1966–67 Serie B

The Serie B 1966–67 was the thirty-fifth tournament of this competition played in Italy since its creation.

Serie B
Season1966–67
ChampionsSampdoria
2nd title
Arezzo
Catanzaro
Messina
Modena
Palermo
Pisa
Reggina
Salernitana
Savona
Varese
Serie B 1966-67 team distribution

Teams
1966–67 Sampdoria team

Savona, Arezzo and Salernitana had been promoted from Serie C, while Sampdoria, Catania and Varese had been relegated from Serie A.

The Genoa’s “derby” was played in Serie B for the first time.

Events

Transitional promotions and relegations were imposed by the reduction of the Serie A.

Final classification
Pos Team Pld W D L GF GA GR Pts Promotion or relegation
1 Sampdoria (P, C) 38 20 14 4 47 19 2.474 54 1967–68 Serie A
2 Varese (P) 38 19 13 6 44 21 2.095 51
3 Catanzaro 38 14 14 10 44 42 1.048 42
3 Catania 38 15 12 11 35 31 1.129 42
3 Reggiana 38 15 12 11 35 39 0.897 42
6 Padova 38 11 17 10 37 33 1.121 39
6 Modena 38 12 15 11 41 44 0.932 39
6 Potenza 38 13 13 12 35 38 0.921 39
9 Palermo 38 12 14 12 34 26 1.308 38
9 Reggina 38 11 16 11 35 33 1.061 38
11 Messina 38 11 15 12 36 40 0.900 37
12 Genoa 38 12 12 14 39 33 1.182 36
12 Verona 38 12 12 14 33 36 0.917 36
12 Pisa 38 10 16 12 27 30 0.900 36
12 Novara 38 13 10 15 31 35 0.886 36
16 Livorno 38 12 11 15 32 39 0.821 35
17 Savona (R) 38 12 10 16 44 46 0.957 34 1967–68 Serie C
18 Arezzo (R) 38 11 10 17 39 44 0.886 32
19 Alessandria (R) 38 8 13 17 35 48 0.729 29
20 Salernitana (R) 38 9 7 22 23 49 0.469 25
Source: Panini
(C) Champion; (P) Promoted; (R) Relegated.

Results
Home \ Away ALE ARE CTN CTZ GEN LIV MES MOD NOV PAD PAL PIS POT REA REG SAL SAM SVN VAR HEL
Alessandria 2–0 1–1 0–2 2–3 2–0 0–0 2–2 2–2 0–2 4–1 1–0 2–0 1–1 0–2 3–1 2–2 3–0 0–3 0–2
Arezzo 3–0 1–1 0–1 2–1 1–1 2–0 2–3 2–0 2–2 0–1 1–0 2–4 1–1 1–0 2–0 0–0 3–2 0–0 2–0
Catania 1–0 1–0 2–1 2–1 2–1 1–1 0–2 0–0 1–1 1–0 2–0 1–2 3–0 0–0 1–0 0–0 2–1 0–0 2–0
Catanzaro 3–1 1–0 2–1 1–1 1–1 2–0 1–1 2–0 1–1 0–0 1–0 2–2 1–0 1–1 3–0 0–0 3–0 2–1 3–1
Genoa 3–1 1–0 0–0 1–0 1–0 2–2 1–0 0–1 0–0 1–1 3–0 2–0 8–1 1–1 2–0 1–0 0–0 2–0 1–1
Livorno 1–0 2–1 1–3 4–1 1–0 4–1 0–0 0–0 1–0 2–1 2–0 1–1 1–2 2–1 1–0 0–1 1–0 0–0 0–1
Messina 2–0 0–0 0–0 2–2 2–0 3–1 0–2 2–0 1–1 0–0 1–1 4–1 0–0 2–0 2–0 1–3 0–0 1–1 1–0
Modena 1–1 1–0 1–3 0–0 1–0 2–2 2–1 1–0 0–1 0–0 2–2 1–0 0–0 0–0 1–0 1–0 2–2 2–2 3–1
Novara 0–0 1–0 1–0 0–1 3–1 3–1 2–0 1–2 2–0 1–0 0–0 1–1 3–0 3–2 2–0 0–2 1–0 0–2 2–0
Padova 1–1 1–1 0–1 1–1 1–0 0–0 0–1 2–1 2–0 1–0 1–1 1–1 2–0 6–0 1–1 2–2 2–2 0–2 2–1
Palermo 0–0 0–3 0–1 2–0 3–1 0–0 2–1 2–2 2–0 2–0 0–0 4–0 2–0 0–0 4–0 0–1 1–0 0–0 1–1
Pisa 0–0 2–0 2–0 5–1 1–0 1–0 0–0 1–0 1–0 1–0 0–0 1–1 0–1 0–0 0–0 2–3 1–0 0–1 2–1
Potenza 1–0 0–3 1–1 2–2 2–0 1–0 3–0 1–0 1–1 1–0 0–1 0–0 1–0 0–0 3–0 0–0 0–1 2–1 1–1
Reggiana 2–1 1–0 0–0 2–1 0–0 2–0 4–0 1–1 0–0 1–0 1–0 0–0 0–1 1–0 3–1 1–1 1–1 2–1 0–0
Reggina 2–0 5–0 1–0 1–1 0–0 1–0 2–1 1–1 1–0 3–0 0–2 2–2 0–0 1–0 0–0 1–1 2–1 1–1 2–0
Salernitana 1–2 1–0 3–0 2–0 1–0 0–0 0–2 3–2 0–0 0–1 1–0 1–0 0–1 1–2 1–0 2–2 3–2 0–2 0–1
Sampdoria 1–0 3–0 2–0 3–0 0–0 3–0 0–0 1–0 3–1 0–0 1–0 0–0 1–0 1–2 1–0 1–0 1–0 2–0 2–1
Savona 0–0 3–2 2–1 2–0 1–0 0–1 0–0 5–1 3–0 1–1 1–1 4–1 1–0 4–2 0–0 1–0 2–1 0–1 0–1
Varese 1–0 1–1 1–0 2–0 1–1 1–0 2–0 3–0 0–0 0–1 2–1 0–0 2–0 1–0 2–1 2–0 0–0 2–1 3–1
Hellas Verona 1–1 1–1 2–0 0–0 1–0 3–0 0–2 2–0 1–0 0–0 0–0 1–0 1–0 0–1 2–1 0–0 0–2 5–1 0–0
Updated to match(es) played on unknown. Source: Almanacco Illustrato del Calcio - La Storia 1898-2004, Panini Edizioni, Modena, September 2005 (in Italian)
Legend: Blue = home team win; Yellow = draw; Red = away team win.

References and sources
  • Almanacco Illustrato del Calcio - La Storia 1898-2004, Panini Edizioni, Modena, September 2005
gollark: Perhaps it has some sort of connection tracking limit.
gollark: Not unsafe in the sense that it'll do undefined behaviour probably, just that you can't statically be sure it only contains the type you want.
gollark: It's a wildly unsafe and slow "generic", and you can write fast code with generics. More so than if you have to unsafely typecast any time you want a data structure other than the 3 built-in ones.
gollark: (I know they seem to be working on them now, but it's after years of denying they were necessary or good)
gollark: Go as in golang? In which case, mandatory lol no generics.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.