1896 Chilean presidential election

The Chilean presidential election of 1896 took place through a system of electors, and resulted in the election as President of Federico Errázuriz Echaurren. The election was marred by controversy, and there had to be a confirmation in Congress to satisfy Errázuriz's opponents.

This article is part of a series on the
politics and government of
Chile
Comptroller General
Constitutional Court
 Chile portal

Campaign

For this campaign the political forces organized themselves in two big alliances: Liberal-Conservative Coalition, whose candidate was Federico Errázuriz Echaurren, and the Liberal Alliance, whose candidate was the Senator for Santiago Vicente Reyes Palazuelos.

The campaign itself was furious and fairly even. Reyes was a member of the Doctrinary Liberal party and boasted of being a "free-thinker". On the other hand, Errázuriz was very popular with the conservatives and belonged to a well-known political family of impeccable catholic credentials. The economic issues also came to the fore: Reyes and his followers were in favor of going back to the metallic conversion, while Errázuriz (whose voting base was heavily influenced by the large land-owners and agricultural producers) was in favor of a variable conversion system that could keep the exchange rate favorable for their exports.

After a very close vote, in which the decision Errázuriz won, the Liberal Alliance refused to recognize the result. The decision was moved to the full congress, where finally Errázuriz prevailed by only two votes.

Results

Electoral vote

CandidatesPartyVotes%
Federico Errázuriz EchaurrenCoalition14350.71%
Vicente Reyes PalazuelosLiberal Alliance13949.29%
Total282100%

Source: (in Spanish)

Congress plenary election

CandidatesPartyVotes%
Federico Errázuriz EchaurrenCoalition6250.82%
Vicente Reyes PalazuelosLiberal Alliance6049.18%
Abstentions1
Total122100%

Source: (in Spanish)

gollark: I mean, I mentioned recursive descent parsing on APIONET beforehand, it's approximately in my overly-onelinery and bad-variable-namey style, it's a technically working lisp but weird and broken in a few ways (negative number parsing!), I think some of the comments are vaguely inaccurate or at least not how someone more experienced with lisps would describe things, and the thing ignored Python idioms a fair bit.
gollark: Thus, leave.
gollark: *May* be, I think.
gollark: Anyway, I'm kind of surprised that nobody got that my lisp interpreter was me, although maybe I'm sinthorionizing slightly.
gollark: It should be a program which hijacks your computer and uses it for bee deployment.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.