potential for patients waiting for organ transplant or while a patient's own liver regenerates sufficiently to resume normal function. So far, clinical trials using artificial liver systems and hepatocyte transplantation in end-stage liver diseases have shown improvement of health markers but have not yet improved survival.[43] The short longevity and aggregation of artificial hepatocytes after transplantation are the main obstacles encountered. Hepatocytes co-encapsulated with stem cells show greater viability in culture and after implantation[44] and implantation of artificial stem cells alone have also shown liver regeneration.[45] As such interest has arisen in the use of stem cells for encapsulation in regenerative medicine.

Encapsulated bacterial cells

The oral ingestion of live bacterial cell colonies has been proposed and is currently in therapy for the modulation of intestinal microflora,[46] prevention of diarrheal diseases,[47] treatment of H. Pylori infections, atopic inflammations,[48] lactose intolerance[49] and immune modulation,[50] amongst others. The proposed mechanism of action is not fully understood but is believed to have two main effects. The first is the nutritional effect, in which the bacteria compete with toxin producing bacteria. The second is the sanitary effect, which stimulates resistance to colonization and stimulates immune response.[2] The oral delivery of bacterial cultures is often a problem because they are targeted by the immune system and often destroyed when taken orally. Artificial cells help address these issues by providing mimicry into the body and selective or long term release thus increasing the viability of bacteria reaching the gastrointestinal system.[2] In addition, live bacterial cell encapsulation can be engineered to allow diffusion of small molecules including peptides into the body for therapeutic purposes.[2] Membranes that have proven successful for bacterial delivery include cellulose acetate and variants of alginate.[2] Additional uses that have arosen from encapsulation of bacterial cells include protection against challenge from M. Tuberculosis[51] and upregulation of Ig secreting cells from the immune system.[52] The technology is limited by the risk of systemic infections, adverse metabolic activities and the risk of gene transfer.[2] However, the greater challenge remains the delivery of sufficient viable bacteria to the site of interest.[2]

Artificial blood cell

Oxygen carriers

Nano sized oxygen carriers are used as a type of red blood cell substitutes, although they lack other components of red blood cells. They are composed of a synthetic polymersome or an artificial membrane surrounding purified animal, human or recombinant hemoglobin.[53] Overall, hemoglobin delivery continues to be a challenge because it is highly toxic when delivered without any modifications. In some clinical trials, vasopressor effects have been observed.[54][55]

Red blood cells

Research interest in the use of artificial cells for blood arose after the AIDS scare of the 1980s. Besides bypassing the potential for disease transmission, artificial red blood cells are desired because they eliminate drawbacks associated with allogenic blood transfusions such as blood typing, immune reactions and its short storage life of 42 days. A hemoglobin substitute may be stored at room temperature and not under refrigeration for more than a year.[1] Attempts have been made to develop a complete working red blood cell which comprises carbonic not only an oxygen carrier but also the enzymes associated with the cell. The first attempt was made in 1957 by replacing the red blood cell membrane by an ultrathin polymeric membrane[56] which was followed by encapsulation through a lipid membrane[57] and more recently a biodegradable polymeric membrane.[1] A biological red blood cell membrane including lipids and associated proteins can also be used to encapsulate nanoparticles and increase residence time in vivo by bypassing macrophage uptake and systemic clearance.[58]

Leuko-polymersome

A leuko-polymersome is a polymersome engineered to have the adhesive properties of a leukocyte.[59] Polymersomes are vesicles composed of a bilayer sheet that can encapsulate many active molecules such as drugs or enzymes. By adding the adhesive properties of a leukocyte to their membranes, they can be made to slow down, or roll along epithelial walls within the quickly flowing circulatory system.

Synthetic cells

The minimal cell

The German pathologist Rudolf Virchow brought forward the idea that not only does life arise from cells, but every cell comes from another cell; "Omnis cellula e cellula".[60] Until now, most attempts to create an artificial cell have only created a package that can mimic certain tasks of the cell. Advances in cell-free transcription and translation reactions allow the expression of many genes, but these efforts are far from producing a fully operational cell.

The future is in the creation of a protocell, or a cell which has all the minimum requirements for life. Members from the J. Craig Venter Institute have used a top-down computational approach to knock out genes in a living organism to a minimum set of genes.[5] In 2010, the team succeeded in creating a replicating strain of Mycoplasma mycoides (Mycoplasma laboratorium) using synthetically created DNA deemed to be the minimum requirement for life which was inserted into a genomically empty bacterium.[5] It is hoped that the process of top-down biosynthesis will enable the insertion of new genes that would perform profitable functions such as generation of hydrogen for fuel or capturing excess carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.[61] the myriad regulatory, metabolic, and signaling networks are not completely characterized. These top-down approaches have limitations for the understanding of fundamental molecular regulation, since the host organisms have a complex and incompletely defined molecular composition.[62]. In 2019 a complete computational model of all pathways in Mycoplasma Syn3.0 cell was published, representing the first complete in silico model for a living minimal organism.[63]

A bottom-up approach to build an artificial cell would involve creating a protocell de novo, entirely from non-living materials. It is proposed to create a phospholipid bilayer vesicle with DNA capable of self-reproducing using synthetic genetic information. The three primary elements of such artificial cells are the formation of a lipid membrane, DNA and RNA replication through a template process and the harvesting of chemical energy for active transport across the membrane.[64][65] The main hurdles foreseen and encountered with this proposed protocell are the creation of a minimal synthetic DNA that holds all sufficient information for life, and the reproduction of non-genetic components that are integral in cell development such as molecular self-organization.[66] However, it is hoped that this kind of bottom-up approach would provide insight into the fundamental questions of organizations at the cellular level and the origins of biological life. So far, no completely artificial cell capable of self-reproduction has been synthesized using the molecules of life, and this objective is still in a distant future although various groups are currently working towards this goal.[67]

Another method proposed to create a protocell more closely resembles the conditions believed to have been present during evolution known as the primordial soup. Various RNA polymers could be encapsulated in vesicles and in such small boundary conditions, chemical reactions would be tested for.[68]

Heavy investing in biology has been done by large companies such as ExxonMobil, who has partnered with Synthetic Genomics Inc; Craig Venter's own biosynthetics company in the development of fuel from algae.[69]

As of 2016, Mycoplasma genitalium is the only organism used as a starting point for engineering a minimal cell, since it has the smallest known genome that can be cultivated under laboratory conditions; the wild-type variety has 482, and removing exactly 100 genes deemed non-essential resulted in a viable strain with improved growth rates. Reduced-genome Escherichia coli is considered more useful, and viable strains have been developed with 15% of the genome removed.[70]:29–30

Electronic artificial cell

The concept of an Electronic Artificial Cell has been expanded in a series of 3 EU projects coordinated by John McCaskill from 2004-2015.

The European Commission sponsored the development of the Programmable Artificial Cell Evolution (PACE) program[71] from 2004-2008 whose goal was to lay the foundation for the creation of "microscopic self-organizing, self-replicating, and evolvable autonomous entities built from simple organic and inorganic substances that can be genetically programmed to perform specific functions"[71] for the eventual integration into information systems. The PACE project developed the first Omega Machine, a microfluidic life support system for artificial cells that could complement chemically missing functionalities (as originally proposed by Norman Packard, Steen Rasmussen, Mark Beadau and John McCaskill). The ultimate aim was to attain an evolvable hybrid cell in a complex microscale programmable environment. The functions of the Omega Machine could then be removed stepwise, posing a series of solvable evolution challenges to the artificial cell chemistry. The project achieved chemical integration up to the level of pairs of the three core functions of artificial cells (a genetic subsystem, a containment system and a metabolic system), and generated novel spatially resolved programmable microfluidic environments for the integration of containment and genetic amplification.[71] The project led to the creation of the European center for living technology.[72]

Following this research, in 2007, John McCaskill proposed to concentrate on an electronically complemented artificial cell, called the Electronic Chemical Cell. The key idea was to use a massively parallel array of electrodes coupled to locally dedicated electronic circuitry, in a two-dimensional thin film, to complement emerging chemical cellular functionality. Local electronic information defining the electrode switching and sensing circuits could serve as an electronic genome, complementing the molecular sequential information in the emerging protocols. A research proposal was successful with the European Commission and an international team of scientists partially overlapping with the PACE consortium commenced work 2008-2012 on the project Electronic Chemical Cells. The project demonstrated among other things that electronically controlled local transport of specific sequences could be used as an artificial spatial control system for the genetic proliferation of future artificial cells, and that core processes of metabolism could be delivered by suitably coated electrode arrays.

The major limitation of this approach, apart from the initial difficulties in mastering microscale electrochemistry and electrokinetics, is that the electronic system is interconnected as a rigid non-autonomous piece of macroscopic hardware. In 2011, McCaskill proposed to invert the geometry of electronics and chemistry : instead of placing chemicals in an active electronic medium, to place microscopic autonomous electronics in a chemical medium. He organized a project to tackle a third generation of Electronic Artificial Cells at the 100 µm scale that could self-assemble from two half-cells "lablets" to enclose an internal chemical space, and function with the aid of active electronics powered by the medium they are immersed in. Such cells can copy both their electronic and chemical contents and will be capable of evolution within the constraints provided by their special pre-synthesized microscopic building blocks. In September 2012 work commenced on this project.[73]

Ethics and controversy

Protocell research has created controversy and opposing opinions, including critics of the vague definition of "artificial life".[74] The creation of a basic unit of life is the most pressing ethical concern, although the most widespread worry about protocells is their potential threat to human health and the environment through uncontrolled replication.[61]

International Research Community

In the mid-2010s the research community started recognising the need to unify the field of synthetic cell research, acknowledging that the task of constructing an entire living organism from non-living components was beyond the resources of a single country.[75]

In 2017 the international Build-a-Cell large-scale research collaboration for the construction of synthetic living cell was started[76], followed by national synthetic cell organizations in several countries. Those national organizations include FabriCell[77], MaxSynBio[78] and BaSyC[79]. The European synthetic cell efforts were unified in 2019 as SynCellEU initiative[80].

gollark: https://dragcave.net/lineage/n/Unpupulous
gollark: Ooh, that's a good name, better use that.
gollark: Quite unpupulous.
gollark: Except after they occur and are reported, I guess.
gollark: Names aren't reviewed.

See also

References
  1. Chang TM (2007). Artificial cells : biotechnology, nanomedicine, regenerative medicine, blood substitutes, bioencapsulation, cell/stem cell therapy. Hackensack, N.J.: World Scientific. ISBN 978-981-270-576-1.
  2. Prakash S (2007). Artificial cells, cell engineering and therapy. Boca Raton, Fl: Woodhead Publishing Limited. ISBN 978-1-84569-036-6.
  3. Gebelein CG (1983). Polymeric materials and artificial organs based on a symposium sponsored by the Division of Organic Coatings and Plastics Chemistry at the 185th Meeting of the American Chemical Society. Washington, D.C.: American Chemical Society. ISBN 978-0-8412-1084-4.
  4. Deamer D (July 2005). "A giant step towards artificial life?". Trends in Biotechnology. 23 (7): 336–8. doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2005.05.008. PMID 15935500.
  5. Gibson DG, Glass JI, Lartigue C, Noskov VN, Chuang RY, Algire MA, et al. (July 2010). "Creation of a bacterial cell controlled by a chemically synthesized genome". Science. 329 (5987): 52–6. Bibcode:2010Sci...329...52G. doi:10.1126/science.1190719. PMID 20488990.
  6. Chang TM (October 1964). "Semipermeable Microcapsules". Science. 146 (3643): 524–5. Bibcode:1964Sci...146..524C. doi:10.1126/science.146.3643.524. PMID 14190240.
  7. Chang T (1996). "Editorial: past, present and future perspectives on the 40th anniversary of hemoglobin based red blood cell substitutes". Artificial Cells Blood Substit Immobil Biotechnol. 24: ixxxvi.
  8. Palmour RM, Goodyer P, Reade T, Chang TM (September 1989). "Microencapsulated xanthine oxidase as experimental therapy in Lesch-Nyhan disease". Lancet. 2 (8664): 687–8. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(89)90939-2. PMID 2570944.
  9. Chang TM (1997). Blood substitutes. Basel: Karger. ISBN 978-3-8055-6584-4.
  10. Soon-Shiong P, Heintz RE, Merideth N, Yao QX, Yao Z, Zheng T, et al. (April 1994). "Insulin independence in a type 1 diabetic patient after encapsulated islet transplantation". Lancet. 343 (8903): 950–1. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(94)90067-1. PMID 7909011.
  11. Liu ZC, Chang TM (June 2003). "Coencapsulation of hepatocytes and bone marrow stem cells: in vitro conversion of ammonia and in vivo lowering of bilirubin in hyperbilirubemia Gunn rats". The International Journal of Artificial Organs. 26 (6): 491–7. doi:10.1177/039139880302600607. PMID 12894754.
  12. Aebischer P, Schluep M, Déglon N, Joseph JM, Hirt L, Heyd B, et al. (June 1996). "Intrathecal delivery of CNTF using encapsulated genetically modified xenogeneic cells in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients". Nature Medicine. 2 (6): 696–9. doi:10.1038/nm0696-696. PMID 8640564.
  13. Budin I, Devaraj NK (January 2012). "Membrane assembly driven by a biomimetic coupling reaction". Journal of the American Chemical Society. 134 (2): 751–3. doi:10.1021/ja2076873. PMC 3262119. PMID 22239722.
  14. Staff (25 January 2012). "Chemists Synthesize Artificial Cell Membrane". ScienceDaily.
  15. Staff (26 January 2012). "Chemists create artificial cell membrane". kurzweilai.net.
  16. "World-first working eukaryotic cell made from plastic". Gizmag.com. Retrieved 2014-01-17.
  17. Johnson, R. (2013). "Nanoreactors: Catalysis in compartments". Nature Chemistry. 6 (1): 5. Bibcode:2014NatCh...6....5J. doi:10.1038/nchem.1840.
  18. "Artificial Cells Are Tiny Bacteria Fighters. - British Lung Foundation | HealthUnlocked". HealthUnlocked. Retrieved 2018-09-07.
  19. "Researchers create artificial 'lego cells' that can detect and fight bacteria- Technology News, Firstpost". Tech2. 2018-09-04. Retrieved 2018-09-07.
  20. "Artificial cells are tiny bacteria fighters". ScienceDaily. Retrieved 2018-09-07.
  21. Vivier A, Vuillemard JC, Ackermann HW, Poncelet D (1992). "Large-scale blood substitute production using a microfluidizer". Biomaterials, Artificial Cells, and Immobilization Biotechnology. 20 (2–4): 377–97. doi:10.3109/10731199209119658. PMID 1391454.
  22. Park et al 1981
  23. Chang TM (January 1971). "The in vivo effects of semipermeable microcapsules containing L-asparaginase on 6C3HED lymphosarcoma". Nature. 229 (5280): 117–8. Bibcode:1971Natur.229..117C. doi:10.1038/229117a0. PMID 4923094.
  24. Yu B, Chang TM (April 2004). "Effects of long-term oral administration of polymeric microcapsules containing tyrosinase on maintaining decreased systemic tyrosine levels in rats". Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 93 (4): 831–7. doi:10.1002/jps.10593. PMID 14999721.
  25. Meadows GG, Pierson HF, Abdallah RM, Desai PR (August 1982). "Dietary influence of tyrosine and phenylalanine on the response of B16 melanoma to carbidopa-levodopa methyl ester chemotherapy". Cancer Research. 42 (8): 3056–63. PMID 7093952.
  26. Chang TM (February 2004). "Artificial cell bioencapsulation in macro, micro, nano, and molecular dimensions: keynote lecture". Artificial Cells, Blood Substitutes, and Immobilization Biotechnology. 32 (1): 1–23. doi:10.1081/bio-120028665. PMID 15027798.
  27. Löhr M, Hummel F, Faulmann G, Ringel J, Saller R, Hain J, Günzburg WH, Salmons B (May 2002). "Microencapsulated, CYP2B1-transfected cells activating ifosfamide at the site of the tumor: the magic bullets of the 21st century". Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology. 49 Suppl 1: S21–4. doi:10.1007/s00280-002-0448-0. PMID 12042985.
  28. Kröger JC, Benz S, Hoffmeyer A, Bago Z, Bergmeister H, Günzburg WH, et al. (1999). "Intra-arterial instillation of microencapsulated, Ifosfamide-activating cells in the pig pancreas for chemotherapeutic targeting". Pancreatology. 3 (1): 55–63. doi:10.1159/000069147. PMID 12649565.
  29. Carmen IH (April 2001). "A death in the laboratory: the politics of the Gelsinger aftermath". Molecular Therapy. 3 (4): 425–8. doi:10.1006/mthe.2001.0305. PMID 11319902.
  30. Raper SE, Chirmule N, Lee FS, Wivel NA, Bagg A, Gao GP, et al. (1 September 2003). "Fatal systemic inflammatory response syndrome in a ornithine transcarbamylase deficient patient following adenoviral gene transfer". Molecular Genetics and Metabolism. 80 (1–2): 148–58. doi:10.1016/j.ymgme.2003.08.016. PMID 14567964.
  31. Cavazzana-Calvo M, Hacein-Bey S, de Saint Basile G, Gross F, Yvon E, Nusbaum P, et al. (April 2000). "Gene therapy of human severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID)-X1 disease". Science. 288 (5466): 669–72. Bibcode:2000Sci...288..669C. doi:10.1126/science.288.5466.669. PMID 10784449.
  32. Hacein-Bey-Abina S, Von Kalle C, Schmidt M, McCormack MP, Wulffraat N, Leboulch P, et al. (October 2003). "LMO2-associated clonal T cell proliferation in two patients after gene therapy for SCID-X1". Science. 302 (5644): 415–9. Bibcode:2003Sci...302..415H. doi:10.1126/science.1088547. PMID 14564000.
  33. Chang PL, Van Raamsdonk JM, Hortelano G, Barsoum SC, MacDonald NC, Stockley TL (February 1999). "The in vivo delivery of heterologous proteins by microencapsulated recombinant cells". Trends in Biotechnology. 17 (2): 78–83. doi:10.1016/S0167-7799(98)01250-5. PMID 10087608.
  34. al-Hendy A, Hortelano G, Tannenbaum GS, Chang PL (February 1995). "Correction of the growth defect in dwarf mice with nonautologous microencapsulated myoblasts--an alternate approach to somatic gene therapy". Human Gene Therapy. 6 (2): 165–75. doi:10.1089/hum.1995.6.2-165. PMID 7734517.
  35. Dunea G, Kolff WJ (1965). "Clinical Experience with the Yatzidis Charcoal Artificial Kidney". Transactions of the American Society for Artificial Internal Organs. 11: 178–82. doi:10.1097/00002480-196504000-00035. PMID 14329080.
  36. Bensinger WI, Buckner CD, Clift RA (1985). "Whole blood immunoadsorption of anti-A or anti-B antibodies". Vox Sanguinis. 48 (6): 357–61. doi:10.1111/j.1423-0410.1985.tb00196.x. PMID 3892895.
  37. Yang L, Cheng Y, Yan WR, Yu YT (2004). "Extracorporeal whole blood immunoadsorption of autoimmune myasthenia gravis by cellulose tryptophan adsorbent". Artificial Cells, Blood Substitutes, and Immobilization Biotechnology. 32 (4): 519–28. doi:10.1081/bio-200039610. PMID 15974179.
  38. Chang PL (1994). "Calcium phosphate-mediated DNA transfection". In Wolff JA (ed.). Gene Therapeutics. Boston: Birkhauser. pp. 157–179. doi:10.1007/978-1-4684-6822-9_9. ISBN 978-1-4684-6822-9.
  39. Ponce S, Orive G, Gascón AR, Hernández RM, Pedraz JL (April 2005). "Microcapsules prepared with different biomaterials to immobilize GDNF secreting 3T3 fibroblasts". International Journal of Pharmaceutics. 293 (1–2): 1–10. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2004.10.028. PMID 15778039.
  40. Kizilel S, Garfinkel M, Opara E (December 2005). "The bioartificial pancreas: progress and challenges". Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics. 7 (6): 968–85. doi:10.1089/dia.2005.7.968. PMID 16386103.
  41. Dixit V, Gitnick G (27 November 2003). "The bioartificial liver: state-of-the-art". European Journal of Surgery. 164 (S12): 71–76. doi:10.1080/11024159850191481. PMID 10029369.
  42. Demetriou AA, Whiting JF, Feldman D, Levenson SM, Chowdhury NR, Moscioni AD, Kram M, Chowdhury JR (September 1986). "Replacement of liver function in rats by transplantation of microcarrier-attached hepatocytes". Science. 233 (4769): 1190–2. Bibcode:1986Sci...233.1190D. doi:10.1126/science.2426782. PMID 2426782.
  43. Sgroi A, Serre-Beinier V, Morel P, Bühler L (February 2009). "What clinical alternatives to whole liver transplantation? Current status of artificial devices and hepatocyte transplantation". Transplantation. 87 (4): 457–66. doi:10.1097/TP.0b013e3181963ad3. PMID 19307780.
  44. Liu ZC, Chang TM (March 2002). "Increased viability of transplanted hepatocytes when hepatocytes are co-encapsulated with bone marrow stem cells using a novel method". Artificial Cells, Blood Substitutes, and Immobilization Biotechnology. 30 (2): 99–112. doi:10.1081/bio-120003191. PMID 12027231.
  45. Orive, edited by José Luis Pedraz, Gorka (2010). Therapeutic applications of cell microencapsulation (Online-Ausg. ed.). New York: Springer Science+Business Media. ISBN 978-1-4419-5785-6.CS1 maint: extra text: authors list (link)
  46. Mattila-Sandholm T, Blum S, Collins JK, Crittenden R, De Vos W, Dunne C, et al. (1 December 1999). "Probiotics: towards demonstrating efficacy". Trends in Food Science & Technology. 10 (12): 393–399. doi:10.1016/S0924-2244(00)00029-7.
  47. Huang JS, Bousvaros A, Lee JW, Diaz A, Davidson EJ (November 2002). "Efficacy of probiotic use in acute diarrhea in children: a meta-analysis". Digestive Diseases and Sciences. 47 (11): 2625–34. doi:10.1023/A:1020501202369. PMID 12452406.
  48. Isolauri E, Arvola T, Sütas Y, Moilanen E, Salminen S (November 2000). "Probiotics in the management of atopic eczema". Clinical and Experimental Allergy. 30 (11): 1604–10. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2222.2000.00943.x. PMID 11069570.
  49. Lin MY, Yen CL, Chen SH (January 1998). "Management of lactose maldigestion by consuming milk containing lactobacilli". Digestive Diseases and Sciences. 43 (1): 133–7. doi:10.1023/A:1018840507952. PMID 9508514.
  50. Gill HS (1 May 1998). "Stimulation of the Immune System by Lactic Cultures". International Dairy Journal. 8 (5–6): 535–544. doi:10.1016/S0958-6946(98)00074-0.
  51. Aldwell FE, Tucker IG, de Lisle GW, Buddle BM (January 2003). "Oral delivery of Mycobacterium bovis BCG in a lipid formulation induces resistance to pulmonary tuberculosis in mice". Infection and Immunity. 71 (1): 101–8. doi:10.1128/IAI.71.1.101-108.2003. PMC 143408. PMID 12496154.
  52. Park JH, Um JI, Lee BJ, Goh JS, Park SY, Kim WS, Kim PH (September 2002). "Encapsulated Bifidobacterium bifidum potentiates intestinal IgA production". Cellular Immunology. 219 (1): 22–7. doi:10.1016/S0008-8749(02)00579-8. PMID 12473264.
  53. Kim HW, Greenburg AG (September 2004). "Artificial oxygen carriers as red blood cell substitutes: a selected review and current status". Artificial Organs. 28 (9): 813–28. doi:10.1111/j.1525-1594.2004.07345.x. PMID 15320945.
  54. Nelson DJ (1998). "Blood and HemAssistTM (DCLHb): Potentially a complementary therapeutic team". In Chang TM (ed.). Blood Substitutes: Principles, Methods, Products and Clinical Trials. 2. Basel: Karger. pp. 39–57.
  55. Burhop KE, Estep TE (2001). "Hemoglobin induced myocardial lesions". Artificial Cells, Blood Substitutes, and Biotechnology. 29 (2): 101–106. doi:10.1080/10731190108951271. PMC 3555357.
  56. "30th Anniversary in Artificial Red Blood Cell Research". Artificial Cells, Blood Substitutes and Biotechnology. 16 (1–3): 1–9. 1 January 1988. doi:10.3109/10731198809132551.
  57. Djordjevich L, Miller IF (May 1980). "Synthetic erythrocytes from lipid encapsulated hemoglobin". Experimental Hematology. 8 (5): 584–92. PMID 7461058.
  58. Hu CM, Zhang L, Aryal S, Cheung C, Fang RH, Zhang L (July 2011). "Erythrocyte membrane-camouflaged polymeric nanoparticles as a biomimetic delivery platform". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 108 (27): 10980–5. Bibcode:2011PNAS..10810980H. doi:10.1073/pnas.1106634108. PMC 3131364. PMID 21690347.
  59. Hammer DA, Robbins GP, Haun JB, Lin JJ, Qi W, Smith LA, et al. (1 January 2008). "Leuko-polymersomes". Faraday Discussions. 139: 129–41, discussion 213–28, 419–20. Bibcode:2008FaDi..139..129H. doi:10.1039/B717821B. PMC 2714229. PMID 19048993.
  60. Virchow RL (1858). Die cellularpathologie in ihrer begründung auf physiologische und pathologische gewebelehre [Cellular pathology in its justification of physiological and pathological histology]. Zwanzig Vorlesungen gehalten wahrend der Monate Februar, Marz und April 1858 (in German). Berlin: Verlag von August Hirschwald. p. xv.
  61. Parke EC (2009). Beadau MA (ed.). The ethics of protocells moral and social implications of creating life in the laboratory ([Online-Ausg.] ed.). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. ISBN 978-0-262-51269-5.
  62. Armstrong R (September 2014). "Designing with protocells: applications of a novel technical platform". Life. 4 (3): 457–90. doi:10.3390/life4030457. PMC 4206855. PMID 25370381.
  63. Breuer, Marian; Earnest, Tyler M.; Merryman, Chuck; Wise, Kim S.; Sun, Lijie; Lynott, Michaela R.; Hutchison, Clyde A.; Smith, Hamilton O.; Lapek, John D.; Gonzalez, David J.; De Crécy-Lagard, Valérie; Haas, Drago; Hanson, Andrew D.; Labhsetwar, Piyush; Glass, John I.; Luthey-Schulten, Zaida (2019). "Essential metabolism for a minimal cell". eLife. 8. doi:10.7554/eLife.36842. PMC 6609329. PMID 30657448.
  64. Szostak JW, Bartel DP, Luisi PL (January 2001). "Synthesizing life". Nature. 409 (6818): 387–90. doi:10.1038/35053176. PMID 11201752.
  65. Pohorille A, Deamer D (March 2002). "Artificial cells: prospects for biotechnology". Trends in Biotechnology. 20 (3): 123–8. doi:10.1016/S0167-7799(02)01909-1. hdl:2060/20020043286. PMID 11841864.
  66. Noireaux V, Maeda YT, Libchaber A (March 2011). "Development of an artificial cell, from self-organization to computation and self-reproduction". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 108 (9): 3473–80. Bibcode:2011PNAS..108.3473N. doi:10.1073/pnas.1017075108. PMC 3048108. PMID 21317359.
  67. Rasmussen S, Chen L, Nilsson M, Abe S (Summer 2003). "Bridging nonliving and living matter". Artificial Life. 9 (3): 269–316. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.101.1606. doi:10.1162/106454603322392479. PMID 14556688.
  68. Gilbert W (20 February 1986). "Origin of life: The RNA world". Nature. 319 (6055): 618. Bibcode:1986Natur.319..618G. doi:10.1038/319618a0.
  69. Sheridan C (September 2009). "Big oil bucks for algae". Nature Biotechnology. 27 (9): 783. doi:10.1038/nbt0909-783. PMID 19741613.
  70. "Opinion on synthetic biology II: Risk assessment methodologies and safety aspects". EU Directorate-General for Health and Consumers. 2016-02-12. doi:10.2772/63529. Cite journal requires |journal= (help)CS1 maint: others (link)
  71. "Programmable Artificial Cell Evolution" (PACE)". PACE Consortium.
  72. "European center for living technology". European Center for Living Technology. Archived from the original on 2011-12-14.
  73. "Microscale Chemically Reactive Electronic Agents". Ruhr Universität Bochum.
  74. Bedau M, Church G, Rasmussen S, Caplan A, Benner S, Fussenegger M, et al. (May 2010). "Life after the synthetic cell". Nature. 465 (7297): 422–4. Bibcode:2010Natur.465..422.. doi:10.1038/465422a. PMID 20495545.
  75. "From chemicals to life: Scientists try to build cells from scratch". Retrieved 4 Dec 2019.
  76. "Build-a-Cell". Retrieved 4 Dec 2019.
  77. "FabriCell". Retrieved 8 Dec 2019.
  78. "MaxSynBio - Max Planck Research Network in Synthetic Biology". Retrieved 8 Dec 2019.
  79. "BaSyC". Retrieved 8 Dec 2019.
  80. "SynCell EU". Retrieved 8 Dec 2019.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.