2017 Tashkent Challenger – Doubles
Mikhail Elgin and Denis Istomin were the defending champions but lost in the first round to James Cerretani and Marc Polmans.
Doubles | |
---|---|
2017 Tashkent Challenger | |
Champions | ![]() ![]() |
Runners-up | ![]() ![]() |
Final score | 6–4, 6–2 |
Hans Podlipnik-Castillo and Andrei Vasilevski won the title after defeating Yuki Bhambri and Divij Sharan 6–4, 6–2 in the final.
Seeds
Guillermo Durán / Andrés Molteni (First round) Hans Podlipnik-Castillo / Andrei Vasilevski (Champions) James Cerretani / Marc Polmans (Semifinals) Jeevan Nedunchezhiyan / Vishnu Vardhan (First round)
Draw
Key
- Q = Qualifier
- WC = Wild Card
- LL = Lucky Loser
- Alt = Alternate
- SE = Special Exempt
- PR = Protected Ranking
- ITF = ITF entry
- JE = Junior Exempt
- w/o = Walkover
- r = Retired
- d = Defaulted
First Round | Quarterfinals | Semifinals | Final | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | ![]() ![]() | 4 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 77 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
WC | ![]() ![]() | 4 | 67 | ![]() ![]() | 3 | 63 | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 6 | 79 | ![]() ![]() | 3 | 7 | [10] | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | ![]() ![]() | 66 | 66 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 5 | [6] | ||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 78 | 78 | ![]() ![]() | 5 | 77 | [3] | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 65 | 6 | [10] | ![]() ![]() | 7 | 64 | [10] | ||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 77 | 3 | [6] | ![]() ![]() | 4 | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 6 | 5 | [6] | 2 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 4 | 7 | [10] | ![]() ![]() | 4 | 61 | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 4 | 66 | 3 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 77 | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 78 | 3 | ![]() ![]() | 61 | 64 | ||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | 2 | ![]() ![]() | 77 | 77 | |||||||||||||||||||||
WC | ![]() ![]() | 2 | 4 | ![]() ![]() | 3 | 6 | [4] | ||||||||||||||||||||
WC | ![]() ![]() | 610 | 79 | [3] | 2 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 3 | [10] | ||||||||||||||||||
2 | ![]() ![]() | 712 | 67 | [10] |
gollark: It's an extension of the signed disk thing, really.
gollark: > The primary benefit promised by elliptic curve cryptography is a smaller key size, reducing storage and transmission requirements[6], i.e. that an elliptic curve group could provide the same level of security afforded by an RSA-based system with a large modulus and correspondingly larger key: for example, a 256-bit elliptic curve public key should provide comparable security to a 3072-bit RSA public key. - wikipedia
gollark: For RSA, though.
gollark: Er, 32 bytes.
gollark: I may have slightly lost the copy on my computer, hold on.
References
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.