2000 European Athletics Indoor Championships – Women's shot put

Medalists

GoldSilverBronze
Larisa Peleshenko
 Russia
Nadine Kleinert-Schmitt
 Germany
Astrid Kumbernuss
 Germany

Results

Qualification

Qualifying perf. 18.60 (Q) or 8 best performers (q) advanced to the Final.

RankAthleteNationality#1#2#3ResultNote
1Larisa Peleshenko Russia19.0819.08Q
2Krystyna Danilczyk Poland18.4718.6918.69Q
3Astrid Kumbernuss Germany18.6718.67Q
4Svetlana Krivelyova Russia18.5118.4618.0718.51q
5Nadine Kleinert-Schmitt Germany18.4118.2318.2118.41q
6Lyudmila Sechko Russia18.1317.4916.0718.13q
7Lieja Koeman Netherlands18.10X17.9518.10q
8Nadzeya Astapchuk BelarusX18.09X18.09q
9Valentina Fedyushina UkraineX17.9016.4417.90
10Svetla Sınırtaş Turkey17.7017.3617.2017.70
11Laurence Manfredi France17.51XX17.51
12Kalliopi Ouzouni Greece17.39XX17.39
13Judy Oakes Great Britain17.25XX17.25
14Livia Mehes Romania16.5716.4016.8216.82
15Nadine Beckel Germany16.66XX16.66
16Assunta Legnante Italy15.4716.4216.3816.42
17Linda-Marie Mårtensson SwedenX15.7416.3016.30
Mara Rosolen ItalyXXXNM

Final

RankAthleteNationality#1#2#3#4#5#6ResultNote
Larisa Peleshenko Russia19.86X19.61XX20.1520.15
Nadine Kleinert-Schmitt Germany18.7618.9518.8619.2319.08X19.23
Astrid Kumbernuss Germany19.0319.12XXXX19.12
4Svetlana Krivelyova Russia18.2018.4418.6118.96X18.7018.96
5Krystyna Danilczyk PolandX18.88XXX18.2118.88
6Nadzeya Astapchuk Belarus17.82X18.5318.65X18.3918.65
7Lieja Koeman Netherlands18.3218.38X18.46XX18.46PB
8Lyudmila Sechko Russia17.7317.04XX17.3417.0417.73
gollark: How fun.
gollark: Excitingly, minoteaur crashes when closing the database if migrating it if and only if it is not run under valgrind.
gollark: I can't point to a particular build/project tooling system which *utterly* doesn't fail for me. makefiles fail unfathomably sometimes, cmake fails unfathomably lots of the time, cargo sometimes runs into bizarre dependency errors, nimble works fine actually but I don't ever install stuff from it, luarocks is no, python has an awful mess, etc.
gollark: > In a typical build system, the dependency arrows go down. Although this is the way they would naturally go due to gravity, it is unfortunately also where the enemy's gate is. This makes it very inefficient and unfriendly. In tup, the arrows go up. This is obviously true because it rhymes. See how the dependencies differ in make and tup:Wow, this sounds like a great build system.
gollark: It's a rough measure of project size/complexity.

References

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.