Wang Hui (Qing dynasty)

Wang Hui (simplified Chinese: 王翚; traditional Chinese: 王翬; pinyin: Wáng Huī; 1632–1717) was a Chinese landscape painter, one of the Four Wangs. He, and the three other Wangs, dominated orthodox art in China throughout the late Ming and early Qing periods. Of the Four Wangs, Wang Hui is considered the best-known today.

This is a Chinese name; the family name is Wang.
Wang Hui
Born1632
Changshu, Jiangsu
Died1717 (aged 84–85)
Known forShan shui

Beijing, Shanghai and Taipei museums loaned works for "Landscapes Clear and Radiant: The Art of Wang Hui (1632-1717)" in 2008 at the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York.[1]

Biography

Wang Hui followed in the footprints of his great grandfathers, grandfather, father and uncles and learned painting at a very early age. He was later taught by two contemporary masters, Zhang Ke and Wang Shimin, who taught him to work in the tradition of copying famous Chinese paintings. This is most likely the reason why critics claim that his work is conservative and reflects the Yuan and Song traditions. One critic claimed that "his landscape paintings reflect his nostalgic attachment to classical Chinese aesthetics." Along with the other Wangs, Wang Hui helped to perpetuate the tradition of copying the ancient masters rather than creating original work.

  • Wang Hui, A Thousand Peaks and Myriad Ravines 1693
  • Wang Hui, (need title)
  • Wang Hui, Thousand miles along the Jangtse 1700
  • Wang Hui, Mountains, Streams, and Autumn Trees
  • Wang Hui, Hut in the autumn rain
  • Wang Hui, Fisherman Huts and Clearing Skies in Autumn
  • The Beauty of Green Mountains and Rivers 1679
  • Tree in Autumn and Crows, dated 1712
gollark: Essentially, I am INSULTING utilitarianism.
gollark: It's an element.
gollark: Well, utilitarianism is literally metaphorically erbium, as things go.
gollark: That last bit does sound hilariously egotistical, but the vast majority of possible things which could be valued are basically entirely opposed to my own.
gollark: I think basically all the conveniently expressible "maximize X" things break horribly if actually taken seriously, and I also don't want people to just "have their own personal prescriptions about what is a good quality in the world", since it might severely disagree with mine.

References
  1. Smith, Roberta (September 11, 2008). "Master of Many Styles, and Many Mentors". The New York Times. Retrieved 2008-09-12.

Further reading
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.