Akkala Sami

Akkala Sámi
	ču´kksuâlis
Native to	Russia
Region	Southwest Kola Peninsula
Extinct	29 December 2003[1]; with the death of Maria Sergina
Language family	Uralic Sámi Eastern Mainland Akkala Sámi; ; ; ;
Writing system	Cyrillic
Language codes
ISO 639-3	sia
Glottolog	akka1237[2]

Akkala Sámi is a Sámi language that was spoken in the Sámi villages of A´kkel (Russian Бабинский, Finnish Akkala), Ču´kksuâl (Russian Экостровский) and Sââ´rvesjäu´rr (Russian Гирвасозеро, Finnish Hirvasjärvi), in the inland parts of the Kola Peninsula in Russia. Formerly erroneously regarded as a dialect of Kildin Sámi, it has recently become recognized as an independent Sámi language that is most closely related to its western neighbor Skolt Sámi.

Akkala Sámi is the most endangered Eastern Sámi language. On December 29, 2003, Maria Sergina – the last fluent native speaker of Akkala Sámi – died.[3][4] However, as of 2011 there were at least two people, both aged 70, with some knowledge of Akkala Sámi.[5] Remaining ethnic Akkala Sámi live in the village Yona.

Although there exist a description of Akkala Sámi phonology and morphology, a few published texts, and archived audio recordings,[5] the Akkala Sami language remains among the most poorly documented Sami languages. . One of the few items in the language are chapters 23-28 of the Gospel of Matthew published in 1897. It was translated by A. Genetz, and printed at the expense of the British and Foreign Bible Society.

Sámi dialects and settlements in Russia:

Akkala (Russian Babinsky)

A-1 A´kkel (Russian Babinsky, Finnish Akkala)
A-2 Ču´kksuâl (Russian Ekostrovsky)
A-3 Yona
A-4 Sââ´rvesjäu´rr (Russian Girvasozero, Finnish Hirvasjärvi)

Phonology

Morphology

The following overview is based on Pekka (Pyotr) M. Zaykov's volume.[6] Zaykov's Uralic phonetic transcription is retained here. The middle dot ˑ denotes palatalization of the preceding consonant, analyzed by Zaykov as semisoft pronunciation.

Noun

Akkala Sámi has eight cases, singular and plural: nominative, genitive-accusative, partitive, dative-illative, locative, essive, comitative and abessive. Case and number are expressed by a combination of endings and consonant gradation:

Nominative: no marker in the singular, weak grade in the plural.
Genitive-accusative: weak grade in the singular, weak grade + -i in the plural.
Partitive: this case exists only in the singular, and has the ending -tti͔.
Dative-illative: strong grade + -a, -a͕ or -ɛ in the singular, weak grade + -i in the plural.
Locative: weak grade + -st, -śtˑ in the singular, weak grade + -nˑ in the plural.
Essive: this case exists only in the singular: strong grade + -nˑ.
Comitative: weak grade + -nˑ in the singular, strong grade + -guim, -vuim or -vi̮i̭m in the plural.
Abessive: weak grade + -ta in the singular.

Pronoun

The table below gives the declension of the personal pronouns monn ‘I’ and mij ‘we’. The pronouns tonn ‘you (sg.)’ and sonn ‘(s)he’ are declined like monn, the pronouns tij ‘you (pl.)’ and sij ‘they’ are declined like mij.

	Singular	Plural
Nominative	monn	mij
Genitive-Accusative	mū	mii̭ji
Essive	munˑ	---
Dative-illative	munˑnˑa͔	mii̭ji
Locative	muśtˑ	miśtˑ
Comitative	muinˑ	mii̭jivuim
Abessive	muta	mii̭ta

The interrogative pronouns mī ‘what?’ and tˑī, kī ‘who?’ are declined as follows:

	mī ‘what?’	tˑī, kī ‘who?’
Nominative	mī	tˑī, kī
Genitive-Accusative	mi̮n	t́an, ḱan
Dative-illative	mi̮z	koz
Locative	mi̮st	kośtˑ
Comitative	mi̮i̭nˑ	ḱainˑ
Abessive	mi̮nta	ḱanta

The proximal demonstrative tˑa͕t ‘this’ and the medial demonstrative ti̮t ‘that’ are declined as follows:

	Singular	Plural	Singular	Plural
Nominative	tˑa͕t	tˑa͕k	ti̮t	ti̮k
Genitive-Accusative	tˑa͕nˑ	tˑa͕i	ti̮n	ti̮i̭
Essive	tˑa͕inˑ	---	ti̮i̭nˑ	---
Dative-illative	tˑa͕z	tˑai(t)	ti̮k, ti̮z	ti̮i̭(t)
Locative	tˑa͕śtˑ	tˑa͕in	ti̮śtˑ	ti̮i̼(n)
Comitative	tˑa͕inˑ	tˑa͕ivuim	ti̮i̭nˑ	ti̮i̭vuim
Abessive	tˑa͕ta	tˑa͕ita	ti̮ta	ti̮i̭ta

Verb

Akkala Sámi verbs have three persons and two numbers, singular and plural. There are three moods: indicative, imperative and conditional; the potential mood has disappeared. Below, the paradigm of the verbs va͕n̄ˑće ‘to walk’ and korrɛ ‘to knit’ is given in the present and imperfect tense:

	Present	Imperfect	Present	Imperfect
1sg.	vā͕nʒam	va͕n̄ˑcim	kōram	korri͔m
2sg.	va͕nʒak	vā͕nˑcik	kōrak	korri͔k
3sg.	va͕n̄ˑc	vānˑʒi	korr	kōri͔
1pl.	va͕n̄ˑćepˑ	vānˑʒim	korrɛpˑ	kōri͔m
2pl.	va͕nˑćepˑpˑe	vānˑʒitˑ	korrɛpˑpˑe	kōri͔tˑ
3pl.	vā͕nˑʒatˑ	van̄ˑciš	kōratˑ	korri͔š

The verb ĺiije ‘to be’ conjugates as follows:

	Present	Imperfect
1sg.	ĺam	ĺii̭jim
2sg.	ĺak	ĺiijik
3sg.	ĺie	ĺai
1pl.	ĺepˑ	ĺījim
2pl.	ĺepˑpˑe	ĺījitˑ
3pl.	ĺetˑ	ĺii̭jiš

Compound tenses such as perfect and pluperfect are formed with the verb ĺii̭je in the present or imperfect as auxiliary, and the participle of the main verb. Examples are ĺam tĭĕhtmi̮nč ‘I have known’ from tĭĕhttɛ ‘to know’, and ĺai tui̭jāma ‘(s)he had made’ from tui̭je ‘to make’.

The conditional mood has the marker -č, which is added to the weak grade of the stem: kuarčim ‘I would sew’, vizzčik ‘you (sg.) would become tired’.

As in other Sámi languages, Akkala Sámi makes use of a negative verb that conjugates according to person and number, while the main verb remains unchanged. The conjugation of the negative verb is shown here together with the verb aĺ̄ḱe ‘to begin’:


1sg.	jim aĺg
2sg.	jik aĺg
3sg.	ij aĺg
1pl.	jepˑ aĺg
2pl.	jepˑpˑe aĺg
3pl.	jetˑ aĺg

The third person singular and plural of the verb ĺii̭je ‘to be’ have special contracted forms ɛĺĺa and jāĺa.

gollark: That was a chatbot, not an image model.

gollark: No, the big research organisations are annoyingly serious.

gollark: I feel like it ought to be possible, if not necessarily very good.

gollark: I should really look into automated meme generation at some point.

gollark: We have calculators for a reason.

References

Akkala Sámi at Ethnologue (18th ed., 2015)
Hammarström, Harald; Forkel, Robert; Haspelmath, Martin, eds. (2017). "Akkala Saami". Glottolog 3.0. Jena, Germany: Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History.
"Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2007-04-11. Retrieved 2014-02-07.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
Rantala, Leif, Aleftina Sergina 2009. Áhkkila sápmelaččat. Oanehis muitalus sámejoavkku birra, man maŋimuš sámegielalaš olmmoš jámii 29.12.2003. Roavvenjárga.
Scheller, Elisabeth; 2011; "The Sami Language Situation in Russia"; in Ethnic and Linguistic Context of Identity: Finno-Ugric Minorities; Uralica Helsingiensia series, vol. 5; Helsinki; pp. 79–96.
Зайков, П. М. Бабинский диалект саамского языка (фонолого-морфологическое исследование). Петрозаводск: «Карелия», 1987.

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.

[e18-1] Akkala Sámi at Ethnologue (18th ed., 2015)

[Glottolog-2] Hammarström, Harald; Forkel, Robert; Haspelmath, Martin, eds. (2017). "Akkala Saami". Glottolog 3.0. Jena, Germany: Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History.

[3] "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2007-04-11. Retrieved 2014-02-07.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)

[4] Rantala, Leif, Aleftina Sergina 2009. Áhkkila sápmelaččat. Oanehis muitalus sámejoavkku birra, man maŋimuš sámegielalaš olmmoš jámii 29.12.2003. Roavvenjárga.

[autogenerated1-5] Scheller, Elisabeth; 2011; "The Sami Language Situation in Russia"; in Ethnic and Linguistic Context of Identity: Finno-Ugric Minorities; Uralica Helsingiensia series, vol. 5; Helsinki; pp. 79–96.

[6] Зайков, П. М. Бабинский диалект саамского языка (фонолого-морфологическое исследование). Петрозаводск: «Карелия», 1987.