York (1785–1974 electoral district)
York was a provincial electoral district for the Legislative Assembly of New Brunswick, Canada. It used a bloc voting system to elect candidates. It was abolished with the 1973 electoral redistribution, when the province moved to single-member ridings.
![]() | |
---|---|
Defunct provincial electoral district | |
Legislature | Legislative Assembly of New Brunswick |
District created | 1785 |
District abolished | 1973 |
First contested | 1785 |
Last contested | 1970 |
Members of the Legislative Assembly
Legislature | Years | Member | Party | Member | Party | Member | Party | Member | Party | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1st | 1786 – 1792 | Daniel Murray | Ind. | Isaac Atwood | Ind. | Daniel Lyman | Ind. | Edward Stelle | Ind. | ||||
2nd | 1793 – 1795 | Archibald McLean | Ind. | Stair Agnew | Ind. | Jacob Ellegood | Ind. | ||||||
3rd | 1795 – 1796 | James French[1] | Ind. | ||||||||||
1796 – 1802 | Stair Agnew[2] | Ind. | |||||||||||
4th | 1802 – 1809 | John Davison | Ind. | Walter Price | Ind. | ||||||||
5th | 1809 – 1816 | Peter Fraser | Ind. | John Allen | Ind. | Duncan McLeod | Ind. | ||||||
6th | 1817 – 1819 | John Dow[3] | Ind. | ||||||||||
7th | 1820 | ||||||||||||
8th | 1821 | ||||||||||||
1822 – 1827 | William Taylor | Ind. | |||||||||||
9th | 1827 – 1830 | Richard Ketchum | Ind. | ||||||||||
10th | 1831 – 1832 | Jedediah Slason | Ind. | ||||||||||
1832 – 1834 | James Taylor | Ind. | |||||||||||
11th | 1835 – 1837 | Lemuel Allan Wilmot | Ref. | ||||||||||
12th | 1837 – 1842 | Charles Fisher | Ref. | ||||||||||
13th | 1843 – 1846 | ||||||||||||
14th | 1847 – 1850 | Thomas Baillie | Ind. | ||||||||||
15th | 1851 – 1854 | George Luther Hathaway | Cons. | Thomas Pickard, Jr. | Ind. | ||||||||
16th | 1854 – 1856 | Charles Fisher | Ref. | Charles McPherson | Ind. | ||||||||
17th | 1856 – 1857 | John Campbell Allen | Ind. | ||||||||||
18th | 1857 – 1861 | John McIntosh | Ind. | ||||||||||
19th | 1862 – 1865 | George Luther Hathaway | Cons. | Hiram Dow | Ind. | ||||||||
20th | 1865 – 1866 | John James Fraser | Cons. | William Hayden Needham | Ind. | ||||||||
21st | 1866 – 1867 | Hiram Dow | Ind. | Charles Fisher[4] | Ref. | Alexander Thompson | Ind. | John Adolphus Beckwith | Cons. | ||||
1867 – 1868 | John Pickard[4] | Ind. | |||||||||||
1869 – 1870 | William Hayden Needham | Ind. | |||||||||||
22nd | 1870 – 1872 | Robert Robinson | Ind. | George Luther Hathaway[5] | Cons. | Charles McPherson | Ind. | ||||||
1872 – 1874 | John James Fraser | Cons. | |||||||||||
23rd | 1875 – 1878 | Thomas F. Barker | Cons. | Hiram Dow | Ind. | ||||||||
24th | 1879 – 1882 | Andrew George Blair | Lib. | Frederick P. Thompson[6] | Lib. | George J. Colter | Lib.-Con. | ||||||
25th | 1883 – 1885 | Edward Ludlow Wetmore | Lib. | ||||||||||
1885 – 1886 | William Wilson | Lib. | |||||||||||
26th | 1886 – 1890 | Richard Bellamy[7] | Lib. | David R. Moore | Lib. | ||||||||
27th | 1890[8] | John Anderson | Ind. | ||||||||||
1890 – 1892 | Thomas Colter | Cons. | |||||||||||
28th | 1892 – 1895 | William K. Allen | Ind. | William T. Howe | Cons. | James K. Pinder | Cons. | Herman Pitts | Cons. | ||||
29th | 1896 – 1899 | John Black | Lib. | ||||||||||
30th | 1899 – 1901 | William T. Whitehead | Ind. | John A. Campbell | Ind. | Alexander Gibson[4] | Lib. | Frederick P. Thompson[9] | Lib. | ||||
1901 – 1903 | George W. Allen | Ind. | |||||||||||
31st | 1903 – 1908 | George F. Burden | Ind. | ||||||||||
32nd | 1908 – 1911 | Harry Fulton McLeod[4] | Cons. | John A. Young | Cons. | Thomas Robison[10] | Cons. | James K. Pinder | Cons. | ||||
1911 – 1912 | Oscar E. Morehouse | Cons. | |||||||||||
33rd | 1912 – 1914 | ||||||||||||
1914 – 1917 | Percy A. Guthrie | Cons. | |||||||||||
34th | 1917 – 1920 | William C. Crocket | Cons. | Samuel B. Hunter | Lib. | ||||||||
35th | 1921 – 1925 | Charles Dow Richards | Cons. | ||||||||||
36th | 1925 – 1930 | B. H. Dougan | Cons. | G. C. Grant | Cons. | James M. Scott | Cons. | see Fredericton | |||||
37th | 1931 – 1935 | Marcus Lorne Jewett | Cons. | Charles Dow Richards[11] | Cons. | ||||||||
38th | 1935 – 1939 | John B. McNair | Lib. | Ernest W. Stairs | Lib. | H. Ralph Gunter | Lib. | Stewart E. Durling | Lib. | ||||
39th | 1939 – 1944 | C. Hedley Forbes | Cons. | Charles Price | Cons. | John Rutherford Messer | Cons. | Arthur J. McEvoy | Cons. | ||||
40th | 1944 – 1948 | Harry A. Corey | Lib. | Donald T. Cochrane | Lib. | Henry C. Greenlaw | Lib. | John B. McNair | Lib. | ||||
41st | 1948 – 1952 | ||||||||||||
42nd | 1952 – 1956 | Harry Ames[12] | PC | C. Weldon Lawrence | PC | John F. McInerney | PC | William J. West | PC | ||||
43rd | 1957 – 1960 | ||||||||||||
44th | 1960 – 1963 | George Everett Chalmers | PC | ||||||||||
45th | 1963 – 1967 | ||||||||||||
46th | 1967 – 1970 | Carl Mooers | PC | see Fredericton | |||||||||
47th | 1970 – 1974 | ||||||||||||
Riding dissolved into York North and York South | |||||||||||||
Election results
1970 New Brunswick general election | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Party | Candidate | Votes | Elected | |||||
Progressive Conservative | Harry Ames | 6,050 | ![]() | |||||
Progressive Conservative | Carl Mooers | 5,954 | ![]() | |||||
Liberal | John Ker | 4,278 | ||||||
Liberal | Albert A. Knox | 4,272 | ||||||
New Democratic | James William Bradley | 318 | ||||||
New Democratic | Richard Lawrence Bright | 295 |
1967 New Brunswick general election | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Party | Candidate | Votes | Elected | |||||
Progressive Conservative | Harry Ames | 5,616 | ![]() | |||||
Progressive Conservative | Carl Mooers | 5,393 | ![]() | |||||
Liberal | John Fawcett | 4,755 | ||||||
Liberal | William Gould | 4,403 |
gollark: It must comfort you to think so.
gollark: > There is burgeoning interest in designing AI-basedsystems to assist humans in designing computing systems,including tools that automatically generate computer code.The most notable of these comes in the form of the first self-described ‘AI pair programmer’, GitHub Copilot, a languagemodel trained over open-source GitHub code. However, codeoften contains bugs—and so, given the vast quantity of unvettedcode that Copilot has processed, it is certain that the languagemodel will have learned from exploitable, buggy code. Thisraises concerns on the security of Copilot’s code contributions.In this work, we systematically investigate the prevalence andconditions that can cause GitHub Copilot to recommend insecurecode. To perform this analysis we prompt Copilot to generatecode in scenarios relevant to high-risk CWEs (e.g. those fromMITRE’s “Top 25” list). We explore Copilot’s performance onthree distinct code generation axes—examining how it performsgiven diversity of weaknesses, diversity of prompts, and diversityof domains. In total, we produce 89 different scenarios forCopilot to complete, producing 1,692 programs. Of these, wefound approximately 40 % to be vulnerable.Index Terms—Cybersecurity, AI, code generation, CWE
gollark: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2108.09293.pdf
gollark: This is probably below basically everywhere's minimum wage.
gollark: (in general)
References
- unseated after an appeal
- died in 1821
- died in 1832
- elected to federal seat
- died in 1872
- named to Legislative Council
- lost second election
- election protested and a second election was held in October 1890
- called to the Senate in 1902
- died in 1911
- resigned to accept appointment as judge
- died in 1973
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.