Diploma mill

Diploma mill is a fully apt term (though seen as pejorative by the cranks operating said mills) for the many bogus "schools," "colleges" and "universities" — run by charlatans and for naïve minds — that confer fictional "degrees" that are not recognized by any other educational institutions or bodies. Large numbers of gullible people get duped into signing up for these — often seriously expensive — programs.

It's a
Crime
Articles on illegal behaviour
v - t - e

Large numbers of charlatans also sign up in order to expand their qualifications. A good number of creation "scientists," most notably Kent Hovind and Carl Baugh, have used diploma mill degrees as fraudulent cudgels to intimidate would-be debate opponents with their "credentials".

Diploma mills damage the reputation of distance education, and indeed qualifications in general, for everyone who isn't a fraud.

The United States is a diploma mill haven: the U.S. does not have a federal law prohibiting diploma mills and does not regulate the use of terms like "university" or the names of degrees. A mail-box company granting a "degree" of Executive MBA from Cheeseburger University would be perfectly legal. While there is a central authority for accreditation, its enforcement powers are lacking.

Contrast with real degrees

Many people receive advertisements for "colleges" offering the opportunity to earn college degrees (usually for personal advancement) with little or no work.[1] These degrees, of course, typically do not represent a substantial learning opportunity and do not give the "students" the knowledge and skills represented by a traditional degree.

Earning a real degree implies a dedication of time, effort, and often great cost at some rigorous study at an institution at which one can flunk for inadequate performance or academic misconduct and receive no recognition of achievement. To be sure, many vocational schools that offer a certificate in a trade never claim that their degrees are comparable to academic degrees, so such schools are not diploma mills.

What gives a real qualification or degree its power is the fact that it is recognised by other institutions or authorities worldwide.[2] Anyone can sign a piece of paper saying that they have a qualification in "being a badass," but unless the "Departments of Badass" at "Badass Universities" all over the world recognise that piece of paper as meaning something, it means precisely nothing. Real educational institutions that are recognised as being able to give degrees and qualifications are accredited; meaning that their curriculum and standards have been examined and approved by an appropriate board of experts and we can be reasonably sure that the person holding the piece of paper can do what that piece of paper says they can.

Contrast with real correspondence schools

There are many accredited institutions that teach degree courses by correspondence. A degree from the Open University is highly respected by UK employers, as it not only shows qualifications in a field but that you are the sort of person who can start a years-long process and successfully finish it while working a day job. The University of New England does similar courses in Australia, Morocco, and the US. For-profit schools like the University of Phoenix, the Lincoln Technical Institute,[3] and DeVry University have a somewhat worse reputation,[4] but are still presently accredited.

Just like a degree where you show up for class, these are real degrees that involve hard work over a number of years. You may be a paying customer, but you have to actually pass your course for real.

Non-accredited courses and fraud

In the United States, the Secretary of Education maintains a list of recognized accreditation agencies whose decisions are accepted as legitimate. The governments and universities of other countries may also recognize them. However, it is easy for a school to operate without accreditation and almost entirely without oversight and regulation, and thus their degrees and qualifications are essentially meaningless. There are also a number of agencies who offer "accreditation" to such schools, but as these are unrecognized by the government and other global bodies, their accreditations are almost worthless.

Unfortunately, this can constitute fraud at several levels. Compare to the case of people buying or selling a "novelty" fake ID — it's not illegal to own a fake ID,[5] it's illegal to use it. Using degrees and qualifications obtained from unaccredited institutions is similar — if someone tries to pass off the PhD they got for $800 from the Internet as something that actually took them three years working in a lab, resulting in a 50,000 word thesis that they defended every single word of, they're in trouble.

Using fraudulent credentials

The schools are offering fraudulent credentials by misrepresenting the value of the "degrees" awarded, but at the same time, many of the students are also fully aware of the negligible value of their credentials. Nevertheless they use them to misrepresent their knowledge and skills to employers, licensing boards, clients, customers, and students. If you see someone being interviewed on TV about the miracles of nutrition or homeopathy or espousing the wonders of the global flood, and they have "Dr" or "PhD" in their title, it's likely that these credentials came from a diploma mill.[6] Often, they'll make a big show of their titles in order to intimidate people into thinking they're right.

For some reason, people with real, i.e., fully accredited, qualifications don't tend to display them too frequently or prominently. Ben Goldacre often doesn't flaunt the "Dr" to which he's entitled, Richard Dawkins is hardly ever listed as "Prof" except in very formal circumstances. Internet entertainer Stuart Ashen is actually a doctor of psychology, but describes himself as a "failed psychologist and internet cunt",[7][8] as opposed to "Dr. Ashen". Actual experts tend to care more about their field itself than about credentialism and will generally at least listen to arguments from those without a qualification, in case they have something interesting and apposite to say. The Dunning-Kruger effect comes into play on this one: those who are ignorant are extremely proud of their phony doctoral credentials, whereas those who are knowledgeable are far more humble about it.

Recognising fraud

While it is extremely easy to get away with essentially faking a credential, it can become a legal issue if that person is in the public eye. The public are deemed to have certain expectations of someone holding the title of "Dr" or "PhD"; someone using these titles without accredited substantiation can be forced to stop doing so. Such a thing happened to Gillian McKeith when the UK Advertising Standards Agency told her to stop using the titles on her books and TV shows following a complaint by several readers and forum members of Ben Goldacre's Bad Science blog.

In the United Kingdom, it is also illegal to run a diploma mill — that is, it is illegal to offer qualifications that purport to be or may be easily confused with a degree from a legitimate British university unless you are on the list of approved awarding bodies maintained by the government. Similar laws exist in Malaysia, India, Germany, and other countries. In some countries, such as South Korea, it is illegal to claim to have a degree if it is from an unaccredited university. New Zealand law makes it illegal to use the terms "degree" or "university" in reference to unaccredited qualifications.

In 2015, The New York Times reported that many of the diploma mills are run from a single shadowy company called Axact in Karachi, Pakistan. The company reportedly earns tens of millions of dollars per year. Axact promptly threatened legal action against The Times following a preliminary posting of the story.[9] In May of 2015 Shoaib Sheikh, the CEO of Axact, and 5 other directors were arrested by Pakistani authorities who also sealed Axact offices.[10][11]

Reasons for being unaccredited

Legitimate

Not all unaccredited schools are diploma mills. There are a few legitimate reasons for a school to be unaccredited. For example, the accreditation process takes time and a new school may not have completed the process. The state of California has an official two-tiered system of education where the Bureau for Private Post-secondary and Vocational Education (BPPVE) supervises and establishes standards for otherwise unaccredited schools.

Some states consider it perfectly legitimate for religious schools to be unaccredited. This makes some sense with seminaries for obscure religions, where there is not yet a large-scale consensus on what is required for ordination, but is also (unfortunately) an easy route for those who want to peddle pseudoscience.

Quasi-legitimate

For some religious organizations, 'fake' credentials that won't be accepted elsewhere are a feature, not a bug. Jehovah's Witnesses, for instance, have a number of vocational and higher education schools with their own internal accreditation that virtually no one outside of their organization would ever hear of. This means that if you are a highly skilled professional in the Witnesses, your credentials are only worth anything if you stay in the Witnesses. Witnesses will refuse to act as references for ex-Witnesses, Witnesses are restricted from forming connections with non-Witnesses, and outside higher education is forbidden (though they love to recruit lawyers). Lack of verifiable credentials is just one more barrier to escape.

Illegitimate

Some diploma mills attempt to shield themselves using conspiracy theories, claiming that the accreditation system is a cudgel designed to force schools to teach "accepted" topics and run like the plague from "controversial" topics lest the degrees they issue be rendered mud by the Evil Liberal Science Conspiracy.[12] Erm... yeah.

Some diploma mills

Famous holders of mill diplomas
gollark: I should make ABR automatically assign people new apioforms every day (if they opt in).
gollark: It's not like your forces could do anything.
gollark: As long as they aren't the French president kind. Cloning them was a bad idea. Why did we do that again?
gollark: The world needs more macrons.
gollark: <@160279332454006795> I need project ideas I can call Macron.

See also

References
  1. Ben Goldacre managed to get a degree for his cat, who had been dead for a few years at the time.
  2. So in case you don't learn anything, at least it gets you qualified for job(s). Not that it would get you hired, just "qualified".
  3. Lincoln Tech: Trade Schools & Vocational Training Programs
  4. Christina H. (20 July 2010). "Why You Should Beware of Schools from Late Night TV Ads". Cracked.com.
  5. With some exceptions, e.g. a fake FBI ID in the US.
  6. There are notable exceptions, e.g. Jason Lisle or Kurt Wise, however.
  7. Neo Double Games review (DS Rip off) by ashens (Mar 28, 2006) YouTube.
  8. What are the origan[sic] of the "failed psychologist and Internet cunt" quote by Boober_Calrissian (2019) Reddit.
  9. Declan Walsh (May 17, 2015). "Fake Diplomas, Real Cash: Pakistani Company Axact Reaps Millions". The New York Times.
  10. Pakistan detains Axact chief Shoaib Sheikh over 'fake degrees' 27 May 2015 BBC News
  11. Ahmad Tauqir (May 27, 2015). "Axact CEO Shoaib Sheikh among six directors arrested; Thousands of fake degrees recovered from Axact office". 92 News HD.
  12. For example, the School of Biblical Apologetics at the Institute for Creation Research was unable to obtain accreditation because of their creationist beliefs, and states on their website: "ICR has prioritized curriculum content and practical ministry needs, rather than adding the expensive costs of academic accreditation politics..." Retrieved on 4 December 2015.
This article is issued from Rationalwiki. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.