2010 Challenger of Dallas – Singles

Ryan Sweeting was the defending champion, and he won in the final 6–4, 6–2 against Carsten Ball.

Singles
2010 Challenger of Dallas
Champion Ryan Sweeting
Runner-up Carsten Ball
Final score6–4, 6–2
Main article: 2010 Challenger of Dallas

Seeds
  1. Jesse Levine (First Round)
  2. Carsten Ball (Final)
  3. Robert Kendrick (Quarterfinals)
  4. Kevin Anderson (First Round)
  5. Michael Yani (Semifinals)
  6. Jesse Witten (First Round)
  7. Ryan Sweeting (Champion)
  8. Ramón Delgado (Semifinals)

Draw

Key

Finals
Semifinals Final
          
7 Ryan Sweeting 6 64 6
8 Ramón Delgado 4 77 4
7 Ryan Sweeting 6 6  
2 Carsten Ball 4 2  
5 Michael Yani 3 5  
2 Carsten Ball 6 7  

Top Half
First Round Second Round Quarterfinals Semifinals
1 J Levine 65 7 4
  A Bogomolov Jr. 77 5 6   A Bogomolov Jr. 6 6  
WC D Webb 1 2     A Begemann 4 2  
  A Begemann 6 6     A Bogomolov Jr. 2 3  
  G Soeda 6 6   7 R Sweeting 6 6  
  KT Im 2 1     G Soeda 2 2  
Q N Monroe 1 4   7 R Sweeting 6 6  
7 R Sweeting 6 6   7 R Sweeting 6 63 6
4 K Anderson 6 5 63 8 R Delgado 4 77 4
WC B Reynolds 3 7 77 WC B Reynolds 6 6  
  L Cook 6 2 4   V Millot 4 4  
  V Millot 4 6 6 WC B Reynolds 3 2  
  A Kuznetsov 7 77   8 R Delgado 6 6  
Q L Gregorc 5 62     A Kuznetsov 6 3 3
  R Berankis 1 6 65 8 R Delgado 4 6 6
8 R Delgado 6 3 77

Bottom Half
First Round Second Round Quarterfinals Semifinals
5 M Yani 6 6  
  M Philippoussis 4 4   5 M Yani 7 6  
WC R Harrison 6 6   WC R Harrison 5 2  
Q J Paukku 3 4   5 M Yani 3 77 77
WC M McClune 6 6   3 R Kendrick 6 65 64
  S Jenkins 3 3   WC M McClune 6 61 4
Q J-N Insausti 3 4   3 R Kendrick 3 77 6
3 R Kendrick 6 6   5 M Yani 3 5  
6 J Witten 61 3   2 C Ball 6 7  
  R DeHeart 77 6     R DeHeart 2 6 3
  G Dimitrov 6 2 2   M Crugnola 6 3 6
  M Crugnola 3 6 6   M Crugnola 4 1  
  A Stoppini 6 6   2 C Ball 6 6  
  I Sijsling 1 2     A Stoppini 5 3  
  G Lapentti 3 4   2 C Ball 7 6  
2 C Ball 6 6  
gollark: If you do have very accurate models it runs into confusing recursions, but causally speaking it's still better to defect.
gollark: I mean, if you don't have the opponent's source code/very accurate models, it is in all cases better to defect than cooperate. That is basically what "strictly better" means.
gollark: It... is?
gollark: But it is strictly better for you to defect.
gollark: If you both cooperate it's better.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.