2004 Toppserien
The 2004 season of the Toppserien, the highest women's football (soccer) league in Norway, began on 17 April 2004 and ended on 30 October 2004.
| Season | 2004 |
|---|---|
| Champions | Røa 1st title |
| Relegated | Arna-Bjørnar Medkila |
| Matches played | 90 |
| Goals scored | 348 (3.87 per match) |
| Top goalscorer | .svg.png){kind=small} (20 goals) |
← 2003 2005 → | |
18 games were played with 3 points given for wins and 1 for draws. Number nine and ten were relegated, while the two top teams from the First Division were promoted.
Røa won the league one point ahead of Trondheims-Ørn.
League table
| Pos | Team | Pld | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Qualification or relegation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Røa (C) | 18 | 14 | 2 | 2 | 39 | 9 | +30 | 44 | Qualification for the UEFA Women's Cup first qualifying round |
| 2 | Trondheims-Ørn | 18 | 13 | 4 | 1 | 46 | 18 | +28 | 43 | |
| 3 | Fløya | 18 | 10 | 3 | 5 | 47 | 22 | +25 | 33 | |
| 4 | Asker | 18 | 9 | 4 | 5 | 37 | 23 | +14 | 31 | |
| 5 | Kolbotn | 18 | 9 | 1 | 8 | 51 | 34 | +17 | 28 | |
| 6 | Team Strømmen | 18 | 7 | 2 | 9 | 36 | 39 | −3 | 23 | |
| 7 | Sandviken | 18 | 4 | 6 | 8 | 23 | 44 | −21 | 18 | |
| 8 | Klepp | 18 | 5 | 2 | 11 | 26 | 40 | −14 | 17 | |
| 9 | Arna-Bjørnar (R) | 18 | 4 | 1 | 13 | 31 | 54 | −23 | 13 | Relegation to 1. divisjon |
| 10 | Medkila (R) | 18 | 2 | 1 | 15 | 12 | 65 | −53 | 7 |
Source: NIFS
Rules for classification: 1) points; 2) goal difference; 3) number of goals scored.
(C) Champion; (R) Relegated.
Rules for classification: 1) points; 2) goal difference; 3) number of goals scored.
(C) Champion; (R) Relegated.
Top goalscorers
- 20 goals:
- 17 goals:
- 12 goals:
- 11 goals:
- 10 goals:
- 9 goals:
- 8 goals:
Promotion and relegation
- Arna-Bjørnar and Medkila were relegated to the First Division
- Kattem and Liungen were promoted from the First Division.
gollark: Quantum computing is not actually a magic "speed up all computations" box.
gollark: Using relatively general-purpose hardware is quite useful right now since the details of how to do things aren't that pinned down yet and being able to experiment is valuable.
gollark: In that they can frequently do the sort of thing a human could do in one shot without needing to do much conscious thought or use working memory, but fall down horribly on lots of multi-step things or particularly thinky stuff.
gollark: They're not replicating the actual implementation very much. They do seem to be replicating the rough functionality.
gollark: They also do not actually perfectly remember things (or "form new memories" at all after training) unless you glue some kind of external memory retrieval on.
References
| Seasons | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clubs |
| ||||
| Associated competitions | |||||
 | |||||
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.