2019 Bella Cup – Doubles
Maja Chwalińska and Katarzyna Kawa were the defending champions, but chose not to participate.[1]
Doubles | |
---|---|
2019 Bella Cup | |
Champions | ![]() ![]() |
Runners-up | ![]() ![]() |
Final score | 6–4, 3–6, [10–4] |
Rebeka Masarova and Rebecca Šramková won the title, defeating Robin Anderson and Anhelina Kalinina in the final, 6–4, 3–6, [10–4].
Seeds
Danka Kovinić / Laura Pigossi (Semifinals) Chen Pei-hsuan / Wu Fang-hsien (First round) Irina Bara / Elena Bogdan (Semifinals) Robin Anderson / Anhelina Kalinina (Final)
Draw
Key
- Q = Qualifier
- WC = Wild Card
- LL = Lucky Loser
- Alt = Alternate
- SE = Special Exempt
- PR = Protected Ranking
- ITF = ITF entry
- JE = Junior Exempt
- w/o = Walkover
- r = Retired
- d = Defaulted
Draw
First Round | Quarterfinals | Semifinals | Final | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 3 | 3 | 1 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 1 | 77 | [10] | ![]() ![]() | 4 | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 6 | 64 | [6] | 1 | ![]() ![]() | 5 | 6 | [8] | |||||||||||||||||||
4 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | 4 | ![]() ![]() | 7 | 2 | [10] | |||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 0 | 3 | 4 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||
WC | ![]() ![]() | 64 | 6 | [6] | WC | ![]() ![]() | 1 | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||
WC | ![]() ![]() | 77 | 4 | [10] | 4 | ![]() ![]() | 4 | 6 | [4] | ||||||||||||||||||
Alt | ![]() ![]() | 4 | 5 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 3 | [10] | ||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 6 | 7 | ![]() ![]() | 3 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 2 | 2 | 3 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | 3 | ![]() ![]() | 3 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 4 | 4 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | ![]() ![]() | 7 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 6 | 3 | [10] | ![]() ![]() | 5 | 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | ![]() ![]() | 4 | 6 | [5] |
gollark: But there are an infinitely large number of possible gods, and some do weirder things like "punish/reward entirely at random", "have no interest whatsoever in humanity", "punish people who believe in other gods", and all that, and Pascal's Wager just *ignores* those.
gollark: Pascal's Wager might work if the only options are "no god" or "one god, and it's the one you believe in, and they'll reward you if you believe and punish you otherwise".
gollark: Also, I should be specific, "a god and associated religious claims", not just "a god".
gollark: Pascal's Wager is really stupid.
gollark: > I’d rather just have faith and get on with my lifeThis seems like a bizarre attitude, since if you... don't actually have evidence for a god at all... it's really weird for that belief to affect your decisions.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.