Aircraft and Shipbuilding Industries Act 1977

The Aircraft and Shipbuilding Industries Act 1977 is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom that nationalised large parts of the UK aerospace and shipbuilding industries and established two corporations, British Aerospace and British Shipbuilders (s.1).

Aircraft and Shipbuilding Act 1977
Long titleAn Act to provide for the establishment of two bodies corporate to be called British Aerospace and British Shipbuilders, and to make provision with respect to their functions; to provide for the vesting in British Aerospace of the securities of certain companies engaged in manufacturing aircraft and guided weapons and the vesting in British Shipbuilders of the securities of certain companies engaged in shipbuilding and allied industries; to make provision for the vesting in those companies of certain property, rights and liabilities; to provide for payments to British Aerospace and its wholly owned subsidiaries, for the purpose of promoting the design, development and production of civil aircraft; and for connected purposes.
Citation1977 c. 3
Introduced bySecretary of State for Industry Tony Benn 30 April 1975[1]
Territorial extentEngland and Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland
Dates
Royal assent17 March 1977
Commencement17 March 1977
Other legislation
Amended byBritish Aerospace Act 1980
Status: Current legislation
Text of statute as originally enacted
Revised text of statute as amended

Nationalisation of the two industries had been a manifesto commitment of the Labour Party in the February 1974 United Kingdom general election. It met immediate opposition from the industries, including from Labour politician and Vickers chairman Lord Robens.[2]

The nationalisation was announced in July 1974 but the compensation terms were not announced until March 1975.[3] The bill had its first reading on 30 April 1975 but ran out of parliamentary time in that session.[4] Subsequent bills had a stormy passage through Parliament. Ship repairing was originally included in its scope but removed because of the findings of examiners that the bill was hybrid. The bill was rejected by the House of Lords on three separate occasions. It was possible that the provisions of the Parliament Acts 1911 and 1949 could have been employed to enact it, but the legislation was approved following concessions by the government, including deletion of the twelve ship repairing companies.

List of assets subsumed by British Aerospace

The assets of the following companies vested in British Aerospace on 29 April 1977 (ss.19(1) and 56(1)/ Sch.1):[5]

List of assets subsumed by British Shipbuilders

The assets of the following companies vested in British Shipbuilders on 1 September 1977 (ss.19(1) and 56(1)/ Sch.2):[6]

Shipbuilders

Marine diesel manufacturers

Note: Harland and Wolff, Belfast was state-owned but did not form part of British Shipbuilders.

Compensation

Section 35 of the act provided for compensation to the original owners. Compensation was to be by government bonds against a valuation of the shares over a relevant period of six months up to the Labour Party's election on 28 February 1974. For companies listed on the London Stock Exchange, this was the average quoted price over the relevant period. For non-listed shares, the government would negotiate with a shareholders' representative to establish an hypothetical market valuation. If no agreement was reached, the shareholders had recourse to arbitration (ss.36–41).[3] However, section 39 controversially included a provision to make deductions from this base value if a company had dissipated its assets by declaring dividends in anticipation of nationalisation, or by other means.[7]

Aircraft and Shipbuilding Industries Arbitration Tribunal

Section 42 of the act established the Aircraft and Shipbuilding Industries Arbitration Tribunal to hear appeals over valuation but not challenges to the fairness of the statutory formula. The tribunal was governed by rules made respectively by the Lord Advocate for Scotland and the Lord Chancellor for the remainder of the UK.[8][9] There was a right of appeal to the Court of Session in Scotland and to the Court of Appeal in the remainder of the UK (Sch.7), with a possible further appeal to the House of Lords. There was also provision for judicial review of the original compensation offer.[10]

Having been described, in 2006, by the Council on Tribunals as "rarely convened/moribund",[11] the tribunal was abolished in March 2013[12] under the UK Government's public bodies reforms.

European Court of Human Rights

The Conservative Party had been critical of the compensation proposals but, after being elected in the 1979 United Kingdom general election did not change the arrangements. All shareholders had been paid out by the end of 1980.[3] In 1980 unsuccessful applications to the European Court of Human Rights over the compensation were made by Vosper, Vickers, Yarrow and shareholders including English Electric, M&G Securities, Prudential, and Sir William Lithgow.[13]

They complained, in the end unsuccessfully, that the compensation scheme breached several articles of the European Convention on Human Rights, namely:[9][14]

  • Art.1 of Protocol 1, right to peaceful enjoyment of one's possessions;
  • Art.6(1), right to a fair trial;
  • Art.13, right to an effective remedy;
  • Art.14, prohibition of discrimination;
  • Art.17, prohibition of abuse of rights;
  • Art.18, limitations on permitted restrictions of rights.
gollark: (probably not, but it would be kind of ironic)
gollark: Random idea: maybe people's belief in the bystander effect *causes* the bystander effect.
gollark: Unless the universe is just being simulated by accident as part of solving some complex optimization problem or something weird like that.
gollark: Basically the only universal is probably that less computation is preferred.
gollark: The laws of physics their computers run on might happen to allow some specific computations to run very fast, or make it run very slowly.

References
  1. Hill, Peter (1 May 1975). "Benn move to beat Shipyard Bill delay". The Times. p. 19, col D.
  2. Tweedale, G. (2008) "Robens, Alfred, Baron Robens of Woldingham (1910–1999)", Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, Oxford University Press, online edn, accessed 26 March 2008
  3. Lauterpacht (1987) p.440
  4. Lauterpacht (1987) p.450
  5. SI 1977/539, art.2
  6. SI 1977/540, art.2 Archived 30 September 2007 at the Wayback Machine
  7. Hill, Peter (2 May 1975). "Compensation fight likely as Bill sets target for ship and aircraft takeover". The Times. p. 19, col A.
  8. Aircraft and Shipbuilding Industries Arbitration Tribunal Rules 1977, Aircraft and Shipbuilding Industries Arbitration Tribunal (Scottish Proceedings) Rules 1977
  9. Application 9482/81
  10. Lauterpacht (1987) pp456–457
  11. Council on Tribunals (2006). "Annual Report 2005/ 2006" (PDF). Council on Tribunals archive site. Ministry of Justice. pp. p.70. Archived from the original (PDF) on 1 December 2008. Retrieved 22 March 2008.
  12. "Public Bodies (Abolition of the Aircraft and Shipbuilding Industries Arbitration Tribunal) Order 2013". legislation.gov.uk. Retrieved 25 April 2014.
  13. Lauterpacht (1987) p.479
  14. Lauterpacht (1987) p.441

Sources
  • Norton, P. M. (1991). "A law of the future or a law of the past? Modern tribunals and the International law of expropriation". American Journal of International Law. 85 (3): 474–505. doi:10.2307/2203108. JSTOR 2203108.
  • Lithgow and Others, in Lauterpacht, E. (1987) International Law Reports, London: Cambridge University Press, ISBN 0-949009-08-3, pp438–536
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.