2012 LET Access Series

The 2012 LET Access Series was a series of professional women's golf tournaments held from March through November 2012 across Europe. The LET Access Series is the second-tier women's professional golf tour in Europe and is the official developmental tour of the Ladies European Tour.[1]

Tournament results

The table below shows the 2012 schedule. The numbers in brackets after the winners' names show the number of career wins they had on the LET Access Series up to and including that event.[2]

DatesTournamentLocationPrize fund (€)Winner
14–16 MarTerre Blanche Ladies OpenFrance25,000 Marion Ricordeau (1)
12–14 AprDinard Ladies OpenFrance25,000 Carly Booth (1)
19–21 AprBanesto Tour ZaragozaSpain20,000 Carly Booth (2)
10–12 MayKristianstad Åhus Ladies OpenSweden30,000 Cecilie Lundgreen (1)
16–18 MayLjungbyhed Park PGA Ladies OpenSweden30,000 Pamela Pretswell (1)
22–24 MayGolfStream Ladies OpenUkraine20,000 Anastasia Kostina (1)
4–6 JulLadies Norwegian ChallengeNorway25,000 Marianne Skarpnord (1)
9–11 AugWomen's Bank OpenFinland30,000 Cecilie Lundgreen (2)
16–18 AugSamso Ladies OpenDenmark20,000 Antonella Cvitan (1)
13–15 SepFourqueux Ladies OpenFrance25,000 Caroline Afonso (3)
5–7 OctAzores Ladies OpenPortugal25,000 Anna Rossi (1)
28–30 OctCrete Ladies OpenGreece25,000 Christine Wolf (1)
8–10 NovBanesto Tour ValenciaSpain20,000 Holly Clyburn (1)

Order of Merit rankings

The top five players on the LETAS Order of Merit earn LET membership for the Ladies European Tour. Players finishing in positions 6–20 get to skip the first stage of the qualifying event and automatically progress to the final stage of the Lalla Aicha Tour School.[3]

RankPlayerCountryEventsPoints
1 Pamela Pretswell Scotland 12 19,372
2 Marion Ricordeau France 12 18,946
3 Cecilie Lundgreen Norway 9 15,277
4 Katy McNicoll Scotland 13 15,165
5 Julie Tvede Denmark 13 12,028
6 Antonella Cvitan Sweden 11 10,735
7 Anastasia Kostina Russia 12 10,083
8 Viva Schlasberg Sweden 13 9,964
9 Tamara Johns Australia 10 9,790
10 Pamela Feggans Scotland 10 9,580
gollark: Maybe I should try arbitrarily increasing the confusion via recursion.
gollark: If people are randomly assigned (after initial mental development and such) to an environment where they're much more likely to do bad things, and one where they aren't, then it seems unreasonable to call people who are otherwise the same worse from being in the likely-to-do-bad-things environment.I suppose you could argue that how "good" you are is more about the change in probability between environments/the probability of a given real world environment being one which causes you to do bad things. But we can't check those with current technology.
gollark: I think you can think about it from a "veil of ignorance" angle too.
gollark: As far as I know, most moral standards are in favor of judging people by moral choices. Your environment is not entirely a choice.
gollark: If you put a pre-most-bad-things Hitler in Philadelphia, and he did not go around doing *any* genocides or particularly bad things, how would he have been bad?

See also

References
  1. "About LET Access Series". Ladies European Tour. Retrieved 14 July 2020.
  2. "2012 Tournaments". LET Access Series. Retrieved 14 July 2020.
  3. "2012 Order of Merit". LET Access Series.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.