1918 Wansbeck by-election

The Wansbeck by-election, 1918 was a parliamentary by-election held for the House of Commons constituency of Wansbeck in Northumberland on 28 May 1918.

Vacancy
Charles Fenwick

The by-election was caused by the death on 20 April 1918 of the sitting Liberal MP Rt Hon. Charles Fenwick, at the age of 68. He had held the seat since the general election of 1885. Fenwick was prominent figure in the Northumberland Miners' Association having first worked as a coal miner at the age of 10. He was one of a large group of miners representatives who refused to join the Labour party.[1]

Electoral history

Fenwick, as a sponsored candidate of the Northumberland miners, had won the seat for the Liberals at every election since the seat was created in 1885. When the Miners Federation of Great Britain voted to affiliate to the Labour party in 1909, Fenwick, retaining the support of the Northumberland miners, contested both 1910 general elections as a Liberal candidate. The Labour party did not field a candidate against him and at the December 1910 general election he was returned unopposed. The last contested election in Wansbeck was the January 1910 contest;

General election January 1910 Electorate
Party Candidate Votes % ±
Liberal Charles Fenwick 10,872 70.0
Conservative Charles Percy 4,650 30.0
Majority 6,222 40.0
Turnout 15,522
Liberal hold Swing

Candidates

Liberals

Wansbeck Liberal Association adopted Alderman Robert Mason as their candidate to replace Fenwick.[2] Mason was a 60-year-old shipping agent and shipowner [3] with local government and community connections. He was an Alderman of Northumberland County Council and a Justice of the Peace.[4]

Conservatives

As participants in the wartime coalition with Prime Minister, David Lloyd George, the Conservatives chose not to contest the by-election.[5] Given that they normally polled poorly, this was not much of a sacrifice.

Labour

Despite the Liberal tradition in Wansbeck, and the fact that Fenwick had been unopposed at the last general election, and despite the wartime electoral party truce, the local Labour Party decided to contest the by-election and selected a local 34-year-old coal miner from Ashington, Ebenezer Edwards.[6] Edwards was the nominee of the Northumberland Miners' Association and received the support of the Miners' Federation of Great Britain. He was not actually endorsed by the National Executive of the Labour party, because of the wartime electoral truce. Edwards was an opponent of the war and had chosen to remain working in the mines rather than enlist.

Campaign

Polling day was set for 28 May 1918, 38 days after the death of Fenwick, allowing for an unusually long campaign.

Result

Mason retained the seat for the Liberal party with a majority of 547 votes over Edwards.[7]

Wansbeck by-election, 1918 Electorate
Party Candidate Votes % ±
Liberal Robert Mason 5,814 52.5 n/a
Labour Ebenezer Edwards 5,267 47.5 n/a
Majority 547 5.0 n/a
Liberal hold Swing n/a

The result was a narrow endorsement by the electorate for the government’s handling of the war effort, both in military terms and industrially on the home front. However Labour could claim to be wresting the traditional mining vote away from the Liberals.[8]

Aftermath

Soon after the Wansbeck result Labour’s National Executive Committee formally refused to renew the wartime truce between the political parties.[9] Edwards took on Mason again for Labour at the 1918 general election but with a larger electorate and the national swing behind him, Mason increased his majority to 3,399.[10]

Wansbeck General Election, 1918 Electorate 42,750
Party Candidate Votes % ±
Liberal Robert Mason 14,065 56.9 +4.4
Labour Ebenezer Edwards 10,666 43.1 -4.4
Majority 3,399 13.8 +8.8
Liberal hold Swing +4.4
gollark: Also also, "convention over configuration" being stupid. Yes, the choice of four spaces vs two isn't too significant, but being able to choose means you'll have code you can possibly read a bit more easily, and also public/privateness via *capitalization* just (in my opinion) looks ugly and is annoying if you want to change privacy.
gollark: i.e. generic slices/maps/channels but not actual generics, == being ***maaaaagic*** (admittedly like in most languages, I think), and `make`/`new`.
gollark: Also, as well as that, how it just special-cases stuff instead of implementing reusable solutions.
gollark: e.g. no map function existing or even being possible means that you have *readable* code with a for loop, but it's harder to understand *why that's there* and *what it's for*.
gollark: The main problem I have with it is that it conflates readability (you can see what the code is doing at a low level) with comprehensibility (you know what and why it's doing at a higher one).

References
  1. Norman McCord, Charles Fenwick in Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, OUP 2004-09
  2. The Times, 13 May 1918 p6
  3. The Times, 22 May 1918 p3
  4. Who was Who, OUP 2007
  5. The Times, 30 May 1918 p3
  6. The Times, 22 May 1918 p3
  7. The Times, 30 May 1918 p3
  8. Roy Church and Quentin Outram, Strikes and Solidarity: Coalfield Conflict in Britain 1899-1966; Cambridge University Press, 1998 p69
  9. G. R. Searle, A New England? Peace and War 1886-1918; OUP 2005 p827
  10. The Times House of Commons 1919 ; Politico’s Publishing 2004 p59

See also
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.