1988 CA-TennisTrophy – Singles

Jonas Svensson was the defending champion but lost in the quarterfinals to Horst Skoff.

Singles
1988 CA-TennisTrophy
Champion Horst Skoff
Runner-up Thomas Muster
Final score46, 63, 64, 62

Skoff won in the final 46, 63, 64, 62 against Thomas Muster.

Seeds

  1. Thomas Muster (Final)
  2. Jonas Svensson (Quarterfinals)
  3. Andrei Chesnokov (Semifinals)
  4. Kevin Curren (Semifinals)
  5. Magnus Gustafsson (Second Round)
  6. Michiel Schapers (Quarterfinals)
  7. Sergio Casal (Semifinals)
  8. Marián Vajda (Quarterfinals)

Draw

Key

Final

Semifinals Final
            
1 Thomas Muster 6 6
4 Kevin Curren 4 4
1 Thomas Muster 6 3 4 2  
  Horst Skoff 4 6 6 6  
3 Andrei Chesnokov 5 4
  Horst Skoff 7 6

Section 1

First Round Second Round Quarterfinals Semifinals
1 T Muster 6 1 6
  M Laurendeau 4 6 3 1 T Muster 6 7  
WC A Antonitsch 6 3 6 WC A Antonitsch 3 6  
  J Gunnarsson 2 6 1 1 T Muster 7 6  
  M Narducci 3 1   8 M Vajda 6 2  
Q C Panatta 6 6   Q C Panatta 3 6 2
  P Wekesa 1 4   8 M Vajda 6 1 6
8 M Vajda 6 6   1 T Muster 6 6  
4 K Curren 7 6   4 K Curren 4 4  
  P Korda 6 4   4 K Curren 6 3 6
  R Smith 6 6     R Smith 4 6 4
WC M Oberleitner 3 4   4 K Curren 6 6  
  P Lundgren 6 6   6 M Schapers 2 2  
  J Sánchez 3 3     P Lundgren 4 6  
Q P Palandjian 0 0   6 M Schapers 6 7  
6 M Schapers 6 6  

Section 2

First Round Second Round Quarterfinals Semifinals
5 M Gustafsson 3 7 6
Q L Jonsson 6 5 4 5 M Gustafsson 5 3  
  F Roese 1 0     R Reneberg 7 6  
  R Reneberg 6 6     R Reneberg 2 6 3
  N Kroon 5 7 2 3 A Chesnokov 6 2 6
  A Võsand 7 5 6   A Võsand 6 1  
  Y Doumbia 5 4   3 A Chesnokov 7 6  
3 A Chesnokov 7 6   3 A Chesnokov 5 4  
7 S Casal 6 6     H Skoff 7 6  
WC T Šmíd 4 4   7 S Casal 7 4 4
  J Nyström 1 6     H Skoff 5 6 6
  H Skoff 6 7     H Skoff 6 6  
Q G Prpić 4 6   2 J Svensson 4 3  
  C Bergström 6 7     C Bergström      
  J Grabb 2 4   2 J Svensson w/o    
2 J Svensson 6 6  
gollark: I mean, yes, it *kind of makes a bit of sense*, but it's really unintuitive.
gollark: Oh, that too, seems very stupid.
gollark: This was discussed on the esolangs server a bit back: yes, floats are nice because they're fast and all, but "don't report errors unless explicitly asked for" and "reserve piles of values for nan" seems stupid.
gollark: I don't like it much either.
gollark: Fun fact: Python package management is evil.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.