1960 Belgian Congo general election

General elections were held in the Belgian Congo on 22 May 1960, in order to create a government to rule the country following independence, scheduled for 30 June. The 137-seat Chamber of Deputies was elected by men over the age of 21. The seats were filled by district-based lists,[1] although only two parties, the Mouvement National Congolais-Lumumba (MNC-L) and the Parti National du Progrès, submitted lists in more than one district.

1960 Belgian Congo general election

22 May 1960
137 members of the Chamber of Deputies All 84 members of the Senate
Turnout	81.8%
Majority party Minority party Third party   Leader Patrice Lumumba Antoine Gizenga Joseph Kasa-Vubu Party MNC-Lumumba PSA ABAKO Seats won 33 13 12 Popular vote 521,187 278,971 210,542 Percentage 23.4% 12.6% 9.5%

The MNC-L, led by Patrice Lumumba, won the most seats and Lumumba was confirmed as Prime Minister by Parliament after forming a coalition that included the Parti Solidaire Africain, Centre de Regroupment Africain and other parties.[1][2] Voter turnout was 81.8%.[3]

Following the election, an 84-seat Senate was elected by Provincial Assembly members, and the two chambers elected Joseph Kasa-Vubu of ABAKO as President after some days of turmoil.[4]

Background

Belgian rule of the Congo

Map of Africa with the Democratic Republic of the Congo's modern borders

Colonial rule in the Congo began in the late 19th century. King Leopold II of Belgium, frustrated by Belgium's lack of international power and prestige, attempted to persuade the Belgian government to support colonial expansion around the largely unexplored Congo Basin. The Belgian government's ambivalence about the idea led Leopold to eventually create the colony on his own account, achieving international recognition for the Congo Free State in 1885.[5] By the turn of the century, however, the violence of Free State officials against indigenous Congolese and the ruthless system of economic extraction had led to intense diplomatic pressure on Belgium to take official control of the country, which it did in 1908, creating the Belgian Congo.[6] The colony was divided into six provinces: Léopoldville, Équateur, Orientale, Kivu, Kasai, and Katanga.[7] The city of Léopoldville was designated as the capital in 1923.[8]

Belgian rule in the Congo was based around the "colonial trinity" (trinité coloniale) of state, missionary and private company interests. The privileging of Belgian commercial interests meant that capital sometimes flowed back into the Congo and that individual regions became specialised.[9] The country was split into nesting, hierarchically organised administrative subdivisions, and run uniformly according to a set "native policy" (politique indigène).[10] As early as the 1920s, the Congo possessed one of the densest colonial regimes in Africa. The administration was heavily involved in the life of the Congolese; Belgian functionaries (government civil servants) closely monitored and enforced agricultural production, provided medical services to many residents, and frequently toured even the most rural territories to oversee their subjects.[11] There was also a high degree of racial segregation between the native and white populations, the latter of which grew considerably after the end of World War II due to immigration from Europe.[10]

Rise in Congolese political activity

See also: Belgian Congo in World War II

During the latter stages of World War II a new social stratum emerged in the Congo, known as the évolués. Forming an African middle class in the colony, they held skilled positions (such as clerks and nurses) made available by the economic boom. While there were no universal criteria for determining évolué status, it was generally accepted that one would have "a good knowledge of French, adhere to Christianity, and have some form of post-primary education."[12] Early on in their history, most évolués sought to use their unique status to earn special privileges in the Congo.[13] Since opportunities for upward mobility through the colonial structure were limited, the évolué class institutionally manifested itself in elite clubs through which they could enjoy trivial privileges that made them feel distinct from the Congolese "masses".[14] Additional groups, such as labour unions, alumni associations, and ethnic syndicates, provided other Congolese the means of organisation.[15] Among the most important of these was the Alliance des Bakongo (ABAKO), representing the Kongo people of the Lower Congo.[16] However, they were restricted in their actions by the administration. While white settlers were consulted in the appointment of certain officials, the Congolese had no means of expressing their beliefs through the governing structures.[17] Though native chiefs held legal authority in some jurisdictions, in practice they were used by the administration to further its own policies.[8]

Up into the 1950s most évolués were concerned only with social inequalities and their treatment by the Belgians. Questions of self-government were not considered until 1954, when ABAKO requested that the administration consider a list of suggested candidates for a Léopoldville municipal post.[18] That year the association was taken over by Joseph Kasa-Vubu, and under his leadership it became increasingly hostile to the colonial authority and sought autonomy for the Kongo regions in the Lower Congo.[19] In 1956 a group of Congolese intellectuals under the tutelage of several European academics issued a manifesto calling for a transition to independence over the course of 30 years. The ABAKO quickly responded with a demand for "immediate independence".[20] The Belgian government was not prepared to grant the Congo independence and even when it started realising the necessity of a plan for decolonisation in 1957, it was assumed that such a process would be solidly controlled by Belgium.[21] In December 1957 the colonial administration instituted reforms that permitted municipal elections and the formation of political parties. Some Belgian parties attempted to establish branches in the colony, but these were largely ignored by the population in favour of Congolese-initiated groups.[22] Nationalism fermented in 1958 as more évolués began interacting with others outside of their own locales and started discussing the future structures of a post-colonial Congolese state.[23] Nevertheless, most political mobilisation occurred along tribal and regional divisions.[24] In Katanga, various tribal groups came together to form the Confédération des associations tribales du Katanga (CONAKAT) under the leadership of Godefroid Munongo and Moïse Tshombe. Hostile to immigrant peoples, it advocated provincial autonomy and close ties with Belgium. Most of its support was rooted in individual chiefs, businessmen, and European settlers of southern Katanga.[25] It was opposed by Jason Sendwe's Association Générale des Baluba du Katanga (BALUBAKAT).[26]

Patrice Lumumba, founding member and leader of the MNC

In October 1958 a group of Léopoldville évolués including Patrice Lumumba, Cyrille Adoula and Joseph Iléo established the Mouvement National Congolais (MNC). Diverse in membership, the party sought to peacefully achieve Congolese independence, promote the political education of the populace, and eliminate regionalism.[27] The MNC drew most of its membership from the residents of the eastern city of Stanleyville, where Lumumba was well known, and from the population of the Kasai Province, where efforts were directed by a Muluba businessman, Albert Kalonji.[28] Belgian officials appreciated its moderate and anti-separatist stance and allowed Lumumba to attend the All-African Peoples' Conference in Accra, Ghana, in December 1958 (Kasa-Vubu was informed that the documents necessary for his travel to the event were not in order and was not permitted to go[29]). Lumumba was deeply impressed by the Pan-Africanist ideals of Ghanaian President Kwame Nkrumah and returned to the Congo with a more radical party programme.[30] He reported on his trip during a widely-attended rally in Léopoldville and demanded the country's "genuine" independence.[24]

Fearing that they were being overshadowed by Lumumba and the MNC, Kasa-Vubu and the ABAKO leadership announced that they would be hosting their own rally in the capital on 4 January 1959.[24] The municipal government (under Belgian domination) was given short notice, and communicated that only a "private meeting" would be authorised. On the scheduled day of the rally the ABAKO leadership told the crowd that had gathered that the event was postponed and that they should disperse. The mass was infuriated and instead began hurling stones at the police and pillaging European property, initiating three days of violent and destructive riots.[31] The Force Publique, the colonial army, was called into service and suppressed the revolt with considerable brutality.[32] In wake of the riots Kasa-Vubu and his lieutenants were arrested. Unlike earlier expressions of discontent, the grievances were conveyed primarily by uneducated urban residents, not évolués.[33] Popular opinion in Belgium was one of extreme shock and surprise. An investigative commission found the riots to be the culmination of racial discrimination, overcrowding, unemployment, and wishes for more political self-determination. On 13 January the administration announced several reforms, and the Belgian King, Baudouin, declared that independence would be granted to the Congo in the future.[32]

Meanwhile, discontent surfaced among the MNC leadership, who were bothered by Lumumba's domination over the party's politics. Relations between Lumumba and Kalonji also grew tense, as the former was upset with how the latter was transforming the Kasai branch into an exclusively Luba group and antagonising other tribes. This culminated into the split of the party into the MNC-Lumumba/MNC-L under Lumumba and the MNC-Kalonji/MNC-K under Kalonji and Iléo. The latter began advocating federalism. Adoula left the organisation.[28] Alone to lead his own faction and facing competition from ABAKO, Lumumba became increasingly strident in his demands for independence. Following an October riot in Stanleyville he was arrested. Nevertheless, the influence of himself and the MNC-L continued to grow rapidly. The party advocated for a strong unitary state, nationalism, and the termination of Belgian rule and began forming alliances with regional groups, such as the Kivu-based Centre du Regroupement Africain (CEREA).[34] Though the Belgians supported a unitary system over the federal models suggested by ABAKO and CONAKAT, they and more moderate Congolese were unnerved by Lumumba's increasingly extremist attitudes. With the implicit support of the colonial administration, the moderates formed the Parti National du Progrès (PNP) under the leadership of Paul Bolya and Albert Delvaux. It advocated centralisation, respect for traditional elements, and close ties with Belgium.[35] In southern Léopoldville Province, a socialist-federalist party, the Parti Solidaire Africain (PSA) was founded. Antoine Gizenga served as its president, and Cléophas Kamitatu was in charge of the Léopoldville Province chapter.[36]

The Belgo-Congolese Round Table Conference

Main article: Belgo-Congolese Round Table Conference

Opening meeting of the Belgo-Congolese Round Table Conference on 20 January 1960

After the riots of 4 January 1959 Belgian leaders became increasingly fearful of a violent political conflict emerging in the Congo. The security situation in the country deteriorated over the course of the year, especially in the Lower Congo and in Kasai, where violent clashes between Baluba and Lulua were taking place. Fearing the degeneration of the unrest into a colonial war and facing intense pressure for reform, in late 1959 the Belgian government announced that it would host a round table conference in Brussels in 1960 with the Congolese leadership to discuss the political future of the country.[37]

On the eve of the conference the Congolese delegations banded into a "Common Front" and demanded that all decisions be made binding on the Belgian government and that the Congo be granted immediate independence.[38] The conference formally opened on 20 January. In the first speech, the Belgian Prime Minister assured that the Congo would be granted independence but did not specify a date. Serious negotiations did not commence until the following day.[39] Kasa-Vubu demanded that a Congolese government be formed immediately, but his request was denied.[40] Disagreements between him and the Belgians over the competence of the conference led to the former walking out during the negotiations. It was then suggested that the date of independence be discussed. Lumumba, meanwhile, was released from prison and flew to Brussels to participate in the conference.[41] On 27 January he made his first appearance and voiced his support for independence. After some discussion the Common Front accepted the date of 30 June 1960 for sovereignty to be granted to the Congo.[42] The decisions of the delegates were ratified in a series of resolutions on 19 February and the conference closed the following day.[43]

The Loi Fondamentale

It was decided at the Round Table Conference that the resolutions the participants adopted would serve as the basis for the Loi Fondamentale (Fundamental Law), a temporary draft constitution left for the Congo until a permanent one could be promulgated by a Congolese parliament.[44] Summarising the similarities between the Loi Fondementale and the Constitution of Belgium, Raymond Scheyven, Minister-in-charge of Economic Affairs for the Congo, observed, "We have presented the Congolese with a political system similar to ours....It features communes, provincial assemblies, a bicameral system, and a political system where the head of state is irresponsible."[45]

The division of executive power between a presumably symbolic head of state and head of government was the most noticeable and potentially harmful feature borrowed from the Belgian constitution. As in a parliamentary system, such power was to be exercised by a Prime Minister and a cabinet responsible to Parliament. If the cabinet lost the confidence of Parliament, a motion of censure would be passed (either with a simple majority in both houses of a two-thirds majority in a single house) and it would be dismissed. By comparison, the head of state (a President) was irresponsible and only had the power to ratify treaties, promulgate laws, and nominate high ranking officials (including the Prime Minister and the cabinet).[45]

A parliament was to be composed of a lower chamber and an upper chamber. The lower chamber (Chamber of Deputies) would consist of 137 members directly "elected by universal suffrage according to the procedure fixed by the electoral law" with one deputy for every 100,000 people. The upper chamber (Senate) would be composed of 14 members from each province, elected by the members of their respective provincial assemblies.[45] Senators and deputies that assumed a ministerial post in the central government were allowed to retain their seats in Parliament.[46] The provincial assemblies were unicameral and varied in size, depending on the population of the provinces they served.[45]

Articles 219 and 220 delineated the authority of the central and provincial governments.[47] The division of authority, a compromise between the federalist and unitarianist politicians, was dubbed by Belgian lawyers as "quasi-federalism".[48]

The elections

MNC-K campaign poster for Albert Kalonji

Even though the date for independence had been established at the Round Table Conference, there was still substantial uncertainty throughout the Congo as to which faction would come to dominate politics in the new government. This caused deep anxiety among most of the electorate. As the Congolese had little experience in democratic processes, few eligible voters in rural areas realised the meaning and importance of an election, and even fewer understood electoral mechanics and procedure.[44]

Electoral procedure was prescribed by the electoral law of 23 March 1960. Voting was compulsory for all "males of Congolese status". Yet in order to register, one had to be at least 21 years of age and had to have resided in their respective constituency for at least six months. In order to be a candidate for provincial or federal office, one had to be at least 25 years of age, been born to a Congolese mother, and had to have resided in the Congo for at least five years.[47] For aspiring senators, the age requirement was 30.[49]

The official electoral campaign began on 11 May, marred by confusion and violence. Rival parties employed tactics that ranged from threats to sabotage of an opponent's headquarters to murder. Such intimidation was especially prevalent in areas that were under heavy influence from the militant sects of CEREA, the PSA, ABAKO, the MNC-L, and the MNC-K. This was due not only to such parties' own radical, differing beliefs but also to a general suspicion that the Belgians would organise the contest to favor the moderates.[49] With the notable exceptions of CONAKAT, the PNP, and the Parti de l'Unité Nationale (PUNA), most parties' rhetoric was anti-colonial in focus.[50] Frequent attacks on the colonial administration by candidates led to confusion among segments of the electorate, which were given the impression that all forms of government—except welfare services—were to be eliminated after independence.[51] Openly socialist messages declined during the campaign, with the exception of Gizenga's speeches.[52] Freedom of religion was also a major issue, especially in areas where Islam or separatist forms of Christianity were prominent. This led to attacks on the Catholic Church's monopoly on the education system.[50] The MNC-L and the PNP were the only parties to launch significant national campaigns.[53] The parties in favor of a unitary system of government tended to place their best candidates in the central government races, while their federalist counterparts focused on provincial campaigns.[54]

In the tumult of the last days of the Belgian domination, incidents caused returns to come late in some places.[55]

Results

Chamber of Deputies

Party	Votes	%	Seats
Mouvement National Congolais-Lumumba	521,187	23.4	33
Parti Solidaire Africain	278,971	12.6	13
ABAKO	210,542	9.5	12
Mouvement National Congolais-Kalonji	147,578	6.6	7
Parti National du Progrès	137,195	6.1	7
CONAKAT	104,821	4.7	8
Centre de Regroupement Africain	95,721	4.3	10
Party of National Unity	92,547	4.2	7
BALUBAKAT (CK)	80,434	3.6	6
Congolese National Union	63,425	2.9	3
LUKA	52,612	2.4	3
Kasaian Union	47,526	2.1	2
Congolese Grouping	41,202	1.9	4
Basonge Unity Movement (MNC-L)	30,280	1.4	1
ATCAR (CK)	29,657	1.3	1
MEDERCO (PNP)	27,634	1.2	2
Ngwaka Association (PUNA)	26,114	1.2	2
Kasaian Coalition (MNC-L)	21,465	1.0	1
Alliance des Bayanzi	21,024	0.9	1
UNEBAFI (MNC-L)	19,324	0.9	1
Common Front–Delvaux	17,716	0.7	1
ARP−PRC	16,892	0.8	1
Union of the Mongo	16,739	0.8	1
MNC-K Independents	14,364	0.6	1
Coutumier (PNP)	13,408	0.6	1
Democratic Rally of Lac, Kwango and Kwilu	12,761	0.6	1
Regional parties	19,422	0.9	2
Independents	63,333	2.8	5
Invalid/blank votes	549,701	–	–
Total	2,773,595	100	137
Registered voters/turnout	3,390,940	81.8	–
Source: Nohlen et al.

Senate

Party	Seats
Mouvement National Congolais-Lumumba	21
Centre de Regroupement Africain	7
CONAKAT	7
ABAKO	5
Cartel Katangais	5
Parti Solidaire Africain	5
Mouvement National Congolais-Kalonji	4
Union of the Mongo	4
Congolese National Union	3
Parti National du Progrès	3
LUKA	2
Congolese Grouping	1
Democratic Rally of Lac, Kwango and Kwilu	1
Kasaian Coalition	1
People's Party	1
Other parties	1
Independents	5
Total	84
Source: Sternberger et al.[56]

Reactions

After the results were announced, Lumumba stated, "I am ready to co-operate with our opponents to from a national union government."[57] Belgium was surprised by the MNC-L's electoral success. Belgians who had anticipated a PNP-led government were revolted at the prospect of Lumumba leading an independent Congo.[58] Many members of the various foreign missions in the Congo, however, believed that he was the only man capable of bringing order and stability to the country.[59]

Notes

Citations

1. DRC: 1960 National Assembly results EISA
2. "BELGIAN CONGO: Nightmare". Time. 1960-06-13. ISSN 0040-781X. Retrieved 2017-10-28.
3. Nohlen, D, Krennerich, M & Thibaut, B (1999) Elections in Africa: A data handbook, p291 ISBN 0-19-829645-2
4. "BELGIAN CONGO: A Blight at Birth". Time. 1960-06-27. ISSN 0040-781X. Retrieved 2017-10-28.
5. Gibbs 1991, pp. 39–42.
6. Gibbs 1991, pp. 46–49.
7. Epstein 1965, p. 175.
8. Gibbs 1991, p. 51.
9. Turner 2007, p. 28.
10. Turner 2007, p. 29.
11. Young 1965, pp. 10–13.
12. Gibbs 1991, p. 70.
13. Willame 1972, p. 24. sfn error: no target: CITEREFWillame1972 (help)
14. Willame 1972, p. 25. sfn error: no target: CITEREFWillame1972 (help)
15. Young 1965, p. 291.
16. Hoskyns 1965, p. 22.
17. Young 1965, p. 29.
18. Young 1965, pp. 274–275.
19. Hoskyns 1965, pp. 22–23.
20. Young 1965, p. 276.
21. Young 1965, pp. 36–37.
22. Young 1965, pp. 296–297.
23. Young 1965, p. 277.
24. Nzongola-Ntalaja 2002, p. 84.
25. Hoskyns 1965, pp. 25–27.
26. Lemarchand 1964, p. 241.
27. Hoskyns 1965, p. 27.
28. Hoskyns 1965, p. 29.
29. Hoskyns 1965, p. 23.
30. Hoskyns 1965, p. 28.
31. Nzongola-Ntalaja 2002, p. 85.
32. Hoskyns 1965, p. 10.
33. Nzongola-Ntalaja 2002, p. 86.
34. Hoskyns 1965, p. 30.
35. Hoskyns 1965, p. 31.
36. Merriam 1961, pp. 131–132.
37. Hoskyns 1965, pp. 36–37.
38. Hoskyns 1965, pp. 37–38.
39. Hoskyns 1965, p. 38.
40. Packham 1996, p. 21. sfn error: no target: CITEREFPackham1996 (help)
41. Hoskyns 1965, pp. 38–39.
42. Hoskyns 1965, p. 40.
43. Hoskyns 1965, p. 46.
44. Lemarchand 1964, p. 214.
45. Lemarchand 1964, p. 215.
46. Young 1965, p. 369.
47. Lemarchand 1964, p. 216.
48. Hoskyns 1965, p. 45.
49. Lemarchand 1964, p. 217.
50. Lemarchand 1964, p. 218.
51. Young 1965, p. 299.
52. Namikas 2013, p. 57.
53. Young 1965, p. 300.
54. Lemarchand 1964, p. 244.
55. "BELGIAN CONGO: Late Returns". Time. 1960-06-06. ISSN 0040-781X. Retrieved 2017-10-28.
56. Dolf Sternberger, Bernhard Vogel, Dieter Nohlen & Klaus Landfried (1978) Die Wahl der Parlamente: Band II: Afrika, Zweiter Halbband, p2428
57. Govender 1971, p. 56.
58. Hoskyns 1965, pp. 73–74.
59. Weissman 1974, p. 54.

References

• Epstein, Howard M. (1965). Revolt in the Congo, 1960–1964. New York: Facts on File. OCLC 875482690.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
• Gibbs, David N. (1991). The Political Economy of Third World Intervention: Mines, Money, and U.S. Policy in the Congo Crisis. American Politics and Political Economy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 9780226290713.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
• Govender, Robert (1971). The Martyrdom of Patrice Lumumba. London: Neillgo. OCLC 973704.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
• Hoskyns, Catherine (1965). The Congo Since Independence: January 1960 – December 1961. London: Oxford University Press. OCLC 414961.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
• Lemarchand, René (1964). Political Awakening in the Belgian Congo. Berkeley: University of California Press. OCLC 905074256.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
• Merriam, Alan P. (1961). Congo: Background of Conflict. Evanston, Illinois: Northwestern University Press. OCLC 424186.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
• Namikas, Lise (2013). Battleground Africa: Cold War in the Congo, 1960–1965. Washington, D.C.: Woodrow Wilson Center Press. ISBN 978-0-8047-8486-3.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
• Nzongola-Ntalaja, Georges (2002). The Congo: From Leopold to Kabila: A People's History (illustrated, reprint ed.). London: Zed Books. ISBN 9781842770535.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
• Turner, Thomas (2007). The Congo Wars: Conflict, Myth, and Reality (2nd ed.). London: Zed Books. ISBN 978-1-84277-688-9.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
• Weissman, Stephen R. (1974). American Foreign Policy in the Congo: 1960-1964. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. ISBN 9780801408120.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
• Young, Crawford (1965). Politics in the Congo: Decolonization and Independence. Princeton: Princeton University Press. OCLC 307971.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)