J. William Fulbright

James William Fulbright (April 9, 1905 – February 9, 1995) was a United States Senator representing Arkansas from January 1945 until his resignation in December 1974. Fulbright is the longest serving chairman in the history of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. A Southern Democrat and a staunch multilateralist, he supported the creation of the United Nations and was a signatory to the Southern Manifesto. Fulbright also opposed McCarthyism and the House Un-American Activities Committee and later became known for his opposition to American involvement in the Vietnam War. His efforts to establish an international exchange program eventually resulted in the creation of a fellowship program which bears his name, the Fulbright Program.

J. William Fulbright
United States senator from Arkansas
In office January 3, 1945 – December 31, 1974
Preceded by	Hattie Caraway
Succeeded by	Dale Bumpers
Member of the U.S. House of Representatives from Arkansas's 3rd district
In office January 3, 1943 – January 3, 1945
Preceded by	Clyde T. Ellis
Succeeded by	James William Trimble
Chair of the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations
In office January 3, 1959 – December 31, 1974
Preceded by	Theodore F. Green
Succeeded by	John J. Sparkman
Chair of the Senate Committee on Banking and Currency
In office January 3, 1955 – January 3, 1959
Preceded by	Homer Capehart
Succeeded by	A. Willis Robertson
Personal details
Born	James William Fulbright (1905-04-09)April 9, 1905 Sumner, Missouri, U.S.
Died	February 9, 1995(1995-02-09) (aged 89) Washington, D.C., U.S.
Nationality	American
Political party	Democratic
Spouse(s)	Elizabeth Williams (1932–1985) Harriet Mayor
Alma mater	University of Arkansas Pembroke College, Oxford George Washington University

Early life

An earlier portrait of Senator Fulbright.

Fulbright was born in Sumner, Missouri, the son of Roberta Fulbright (née Waugh) and Jay Fulbright.[1] In 1906 the Fulbright family moved to Fayetteville, Arkansas. His mother was a businesswoman, who consolidated her husband's business enterprises and became an influential newspaper publisher, editor, and journalist. Fulbright's parents enrolled him in the University of Arkansas's College of Education's experimental grammar and secondary school.[2]

Fulbright earned a history degree from the University of Arkansas in 1925, where he became a member of the Sigma Chi fraternity. He was elected president of the student body and a star four-year player for the Razorback football team from 1921 to 1924.[3][4]

Fulbright later studied at Oxford University, where he was a Rhodes Scholar at Pembroke College and graduated in 1928. Fulbright's time at Oxford made him into a lifelong Anglophile, and he always had warm memories of Oxford.[5] Fulbright credited his time at Oxford with broadening his horizons as he learned much about the world beyond America and particulay credited one of his professors and friends, R. B. McCallum, with encouraging him to think about the world as an interlinked entity, where developments in one part of the world would always impact on the other parts.[6] McCallum was a great admirer of Woodrow Wilson, a supporter of the League of Nations, and a believer that multinational organizations were the best way to keep the peace.[7] Fulbright remained close to McCallum for the rest of his life and regularly exchanged letters with his mentor until his death in 1973.[8] At Oxford, he played on the rugby and lacrosse teams, and every summer, Fulbright decamped for France ostensibly to improve his French but really just to enjoy life in France.[9] Fulbright's "one world" philosophy encouraged by McCallum made him skeptical of isolationism. He received his law degree from The George Washington University Law School in 1934, was admitted to the bar in Washington, DC, and became an attorney in the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department of Justice.

Fulbright was a lecturer in law at the University of Arkansas from 1936 to 1939. He was appointed president of the school in 1939, making him the youngest university president in the country. He held that post until 1941. The School of Arts and Sciences at the University of Arkansas is named in his honor, and he was elected there into Phi Beta Kappa. He was a member of the Founding Council of the Rothermere American Institute, University of Oxford.[10] In September 1939, Fulbright, as president of the University of Arkansas, issued a public declaration declaring his sympathy with the Allied cause and urged the United States to maintain a pro-Allied neutrality.[11] In the summer of 1940, Fulbright went a step further and declared it was in America's "vital interest" to enter the war on the Allied side and warned that a victory by Nazi Germany would make the world a much darker.[12] The same year, Fulbright joined the Committee to Defend America by Aiding the Allies.[13]

Fulbright's sister, Roberta, married Gilbert C. Swanson, the head of the Swanson frozen-foods conglomerate, and was the maternal grandmother of media figure Tucker Carlson.[14] In June 1941, Fulbright was suddenly fired from the University of Arkansas by the Governor, Homer Martin Adkins.[15] He learned that the reason for his sacking was that Adkins had been offended that a newspaper owned by Fulbright's mother had supported the governor's opponent in the 1940 Democratic primary, and that was the governor's revenge.[16] Upset at the way that the governor's caprice had ended his academic career, Fulbright became interested in politics.[17]

Congressional career

U.S. House of Representatives

Fulbright was elected to the United States House of Representatives as a Democrat in 1942, where he served one term. During this period, he became a member of the House Foreign Affairs Committee. During World War II, there was much debate about the best way to win the peace after the Allies presumably won the war, with many urging the United States to reject isolationism. The House adopted the Fulbright Resolution, which supported international peacekeeping initiatives and encouraged the United States to participate in what became the United Nations in September 1943. That brought Fulbright to national attention.

In 1943, a confidential analysis by Isaiah Berlin of the House and Senate foreign relations committees for the British Foreign Office identified Fulbright as "a distinguished new-comer to the House."[18] It continued:

A young (age 38) wealthy ex-Rhodes scholar, whose major experience so far has been of farming and business. He has already shown versatile competence and ability in business as special attorney in the Anti-Trust Division of the Justice Department and as president of the University of Arkansas. An alert and intelligent member of the committee who recently drew a comparison between the British practice of making grants to her allies and America's World War practice of making loans on fixed financial terms, to show that it was America which had departed from the general international practice in the matter. Fulbright would like to see the United States obtain only non-material benefits from Lend-Lease, namely, political commitments from the countries receiving it, that would enable a system of post-war collective security to be set up. An internationalist.[18]

U.S. Senate

He was elected to the Senate in 1944 and unseated incumbent Hattie Carraway, the first woman ever elected to the U.S. Senate. He served five six-year terms. In his first general election to the Senate, Fulbright defeated the Republican Victor Wade of Batesville by 85.1% to 14.9%.

He promoted the passage of legislation establishing the Fulbright Program in 1946 of educational grants (Fulbright Fellowships and Fulbright Scholarships), sponsored by the Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs of the United States Department of State, governments in other countries, and the private sector. The program was established to increase mutual understanding between the peoples of the United States and other countries through the exchange of persons, knowledge, and skills.[19] It is considered one of the most prestigious award programs and operates in 155 countries. In 1947, he supported the Truman Doctrine and voted for American aid to Greece.[20] Subsequently, he voted for the Marshall Plan and to join NATO.[21] Fulbright was very supportive of the plans for a federation of Western Europe.[22] Fulbright supported the 1950 plan written by Jean Monnet and presented by French Foreign Minister Robert Schuman for a European Coal and Steel Community, which came into existence in 1951 and became the European Economic Community in 1957 and was renamed the European Union in 1993.

Fulbright became a member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee in 1949 and served as chairman from 1959 to 1974. He was the longest-serving chair in that committee's history. In his speeches, Fulbright showed himself to be a Europeanist committed to resisting Soviet expansionism in Europe but was hostile to American commitments in Asia.[23] Despite his reputation as one of the Senate's leading foreign policy experts, he said almost nothing about the Korean War until China entered the war in October 1950. He then warned against escalating the war by attacking China, despite the support from many both outside and inside the government, most notably General Douglas MacArthur.[24] In a speech on 18 January 1951, he dismissed Korea as a matter of peripheral interest that was not worth World War III, and he condemned the plans to attack China as reckless and dangerous.[25] In the same speech, he argued that the Soviet Union, not China, was the real enemy and that Korea was a distraction from Europe, which he considered to be far more important.[26]

When President Harry S. Truman sacked MacArthur for insubordination in April 1951 after MacArthur publicly criticized Truman for deciding to not widen the war and stating that the United States would not directly attack China, Fulbright came to Truman's defense.[27] Against MacArthur's argument that there was "no substitute for victory" and the Korean War could not be won except expanding it by attacking China, Fulbright noted that the U.S. Constitution states quite explicitly that the President is the supreme commander-in-chief and that it was the duty of generals to obey the president, not vice versa.[28] When MacArthur appeared before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, having been invited by Republican senators looking for a chance to embarrass Truman, Fulbright embraced the role of Truman's defender.[29] During his acrimonious exchanges with MacArthur, a basic difference emerged in their philosophies. MacArthur took a position that was strongly anticommunist and argued that communism, by its very existence, was a mortal danger to the United States, which required a policy of seeking to eradicate communism whatever it existed in the world. From that viewpoint, MacArthur argued that Truman's policy of fighting a "limited war" in Korea was dangerous and that the correct policy to follow was to invade China with the aim of overthrowing Mao Zedong and restoring Chiang Kai-shek.[30] In response, Fulbright stated, "I had not myself thought of our enemy as being Communism, I thought of it as primarily being imperialist Russia."[31]

Fulbright believed that the antagonist was the Soviet Union, or Russia, as he preferred to call it, which just happened to be a communist state and so he advocates a foreign policy he advocated that was anti-Soviet, rather than anticommunist.[32] At the same time, Fulbright believed that World War III would be almost certainly be a nuclear war that might very well spell the end of humanity and so he favored the policy of containment of the Soviet Union, instead of the policy of rollback advocated by MacArthur and many right-wing American politicians such as Senator Joseph McCarthy.[33] Furthermore, Fulbright saw the Cold War as more of a political struggle than a military struggle, and in a 1952 speech, he criticized Truman for excessively-high levels of military spending.[34] Fulbright argued that the evidence that the Soviet Union was about to attack the United States was weak. If a war with the Soviets was extremely unlikely to occur, he asked if it was really necessary to devote such a high percentage of the budget to the military.[35]

The intellectual Fulbright had a strong personal dislike of the anti-intellectual McCarthy, whose demagogy Fulbright viewed as a major threat to American democracy and likely to cause World War III.[36] In a speech, Fulbright called McCarthy an incredibly-vulgar and crude man, who, if unchecked, would cause America's institutions to fall victim to "swinish blight of anti-intellectualism".[37] Fulbright was the only senator to vote against an appropriation for the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations in 1954, which was chaired by McCarthy.[38] Like his friend, Adlai Stevenson, Fulbright was regarded as a "Cold War liberal."[39] During the Eisenhower administration, Fulbright tended to support the substance of its policies, but he criticized its style.[40]

In 1956, Fulbright campaigned across the country for the unsuccessful Stevenson-Kefauver ticket. He swamped his Republican challenger that year, Ben C. Henley, the state party chairman and a brother of U.S. District Judge Jesse Smith Henley of Harrison, Arkansas. In his re-election bid in 1956, Fulbright emphasized his opposition to civil rights for blackd and his support for segregation. Hr noted his support for oil companies and that he consistently voted for more farm aid to poultry farmers (one of Arkansas's major exports were chickens).[41]

Fulbright signed the Southern Manifesto in opposition of the U.S. Supreme Court's historic 1954 Brown v. Board of Education decision, which the Manifesto deemed "a clear abuse of judicial power." With other southern Democrats, Fulbright participated in the filibuster of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and opposed the 1965 Voting Rights Act.[42] However, in 1970, during the Nixon administration, Fulbright voted for a five-year extension of the Voting Rights Act.[43] He also led the charge against confirming Nixon's conservative Supreme Court nominees Clement Haynsworth and Harold Carswell.[44]

According to a historian and former Special Assistant to President John Kennedy Arthur Schlesinger, Jr., Fulbright was Kennedy's first choice as Secretary of State, but it was felt that Fulbright was too controversial. Rather the "lowest common denominator", Dean Rusk, was chosen.[45]

Senator Fulbright and the Chicken Tax

US intensive chicken farming led to the 1961–1964 "chicken war" with Europe.

With imports of inexpensive chicken from the U.S., chicken prices fell quickly and sharply across Europe, which radically affected European chicken consumption.[46] U.S. chicken overtook nearly half of the imported European chicken market.[46] Coming on the heels of a "crisis in trade relations between the U.S. and the Common Market,"[46] Europe moved ahead with tariffs. [47]

Senator Fulbright, as chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and Democratic Senator from Arkansas—a chief poultry-producing state—interrupted a NATO debate on nuclear armament to protest trade sanctions on U.S. chicken,[48] going so far as to threaten cutting US troops in NATO.

The U.S. subsequently enacted a 25% tariff on imported light trucks, known as the chicken tax, which remains in effect as of 2010.

Fulbright raised serious objections to Kennedy about the impending Bay of Pigs Invasion in April 1961 and also to President Lyndon B. Johnson on the 1965 Dominican Civil War.[49]

In May 1961, Fulbright denounced the Kennedy administration's system of having diplomats rotate from one position to another as an "idiot policy."[50]

On 30 July 1961, two weeks before the erection of the Berlin Wall, Fulbright said in a television interview, "I don't understand why the East Germans don't just close their border, because I think they have the right to close it."[51][52] Fulbright's statement was reported as a three-column spread on the front page of the East German communist Socialist Unity Party of Germany newspaper Neues Deutschland. The West German reception of his statement was extremely negative. A cable from US embassy in Bonn reported that "rarely has a statement by a prominent American official aroused so much consternation, chagrin and anger." Chancellor Willy Brandt's Press Secretary Egon Bahr was quoted as saying, "We privately called him Fulbricht."[53] (Walter Ulbricht, who was the East German head of state at the time.)

McGeorge Bundy sent the press coverage of Fulbright's interview to Kennedy with a comment about "the helpful impact of Senator Fulbright's remarks." Kennedy subsequently refused to distance himself from Fulbright's observation, which suggests that he asked Fulbright to make the statement as a way of signaling to Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev that the building of a wall would be viewed by the U.S. as an acceptable way of defusing the Berlin Crisis.[54]

The President (John Kennedy) is hobbled in his task of leading the American people to consensus and concerted action by the restrictions of power imposed on him by a constitutional system designed for an 18th century agrarian society far removed from the centers of world power. He alone, among elected officials can rise above parochialism and private pressures. He alone, in his role as teacher and moral leader, can hope to overcome the excesses and inadequacies of a public opinion that is all too often ignorant of the needs, the dangers, and the opportunities in our foreign relations. It is imperative that we break out of the intellectual confines of cherished and traditional beliefs and open our minds to the possibility that Basic Changes in Our System may be essential to meet the requirements of the 20th century.

— J William Fulbright, Stanford University, 1961

Fulbright met with Kennedy during the latter's visit to Fort Smith, Arkansas, in October 1961.[55]

After the Cuban Missile Crisis, which almost caused a nuclear war between the United States and the Soviet Union, Fulbright moved away from the "containment" policies that he had advocated in the 1950s.[56] Fulbright argued that a nuclear war would be the end of humanity and though he did not like the Soviet Union, it was far better to pursue a policy of détente and of reducing tensions than to fight a war that nobody would win.[57] Fulbright was regularly involved in debates with Senator Barry Goldwater, who had emerged as the leader of the more right-wing Republicans.[58] In response to Goldwater's call for a "total victory" over communism, Fulbright challenged him by asking if he really believed that a "total victory" was worth a nuclear war that would kill hundreds of millions of people.[59] When Goldwater replied it was possible for the U.S. to win a nuclear war, Fulbright challenged him if he really wanted the U.S. to occupy what would be left of the Soviet Union and China after a nuclear war, and Goldwater did not reply to the remark.[60]

During testimony to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee in 1963, Fulbright claimed that $5 million tax-deductible from philanthropic Americans was sent to Israel and then recycled back to the U.S. for distribution to organizations seeking to influence public opinion in favor of Israel.[61] That statement led to friction with organized pro-Israeli groups in the U.S.

Frustration with the ability of the Zionist Organization of America and other Zionist lobby groups to influence senators with their campaign contributions led Fulbright to retort on Face the Nation on April 15, 1973, "Israel controls the U.S. Senate."[62] "The Senate is subservient to Israel, in my opinion much too much. We should be more concerned about the United States interest rather than doing the bidding of Israel. This is a most unusual development."[63]

Perhaps his most notable case of dissent was his public condemnation of foreign and domestic policies, in particular, his concern that right-wing radicalism, as espoused by the John Birch Society and the wealthy oilman H. L. Hunt, had infected the U.S. military.[64] He was, in turn, denounced by Republican Senators J. Strom Thurmond and Barry Goldwater. Goldwater and Texas Senator John Tower announced that they were going to Arkansas to campaign against Fulbright,[65] but Arkansas voters re-elected Fulbright.

One of Fulbright's local staffers in Arkansas was James McDougal. While he worked for Fulbright, McDougal met the future Arkansas Governor and US President Bill Clinton and the two of them, along with their wives, began investing in various development properties, including the parcel of land along the White River in the Ozarks that would later be the subject of an independent counsel investigation during Clinton's first term in office.[66]

Despite serving in the Senate for 30 years, Fulbright remained Arkansas' junior senator throughout his tenure, serving alongside the senior senator, John L. McClellan. He along with Tom Harkin of Iowa who served alongside Chuck Grassley, are both the longest-serving senators in history who never became their state's senior senator.

In terms of legislative power, Fulbright's career was somewhat stunted, with its influence never matching its luminescence. For all his seniority and powerful committee posts, he was not considered part of the Senate's inner circle of friends and power brokers. He seemed to prefer it that way: the man who Harry S. Truman had called an "overeducated SOB" was, in the words of Clayton Fritchey, "an individualist and a thinker," whose "intellectualism alone alienates him from the Club" of the Senate.[67]

McCarthy confrontation

The Republicans gained a majority in the Senate after the 1952 elections, which allowed Wisconsin Senator Joseph McCarthy to become chairman of the Senate Committee on Government Operations.[68] A month into McCarthy's tenure, Fulbright received a letter from former Connecticut Senator William Benton with whom he had developed a friendship during the Jessup hearings. Benton had lost his re-election bid the previous November after being targeted by anticommunist supporters of McCarthy. Benton urged Fulbright to assume a leading role against McCarthy and pledged he would receive support for doing so.[69] Fulbright, though sympathetic toward Benton, wished to follow the guideline set by Senate Minority Leader Lyndon B. Johnson, who indicated his unwillingness to have Democrats become involved in condemning McCarthy. Fulbright was alarmed by McCarthy's attack on the Voice of America (VOA) and the United States Information Agency, the latter agency then supervising educational exchange programs.[69] That was followed by the summer 1953 withdrawal by the State Department of a fellowship for a male student, whose wife was suspected of communist affiliation and the scheduling by the Senate Appropriations Committee of a hearing on the annual appropriations of the Information Agency, the inquiry appearing to put the Fulbright Program at stake.[69]

The confrontation between Fulbright and McCarthy took place in the Supreme Court Chamber of Capitol Hill. McCarthy questioned Fulbright over his knowledge of whether the board clearing students for funding from the Information Agency received a security check, and on a policy that bars communists and their sympathizers from receiving appointments as lecturers and professors. McCarthy pressed Fulbright to answer the second question while Fulbright recounted members of the board.[69] McCarthy explained that he believed that Fulbright had some level of influence on the Fulbright Program since it bore his name, but Fulbright disagreed and stated that his exerting such influence would destroy the board.[69] After McCarthy insisted to be authorized to release statements of some Fulbright Program students both praising the communist form of government and condemning American values, Fulbright countered that he was willing to submit thousands of names of students who had praised the US and its way of government in their statements. The encounter was the last time McCarthy made a public assault on the program. The leading historian and original Fulbright Program board member Walter Johnson credited Fulbright with preventing the program from being ended by McCarthyism.[69]

Early segregation activities

In 1950, Fulbright cosponsored an amendment, which, if enacted, would allow soldiers to choose whether or not to serve in a racially-integrated unit.[70] Two years later, Fulbright assisted with blocking an Alaska statehood bill entirely because of his view that legislators from the state would support civil rights bills.[70]

To express southern disagreement with the 1954 U.S. Supreme Court decision in Brown v. Board of Education, which ruled that public school segregation was unconstitutional,[71] South Carolina Senator Strom Thurmond wrote the initial draft of the Southern Manifesto.[72] Fulbright signed a later version of the document, along with 18 other senators.[73] In a letter to a constituent in Little Rock, Fulbright stated that the South had no way of expressing how wrong its representatives believed the Supreme Court was except to attempt to replicate the secession of the South from the Union before the American Civil War. Fulbright telephoned Alabama Senators John Sparkman and Lister Hill as well as Price Daniel, all of whom agreed to support a moderate version of the Southern Manifesto. Fulbright told his despondent aides that the new version would be the only way that Hill and he would retain influence within the Dixie delegation. The draft put forth by the four senators took a moderate approach to the Supreme Court decision by pledging the southern senators would reverse the ruling through legal moves and recognizing themselves as the minority in the Senate. Hardliners against civil rights were dismayed by the modifications to the document made by Fulbright because they viewed it as casting them as supplicants, rather than victims. According to the biographer Randall Bennett Woods, Fulbright believed that the South was not yet ready for integration but that education would eventually eradicate prejudice and allow blacks to "take their rightful place in American society."[70] Fulbright's signing of the Southern Manifesto did not prevent him from being able to survive politically amid the growing numbers of black voters in Arkansas. He delivered an address to the Arkansas Democratic Voters' Association, where he insisted his intervention had led to the moderate version of the Southern Manifesto, and his claims were generally accepted by Arkansan black leadership.[70]

Vietnam War and US. foreign policy

In early 1961, Fulbright advised Kennedy not to back the Bay of Pigs invasion: "The Castro regime is a thorn in the flesh. But it is not a dagger at the heart."[74] In August 1961, as the Kennedy administration held firm in its commitment to a five-year foreign aid program, Fulbright and Pennsylvania U.S. Representative Thomas E. Morgan accompanied Democratic congressional leadership to their weekly White House breakfast session with Kennedy.[75] In delivering opening statements on August 4, Fulbright spoke of the program introducing a new concept of foreign aid in the event of its passage.[76]

On March 25, 1964, Fulbright delivered an address calling on the U.S. to adapt itself to a world that was both changing and complex, the address being said by Fulbright to have been meant to explore self-evident truths in the national vocabulary of the U.S. regarding the Soviet Union, Cuba, China, Panama, and Latin America.[77]

In May 1964, Fulbright predicated that time would see a cessation in the misunderstanding within the relationship between France and the United States and that French President Charles de Gaulle was deeply admired for his achievements despite confusion that might arise in others from his rhetoric.[78]

On 4 August 1964, Defense Secretary Robert McNamara accused North Vietnam of attacking an American destroyer, the USS Maddox in international waters in what came to be known as the Gulf of Tonkin incident.[79] The same day, President Johnson went on national television to denounce North Vietnam for "aggression" and to announce that he had ordered retaliatory air raids on North Vietnam.[80] In the same speech, Johnson asked Congress to a resolution to prove to North Vietnam and its ally China that United States was united "in support of freedom and in defense of peace in southeast Asia."[81] On 5 August 1964, Fulbright arrived at the White House to meet Johnson, where Johnson asked his old friend to use all his influence to get the resolution passed by the widest possible margin.[82] Fulbright was one of the senators whom Johnson was most anxious and keen to have support the resolution.[83] Fulbright was too much an individualist and intellectual to belong to the "Club" of the Senate, but he was widely respected as a thinker on foreign policy and was known to be a defender of Congress's prerogatives. From Johnson's viewpoint, having him support the resolution would bring many of the waverers around to voting for the resolution, as indeed proved to be the case.[84]

Johnson insisted quite vehemently to Fulbright that the alleged attack on the Maddox had taken place, and it was only later that Fulbright became skeptical about whether the alleged attack had really taken place.[85] Furthermore, Johnson insisted that the resolution, which was a "functional equivalent to a declaration of war," was not intended to be used for going to war in Vietnam.[86] In the 1964 presidential election, the Republicans had nominated Goldwater as their candidate, who ran on a platform accusing Johnson of being "soft on communism" and by contrast promised a "total victory" over communism. Johnson argued to Fulbright that the resolution was an election-year stunt that would prove to the voters that he was really "tough on communism" and so dent the appeal of Goldwater by denying him of his main avenue of attack.[87] Besides for the internal political reason that Johnson gave for the resolution, he also gave a foreign policy reason that argued that such a resolution would intimidate North Vietnam into ceasing to try to overthrow the government of South Vietnam and so Congress passage of the resolution would make American involvement in Vietnam less likely, rather than more likely.[88] Fulbright's longstanding friendship with Johnson made it difficult for him to go against him, who cunningly exploited Fulbright's vulnerability, his desire to have greater influence over foreign policy.[89] Johnson gave Fulbright the impression that he would be one of his unofficial advisers on foreign policy and that he was very interested in turning his ideas into policies if he voted for the resolution, which was a test of their friendship.[90] Johnson also hinted that he was thinking about sacking Rusk if he won the 1964 election and would consider nominating Fulbright to be the next Secretary of State.[91] Finally, for Fulbright in 1964, it was inconceivable that Johnson would lie to him, and Fulbright believed the resolution "was not going to be used for anything other than the Tonkin Gulf incident itself," as Johnson had told him.[92]

On 6 August 1964, Fulbright gave a speech on the Senate floor that called for the resolution to be passed as he accused North Vietnam of "aggression" and praised Johnson for his "great restraint... in response to the provocation of a small power."[93] He also declared his support for the Johnson administration's "noble" Vietnam policy, which he called a policy of seeking "to establish viable, independent states in Indochina and elsewhere which will be free and secure from the combination of Communist China and Communist North Vietnam."[94] Fulbright concluded that the policy could be accomplished via diplomatic means and, echoing Johnson's argument, argued that it was necessary to pass the resolution as a way to intimidate North Vietnam, which would presumably change its policies towards South Vietnam once Congress passed the resolution.[95] Several senators, such as Allen Elleder, Jacob Javits, John Sherman Cooper, Daniel Brewster, George McGovern, and Gaylord Nelson, were very reluctant to vote for a resolution that would be a blank check for a war in Southeast Asia, and in a meeting, Fulbright sought to assure them by saying that passing such a resolution would make fighting a war less likely and claimed that the whole purpose of the resolution was intimidation.[96] Nelson wanted to insert an amendment to bar the president from sending troops to fight in Vietnam unless he obtained the permission of Congress first and said that he did not like the open-ended nature of this resolution.[97] Fulbright persuaded him not to do so by arguing the resolution was "harmless" and saying that the real purpose of the resolution was "to pull the rug out from under Goldwater." He went on to ask Nelson whether he preferred Johnson or Goldwater to win the election.[98] Fulbright dismissed Nelson's fears of giving Johnson a blank check by saying that he had Johnson's word that "the last thing we want to do is become involved in a land war in Asia."[99]

On August 7, 1964, a unanimous House of Representatives and all but two members of the Senate voted to approve the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution, which led to a dramatic escalation of the Vietnam War. Fulbright, who sponsored the resolution, would later write:

Many Senators who accepted the Gulf of Tonkin resolution without question might well not have done so had they foreseen that it would subsequently be interpreted as a sweeping Congressional endorsement for the conduct of a large-scale war in Asia.[100]

Fulbright (left) with Senator Wayne Morse during a hearing of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on the Vietnam War in 1966

By his own admission, Fulbright knew almost nothing about Vietnam until he met in 1965 Bernard B. Fall, a French journalist who often wrote about Vietnam.[101] Speaking to Fall radically changed Fulbright's thinking about Vietnam, as Fall asserted that it simply not true that Ho Chi Minh was a Sino-Soviet "puppet" who wanted to overthrow the government of South Vietnam because his masters in Moscow and Beijing had presumably told him to do so.[102] Fall's influence served as the catalyst for the change in Fulbright's thinking, as Fall introduced to the writings of Philippe Devillers and Jean Lacouture.[103] Fulbright made it his mission to learn as possible about Vietnam and indeed he had learned so much that at a meeting with the Secretary of State Dean Rusk, Fulbright was able to correct several mistakes made by the former about Vietnamese history, much to Rusk's discomfort.[104] In January 1966, Fulbright invited Johnson to appear before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee to explain why America was fighting in Vietnam, an offer that Johnson refused.[105]

As chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee, Fulbright held several series of hearings on the Vietnam War. Many of the earlier hearings, in 1966, were televised to the nation in their entirety, a rarity until C-SPAN. Starting on 4 February 1966, Fulbright held the first hearings about the Vietnam War, where George F. Kennan and General James M. Gavin appeared as expert witnesses.[106] The hearings had prompted by Johnson's request for additional $400 million to pay for the war, which gave Fulbright an excuse to hold them.[107] Kennan testified that the Vietnam War was a grotesque distortion of the containment policy that he had outlined in 1946 and 1947. The World War II hero Gavin testified that it was his opinion as a soldier that the war could not be won as it being fought.[108] On 4 February 1966, in an attempt to upstage the hearings Fulbright was holding in Washington, Johnson called an impromptu summit in Honolulu in the hope that the media would play more attention to the summit that he had called than to the hearings Fulbright was holding.[109] Johnson's two rebuttal witnesses at the hearings were General Maxwell Taylor and Secretary of State Dean Rusk.[110] Fulbright's reputation as a well-informed expert on foreign policy and his folksy Southern drawl, which made him sound "authentic" to ordinary Americans, made a formidable opponent for Johnson.[111] During his exchanges with Taylor, Fulbright equated the firebombing of Japanese cities in World War II with the Operation Rolling Thunder bombings of North Vietnam and the use of napalm in South Vietnam, much to Taylor's discomfort.[112] Fulbright condemned the bombing of North Vietnam and asked Taylor to think of the "millions of little children, sweet little children, innocent pure babies who love their mothers, and mothers who love their children, just lke you love your son, thousands of little children, who never did us any harm, being slowly burned to death."[113] A visibly-uncomfortable Taylor stated that the United States was not targeting civilians in either Vietnam.[114] Johnson called the hearings "a very, very disastrous break."[115]

As Fulbright had once been Johnson's friend, his criticism of the war was seen as a personal betrayal and lef Johnson to lash out in especially vitriolic terms against him.[116] Johnson took the view that at least Senator Wayne Morse had always been opposed to the Vietnam War, but Fulbright had promised him to support his Vietnam policy in 1964, causing him to see Fulbright as a "Judas" figure.[117] Johnson liked to mock Fulbright as "Senator Halfbright" and sneered it was astonishing that someone as "stupid" as Fulbright had been awarded a degree at Oxford.[118]

In April 1966, Fulbright delivered a speech at Johns Hopkins University, where Johnson had delivered a forthright defense of the war just a year earlier. Fulbright was sharply critical of the war.[119] In his speech delivered in his usual folksy Southern drawl, Fulbright stated that the United States was "in danger of losing its perspective on what exactly is within the realm of its power and what is beyond it."[120] Warning of what he called "the arrogance of power," Fulbright declared "we are not living up to our capacity and promise as a civilized power for the world." He called the war a betrayal of American values.[121] Johnson was furious with the speech, which he saw a personal attack from a man who had once been his friend and believed the remark about the "arrogance of power" to be about him.[122] Johnson lashed out in a speech in which he called Fulbright and other critics of the war "nervous Nellies," who knew the war in Vietnam could and would be won but were just too cowardly to fight on to the final victory.[123]

In 1966, Fulbright published The Arrogance of Power, which attacked the justification of the Vietnam War, Congress's failure to set limits on it, and the impulses that had given rise to it. Fulbright's scathing critique undermined the elite consensus that the military intervention in Indochina was necessitated by Cold War geopolitics.

In his book, Fulbright offered an analysis of American foreign policy:

Throughout our history two strands have coexisted uneasily; a dominant strand of democratic humanism and a lesser but durable strand of intolerant Puritanism. There has been a tendency through the years for reason and moderation to prevail as long as things are going tolerably well or as long as our problems seem clear and finite and manageable. But... when some event or leader of opinion has aroused the people to a state of high emotion, our puritan spirit has tended to break through, leading us to look at the world through the distorting prism of a harsh and angry moralism.

Fulbright also related his opposition to any American tendencies to intervene in the affairs of other nations:

Power tends to confuse itself with virtue and a great nation is particularly susceptible to the idea that its power is a sign of God's favor, conferring upon it a special responsibility for other nations—to make them richer and happier and wiser, to remake them, that is, in its own shining image. Power confuses itself with virtue and tends also to take itself for omnipotence. Once imbued with the idea of a mission, a great nation easily assumes that it has the means as well as the duty to do God's work.

He was also a strong believer in international law:

Law is the essential foundation of stability and order both within societies and in international relations. As a conservative power, the United States has a vital interest in upholding and expanding the reign of law in international relations. Insofar as international law is observed, it provides us with stability and order and with a means of predicting the behavior of those with whom we have reciprocal legal obligations. When we violate the law ourselves, whatever short-term advantage may be gained, we are obviously encouraging others to violate the law; we thus encourage disorder and instability and thereby do incalculable damage to our own long-term interests.

By 1967, the Senate was divided into three blocs. There was an antiwar "dove" bloc, led by Fulbright; a pro-war "hawk" bloc, led by the conservative Southern Democrat Senator John C. Stennis, and a third bloc consisting of waverers, who tended to shift their positions about war in tune with public opinion and moved variously closer to doves and hawks as they followed the public opinion polls.[124] In contrast to his hostile attitudes towards Fulbright, Johnson was afraid of being labeled as soft on communism and so tended to try to appease Stennis and the hawks, who kept pressuring for more-and-more aggressive measures in Vietnam.[125] In criticizing the war, Fulbright was careful to draw a distinction between condemning the war and condemning the ordinary soldiers fighting the war. After General William Westmoreland gave a speech in 1967 before a joint session of Congress, Fulbright stated, "From the military standpoint, it was fine. The point is the policy that put our boys there."[126] On 25 July 1967, Fulbright was invited with all of the other chairmen of the Senate committees to the White House to hear Johnson say that the war was being won.[127] Fulbright told Johnson: "Mr. President, what you really need to do is stop the war. That will solve all your problems. Vietnam is ruining our domestic and our foreign policy. I will not support it anymore."[128] To prove that he was serious, Fulbright threatened to block a foreign aid bill before his committee and said that it was the only way to make Johnson pay attention to his concerns.[129] Johnson accused Fulbright of wanting to ruin America's reputation around the world.[130] Using his favorite tactic of seeking to divide his opponents, Johnson told the other senators: "I understand all of you feel you under the gun when you are down here, at least according to Bill Fulbright."[131] Fulbright replied: "Well, my position is that Vietnam is central to the whole problem. We need a new look. The effects of Vietnam are hurting the budget and foreign relations generally."[132] Johnson exploded in fury: "Bill, everybody doesn't have a blind spot like you do. You say, 'Don't bomb North Vietnam', on just about everything. I don't have simple solution you have.... I am not going to tell our men in the field to put their right hands behind their backs and fight only with their lefts. If you want me to get out of Vietnam, then you have the prerogative of taking the resolution which we are out there now. You can repeal it tomorrow. You can tell the troops to come home. You can tell General Westmoreland that he doesn't know what is doing."[133] As Johnson's face was red, Senate Majority Leader Mike Mansfield decided to calm matters down by changing the subject.[134]

In early 1968, Fulbright was deeply depressed as he stated: "The President, unfortunately, seems to have closed his mind to the consideration of any alternative, and his Rasputin-W.W. Rostow-seems able to isolate him from other views, and the Secretary [of State] happens to agree. I regret that I am unable to break this crust of immunity."[135] However, after Robert McNamara was fired as Defense Secretary, Fulbright saw a "ray of light" as the man who replaced McNamara, Clark Clifford, was a longstanding "close personal friend."[136] Johnson had appointed Clifford Defense Secretary because he was a hawk, but Fulbright sought to change his mind about Vietnam.[137] Fulbright invited Clifford to a secret meeting in which he introduced the newly appointed Defense Secretary to two World War II heroes, General James M. Gavin and General Matthew Ridgway.[138] Both Gavin and Ridgway were emphatic that the United States could not win the war in Vietnam, and their opposition to the war helped to change Clifford's mind.[139] Despite his success with Clifford, Fulbright was close to despair as he wrote in a letter to Erich Frommn that this "literally a miasma of madness in the city, enveloping everyone in the administration and most of those in Congress. I am at a loss of words to describe the idiocy of what we are doing."[140]

Seeing that the Johnson administration was reeling in the wake of the Tet Offensive, Fulbright in February 1968 called for hearings by the Senate Foreign Relations Committee into the Gulf of Tonkin incident, as Fulbright noted that there were several aspects of the claim that North Vietnamese torpedo boats had attacked American destroyers in international waters that seemed dubious and questionable.[141] McNamara was subpoenaed, and the televised hearings led to "fireworks" as Fulbright repeatedly asked difficult answers about De Soto raids on North Vietnam and Operation 34A.[142] On 11 March 1968, Secretary of State Dean Rusk appeared before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.[143] Fulbright made his sympathies clear by wearing a tie decorated with doves carrying olive branches.[144] Through Rusk was scheduled to testify about the Gulf of Tonkin incident, the previous day in The New York Times had appeared a leaked story that Westmoreland had requested for Johnson to send 206,000 more troops to Vietnam.[145] During Rusk's two days of testimony, the main issue turned out to be the troop request with Fulbright insisting for Johnson yo seek congressional approval first.[146] In response to Fulbright's questions, Rusk stated that if more troops were sent to Vietnam, the president would consult "appropriate members of Congress."[147] Most notably, several senators who had voted with Stennis and the other hawks now aligned themselves with Fulbright, which indicated that Congress was turning against the war.[148]

In late October 1968, after Johnson announced a halt in bombing in North Vietnam in accordance with peace talks,[149] Fulbright stated that his hopefulness that the announcement would lead to a general ceasefire.[150]

In March 1969, Secretary of State William P. Rogers testified at a Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing on the Nixon administration's foreign policy, Fulbright telling Rogers that the appearance was both useful and promising.[151] In April 1969, Fublright received a letter from a former soldier who served in Vietnam, Ron Ridenhour, containing the results of Ridenhour's investigation into the My Lai massacre, said that he had heard so many stories from other soldiers about a massacre that had happened in March 1968 at a village that the soldiers knew only as "Pinkville."[152] In May 1969, Fulbright delivered a speech at National War College that advocated for a U.S. withdraw from Vietnam in spite of possibly having to settle for something less than a standoff against the communists. He spoke for overhauling foreign policy to concentrate it less on the power of the executive branch.[153] On 15 October 1969, Fulbright spoke at one of the rallies held by the Moratorium to End the War in Vietnam.[154] As all of the rallies held on 15 October were peaceful, Fulbright taunted a reporter who was hoping there would be violence: "I am sorry that you thought the demonstrations of 15 October were 'subversive and hysterical'. They seemed to me to be extremely well-behaved and a very serious demonstration of disapproval of the tragic mistake... in Vietnam."[155] In response to the Moratorium protests, President Nixon went on national television on 3 November 1969 to give his speech asking for the support of the "silent majority" towards his Vietnam policy.[156] On 4 November, Fulbright told a journalist that Nixon had "fully and truthfully taken upon himself Johnson's war."[157] Fulbright called for the second round of the Moratorium protests scheduled for 15 November to be canceled for fear that Nixon was planning to start a riot to discredit the antiwar movement.[158] The protests in the 15th went ahead and were peaceful, but the success of Nixon's "silent majority speech" left Fulbright depressed as he wrote at the time that "it is very distressing, indeed, to think that we eliminated LBJ only to end up with this, which is almost more than the human spirit can endure."[159] However, on 12 November 1969 appeared in The New York Times an article by Seymour Hersh revealing the My Lai Massacre on 16 March 1968.[160] Fulbright was deeply shocked when he learned about what happened at May Lai: "it is a matter of the greatest importance and emphasizes in the most dramatic manner the brutalization of our society."[161]

In 1970, Daniel Ellsberg offered Fulbright his copy of the Pentagon Papers to ask him to insert them into the Congressional Record, which would allow the media to cite them without fear of prosecution for publishing secret documents.[162] Fulbright declined and instead sent a letter to Defense Secretary Melvin Laird asking him to declassify the Pentagon Papers.[163] In 1971, Fulbright held another set of hearing about the Vietnam. The Fulbright Hearing included the notable testimony of Vietnam veteran and future Senator and Secretary of State John Kerry.

1970s

In February 1970, South Dakota Senator George McGovern accused the former Viet Cong detainee James N. Rowe of being dispatched by the Pentagon to criticize him, Fulbright, and Senate Majority Leader Mike Mansfield, who had indicated their opposition to continued American involvement in Vietnam.[164] On March 11, Fulbright introduced a resolution regarding the commitment of American troops or air forces for combat in Laos by Nixon, who, under the guidelines of the resolution, would not be able to combat forces in or over Laos without congressional affirmative action. In his address introducing the resolution, Fulbright said, "The Senate must not remain silent now while the President uses the armed forces of the United States to, fight an undeclared and undisclosed war in Laos."[165] The following month, the Senate Foreign Relations Committee voted to repeal the 1964 Gulf of Tonkin Resolution. Fulbright admitted the repeal would now have little to no legal impact and described the action as one intended to be part of an ongoing process of clearing out legislation that was now out of date.[166] On August 22, Fulbright stated his support for a bilateral treaty to grant the United States authority to use military force to guarantee both "territory and independence of Israel within the borders of 1967" and that the proposed measure would obligate Israel not to violate those frontiers, which had been created prior to the Six-Day War.[167] In October, Defense Department officials disclosed publication of testimony before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee showing the United States entered a 1960 agreement supporting a 40,000-man Ethiopian army in addition to beginning Ethiopia's opposition to threats against its territorial integrity. Fulbright responded to the disclosure by saying the wording seemed to go "much further than saying a good word in the United Nations" and suggested the U.S. had agreed to aid the Ethiopian Emperor if the possibility of facing an internal insurrection arose.[168]

On February 28, 1971, Fulbright announced his intent to submit a bill compelling the Secretary of State and other Nixon administration officials to appear before Congress to explain their position on Vietnam. Fulbright said that the measure would be warranted by the refusal of William P. Rogers, Henry A. Kissinger, and other officials to appear before Congress. He reasoned that that they would not appear because "they know there are a number of people who don't agree with them, and it makes it embarrassing and they don't like it; they especially don't like to have it in front of television."[169] On October 31, Fulbright pledged his support to less-controversial aspects of foreign aid such as refugee relief and military aid to Israel and predicted the Nixon administration would be met with defeat or contention in the event of proposed aid for Cambodia, Vietnam, Laos, and Greece. Fulbright said a meeting between the Foreign Relations Committee the following day would see "that some kind of interim program will probably be devised" and expressed his disdain for "the continuing resolution approach."[170]

In March 1972, Fulbright sent a letter to Acting Attorney General Richard G. Kleindienst to request to the Justice Department not to use the Information Agency documentary Czechoslovakia 1968 for use in New York. He stated that it appeared to violate the 1948 law that created the agency, which he stated "was created for the purpose of the dissemination abroad of information about the United States, its people, and policies."[171] In April, the Senate Foreign Relations Committee announced the end of an inquiry into a drinking incident involving United States Ambassador to France Arthur K. Watson. Fulbright said that he did not expect the committee to pursue the matter and published a letter on the subject from Rogers.[172] On August 3, the Senate approved the treaty limiting defense missiles for the United States and the Soviet Union.[173] The following day, Fulbright held a closed meeting with members of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee to form a strategy against the Nixon administration's attempts to attach additional reservations to the intercontinental missile agreement signed by Nixon the previous May.[174]

On July 11, 1973, during a speech at an American Bankers Association meeting, Fulbright criticized Capitol Hill attempts to block trade concessions to the Soviet Union until it allowed the emigration of Jews and other groups: "Learning to live together in peace is the most important issue for the Soviet Union and the United States, too important to be compromised by meddling — even idealistic meddling — in each other's affairs."[175] In August, Nixon announced his choice of Kissinger to replace the retiring Rogers as Secretary of State.[176] Ahead of the hearings, Kissinger was expected to have the advantage of cultivating relationships with members of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Vermont Senator George Aiken noting that Kissinger "met with us at Senator Fulbright's house for breakfast at least twice a year."[177] In November 1973, Fulbright endorsed the Middle East policy of Secretary of State Kissinger in a Senate speech, arguing for the central requirement of a peace requirement prior to "another military truce hardens into another untenable and illusory status quo" and added that both sides would need to make concessions. Fulbright stated that Washington, Moscow, and the United Nations were responsible for spearheading the peace settlement.[178]

In May 1974, Fulbright disclosed the existence of a weapon stockpile for South Korea, South Vietnam, and Thailand, and the Defense Department released a statement three days later that confirmed Fulbright's admission.[179] Throughout 1974, Kissinger was investigated for his possible role in initiating wiretaps of 13 government officials and four newsmen from 1969 to 1971.[180][181] In July, Fulbright stated that nothing significant had emerged from the Kissinger testimony during his nomination for Secretary of State the previous fall, and Fulbright indicated his belief that opponents of détente with the Soviet Union were hoping to unseat Kissinger from the investigation into his role in the wiretapping.[182]

Final election and later life

Fulbright left the Senate in 1974, after being defeated in the Democratic primary by then-Governor Dale Bumpers. His well-documented stances on Vietnam, the Middle East, and Watergate were out of step with the Arkansan majority, and his campaign powers had atrophied. Bumpers won by a landslide.[183] Speaking to congressmen in the weeks after Filbright's primary loss, Nixon mocked the defeat.[184]

At the time that he left the Senate, Fulbright had spent his entire 30 years in the Senate as the junior senator from Arkansas, behind John Little McClellan who entered the Senate two years before him. After his retirement, Fulbright practiced international law at the Washington, D.C. office of the law firm Hogan & Hartson from 1975–1993.[185]

On May 5, 1993, President Bill Clinton presented the Presidential Medal of Freedom to Fulbright at his eighty-eighth birthday celebration from the Fulbright Association.[186]

Death and legacy

Fulbright died of a stroke in 1995 at the age of 89 in Washington, DC. A year later, on the occasion of the 50th anniversary dinner of the Fulbright Program held June 5, 1996 at the White House, President Bill Clinton said, "Hillary and I have looked forward for some time to celebrating this 50th anniversary of the Fulbright Program, to honor the dream and legacy of a great American, a citizen of the world, a native of my home state and my mentor and friend, Senator Fulbright."[187]

Fulbright's ashes were interred at the Fulbright family plot in Evergreen Cemetery in Fayetteville, Arkansas.

In 1996, The George Washington University renamed a residence hall in his honor. The J. William Fulbright Hall is located 2223 H Street, N.W., at the corner of 23rd and H Streets. It received historic designations as a District of Columbia historic site on January 28, 2010 and was listed on the National Register of Historic Places on June 18, 2010.[188][189][190]

On October 21, 2002, in a speech at the dedication of the Fulbright Sculpture at the University of Arkansas, Bill Clinton said,

I admired him. I liked him. On the occasions when we disagreed, I loved arguing with him. I never loved getting in an argument with anybody as much in my entire life as I loved fighting with Bill Fulbright. I'm quite sure I always lost, and yet he managed to make me think I might have won.[191]

Fulbright Program

Main article: Fulbright Program

The Fulbright Program was established in 1946 under legislation introduced by then-Senator J. William Fulbright of Arkansas. The Fulbright Program is sponsored by the Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs of the United States Department of State.

Approximately 294,000 "Fulbrighters", 111,000 from the United States and 183,000 from other countries, have participated in the Program since its inception over sixty years ago. The Fulbright Program awards approximately 6,000 new grants annually.

Currently, the Fulbright Program operates in over 155 countries worldwide.

The Thank You Fulbright project was created in April 2012 to provide an annual opportunity for alumni and friends of the Fulbright program to celebrate Fulbright's legacy.

Honors

• 1982 awarded an honorary degree, doctor honoris causa, at the Norwegian Institute of Technology, later part of Norwegian University of Science and Technology.[192]
• 1992 awarded a doctor honoris causa degree at the University of Tampere, Finland.
• Association for Asian Studies (AAS), 1985 Award for Distinguished Contributions to Asian Studies[193]
• 1987 Foreign Language Advocacy Award.[194]

Works

• Fulbright, J. William (1947). Heywood, Robert B. (ed.). The Works of the Mind: The Legislater. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. OCLC 752682744.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
• The Arrogance of Power, New York: Random House, 1966, ISBN 0-8129-9262-8
• The Pentagon Propaganda Machine. New York: Vintage Books. 1971.
• Prospects for the West, William L. Clayton Lectures on International Economic Affairs and Foreign Policy. 1962/1963. Harvard University Press. 1963.
• Old Myths and New Realities and Other Commentaries. Random House. 1964.
• The Crippled Giant;:American foreign policy and its domestic consequences. Harvard University Press. 1972.
• Fulbright, J. William; Tillman, Seth P. (1989). The Price of Empire. Pantheon.

Notes

1. "Roberta Waugh Fulbright". Encyclopedia of Arkansas.
2. Woods 1998, p. 1. sfn error: multiple targets (4×): CITEREFWoods1998 (help)
3. Apple, R. W., Jr. (February 10, 1995). "J. William Fulbright, Senate Giant, Is Dead at 89". The New York Times. Retrieved May 5, 2010.
4. "1964 Arkansas Razorbacks National Championship" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2012-07-28. Retrieved 2012-06-11.
5. Berman, William William Fulbright and the Vietnam War, Kent: Kent State University Press, 1988 p.3
6. Berman, William William Fulbright and the Vietnam War, Kent: Kent State University Press, 1988 p.3
7. Woods, Randall J. William Fulbright, Vietnam, and the Search for a Cold War Foreign Policy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998 p.3
8. Woods, Randall J. William Fulbright, Vietnam, and the Search for a Cold War Foreign Policy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998 p.3
9. Woods, Randall J. William Fulbright, Vietnam, and the Search for a Cold War Foreign Policy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998 p.3
10. "Founding Council | The Rothermere American Institute". Rothermere American Institute. Archived from the original on 2012-11-17. Retrieved 2012-11-22.
11. Berman, William William Fulbright and the Vietnam War, Kent: Kent State University Press, 1988 p.3
12. Berman, William William Fulbright and the Vietnam War, Kent: Kent State University Press, 1988 p.3
13. Berman, William William Fulbright and the Vietnam War, Kent: Kent State University Press, 1988 p.3
14. Harris, David (Sep 9, 1979). "Swanson Saga: End of a Dream". New York Times. p. SM111.
15. Berman, William William Fulbright and the Vietnam War, Kent: Kent State University Press, 1988 p.3
16. Berman, William William Fulbright and the Vietnam War, Kent: Kent State University Press, 1988 p.3
17. Berman, William William Fulbright and the Vietnam War, Kent: Kent State University Press, 1988 p.3
18. Hachey, Thomas E. (Winter 1973–1974). "American Profiles on Capitol Hill: A Confidential Study for the British Foreign Office in 1943" (PDF). Wisconsin Magazine of History. 57 (2): 141–153. JSTOR 4634869. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2013-10-21.
19. On Fulbright's goal of promoting peace and the influence of the Rhodes Scholarships, seeDonald Markwell, (2013). "Instincts to Lead": on Leadership, Peace, and Education, Connor Court: Australia.
20. Berman, William Fulbright and the Vietnam War, Kent: Kent State University Press, 1988 p.5
21. Berman, William Fulbright and the Vietnam War, Kent: Kent State University Press, 1988 p.5
22. Berman, William Fulbright and the Vietnam War, Kent: Kent State University Press, 1988 p.5
23. Berman, William Fulbright and the Vietnam War, Kent: Kent State University Press, 1988 p.5
24. Berman, William Fulbright and the Vietnam War, Kent: Kent State University Press, 1988 p.5
25. Berman, William Fulbright and the Vietnam War, Kent: Kent State University Press, 1988 p.5
26. Berman, William Fulbright and the Vietnam War, Kent: Kent State University Press, 1988 p.5
27. Berman, William Fulbright and the Vietnam War, Kent: Kent State University Press, 1988 p.5
28. Berman, William Fulbright and the Vietnam War, Kent: Kent State University Press, 1988 p.5
29. Berman, William Fulbright and the Vietnam War, Kent: Kent State University Press, 1988 p.5
30. Berman, William Fulbright and the Vietnam War, Kent: Kent State University Press, 1988 p.5
31. Berman, William Fulbright and the Vietnam War, Kent: Kent State University Press, 1988 p.5
32. Berman, William Fulbright and the Vietnam War, Kent: Kent State University Press, 1988 p.5-6
33. Berman, William Fulbright and the Vietnam War, Kent: Kent State University Press, 1988 p.6
34. Berman, William Fulbright and the Vietnam War, Kent: Kent State University Press, 1988 p.6
35. Berman, William Fulbright and the Vietnam War, Kent: Kent State University Press, 1988 p.6
36. Berman, William Fulbright and the Vietnam War, Kent: Kent State University Press, 1988 p.6
37. Berman, William Fulbright and the Vietnam War, Kent: Kent State University Press, 1988 p.6
38. Woods, Randall. "Bill Fulbright (1905–1995)". The Central Arkansas Library System. Retrieved 17 July 2014.
39. Berman, William Fulbright and the Vietnam War, Kent: Kent State University Press, 1988 p.7
40. Berman, William Fulbright and the Vietnam War, Kent: Kent State University Press, 1988 p.7
41. Berman, William Fulbright and the Vietnam War, Kent: Kent State University Press, 1988 p.6-7
42. Woods 1995, pp. 330-331.
43. Woods 1995, p. 555.
44. Woods 1995, pp. 555-557.
45. Schlesinger, Arthur M., Jr. (2008). Journals 1952–2000. Penguin Books. p. 98. ISBN 978-0-14-311435-2. Elizabeth Farmer told me this evening that, at five this afternoon, it looked as if it would be Rusk in State, with Bowles and Bundy as Undersecretaries. (Ken, by the way, told me that Jack had called him on the 7th and talked seriously about Mac as Secretary.) I asked why Rusk had finally emerged. Elizabeth said, 'He was the lowest common denominator.' Apparently Harris Wofford succeeded in stirring the Negroes and Jews up so effectively that the uproar killed Fulbright, who was apparently Jack's first choice.
46. "Western Europe: Nobody But Their Chickens". Time. November 30, 1962. Retrieved May 5, 2010.
47. "Common Market: Ruffled Feathers". Time. August 16, 1963. Retrieved May 5, 2010.
48. "Common Market: The Chicken War". Time. June 14, 1963. Retrieved May 5, 2010.
49. "Verdict on Santo Domingo". Time.com. 1966-11-11. Retrieved 2012-06-11.
50. "Fulbright Protests Rotation of Envoys". Toledo Blade. May 10, 1961.
51. "DER SPIEGEL 52/1993 - Gerechtigkeit unerreichbar". Spiegel.de. 1993-12-27. Retrieved 2012-06-11.
52. Congressional Record — Senate, August 1, 1961, pp. 14222-14224.
53. Berlin in Early Berlin-Wall Era CIA, State Department, and Army Booklets, T.H.E. Hill (compiler), 2014, pp. xviii, xix, 279, 283.
54. W. R. Smyser, Kennedy and the Berlin Wall, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2009, p. 90.
55. Kennedy, John F. (October 29, 1961). "440 - Remarks at the Airport at Fort Smith, Arkansas". American Presidency Project.
56. Berman, William Fulbright and the Vietnam War, Kent: Kent State University Press, 1988 p.10
57. Berman, William Fulbright and the Vietnam War, Kent: Kent State University Press, 1988 p.10-11
58. Berman, William Fulbright and the Vietnam War, Kent: Kent State University Press, 1988 p.11
59. Berman, William Fulbright and the Vietnam War, Kent: Kent State University Press, 1988 p.11
60. Berman, William Fulbright and the Vietnam War, Kent: Kent State University Press, 1988 p.11
61. Grant F. Smith, , "Pulse Media", August 28, 2009
62. Findley, Paul (May 1, 2013). They dare to speak out : people and institutions confront Israel's lobby (3rd ed.). Chicago: Chicago Review Press. p. 315. ISBN 978-1556524820. Retrieved 26 October 2018.
63. "Fulbright: Israel Controls Senate". Jewish Telegraphic Agency. JTA. Retrieved 26 October 2018.
64. abc-clio.com. ABC-CLIO http://www.historyandtheheadlines.abc-clio.com/ContentPages/ContentPage.aspx?entryId=1162164&currentSection=1130228&productid=4. Retrieved 19 July 2014. Missing or empty |title= (help)
65. Johnson, Haynes and Gwertzmann, Bernard (1968). Fulbright: The Dissenter. Doubleday.
66. Labaton, Stephen (9 March 1998). "Clinton Partner In Whitewater Dies in Prison". New York Times. Retrieved 5 October 2014.
67. Fritchey, Clayton (May 1967). "Washington Insight: Who Belongs to the Senate's Inner Club?". Harper's. Vol. 234 no. 1404. Harper's Foundation. pp. 104–108. Retrieved October 30, 2018.(subscription required)
68. Fried, Richard M. (1990). Nightmare in Red: The McCarthy Era in Perspective. Oxford University Press. p. 134. ISBN 0-19-504361-8.
69. Woods, Randall Bennett (1993). Fulbright: A Biography. Cambridge University Press. pp. 181–183. ISBN 978-0521482622.
70. Woods, Randall Bennett (1998). J. William Fulbright, Vietnam, and the Search for a Cold War Foreign Policy. Cambridge University Press. pp. 207–211. ISBN 0-521-58800-6.
71. Joseph Crespino, "The Scarred Stone: The Strom Thurmond Monument", Southern Spaces, 29 April 2010, accessed 10 July 2012
72. "The Southern Manifesto". Time Magazine. March 26, 1956. Retrieved 2007-08-10.
73. Woods, Randall Bennett (1998). J. William Fulbright, Vietnam, and the Search for a Cold War Foreign Policy. Cambridge University Press. p. 13. ISBN 0-521-58800-6.
74. Langguth, A.J. Our Vietnam: The War 1954-1975, New York: Simon & Schuster, 2000 p.125
75. "JFK Stands Pat on 5-Year Aid Program". The Milwaukee Sentinel. August 2, 1961.
76. "Senators Battle Over Foreign Aid Bill". Daytona Beach Morning Journal. August 5, 1961.
77. "Fulbright Says U.S. Must Shed 'Myths' And Think Daringly on Foreign Policy". New York Times. March 26, 1964.
78. "Fulbright Expects Easing Of U.S.-French Discord". New York Times.
79. Berman, William Fulbright and the Vietnam War, Kent: Kent State University Press, 1988 p.24
80. Berman, William Fulbright and the Vietnam War, Kent: Kent State University Press, 1988 p.24
81. Berman, William Fulbright and the Vietnam War, Kent: Kent State University Press, 1988 p.24
82. Berman, William Fulbright and the Vietnam War, Kent: Kent State University Press, 1988 p.25
83. Karnow, Stanley Vietnam A History, New York: Viking, 1983 p.374
84. Karnow, Stanley Vietnam A History, New York: Viking, 1983 p.376
85. Berman, William Fulbright and the Vietnam War, Kent: Kent State University Press, 1988 p.25
86. Berman, William Fulbright and the Vietnam War, Kent: Kent State University Press, 1988 p.25
87. Berman, William Fulbright and the Vietnam War, Kent: Kent State University Press, 1988 p.25
88. Berman, William Fulbright and the Vietnam War, Kent: Kent State University Press, 1988 p.25
89. Berman, William Fulbright and the Vietnam War, Kent: Kent State University Press, 1988 p.25
90. Berman, William Fulbright and the Vietnam War, Kent: Kent State University Press, 1988 p.25
91. Berman, William Fulbright and the Vietnam War, Kent: Kent State University Press, 1988 p.25
92. Berman, William Fulbright and the Vietnam War, Kent: Kent State University Press, 1988 p.25
93. Berman, William Fulbright and the Vietnam War, Kent: Kent State University Press, 1988 p.26
94. Berman, William Fulbright and the Vietnam War, Kent: Kent State University Press, 1988 p.26
95. Berman, William Fulbright and the Vietnam War, Kent: Kent State University Press, 1988 p.26
96. Berman, William Fulbright and the Vietnam War, Kent: Kent State University Press, 1988 p.26
97. Berman, William Fulbright and the Vietnam War, Kent: Kent State University Press, 1988 p.27
98. Berman, William Fulbright and the Vietnam War, Kent: Kent State University Press, 1988 p.27
99. Karnow, Stanley Vietnam A History, New York: Viking, 1983 p.376
100. Fulbright, J. W. (2011) [1966]. The Arrogance of Power. New York: Random House. p. 68. ISBN 978-0-307-80310-8.
101. Berman, William Fulbright and the Vietnam War, Kent: Kent State University Press, 1988 p.51
102. Berman, William Fulbright and the Vietnam War, Kent: Kent State University Press, 1988 p.51
103. Berman, William Fulbright and the Vietnam War, Kent: Kent State University Press, 1988 p.51
104. Berman, William Fulbright and the Vietnam War, Kent: Kent State University Press, 1988 p.51
105. Langguth, A.J. Our Vietnam: The War 1954-1975, New York: Simon & Schuster, 2000 p.417
106. Karnow, Stanley Vietnam A History, New York: Viking, 1983 p.486
107. Langguth, A.J. Our Vietnam: The War 1954-1975, New York: Simon & Schuster, 2000 p.419
108. Langguth, A.J. Our Vietnam: The War 1954-1975, New York: Simon & Schuster, 2000 p.419
109. Karnow, Stanley Vietnam A History, New York: Viking, 1983 p.486
110. Langguth, A.J. Our Vietnam: The War 1954-1975, New York: Simon & Schuster, 2000 p.419
111. Langguth, A.J. Our Vietnam: The War 1954-1975, New York: Simon & Schuster, 2000 p.420
112. Langguth, A.J. Our Vietnam: The War 1954-1975, New York: Simon & Schuster, 2000 p.420
113. Langguth, A.J. Our Vietnam: The War 1954-1975, New York: Simon & Schuster, 2000 p.420
114. Langguth, A.J. Our Vietnam: The War 1954-1975, New York: Simon & Schuster, 2000 p.420
115. Langguth, A.J. Our Vietnam: The War 1954-1975, New York: Simon & Schuster, 2000 p.420
116. Karnow, Stanley Vietnam A History, New York: Viking, 1983 p.486
117. Karnow, Stanley Vietnam A History, New York: Viking, 1983 p.486
118. Karnow, Stanley Vietnam A History, New York: Viking, 1983 p.486
119. Karnow, Stanley Vietnam A History, New York: Viking, 1983 p.486
120. Karnow, Stanley Vietnam A History, New York: Viking, 1983 p.486
121. Karnow, Stanley Vietnam A History, New York: Viking, 1983 p.486
122. Karnow, Stanley Vietnam A History, New York: Viking, 1983 p.486
123. Karnow, Stanley Vietnam A History, New York: Viking, 1983 p.486
124. Karnow, Stanley Vietnam A History, New York: Viking, 1983 p.503
125. Karnow, Stanley Vietnam A History, New York: Viking, 1983 p.503
126. Langguth, A.J. Our Vietnam: The War 1954-1975, New York: Simon & Schuster, 2000 p.443
127. Langguth, A.J. Our Vietnam: The War 1954-1975, New York: Simon & Schuster, 2000 p.449
128. Langguth, A.J. Our Vietnam: The War 1954-1975, New York: Simon & Schuster, 2000 p.449
129. Langguth, A.J. Our Vietnam: The War 1954-1975, New York: Simon & Schuster, 2000 p.449-450
130. Langguth, A.J. Our Vietnam: The War 1954-1975, New York: Simon & Schuster, 2000 p. 450
131. Langguth, A.J. Our Vietnam: The War 1954-1975, New York: Simon & Schuster, 2000 p.450
132. Langguth, A.J. Our Vietnam: The War 1954-1975, New York: Simon & Schuster, 2000 p.450
133. Langguth, A.J. Our Vietnam: The War 1954-1975, New York: Simon & Schuster, 2000 p.450
134. Langguth, A.J. Our Vietnam: The War 1954-1975, New York: Simon & Schuster, 2000 p. 450
135. Berman, William William Fulbright and the Vietnam War, Kent: Kent State University Press, 1988 p.93
136. Berman, William William Fulbright and the Vietnam War, Kent: Kent State University Press, 1988 p.93
137. Berman, William William Fulbright and the Vietnam War, Kent: Kent State University Press, 1988 p.93
138. Berman, William William Fulbright and the Vietnam War, Kent: Kent State University Press, 1988 p.93
139. Berman, William William Fulbright and the Vietnam War, Kent: Kent State University Press, 1988 p.93
140. Berman, William William Fulbright and the Vietnam War, Kent: Kent State University Press, 1988 p.93
141. Berman, William William Fulbright and the Vietnam War, Kent: Kent State University Press, 1988 p.94-95
142. Berman, William William Fulbright and the Vietnam War, Kent: Kent State University Press, 1988 p.95
143. Berman, William William Fulbright and the Vietnam War, Kent: Kent State University Press, 1988 p.95-96
144. Langguth, A.J. Our Vietnam: The War 1954-1975, New York: Simon & Schuster, 2000 p.483
145. Berman, William William Fulbright and the Vietnam War, Kent: Kent State University Press, 1988 p.96
146. Berman, William William Fulbright and the Vietnam War, Kent: Kent State University Press, 1988 p.96
147. Langguth, A.J. Our Vietnam: The War 1954-1975, New York: Simon & Schuster, 2000 p.484
148. Berman, William William Fulbright and the Vietnam War, Kent: Kent State University Press, 1988 p.96
149. Johnson, Lyndon B. (October 31, 1968). "572 - The President's Address to the Nation Upon Announcing His Decision To Halt the Bombing of North Vietnam". American Presidency Project.
150. "Fulbright Is Hopeful". New York Times. November 1, 1968.
151. Rogers Says U.S. Prepared For Mutual Troops Pullout In Vietnam (March 28, 1969)
152. Langguth, A.J. Our Vietnam: The War 1954-1975, New York: Simon & Schuster, 2000 p.547
153. Fulbright, Symington Urge Military Cuts (May 21, 1969)
154. Berman, William William Fulbright and the Vietnam War, Kent: Kent State University Press, 1988 p.116
155. Berman, William William Fulbright and the Vietnam War, Kent: Kent State University Press, 1988 p.116
156. Berman, William William Fulbright and the Vietnam War, Kent: Kent State University Press, 1988 p.117
157. Berman, William William Fulbright and the Vietnam War, Kent: Kent State University Press, 1988 p.117
158. Berman, William William Fulbright and the Vietnam War, Kent: Kent State University Press, 1988 p.117-118
159. Berman, William William Fulbright and the Vietnam War, Kent: Kent State University Press, 1988 p.118
160. Berman, William William Fulbright and the Vietnam War, Kent: Kent State University Press, 1988 p.118
161. Berman, William William Fulbright and the Vietnam War, Kent: Kent State University Press, 1988 p.118
162. Langguth, A.J. Our Vietnam: The War 1954-1975, New York: Simon & Schuster, 2000 p. 583
163. Langguth, A.J. Our Vietnam: The War 1954-1975, New York: Simon & Schuster, 2000 p.583
164. "'2 Soldiers' Prowar Talks Draw Senate Criticism". New York Times. February 6, 1970.
165. "FULBRIGHT OFFERS LAOS RESOLUTION; NIXON CHALLENGED". New York Times. March 12, 1970.
166. "FULBRIGHT PANEL VOTES TO REPEAL TONKIN MEASURE". New York Times. April 11, 1970.
167. "FULBRIGHT FAVORS A U.S. GUARANTEE OF ISRAELF'67LINE". New York Times. August 23, 1970.
168. Finney, John W. "SENATE DISCLOSES U.S.‐ETIMPIA PACT". New York Times.
169. Smith, Terence (March 1, 1971). "Fulbright Hopes to Force Nixon's Advisers to Testify". New York Times.
170. "FULBRIGHT SEES CONGRESS VOTING INTERIM AID PLAN". New York Times. November 1, 1971.
171. "Fulbright Urges Ban on U.S.I.A. Film". New York Times. March 30, 1972.
172. "Senate Panel Drops Inquiry Into the Watson Incident". New York Times. April 12, 1972.
173. "SENATE APPROVES PACT WITH SOVIET ON MISSILES, 88‐2". New York Times. August 4, 1972.
174. Senate Ratifies Treaty; Additions Irk Fulbright (August 4, 1972)
175. "Fulbright Assails Efforts to Link Soviet Trade Accord to Emigration Issue". New York Times. July 12, 1973.
176. Gwertzman, Bernard. "Rogers Quits, Kissinger Named". New York Times.
177. Binder, David (August 23, 1973). "Little Difficulty in Senate Is Seen Over Confirmation of Kissinger as Secretary". New York Times.
178. Gelb, Leslie H. (November 10, 1973). "Fulbright, Supporting Kissinger, Calls for a 'Comprothise Peace'". New York Times.
179. Finney, John W. (May 9, 1974). "U.S. STOCKS ARMS FOR ASIAN ALLIES". New York Times.
180. "KISSINGER BACKED BY RUCKELSHAUS IN WIRETAP CASE". New York Times. June 17, 1974.
181. Binder, David (September 11, 1973). "How the Wiretapping Program Began". The New York Times.
182. "Fulbright Sees Kissinger As Detente Foes' Target". New York Times. July 16, 1974.
183. Woods, Randall Bennett (1998). J. William Fulbright, Vietnam, and the Search for a Cold War Foreign Policy. Cambridge University Press. p. 278. ISBN 9780521588003.
184. Nixon Makes Pitch to Conservatives (June 3, 1974)
185. "Univ. of Arkansas, Fayetteville: FULBRIGHT POST-SENATORIAL PAPERS, SERIES 1". Libinfo.uark.edu. 1980-05-22. Retrieved 2012-06-11.
186. "Univ. of Arkansas, Fayetteville: FULBRIGHT PROGRAM EXHIBIT". Libinfo.uark.edu. 1993-05-05. Retrieved 2012-06-11.
187. "Bill Clinton speech at Fulbright Program". June 5, 1996. Archived from the original on July 18, 2011. Retrieved June 11, 2012.
188. "Fulbright Hall - GWUEncyc". Encyclopedia.gwu.edu. Archived from the original on 2012-03-21. Retrieved 2012-06-11.
189. "Street Address Index". Planning.dc.gov. Archived from the original on 2012-03-24. Retrieved 2012-06-11.
190. "National Register of Historical Places - DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA (DC), District of Columbia County". Nationalregisterofhistoricplaces.com. Retrieved 2012-06-11.
191. "Fulbright Sculpture Dedication". October 21, 2002. Archived from the original on August 1, 2012. Retrieved June 11, 2012.
192. "Honorary doctors at NTNU". Norwegian University of Science and Technology.
193. Association for Asian Studies (AAS)1985 Award for Distinguished Contributions to Asian Studies; retrieved 2011-05-31
194. "The James W. Dodge Foreign Language Advocate Award". Northeast Conference on the Teaching of Foreign Languages. Archived from the original on August 21, 2014. Retrieved August 28, 2014.

References

External video

Presentation by Randall Bennett Woods on Fulbright: A Biography, August 22, 1995, C-SPAN

• Biographical Directory of the United States Congress
• Woods, Randall Bennett (1998). J. William Fulbright, Vietnam, and the Search for a Cold War Foreign Policy (abridged ed.). Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9780521588003.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)

Further reading

• Brown, Eugene (1985). J. William Fulbright: Advice and Dissent. Iowa City: University of Iowa Press. ISBN 0-87745-130-3.
• Clinton, Bill (2005). My Life. Vintage. ISBN 1-4000-3003-X.
• Finley, Keith M. (2008). Delaying the Dream: Southern Senators and the Fight Against Civil Rights, 1938–1965. Baton Rouge: LSU Press.
• Johnson, Haynes and Gwertzmann, Bernard (1968). Fulbright: The Dissenter. Doubleday.
• Powell, Lee Riley (1996). J. William Fulbright and His Time: A Political Biography. Guild Bindery Press. ISBN 1-55793-060-0.
• Woods, Randall B. (1995). Fulbright: A Biography. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-48262-3.

External links

• US Department of State biography
• The Two Americas (Conclusion in "The Arrogance of Power")
• J. William Fulbright at Find a Grave
• A collection of works by J. William Fulbright
• Appearances on C-SPAN

Party political offices
Preceded by Hattie Wyatt Caraway	Democratic nominee for U.S. Senator from Arkansas (Class 3) 1944, 1950, 1956, 1962, 1968	Succeeded by Dale Bumpers
U.S. House of Representatives
Preceded by Clyde T. Ellis	Member of the U.S. House of Representatives from Arkansas's 3rd congressional district 1943–1945	Succeeded by James William Trimble
U.S. Senate
Preceded by Hattie Caraway	U.S. senator (Class 3) from Arkansas 1945–1974 Served alongside: John Little McClellan	Succeeded by Dale Bumpers
Political offices
Preceded by Theodore F. Green	Chairman of the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations 1959–1974	Succeeded by John Sparkman