Xue Er

Xue Er(學而) is the first book of the Analects of Confucius. According to Zhu Xi, a Confucian philosopher in the 12th century, the book Xue Er is the base of moral improvement because it touches upon the basic principles of being a "gentleman" (junzi, 君子). [1]

The Book Xue Er with commentaries by He Yan

Name

Xué(學) Ér(而) consist of two separate Chinese characters. The first character Xué denotes "to learn" as a verb or "the research of something" as a noun. The following character Ér signifies a conjunction between two actions.

The titles of the Analects of Confucius are usually related to the first phrase of a given book. Likewise, the book Xue Er's initial sentence in Classical Chinese starts with "Xue Er":

子(Zǐ)曰(Yuē)：學(Xué)而(Ér)時(Shí)習(Xí)之(Zhī),不(Bú)亦(Yì)說(Yuè)乎(Hū)？

The Master said, "Is it not pleasant to learn with a constant perseverance and application?[2]

Note that although the English translation used only one verb "to learn", In the Classical Chinese text, there are two verbs: 學(Xué, to learn) and 習(Xí, to practice).[3]

Content

Xing Bing's commentary of the Analects Lunyu Zhengyi(論語正義) listed several key words of the book Xue Er. The key words include: Gentleman(君子), filial piety(孝弟), humaneness(仁人), doing one's best(忠), trust(信), the foundation of a nation(道國之法) and the principles of an appropriate friendship(主友之規).[4]

In the book, Confucius opted for hospitality towards strangers and tolerance of ignorance. Confucius also emphasized on the importance of self introspection(through examples from his disciple Zengzi and his own sayings).

Sources
  1. Zhu, Xi (2016). 四書章句集注. Taipei: 國立臺灣大學出版中心. ISBN 9789863501626.
  2. James, Legge (2013). The Analects (The Revised James Legge Translation). e-artnow. ISBN 9788074848605.
  3. Chin, Annping (2014). The Analects. Penguin. ISBN 9780698153516.
  4. Lunyu Zhushu (論語注疏). Peking University Publishing house. 2000. ISBN 9787301047248.
gollark: I got us one (1) role slot.
gollark: But grass is more common.
gollark: If you are converting the cellulosey bits you could just get rid of the lignin *or* take out the cellulose.
gollark: ?news
gollark: Consequentialist-ly speaking (yes, I am aware you don't subscribe to this) a technological development could be "bad", if the majority of the possible uses for it are negative, or it's most likely to be used for negative things. To what extent any technology actually falls into that is a separate issue though.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.