2007 Kansas City Wizards season
2007 was Curt Onalfo's first season as manager. This was the last season the Wizards played all their home matches at Arrowhead Stadium and this was the breakout season for US International Eddie Johnson who scored 15 league goals including back to back hat tricks to end May and begin June, a feat never before accomplished in the league.
2007 season | |||
---|---|---|---|
Manager | Curt Onalfo | ||
Major League Soccer | East: 5th Overall: 8th | ||
Playoffs | Conference Finals | ||
Top goalscorer | League: Eddie Johnson (15) All: Eddie Johnson (15) | ||
Average home league attendance | 11,586 | ||
| |||
Squad
Note: Flags indicate national team as defined under FIFA eligibility rules. Players may hold more than one non-FIFA nationality.
|
|
Competitions
Major League Soccer
Overall | Home | Away | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pld | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD |
30 | 11 | 7 | 12 | 45 | 45 | 0 | 40 | 7 | 3 | 5 | 22 | 18 | +4 | 4 | 4 | 7 | 23 | 27 | −4 |
Last updated: 2007.
Source: Major League Soccer
Date | Opponents | H / A | Result
F – A |
Scorers | Attendance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
April 14, 2007 | D.C. United | A | 4–2 | Harrington Victorine Johnson Sealy |
|
April 21, 2007 | Chicago Fire S.C. | A | 1–2 | Marinelli | |
April 25, 2007 | Toronto FC | H | 3–0 | Johnson Zavagnin Movsisyan |
|
April 28, 2007 | Toronto FC | A | 1–0 | Johnson | |
May 5, 2007 | Columbus Crew | H | 1–0 | Burciaga Jr. | |
May 12, 2007 | FC Dallas | H | 1–2 | Harrington | |
May 19, 2007 | Colorado Rapids | A | 1–1 | Arnaud | |
May 26, 2007 | New England Revolution | A | 4–3 | Johnson 3 Arnaud |
|
June 2, 2007 | New York Red Bulls | H | 3–2 | Johnson 3 | |
June 16, 2007 | New York Red Bulls | A | 3–3 | Movsisyan 2 Zavagnin |
|
June 20, 2007 | Columbus Crew | A | 1–2 | Jewsbury | |
June 24, 2007 | Houston Dynamo | H | 0–1 | ||
July 1, 2007 | Toronto FC | H | 1–1 | Harrington | |
July 4, 2007 | D.C. United | H | 0–1 | ||
July 7, 2007 | Los Angeles Galaxy | A | 2–2 | Movsisyan Arnaud |
|
July 14, 2007 | Real Salt Lake | H | 1–0 | Johnson | |
July 22, 2007 | Colorado Rapids | H | 2–2 | Johnson 2 | |
July 29, 2007 | Chivas USA | H | 3–2 | Zavagnin Arnaud Movsisyan |
|
August 2, 2007 | New England Revolution | A | 0–2 | ||
August 19, 2007 | New England Revolution | H | 0–1 | ||
August 22, 2007 | Chicago Fire S.C. | H | 3–2 | Victorine Sealy Burciaga Jr. |
|
August 25, 2007 | Chicago Fire S.C. | A | 0–2 | ||
August 29, 2007 | Real Salt Lake | A | 1–3 | Johnson | |
September 1, 2007 | Houston Dynamo | A | 1–1 | Johnson | |
September 15, 2007 | Columbus Crew | H | 3–2 | Sealy 2 Johnson |
|
September 22, 2007 | Chivas USA | A | 1–2 | Colombano | |
September 27, 2007 | Los Angeles Galaxy | H | 0–1 | ||
October 5, 2007 | D.C. United | H | 1–1 | Sealy | |
October 13, 2007 | New York Red Bulls | A | 1–2 | Jewsbury | |
October 20, 2007 | FC Dallas | A | 2–0 | Sealy 2 |
U.S. Open Cup qualification
Date | Round | Opponents | H / A | Result
F – A |
Scorers | Attendance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
April 18, 2007 | Semifinal Qualification | Real Salt Lake | A | 1–2 (AET) |
Victorine |
MLS Cup Playoffs
Date | Round | Opponents | H / A | Result
F – A |
Scorers | Attendance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
October 27, 2007 | Conference Semi-finals | Chivas USA | H | 1–0 | Arnaud | |
November 3, 2007 | Conference Semi-finals | Chivas USA | A | 0–0 | ||
November 10, 2007 | Conference Finals | Houston Dynamo | A | 0–2 |
Squad statistics
No. | Pos. | Name | MLS | Playoffs | USOC | Total | Minutes | Discipline | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apps | Goals | Apps | Goals | Apps | Goals | Apps | Goals | League | Total | ![]() |
![]() | |||
1 | GK | ![]() |
30 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 34 | 0 | 2700 | 3090 | 0 | 0 |
5 | MF | ![]() |
29 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 33 | 3 | 2564 | 2850 | 0 | 0 |
2 | DF | ![]() |
29 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 33 | 3 | 2422 | 2812 | 0 | 0 |
9 | MF | ![]() |
29 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 33 | 3 | 2135 | 2402 | 0 | 0 |
22 | FW | ![]() |
28 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 32 | 5 | 2489 | 2807 | 0 | 0 |
14 | MF | ![]() |
28 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 32 | 2 | 2316 | 2642 | 0 | 0 |
3 | DF | ![]() |
27 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 31 | 0 | 2420 | 2810 | 0 | 0 |
12 | DF | ![]() |
25 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 29 | 0 | 2172 | 2562 | 0 | 0 |
7 | FW | ![]() |
24 | 15 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 28 | 15 | 2149 | 2464 | 0 | 0 |
10 | MF | ![]() |
26 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 28 | 1 | 1674 | 1777 | 0 | 0 |
11 | MF | ![]() |
21 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 25 | 0 | 895 | 1267 | 0 | 0 |
6 | DF | ![]() |
23 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 24 | 2 | 1826 | 1824 | 0 | 0 |
19 | FW | ![]() |
18 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 22 | 7 | 1194 | 1487 | 0 | 0 |
29 | FW | ![]() |
17 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 456 | 512 | 0 | 0 |
17 | FW | ![]() |
18 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 19 | 5 | 666 | 786 | 0 | 0 |
26 | MF | ![]() |
10 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 424 | 545 | 0 | 0 |
16 | FW | ![]() |
10 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 1 | 310 | 334 | 0 | 0 |
20 | DF | ![]() |
6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 415 | 415 | 0 | 0 |
15 | DF | ![]() |
5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 360 | 360 | 0 | 0 |
13 | FW | ![]() |
3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 26 | 146 | 0 | 0 |
21 | MF | ![]() |
2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 23 | 24 | 0 | 0 |
Final Statistics
gollark: Speaking more generally than the type system, Go is just really... anti-abstraction... with, well, the gimped type system, lack of much metaprogramming support, and weird special cases, and poor error handling.
gollark: - They may be working on them, but they initially claimed that they weren't necessary and they don't exist now. Also, I don't trust them to not do them wrong.- Ooookay then- Well, generics, for one: they *kind of exist* in that you can have generic maps, channels, slices, and arrays, but not anything else. Also this (https://fasterthanli.me/blog/2020/i-want-off-mr-golangs-wild-ride/), which is mostly about the file handling not being good since it tries to map on concepts which don't fit. Also channels having weird special syntax. Also `for` and `range` and `new` and `make` basically just being magic stuff which do whatever the compiler writers wanted with no consistency- see above- Because there's no generic number/comparable thing type. You would need to use `interface{}` or write a new function (with identical code) for every type you wanted to compare- You can change a signature somewhere and won't be alerted, but something else will break because the interface is no longer implemented- They are byte sequences. https://blog.golang.org/strings.- It's not. You need to put `if err != nil { return err }` everywhere.
gollark: Oh, and the error handling is terrible and it's kind of the type system's fault.
gollark: If I remember right Go strings are just byte sequences with no guarantee of being valid UTF-8, but all the functions working on them just assume they are.
gollark: Oh, and the strings are terrible.
References
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.