1995 Norwegian First Division
The 1995 1. divisjon, Norway's second-tier football league, began play on 29 April 1995 and ended on 1 October 1995. The league was contested by 24 teams, divided in two groups and the winner of each group won promotion to Tippeligaen, while the runners-up played a promotion-playoff to win promotion. The bottom three teams were relegated to the 2. divisjon.
| Season | 1995 |
|---|---|
| Promoted | Moss Skeid Strømsgodset |
| Relegated | Åndalsnes Sarpsborg Vard Haugesund Alta Sandefjord Mjølner |
| Matches played | 264 |
| Goals scored | 853 (3.23 per match) |
← 1994 1996 → | |
Moss and Skeid won promotion to Tippeligaen as group-winners, while Strømsgodset was promoted after beating Sogndal in the promotion play-off. Åndalsnes, Sarpsborg, Vard Haugesund, Alta, Sandefjord and Mjølner was relegated to the 2. divisjon.
League tables
Group 1
| Pos | Team | Pld | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Promotion, qualification or relegation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Moss (C, P) | 22 | 13 | 7 | 2 | 40 | 22 | +18 | 46 | Promotion to Tippeligaen |
| 2 | Sogndal | 22 | 13 | 5 | 4 | 42 | 21 | +21 | 44 | Qualification for the promotion play-offs |
| 3 | Drøbak/Frogn | 22 | 13 | 4 | 5 | 60 | 35 | +25 | 43 | |
| 4 | Haugesund | 22 | 12 | 2 | 8 | 41 | 33 | +8 | 38 | |
| 5 | Åsane | 22 | 10 | 4 | 8 | 38 | 31 | +7 | 34 | |
| 6 | Aalesund | 22 | 8 | 8 | 6 | 43 | 33 | +10 | 32 | |
| 7 | Bryne | 22 | 7 | 9 | 6 | 28 | 31 | −3 | 30 | |
| 8 | Fana | 22 | 8 | 4 | 10 | 31 | 42 | −11 | 28 | |
| 9 | Fyllingen | 22 | 4 | 8 | 10 | 33 | 45 | −12 | 20 | |
| 10 | Åndalsnes (R) | 22 | 4 | 6 | 12 | 22 | 38 | −16 | 18 | Relegation to 2. divisjon |
| 11 | Sarpsborg (R) | 22 | 3 | 8 | 11 | 17 | 38 | −21 | 17 | |
| 12 | Vard Haugesund (R) | 22 | 4 | 1 | 17 | 17 | 43 | −26 | 13 |
Source: nifs.no
Rules for classification: 1) points; 2) goal difference; 3) number of goals scored.
(C) Champion; (P) Promoted; (R) Relegated.
Rules for classification: 1) points; 2) goal difference; 3) number of goals scored.
(C) Champion; (P) Promoted; (R) Relegated.
Group 2
| Pos | Team | Pld | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Promotion, qualification or relegation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Skeid (C, P) | 22 | 19 | 1 | 2 | 59 | 21 | +38 | 58 | Promotion to Tippeligaen |
| 2 | Strømsgodset (O, P) | 22 | 16 | 3 | 3 | 51 | 15 | +36 | 51 | Qualification for the promotion play-offs |
| 3 | Eik-Tønsberg | 22 | 14 | 4 | 4 | 57 | 24 | +33 | 46 | |
| 4 | Odd Grenland | 22 | 12 | 2 | 8 | 54 | 25 | +29 | 38 | |
| 5 | Tromsdalen | 22 | 10 | 5 | 7 | 37 | 25 | +12 | 35 | |
| 6 | Lyn | 22 | 11 | 1 | 10 | 31 | 29 | +2 | 34 | |
| 7 | Nardo | 22 | 7 | 1 | 14 | 31 | 45 | −14 | 22 | |
| 8 | Stålkameratene | 22 | 6 | 4 | 12 | 24 | 53 | −29 | 22 | |
| 9 | Jevnaker | 22 | 6 | 3 | 13 | 30 | 44 | −14 | 21 | |
| 10 | Alta (R) | 22 | 6 | 3 | 13 | 30 | 53 | −23 | 21 | Relegation to 2. divisjon |
| 11 | Sandefjord BK (R) | 22 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 17 | 38 | −21 | 19 | |
| 12 | Mjølner (R) | 22 | 3 | 2 | 17 | 20 | 69 | −49 | 11 |
Source: nifs.no
Rules for classification: 1) points; 2) goal difference; 3) number of goals scored.
(C) Champion; (O) Play-off winner; (P) Promoted; (R) Relegated.
Rules for classification: 1) points; 2) goal difference; 3) number of goals scored.
(C) Champion; (O) Play-off winner; (P) Promoted; (R) Relegated.
gollark: When someone asked for monotonic time to be exposed properly, GUESS WHAT, they decided to "fix" the whole thing in the most Go way possible by "transparently" adding monotonic time to the existing time handling, in some bizarre convoluted way which was a breaking change for lots of code and which limited the range time structs could represent rather a lot.
gollark: Rust, which is COOL™, has monotonic time and system time and such as separate types. Go did *not* have monotonic time for ages, but *did* have an internal function for it which wasn't exposed because of course.
gollark: That article describes, among other things, somewhat poor filesystem interaction handling, and a really stupid way monotonic time was handled.
gollark: https://fasterthanli.me/articles/i-want-off-mr-golangs-wild-ride
gollark: Also, it handles OS interaction poorly and tries to hide complexity sometimes in ways which do not work.
References
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.