Poisoning the well
Poisoning the well (also called the smear tactic) is a rhetorical technique and logical fallacy that uses the association of negative emotions to distract a subject from actual evidence in an argument.
Cogito ergo sum Logic and rhetoric |
![]() |
Key articles |
General logic |
Bad logic |
v - t - e |
Poisoning the well is an appeal to hate.
The usual method is to point out the unpleasant nature of the person making the opposing argument, in which case it is a special case of a personal attack or ad hominem. In general, "to poison the well" means to pre-provide any information that could produce a biased opinion of the reasoning, positive or negative.
It can be done subtly or quite blatantly. A subtle way of poisoning the well would be to use particular adjectives in introducing something that would influence people who are about to hear an argument. A good example would be introducing an argument that you disagree with by using the phrase 'Do you believe this rubbish?' The word 'rubbish' poisons the well.
In a more blatant display, someone can make an outright personal attack in an introduction. For example, asking people to remember that a person has been in prison before listening to their statements; the well is now "poisoned" because people are likely to distrust a person making an argument knowing that they're a convict, regardless of the reasoning that they put forward.
See also
- Appeal to emotion
- Antisemitism — in the context of which the accusation of literal well-poisoning goes back millennia
- FUD
- Loaded language
- Shill gambit
External links
- See the Wikipedia article on Poisoning the well.
- Poisoning the Well, Fallacy Files
- Poisoning the Well, About.com
- Poisoning the Well, Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
- Fallacy: Poisoning the Well, Nizkor Project