1912 United States presidential election in Utah
The 1912 United States presidential election in Utah was held on November 5, 1912 as part of the 1912 United States presidential election. State voters chose four representatives, or electors to the Electoral College, who voted for president and vice president.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
County Results
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Elections in Utah | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
Ballot measures
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
Background
After being overwhelmingly carried by William Jennings Bryan in its first presidential election from its statehood year of 1896, Utah was to vote Republican by increasing margins in the following three elections, with only Washington County in the Dixie region voting Democratic in 1904 and 1908. By 1909, there were just two Democrats in the state legislature – a number fewer than any other state except Michigan during the middle 1900s and 1920s.
However, during William Howard Taft's presidency, his predecessor Theodore Roosevelt became bitterly opposed to his policies on foreign affairs and the opening of public lands to private concerns.[1] and thus decided to run in Republican primaries. Roosevelt's personal popularity and a powerful speaking tour was sufficient for him to "steamroll" through primaries, but Taft was able to prevail as the Republican nominee through traditional machine and party tactics.[2] Reformers bolted the Republicans and formed the "Progressive" or "Bull Moose" Party with Roosevelt as standard-bearer. Taft – already unpopular with the public and not enjoying being President[3] – decided to run, not in expectation of being re-elected but rather to preserve the GOP apparatus for future conservative action.[4]
Because Taft made no efforts to campaign, he lost easily in most states; however, in Utah, a powerful political machine under long-serving senator and Mormon Apostle Reed Smoot had been developed to counter the anti-Mormon "American Party", which had become the effective opposition to the Republicans in local elections and had elected mayors in Salt Lake City.[1] Combined with a very prosperous rural economy in both the farming and mining sectors, this produced strong loyalty among local Mormon communities to Taft,[5] who was also supported by the local Mormon and non-Mormon press. Those supporting Roosevelt were viewed as "insincere" and as "office-seekers", although latterly such press criticism was toned down.[1]
Taft was thus able to hold the state, with the maintenance of tariffs being critical for the 52 percent of Utahans who were farmers in 1912. Wilson and Roosevelt were most successful in the remote, less Mormon areas east of the Wasatch Mountains, and in some urban areas with more progressive tendencies. Socialist Eugene Debs, in the most successful of his five presidential campaigns, obtained eight percent of the vote but did much better than this in some mining areas.
Utah became one of the only two states to vote for Taft in 1912, the other being Vermont, and with 37.46% of the popular vote made the state his strongest victory in the election.[6]
Results
1912 United States presidential election in Utah[7][lower-alpha 1] | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Party | Candidate | Votes | Percentage | Electoral votes | |
Republican | William Howard Taft | 42,013 | 37.42% | 4 | |
Democratic | Woodrow Wilson | 36,579 | 32.58% | 0 | |
Progressive | Theodore Roosevelt | 24,174 | 21.53% | 0 | |
Socialist | Eugene V. Debs | 8,999 | 8.02% | 0 | |
Socialist Labor | Arthur E. Reimer | 510 | 0.45% | 0 | |
Totals | 112,275 | 100.00% | 4 | ||
Results by county
County | William Howard Taft Republican |
Thomas Woodrow Wilson Democratic |
Theodore Roosevelt Progressive |
Eugene Victor Debs Socialist |
Arthur Elmer Reimer Socialist Labor |
Margin | Total votes cast | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
# | % | # | % | # | % | # | % | # | % | # | % | ||
Beaver | 672 | 39.79% | 602 | 35.64% | 307 | 18.18% | 106 | 6.28% | 2 | 0.12% | 70 | 4.15% | 1,689 |
Box Elder | 1,648 | 40.58% | 1,402 | 34.52% | 936 | 23.05% | 75 | 1.85% | 0 | 0.00% | 246 | 6.06% | 4,061 |
Cache | 2,821 | 37.91% | 3,296 | 44.29% | 1,173 | 15.76% | 132 | 1.77% | 20 | 0.27% | -475 | -6.38% | 7,442 |
Carbon | 783 | 35.67% | 514 | 23.42% | 541 | 24.65% | 350 | 15.95% | 7 | 0.32% | 242[lower-alpha 2] | 11.02% | 2,195 |
Davis | 1,283 | 44.15% | 1,142 | 39.30% | 460 | 15.83% | 20 | 0.69% | 1 | 0.03% | 141 | 4.85% | 2,906 |
Emery | 762 | 37.10% | 760 | 37.00% | 336 | 16.36% | 190 | 9.25% | 6 | 0.29% | 2 | 0.10% | 2,054 |
Garfield | 673 | 62.60% | 249 | 23.16% | 128 | 11.91% | 23 | 2.14% | 2 | 0.19% | 424 | 39.44% | 1,075 |
Grand | 190 | 33.63% | 212 | 37.52% | 118 | 20.88% | 45 | 7.96% | 0 | 0.00% | -22 | -3.89% | 565 |
Iron | 690 | 49.57% | 544 | 39.08% | 63 | 4.53% | 94 | 6.75% | 1 | 0.07% | 146 | 10.49% | 1,392 |
Juab | 1,167 | 35.27% | 985 | 29.77% | 344 | 10.40% | 803 | 24.27% | 10 | 0.30% | 182 | 5.50% | 3,309 |
Kane | 429 | 75.40% | 115 | 20.21% | 20 | 3.51% | 5 | 0.88% | 0 | 0.00% | 314 | 55.19% | 569 |
Millard | 970 | 41.08% | 865 | 36.64% | 397 | 16.81% | 124 | 5.25% | 5 | 0.21% | 105 | 4.44% | 2,361 |
Morgan | 318 | 36.64% | 233 | 26.84% | 273 | 31.45% | 44 | 5.07% | 0 | 0.00% | 45[lower-alpha 2] | 5.19% | 868 |
Piute | 206 | 37.52% | 110 | 20.04% | 146 | 26.59% | 87 | 15.85% | 0 | 0.00% | 60[lower-alpha 2] | 10.93% | 549 |
Rich | 328 | 48.88% | 238 | 35.47% | 100 | 14.90% | 5 | 0.75% | 0 | 0.00% | 90 | 13.41% | 671 |
Salt Lake | 12,691 | 35.10% | 10,468 | 28.95% | 8,899 | 24.61% | 3,792 | 10.49% | 308 | 0.85% | 2,223 | 6.15% | 36,158 |
San Juan | 145 | 37.08% | 146 | 37.34% | 96 | 24.55% | 4 | 1.02% | 0 | 0.00% | -1 | -0.26% | 391 |
Sanpete | 2,489 | 42.00% | 1,984 | 33.48% | 1,272 | 21.46% | 171 | 2.89% | 10 | 0.17% | 505 | 8.52% | 5,926 |
Sevier | 1,451 | 41.90% | 915 | 26.42% | 807 | 23.30% | 286 | 8.26% | 4 | 0.12% | 536 | 15.48% | 3,463 |
Summit | 1,294 | 44.13% | 983 | 33.53% | 425 | 14.50% | 226 | 7.71% | 4 | 0.14% | 311 | 10.60% | 2,932 |
Tooele | 950 | 44.25% | 646 | 30.09% | 261 | 12.16% | 282 | 13.13% | 8 | 0.37% | 304 | 14.16% | 2,147 |
Uintah | 544 | 28.36% | 566 | 29.51% | 641 | 33.42% | 165 | 8.60% | 2 | 0.10% | -75[lower-alpha 3] | -3.91% | 1,918 |
Utah | 4,175 | 35.38% | 4,636 | 39.29% | 2,295 | 19.45% | 666 | 5.64% | 27 | 0.23% | -461 | -3.91% | 11,799 |
Wasatch | 1,191 | 41.41% | 957 | 33.28% | 432 | 15.02% | 288 | 10.01% | 8 | 0.28% | 234 | 8.13% | 2,876 |
Washington | 712 | 43.60% | 842 | 51.56% | 72 | 4.41% | 6 | 0.37% | 1 | 0.06% | -130 | -7.96% | 1,633 |
Wayne | 283 | 52.12% | 183 | 33.70% | 24 | 4.42% | 53 | 9.76% | 0 | 0.00% | 100 | 18.42% | 543 |
Weber | 3,148 | 29.19% | 2,986 | 27.69% | 3,608 | 33.46% | 957 | 8.88% | 84 | 0.78% | -460[lower-alpha 2] | -4.27% | 10,783 |
Totals | 42,013 | 37.42% | 36,579 | 32.58% | 24,174 | 21.53% | 8,999 | 8.02% | 510 | 0.45% | 5,434 | 4.84% | 112,275 |
See also
- United States presidential elections in Utah
- 1912 United States presidential election in Vermont - President William Howard Taft's other sole win in 1912
References
- Wahlquist, C. Austin; ‘The 1912 Presidential Election in Utah’ (A Thesis Presented to the Department of History, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah)
- Kraig, Robert Alexander; 'The 1912 Election and the Rhetorical Foundations of the Liberal State', Rhetoric and Public Affairs, Vol. 3, No. 3 (Fall 2000), pp.. 365-366
- Conlin, Joseph R.; The American Past: A Survey of American History, Volume II: Since 1865, Volume 2, p. 607 ISBN 113394664X
- Craig; 'The 1912 Election and the Rhetorical Foundation of the Liberal State', p. 368
- See Sarasohn, David; 'The Election of 1916: Realigning the Rockies', Western Historical Quarterly, Vol. 11, No. 3 (July 1980), pp. 285-305
- "1912 Presidential Election Statistics". Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections. Retrieved 2018-03-05.
- "Presidential Election of 1912 – Map by Counties (.xlsx file for €15)". Géoelections. Archived from the original on 2018-06-13. Retrieved 2017-06-06.
Notes
- There are some differences between these figures and those given in Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections for both the state as a whole and counties. Notably, Leip's figures have both Emery County and San Juan County as tied.
- In the county where Roosevelt ran second ahead of Wilson, margin given is Taft vote minus Roosevelt vote and percentage margin Taft percentage minus Roosevelt percentage.
- In this county where Taft ran third behind both Wilson and Roosevelt, margin given is Wilson vote minus Roosevelt vote and eprcentage margin Wilson percentage minus Roosevelt percentage.