2005 WPSL season
The 2005 Women's Premier Soccer League season was the 9th season of the WPSL.
FC Indiana finished the season as national champions, beating California Storm on penalty kicks after a 4-4 tie in the WPSL Championship game.[1]
Changes From 2004
Name Changes
New Franchises
Folding
Final standings
Purple indicates division title clinched
West Division
Place | Team | P | W | L | T | GF | GA | GD | Points |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | California Storm | 14 | 13 | 0 | 1 | 45 | 7 | 40 | |
2 | Ajax America Women | 14 | 12 | 2 | 0 | 42 | 14 | 36 | |
3 | Utah Spiders | 14 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 26 | 22 | 23 | |
4 | San Diego WFC SeaLions | 14 | 5 | 9 | 0 | 26 | 24 | 15 | |
5 | Elk Grove Pride | 14 | 4 | 7 | 3 | 22 | 22 | 15 | |
6 | Las Vegas Tabagators | 14 | 4 | 6 | 3 | 21 | 34 | 15 | |
7 | San Francisco Nighthawks | 14 | 3 | 10 | 1 | 11 | 45 | 10 | |
8 | Lamorinda East Bay Power | 14 | 1 | 9 | 4 | 15 | 42 | 7 |
Central Division
Place | Team | P | W | L | T | GF | GA | GD | Points |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | FC Indiana | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 3 | 12 | |
2 | Houston Stars | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 17 | 8 | |
3 | Everton FC America | 4 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 2 | |
4 | St. Louis Archers | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 0 |
East Division
Place | Team | P | W | L | T | GF | GA | GD | Points |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | New England Mutiny | 13 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 37 | 7 | 39 | |
2 | Steel City Sparks | 13 | 7 | 3 | 3 | 28 | 22 | 24 | |
3 | Bay State Select | 13 | 7 | 5 | 1 | 29 | 17 | 22 | |
4 | Philadelphia Pirates | 13 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 18 | 25 | 18 | |
5 | Massachusetts Stingers | 14 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 20 | 19 | 15 | |
6 | Rhode Island Rays | 11 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 13 | 19 | 10 | |
7 | Boston-North Aztecs | 13 | 3 | 9 | 1 | 9 | 28 | 10 | |
8 | Maryland Pride | 12 | 2 | 10 | 0 | 16 | 34 | 6 |
Playoffs
Semi finals
California Storm 3-0 Steel City Sparks
FC Indiana 4-0 New England Mutiny
Third Place Playoff
WPSL Championship Game
FC Indiana 4-4 California Storm (Indiana wins 4-3 on penalties)
gollark: If you don't know how it works, people trying to exploit it won't either!
gollark: Sounds great!
gollark: Perhaps there are test vectors somewhere.
gollark: So random shoved together implementations are okay as long as the results are the same.
gollark: I guess side channel attack resistance isn't a problem here since this is running offline.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.