2000 Baia Mare cyanide spill

The 2000 Baia Mare cyanide spill was a leak of cyanide near Baia Mare, Romania, into the Someș River by the gold mining company Aurul, a joint-venture of the Australian company Esmeralda Exploration and the Romanian government.

Dead fish in Tisza

The polluted waters eventually reached the Tisza River and then the Danube, killing large numbers of fish in Hungary, Serbia, and Romania. The spill has been called the worst environmental disaster in Europe since the Chernobyl disaster.[1]

Background

Aurul, the mine operator, is a joint venture company formed by the Australian company Esmeralda Exploration and the Romanian government. The company claimed it had the ability to clean up a by-product of gold mining, the toxic tailings, which began to be spread as toxic dust by the wind.[2] Promising to deal with them and to extract remaining gold from them via gold cyanidation, the company shipped its waste product to a dam near Bozânta Mare, Maramureș County.[2]

Dam failure

On the night of January 30, 2000, a dam holding contaminated waters burst and 100,000 cubic metres (3,500,000 cu ft) of cyanide-contaminated water (containing an estimated 100 metric tonnes of cyanide[3]) spilled over some farmland and then into the Someș river.[1][2]

Esmeralda Exploration blamed excessive snowfall for the dam failure.[1]

Effects

After the spill, the Someș had cyanide concentrations of over 700 times the permitted levels. The Someș flows into the Tisza, Hungary's second largest river, which then flows into the Danube. The spill contaminated the drinking supplies of over 2.5 million Hungarians.[1] In addition to cyanide, heavy metals were also washed into the river and had a long-lasting negative impact on the environment.[1]

Wildlife was particularly affected on the Tisza: on a stretch, virtually all living things were killed, and further south, in the Serbian section, 80% of the aquatic life was killed; 200 tons of it was the fish in these rivers.[1]

Volunteers work in the Tisza

Large quantities of fish died due to the toxicity of cyanide in the waters of the rivers, affecting 62 species of fish, of which 20 are protected species. The Romanian government claimed that the fish had died of cold, and they were not at fault. In Hungary, volunteers participated in removing the dead fish to prevent the disaster from spreading across the food chain, as other animals, such as foxes, otters and ospreys have died after eating contaminated fish.[1]

After the cyanide entered the Danube, the large volume of the river's water diluted the cyanide,[1] but in some sections it still remained as high as 20 to 50 times the maximum permitted concentration.[4]

Two years after the spill, the ecosystem began to recover, but it was still far from its initial state; the fishermen of Hungary claimed that their catches in 2002 were only at a fifth of their original levels.[3]

Subsequent spills

Five weeks later, a spill of contaminated waters (this time with heavy metals) hit the region.[3] A dyke burst in Baia Borşa, Maramureș County and 20,000 cubic metres of zinc, lead and copper-contaminated water made its way into the Tisza.[5]

Reactions

Brett Montgomery, the chairman of the mine operator, Esmeralda, denied responsibility, claiming that the damage of the spill has been "grossly exaggerated" and that the fish died in such numbers because of lack of oxygen due to the freezing of the river.[1]

A spokesman for the company later claimed that media reports from Hungary and Serbia are politically motivated and the fish were killed by spills from industrial plants along the Tisza, due to the dynamite explosions used to break the ice locks on the river or simply due to the raw sewage pumped into the river.[6]

The Hungarian government called the storing of cyanide next to a river madness and argued that the weather was not unprecedented.[1] A European Union report on the disaster blamed the design faults at the mine.[7]

In mid-February 2000, as the spill reached the Romanian section of the Danube, the Romanian government temporarily banned fishing and the usage of Danube water for drinking.[6]

Legacy

Environmental groups, like Friends of the Earth[6] and Greenpeace, argue that the disaster is another reason to ban dangerous mining technologies such as gold mining using the cyanide heap-leaching technique.[6]

German metal band Rammstein produced a song about the spill, called "Donaukinder" (Children of the Danube).

Three attempts were made in the Parliament of Romania to ban gold cyanidation in Romania, none of which have been successful so far.[8]

gollark: If you pay for overly locked down devices, you are supporting said devices.
gollark: I mean, yes, for every stupid thing they do on the x86 devices (not ARM ones) you probably *can* get around it, but why bother and support it?
gollark: Also, MacBooks apparently do rather apiaristic stuff like send the hash (or content mabne, I forgot) of every new binary you run to Apple for notarization.
gollark: * programs
gollark: * code

See also

References
  1. "Death of a river", BBC, February 15, 2000
  2. "Romania's poison dump", BBC, May 19, 2000
  3. "Map: Pollution hotspots", BBC, December 13, 2004
  4. "Hungary appeals for ecological help", BBC, February 15, 2000
  5. "Hungary demands action over pollution", BBC, March 14, 2000
  6. "Firm rejects cyanide damage claims", BBC, February 16, 2000
  7. "Second cyanide spill blights Romania", BBC, January 26, 2001
  8. Horațiu Pepine (November 12, 2013). "A treia încercare de interzicere a cianurilor". Deutsche Welle.

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.