1996 Singapore Open – Doubles
Todd Woodbridge and Mark Woodforde won in the final 7–6, 7–6 against Martin Damm and Andrei Olhovskiy.
Doubles | |
---|---|
1996 Singapore Open | |
Champions | ![]() ![]() |
Runners-up | ![]() ![]() |
Final score | 7–6, 7–6 |
Seeds
Champion seeds are indicated in bold text while text in italics indicates the round in which those seeds were eliminated.
Todd Woodbridge / Mark Woodforde (Champions) Paul Haarhuis / Mark Knowles (Semifinals) Byron Black / Jonathan Stark (First Round) Martin Damm / Andrei Olhovskiy (Final)
Draw
Key
- Q = Qualifier
- WC = Wild Card
- LL = Lucky Loser
- Alt = Alternate
- SE = Special Exempt
- PR = Protected Ranking
- ITF = ITF entry
- JE = Junior Exempt
- w/o = Walkover
- r = Retired
- d = Defaulted
First Round | Quarterfinals | Semifinals | Final | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 1 | 4 | 1 | ![]() ![]() | 4 | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 3 | 4 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 4 | 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | 1 | ![]() ![]() | 7 | 4 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||
3 | ![]() ![]() | 4 | 7 | 3 | Q | ![]() ![]() | 5 | 6 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | 6 | ![]() ![]() | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Q | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | Q | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||
WC | ![]() ![]() | 4 | 4 | 1 | ![]() ![]() | 7 | 7 | ||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 6 | 3 | 4 | 4 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 4 | 6 | 6 | ![]() ![]() | 5 | 7 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 4 | 3 | 4 | ![]() ![]() | 7 | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||
4 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | 4 | ![]() ![]() | 7 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 6 | 3 | 6 | 2 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 3 | 6 | 2 | ![]() ![]() | 4 | 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||
WC | ![]() ![]() | 3 | 4 | 2 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||
2 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 |
gollark: I don't *think* so.
gollark: **Meta**gollariosity.
gollark: ```Error: (=) bad argument type - not a number: #<unspecified> Call history: <eval> [grudger] (memq 1 x) <eval> [helper] (y moves-y moves-x x) <eval> [metagollariosity] (z y x z) <eval> [maybe-tit-for-tat-or-grudger] (= (pseudo-random-integer 2) 1) <eval> [maybe-tit-for-tat-or-grudger] (pseudo-random-integer 2) <eval> [maybe-tit-for-tat-or-grudger] (grudger x y z) <eval> [grudger] (memq 1 x) <eval> [helper] (cons (cadr current-moves) moves-x) <eval> [helper] (cadr current-moves) <eval> [helper] (cons (car current-moves) moves-y) <eval> [helper] (car current-moves) <eval> [helper] (map + scores (prisond (car current-moves) (cadr current-moves))) <eval> [helper] (prisond (car current-moves) (cadr current-moves)) <eval> [helper] (car current-moves) <eval> [helper] (cadr current-moves) <eval> [prisond] (= x y) <--```???
gollark: I'm trying to make all gollarious, but this is hard.
gollark: <@331320482047721472> maybe-tit-for-tat-or-grudger is doing RANDOMNESS. Is this not impure and thus illegal?
References
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.