1917 South Monmouthshire by-election

The South Monmouthshire by-election, 1917 was a by-election held on Thursday 12 July 1917 for the British House of Commons constituency of the Southern Division of Monmouthshire in South Wales.

Vacancy
Herbert

The by-election was caused by the elevation to the peerage of the sitting Liberal MP Ivor Herbert. Herbert had been MP for South Monmouthshire since 1906 before which he had had a distinguished career in the British Army as an officer in the Grenadier Guards. He was Assistant Adjutant General in South Africa from 1889-1901.[1]

Candidates

The Liberals chose Sir Garrod Thomas, then aged 63 years, a noted surgeon and newspaper proprietor as the Coalition candidate.[2] The Conservative and Labour parties, being partners in the coalition, agreed to abide by the wartime electoral truce and not run candidates. Despite the rumour of the possible intervention of Lieutenant E A Charles, a former Liberal Party agent in the seat,[3] neither was there any challenge from the Asquithian Liberals for whom there was little sympathy in Wales, at least during the earlier stages of Lloyd George’s premiership.[4]

Garrod Thomas was not however to get a free run. Councillor Pardoe Thomas, a member of Newport Town Council, an ex-President of the Newport Chamber of Commerce, a shipowner and shipbroker put himself forward as an Independent Democrat.[5]

The campaign

In the atmosphere of wartime Britain, the by-election was swiftly called and progressed. The nominations were in by 6 July and the date of the election set for just a week later.[6] Cllr Thomas’ position was that Parliament should be composed of businessmen[5] but also campaigned as supporter of temperance and a voice in Parliament not bound by the party whip.[3]

Sir Garrod Thomas appealed to the electorate’s sense of patriotism and the need for solidarity during this period of great national struggle. He made the successful prosecution of the war the principal plank of his campaigning.[3] Garrod Thomas was supported by a letter from the prime minister underlining the wartime nature of the contest and held a number of public meetings. Cllr Thomas, perhaps intimidated by what was clearly a pro-war and patriotic atmosphere, failed to match his opponent in terms of public appearances.[7]

Result

The electorate of South Monmouthshire seems to have been almost totally in tune with the coalition government’s national appeal as they returned Garrod Thomas to Parliament with the largest ever majority achieved in the history of their constituency.[8] Garrod Thomas achieved over 80% of the votes cast, comfortably holding the seat for the Coalition. He did not seem to take to Parliamentary life however as, apart from his maiden speech in the House of Commons on medical necessities during wartime,[9] he does not seem to have made any other contributions of any kind.[10] He failed to seek re-election in 1918 [11] and did not stand for Parliament again, although he stayed active in Liberal politics and public life.[12][13]

Result
Garrod Thomas
South Monmouthshire by-election, 12 July 1917
Party Candidate Votes % ±
Liberal Abraham Garrod Thomas 6,769 90.3
Independent Bertie Pardoe Thomas 727 9.7
Majority 6,042 80.6
Liberal hold Swing
gollark: Or was it thousand? Hmmm.
gollark: +>markov 258639553357676545 2
gollark: I also uploaded several hundred digits of π into it.
gollark: +>markov 258639553357676545 2
gollark: Epicbot has in fact queueueueueued many remindotrons, see?

See also

References
  1. The Times House of Commons 1910; Politico’s Publishing, 2004 p73
  2. Who was Who, OUP online, 2007
  3. The Times, 5 July 1917 p3
  4. K O Morgan, Wales in British Politics: 1868-1922; University of Wales Press, 1963 pp277 ff
  5. The Times, 2 July 1917 p5
  6. The Times, 7 July 1917 p5
  7. The Times, 10 July 1917 p3
  8. The Times, 14 July 1917 p3
  9. The Times, 15 August 1917 p8
  10. http://hansard.millbanksystems.com/people/sir-abraham-thomas
  11. F W S Craig, British Parliamentary Election Results, 1885-1918; Macmillan, 1974 p484
  12. The Times, 26 September 1922 p12
  13. The Times, 31 January 1931 p14
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.