2014 Family Circle Cup – Doubles

Kristina Mladenovic and Lucie Šafářová were the defending champions, but Mladenovic chose not to participate this year. Šafářová played alongside Květa Peschke, but they lost in the first round to Chan Hao-ching and Chan Yung-jan.

Doubles
2014 Family Circle Cup
Champions Anabel Medina Garrigues
Yaroslava Shvedova
Runners-up Chan Hao-ching
Chan Yung-jan
Final score7–6(7–4), 6–2
Main article: 2014 Family Circle Cup

Anabel Medina Garrigues and Yaroslava Shvedova won the tournament, defeating the Chan sisters in the final, 7–6(7–4), 6–2.

Seeds
  1. Hsieh Su-wei / Peng Shuai (first round; retired because of abdominal strain (Peng))
  2. Květa Peschke / Lucie Šafářová (first round)
  3. Raquel Kops-Jones / Abigail Spears (semifinals)
  4. Julia Görges / Anna-Lena Grönefeld (quarterfinals)

Draw

Key
First round Quarterfinals Semifinals Final
1 S-w Hsieh
S Peng 		4r
M Erakovic
A Parra Santonja 		5 M Erakovic
A Parra Santonja 		2 1
A Medina Garrigues
Y Shvedova 		60 6 [10] A Medina Garrigues
Y Shvedova 		6 6
WC E Bouchard
T Townsend 		77 3 [7] A Medina Garrigues
Y Shvedova 		7 65 [10]
3 R Kops-Jones
A Spears 		6 3 [11] 3 R Kops-Jones
A Spears 		5 77 [8]
Alt J Gajdošová
S Zheng 		3 6 [9] 3 R Kops-Jones
A Spears 		6 1 [16]
L Huber
L Raymond 		5 6 [7] WC J Janković
A Petkovic 		4 6 [14]
WC J Janković
A Petkovic 		7 2 [10] A Medina Garrigues
Y Shvedova 		77 6
M Lučić-Baroni
N Petrova 		2 6 [3] H-c Chan
Y-j Chan 		64 2
A Kudryavtseva
A Rodionova 		6 2 [10] A Kudryavtseva
A Rodionova 		6 6
J Husárová
V Lepchenko 		2 77 [5] 4 J Görges
A-L Grönefeld 		1 4
4 J Görges
A-L Grönefeld 		6 63 [10] A Kudryavtseva
A Rodionova 		2 1r
A Rosolska
C Scheepers 		6 3 [9] H-c Chan
Y-j Chan 		6 3
WC S Cîrstea
M Kirilenko 		4 6 [11] WC S Cîrstea
M Kirilenko 		3 6 [8]
H-c Chan
Y-j Chan 		6 6 H-c Chan
Y-j Chan 		6 4 [10]
2 K Peschke
L Šafářová 		4 4
gollark: I mostly think of it as the second one. It's possible palaiologos is trying to move it toward the first, and I don't like this.
gollark: It's possible that this stems partly from differences in perception of what esolangs actually is; esoteric programming language discussion place which happens to have a somewhat weird community in it versus weird community which happens to exist in something nominally for esolang discussion.
gollark: Ah, sinthÖrion.
gollark: I figure people are mostly prompted by *something* instead of just bringing it up entirely at random, and a ControversialEsolangs server would lack many of those prompts if it's purely for that.
gollark: And controversial stuff has never arisen from discussing something else?

References
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.