1989 Stella Artois Championships – Doubles

Ken Flach and Robert Seguso were the defending champions but lost in the first round to Tim Pawsat and Laurie Warder.

Doubles
1989 Stella Artois Championships
Champions Darren Cahill
Mark Kratzmann
Runners-up Tim Pawsat
Laurie Warder
Final score76, 63

Darren Cahill and Mark Kratzmann won in the final 76, 63 against Pawsat and Warder.

Seeds

  1. Ken Flach / Robert Seguso (First Round)
  2. John Fitzgerald / Mark Woodforde (Second Round)
  3. Kevin Curren / David Pate (First Round)
  4. Paul Annacone / Christo van Rensburg (First Round)
  5. Pieter Aldrich / Danie Visser (First Round)
  6. Stefan Edberg / Rick Leach (First Round)
  7. Scott Davis / Tim Wilkison (Second Round)
  8. Grant Connell / Glenn Michibata (First Round)

Draw

Key

Finals

Semifinals Final
          
  Tim Pawsat
Laurie Warder
6 4 6
  Jim Courier
Pete Sampras
1 6 3
  Tim Pawsat
Laurie Warder
6 3  
  Darren Cahill
Mark Kratzmann
7 6  
  Darren Cahill
Mark Kratzmann
2 6 6
  Matt Anger
Robert Van't Hof
6 3 1

Top Half

First Round Second Round Quarterfinals Semifinals
1 K Flach
R Seguso
5 3  
  T Pawsat
L Warder
7 6     T Pawsat
L Warder
6 6  
  J Rive
L Shiras
6 6 11   J Rive
L Shiras
2 3  
  A Olhovskiy
D Wheaton
3 7 9   T Pawsat
L Warder
7 3 6
  T Siegel
S Youl
6 3     P Chamberlin
G Muller
6 6 1
  P Chamberlin
G Muller
7 6     P Chamberlin
G Muller
3 7 6
  L Jensen
K Jones
4 6   7 S Davis
T Wilkison
6 6 2
7 S Davis
T Wilkison
6 7     T Pawsat
L Warder
6 4 6
4 P Annacone
C van Rensburg
6 6     J Courier
P Sampras
1 6 3
  S Giammalva Jr.
G Layendecker
7 7     S Giammalva Jr.
G Layendecker
4 4  
  J Stoltenberg
T Woodbridge
6 3 8 WC I Lendl
A Mansdorf
6 6  
WC I Lendl
A Mansdorf
4 6 10 WC I Lendl
A Mansdorf
4 7 2
WC T Nelson
M Wilander
6 6     J Courier
P Sampras
6 6 6
  C Saceanu
M Stich
4 2   WC T Nelson
M Wilander
3 3  
  J Courier
P Sampras
6 6     J Courier
P Sampras
6 6  
5 P Aldrich
D Visser
3 4  

Bottom Half

First Round Second Round Quarterfinals Semifinals
6 S Edberg
R Leach
6 6  
  J Bates
T Svantesson
3 2   6 S Edberg
R Leach
5 6  
  B Dyke
T Nijssen
1 4     D Cahill
M Kratzmann
7 7  
  D Cahill
M Kratzmann
6 6     D Cahill
M Kratzmann
6 6  
  S DeVries
R Matuszewski
6 6 7   N Broad
E Edwards
3 4  
  E Jelen
P Kühnen
2 7 9   E Jelen
P Kühnen
4 1  
  N Broad
E Edwards
7 4 6   N Broad
E Edwards
6 6  
3 K Curren
D Pate
5 6 1   D Cahill
M Kratzmann
2 6 6
8 G Connell
G Michibata
6 4     M Anger
R Van't Hof
6 3 1
  B Drewett
W Masur
7 6     B Drewett
W Masur
6 6 3
  J Grabb
D Nargiso
7 6     J Grabb
D Nargiso
7 4 6
  R Acioly
N Pereira
5 4     J Grabb
D Nargiso
4 6  
  M Anger
R Van't Hof
6 7     M Anger
R Van't Hof
6 7  
  B Man-Son-Hing
A Mronz
4 6     M Anger
R Van't Hof
7 4 12
  Z Ali
U Colombini
2 2   2 J Fitzgerald
M Woodforde
5 6 10
2 J Fitzgerald
M Woodforde
6 6  
gollark: I definitely remember it being possible to. I don't care enough to find a number theory book from my spare phone.
gollark: YOU should prove the case with no common factors.
gollark: Maybe I should have said natural numbers. Oh well.
gollark: I don't know how to prove that for the case where a, b, c have no common factors.
gollark: The proof is trivial and left to the reader.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.