2007 Australian Open – Boys' Singles

Brydan Klein won this event. He defeated Jonathan Eysseric 6–2, 4–6, 6–1 in the final.

Boys' Singles
2007 Australian Open
Champion Brydan Klein
Runner-up Jonathan Eysseric
Final score6–2, 4–6, 6–1
Main article: 2007 Australian Open

Seeds
  1. Martin Kližan (Third Round)
  2. Jonathan Eysseric (Final)
  3. Roman Jebavý (Quarterfinals)
  4. Petru-Alexandru Luncanu (Third Round)
  5. Greg Jones (Quarterfinals)
  6. José Roberto Velasco (First Round)
  7. Danila Arsenov (First Round)
  8. Thomas Fabbiano (Semifinals)
  9. Matteo Trevisan (Third Round)
  10. Ričardas Berankis (Semifinals)
  11. Michal Konečný (Third Round)
  12. Bai Yan (Quarterfinals)
  13. Daniel-Alejandro López (Third Round)
  14. Lofo Ramiaramanana (Second Round)
  15. Gastão Elias (Second Round)
  16. Andrej Martin (Second Round)

Draw

Key

Final eight
Quarterfinals Semifinals Final
               
  Brydan Klein 6 77
5 Greg Jones 3 64
  Brydan Klein 6 6
10 Ričardas Berankis 1 4
3 Roman Jebavý 3 1
10 Ričardas Berankis 6 6
  Brydan Klein 6 4 6
2 Jonathan Eysseric 2 6 1
8 Thomas Fabbiano 6 6
  John-Patrick Smith 3 4
8 Thomas Fabbiano 4 1
2 Jonathan Eysseric 6 6
12 Bai Yan 2 3
2 Jonathan Eysseric 6 6

Top half

Section 1
First Round Second Round Third Round Quarterfinals
1 Martin Kližan 6 6
Goran Rožić 2 3 1 M Kližan 6 77
Harri Heliövaara 5 H Heliövaara 3 64
WC James Duckworth 0 r 1 M Kližan 2 77 1
Q Alexander Smolyakov 3 3 B Klein 6 63 6
Brydan Klein 6 6 B Klein 7 6
Mateusz Szmigiel 1 3 14 L Ramiaramanana 5 1
14 Lofo Ramiaramanana 6 6 B Klein 6 77
9 Matteo Trevisan 6 6 5 G Jones 3 64
Dennis Lajola 1 2 9 M Trevisan 6 6
Dayne Kelly 3 0 P Siributwong 3 2
WC Peerakit Siributwong 6 6 9 M Trevisan 4 6 0
Q Zhou Zhuoqing 1 78 4 5 G Jones 6 3 6
Dimitris Kleftakos 6 66 6 D Kleftakos 2 2
Q Ilija Vučić 2 3 5 G Jones 6 6
5 Greg Jones 6 6

Section 2
First Round Second Round Third Round Quarterfinals
3 Roman Jebavý 2 6 6
Stephen Donald 6 3 3 3 R Jebavý 77 2 7
Vladimir Zinyakov 0 6 3 D Cox 64 6 5
Daniel Cox 6 4 6 3 R Jebavý 6 6
WC Krishananth Balakrishnan 6 2 1 H Moriya 3 3
Hiroki Moriya 4 6 6 H Moriya 6 6
Dylan Sessagesimi 6 3 2 15 G Elias 4 4
15 Gastão Elias 3 6 6 3 R Jebavý 3 1
10 Ričardas Berankis 6 6 10 R Berankis 6 6
WC Troy Smith 4 2 10 R Berankis 7 6
Cho Soong-jae 3 4 M Kecki 5 1
Mateusz Kecki 6 6 10 R Berankis 7 6
Kevin Botti 2 6 6 K Botti 5 4
Rupesh Roy 6 3 3 K Botti 6 4 6
Bernard Tomic 6 4 B Tomic 2 6 3
6 José Roberto Velasco 2 1 r

Bottom half

Section 3
First Round Second Round Third Round Quarterfinals
8 Thomas Fabbiano 6 6
Q James Rigg 3 4 8 T Fabbiano 6 6  
Valentin Dimov 6 6   V Dimov 1 4  
Johnny Hamui 3 2 8 T Fabbiano 7 7  
Lazare Kukhalashvili 2 7 6 11 M Konečný 6 6  
Graeme Dyce 6 6 1   L Kukhalashvili 1 1  
Andrew Thomas 3 6 3 11 M Konečný 6 6  
11 Michal Konečný 6 2 6 8 T Fabbiano 6 6  
16 Andrej Martin 4 6 6   J-P Smith 3 4  
Oh Dae-soung 6 1 2 16 A Martin 4 0 r
Q Drew Daniel 0 2   J-P Smith 6 2  
John-Patrick Smith 6 6   J-P Smith 7 6  
Q Wu Chen-Yu 4 4 4 P-A Luncanu 6 4  
Jared Easton 6 6   J Easton 4 4  
Marcus Daniell 1 1 4 P-A Luncanu 6 6  
4 Petru-Alexandru Luncanu 6 6

Section 4
First Round Second Round Third Round Quarterfinals
7 Danila Arsenov 2 0
WC John Millman 6 6   J Millman 5 6 4
Austin Krajicek 1 6   C Rungkat 7 1 6
Christopher Rungkat 6 7   C Rungkat 5 6 1
Aljaž Bedene 4 0 12 Y Bai 7 4 6
Ilija Martinoski 6 6   I Martinoski 4 6  
WC Brendan McKenzie 6 3 12 Y Bai 6 7  
12 Bai Yan 7 6 12 Y Bai 2 3  
13 Daniel-Alejandro López 4 6 6 2 J Eysseric 6 6  
Lim Yong-kyu 6 2 3 13 D-A López 6 6  
WC Isaac Frost 6 5 1   F Kita 2 3  
Fumiaki Kita 3 7 6 13 D-A López 6 6  
Q Evthimios Karaliolios 5 3 2 J Eysseric 7 7  
Joel Lindner 7 6   J Lindner 3 4  
P Siriluethaiwattana 6 1 2 J Eysseric 6 6  
2 Jonathan Eysseric 7 6
gollark: Which I suppose can make some sense if you assume that it's "rational" in that people... like surprises, or something, but...
gollark: People *play the lottery*, too.
gollark: People somehow can't accept positive-sum games.
gollark: > A core proposition in economics is that voluntary exchanges benefit both parties. We show that people often deny the mutually beneficial nature of exchange, instead espousing the belief that one or both parties fail to benefit from the exchange. Across 4 studies (and 7 further studies in the Supplementary Materials), participants read about simple exchanges of goods and services, judging whether each party to the transaction was better off or worse off afterwards. These studies revealed that win–win denial is pervasive, with buyers consistently seen as less likely to benefit from transactions than sellers. Several potential psychological mechanisms underlying win–win denial are considered, with the most important influences being mercantilist theories of value (confusing wealth for money) and naïve realism (failing to observe that people do not arbitrarily enter exchanges). We argue that these results have widespread implications for politics and society.
gollark: (linking because I happened to read it recently)
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.