1950 LFF Lyga
The 1950 LFF Lyga was the 29th season of the LFF Lyga football competition in Lithuania. It was contested by 16 teams, and Inkaras Kaunas won the championship.
Season | 1950 |
---|---|
← 1949 1951 → |
Group I
Pos | Team | Pld | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Žalgiris Kybartai | 7 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 36 | 12 | +24 | 13 |
2 | Elnias Šiauliai | 7 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 29 | 5 | +24 | 12 |
3 | Audiniai Kaunas | 7 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 26 | 18 | +8 | 8 |
4 | Žalgiris Panevėžys | 7 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 15 | 16 | −1 | 8 |
5 | Spartakas Vilnius | 7 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 6 |
6 | Žalgiris Ukmergė | 7 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 10 | 27 | −17 | 5 |
7 | CF Marijampolė | 7 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 13 | 16 | −3 | 4 |
8 | Žalgiris Tauragė | 7 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 8 | 43 | −35 | 0 |
Source: rsssf.com
Group II
Pos | Team | Pld | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Inkaras Kaunas | 7 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 35 | 3 | +32 | 14 |
2 | FSK Kaunas | 7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 12 | −1 | 9 |
3 | Audra Klaipėda | 7 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 21 | 13 | +8 | 8 |
4 | Dinamo Utena | 7 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 16 | 12 | +4 | 8 |
5 | Dinamo Vilnius | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 13 | 18 | −5 | 6 |
6 | ASK Kaunas | 7 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 12 | 17 | −5 | 4 |
7 | Spartakas Plungė | 7 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 12 | 20 | −8 | 4 |
8 | Spartakas Kaunas | 7 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 29 | −25 | 3 |
Source: rsssf.com
Final
Pos | Team | Pld | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Inkaras Kaunas | 14 | 13 | 0 | 1 | 61 | 10 | +51 | 26 |
2 | Elnias Šiauliai | 14 | 12 | 0 | 2 | 58 | 10 | +48 | 24 |
3 | Audra Klaipėda | 14 | 7 | 0 | 7 | 24 | 41 | −17 | 14 |
4 | FSK Kaunas | 14 | 5 | 2 | 7 | 37 | 48 | −11 | 12 |
5 | Žalgiris Kybartai | 14 | 6 | 0 | 8 | 21 | 48 | −27 | 12 |
6 | Dinamo Utena | 14 | 5 | 0 | 9 | 28 | 28 | 0 | 10 |
7 | Audiniai Kaunas | 14 | 4 | 2 | 8 | 30 | 40 | −10 | 10 |
8 | Žalgiris Panevėžys | 14 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 21 | 55 | −34 | 4 |
9 | Dinamo Vilnius | 7 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 21 | 3 | +18 | 14 |
10 | ASK Kaunas | 7 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 22 | 11 | +11 | 9 |
11 | Žalgiris Ukmergė | 7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 15 | 12 | +3 | 9 |
12 | Spartakas Vilnius | 7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 11 | −4 | 9 |
13 | CF Marijampolė | 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 7 |
14 | Spartakas Plungė | 7 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 9 | 17 | −8 | 3 |
15 | Spartakas Kaunas | 7 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 15 | −10 | 3 |
16 | Žalgiris Tauragė | 7 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 12 | −10 | 2 |
Source: rsssf.com
gollark: It's too late. I bet people already downloaded copies, and in any case it's saved in your brain now.
gollark: Or, well, ranked choice voting in general, approval voting and such aren't that.
gollark: Plain ranked choice voting has problems, approval voting (or STAR voting apparently) seem better.
gollark: Also, over here there's apparently Costco (it might be a US thing too), which apparently runs on a model where they charge monthly subscriptions and limit markup on individual items a lot.
gollark: Lower prices → more betterer.
References
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.