2010 Bauer Watertechnology Cup – Singles
Daniel Brands was the defending champion, but decided not to participate.
Igor Sijsling won this tournament, by defeating Ruben Bemelmans 3–6, 6–2, 6–3 in the final.
Singles | |
---|---|
2010 Bauer Watertechnology Cup | |
Champion | |
Runner-up | |
Final score | 3–6, 6–2, 6–3 |
Seeds
Dustin Brown (Semifinals) Blaž Kavčič (Second Round) Steve Darcis (First Round) Grigor Dimitrov (First Round) Simone Bolelli (Second Round) Ričardas Berankis (First Round) Jesse Huta Galung (Second Round) Denis Gremelmayr (Second Round)
Draw
Key
- Q = Qualifier
- WC = Wild Card
- LL = Lucky Loser
- Alt = Alternate
- SE = Special Exempt
- PR = Protected Ranking
- ITF = ITF entry
- JE = Junior Exempt
- w/o = Walkover
- r = Retired
- d = Defaulted
Finals
Semifinals | Final | ||||||||||||
1 | 65 | 7 | 3 | ||||||||||
7 | 64 | 6 | |||||||||||
3 | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||
6 | 2 | 3 | |||||||||||
7 | 6 | ||||||||||||
Q | 66 | 4 | |||||||||||
Top Half
First Round | Second Round | Quarterfinals | Semifinals | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 7 | 65 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
64 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 6 | 2 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Q | 3 | 1 | WC | 4 | 6 | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||
WC | 6 | 6 | 1 | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 4 | 3 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
WC | 3 | 6 | 6 | WC | 1 | 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||
6 | 6 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 65 | 7 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 62 | 5 | 7 | 64 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Q | 7 | 7 | Q | 63 | 63 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 7 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
6 | 3 | 6 | 7 | 4 | 5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
7 | 6 | 69 | 6 | 7 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
67 | 3 | 3 | 7 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
WC | 1 | 3 | 8 | 6 | 62 | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||
8 | 6 | 6 |
Bottom Half
First Round | Second Round | Quarterfinals | Semifinals | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
5 | 6 | 7 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
LL | 2 | 62 | 5 | 63 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
64 | 5 | 7 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
7 | 7 | 7 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
7 | 62 | 4 | 61 | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
62 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 3 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
6 | 7 | 4 | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 4 | 64 | 7 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
7 | 6 | 1 | Q | 66 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
WC | 7 | 3r | 7 | 3 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 0 | Q | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Q | 6 | 6 | Q | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Q | 7 | 6 | Q | 1 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
5 | 0 | Q | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 6 | 6 |
gollark: You know what, I'll ignore this ENTIRELY for now muahahahaha.
gollark: This is in a 130 line function which *kind of* explains what it's doing, but apiaristically.
gollark: It *seemed* like it was just inserting things, but it may also be moving everything after this into the children of the other thingy?
gollark: ```nim var emNode = newDoublyLinkedNode(emToken) for childNode in token.children.nodes: if childNode.value == opener.value.token: emToken.children.head = childNode.next if childNode.next != nil: childNode.next.prev = nil childNode.next = emNode emNode.prev = childNode if childNode.value == closer.value.token: emToken.children.tail = childNode.prev if childNode.prev != nil: childNode.prev.next = nil childNode.prev = emNode emNode.next = childNode```
gollark: This would really be easier if they had actually bothered to put comments in this. I've worked out that it is in fact *not* a `seq.insert` call precisely, but I don't know what it's meant to be doing.
References
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.