United Nations Security Council Resolution 1495

United Nations Security Council resolution 1495, adopted unanimously on 31 July 2003, after recalling all previous resolutions on the situation in Western Sahara, particularly Resolution 1429 (2002), the Council extended the mandate of the United Nations Mission for the Referendum in Western Sahara (MINURSO) until 31 October 2003 and supported the Baker Plan put forth by James Baker III, who was at that time the Special Representative for Western Sahara of the Secretary-General Kofi Annan, as a replacement of the 1991 Settlement Plan.[1] The resolution, adopted after significant changes to the original draft,[2] was welcomed by the Polisario Front, which supported the Baker Plan, but not by Morocco, which resisted it.[3]

UN Security Council
Resolution 1495
Boujdour in Western Sahara
Date31 July 2003
Meeting no.4,801
CodeS/RES/1495 (Document)
SubjectThe situation concerning Western Sahara
Voting summary
  • 15 voted for
  • None voted against
  • None abstained
ResultAdopted
Security Council composition
Permanent members
Non-permanent members
Part of a series on the
Western Sahara conflict
Background
Disputed regions
Politics
Clashes
Issues
Peace process

Resolution

Observations

The Security Council was concerned at the lack of progress towards a political solution to the dispute between Morocco and the Polisario Front, which remained a potential source of instability to the Maghreb region.[4] It reaffirmed its commitment to assist the parties in achieving a durable solution which will provide for the self-determination of the people of Western Sahara. The parties were commended for their respect of the ceasefire and MINURSO's efforts were also praised.

Acts

Acting under Chapter VI of the United Nations Charter, the Council supported the Baker Plan as the "optimum political solution" to the dispute and called upon both parties to work towards the acceptance and implementation of the plan.[5] Furthermore, the parties and states in the region were asked to co-operate with the Secretary-General and his Personal Envoy.[4]

The resolution called upon the Polisario Front to release all remaining prisoners of war under international humanitarian law and for both parties to co-operate with the International Committee of the Red Cross to resolve the issue of persons unaccounted for since the start of the conflict.[4] The parties were urged to implement confidence-building measures with the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) and for the international community to support the UNHCR and World Food Programme in overcoming the deteriorating food situation among refugees.

Finally, the Secretary-General was asked to provide an assessment of the situation before 31 October 2003.

gollark: *uupz*
gollark: Ezio, on your trade: if we get pagination, how is TJ09 going to submit an offer with it?
gollark: Ah, yes, a frozen Pink hatchling.
gollark: Cool. I wonder whether anyone got a 4-letter DOOM dragon.
gollark: I just noticed that my cheese also has the code "fICan". Can I possibly get more for it?

See also

References
  1. "Security Council extends mandate of Western Sahara mission, calls on parties to work towards acceptance of Special Envoy's peace plan". United Nations. 31 July 2003.
  2. Bamford, David (31 July 2003). "UN agrees Sahara peace deal". BBC News.
  3. "Morocco Rejects Latest UN Peace Plan for Western Sahara". AllAfrica.com. 1 August 2003.
  4. McCormack, T.; McDonald, Avril (2006). Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law – 2003, Volume 6; Volume 2003. Cambridge University Press. pp. 281–282. ISBN 978-90-6704-203-1.
  5. Souare, Issaka K. (2007). Western Sahara: is there light at the end of the tunnel?. Institute for Security Studies (South Africa). p. 5.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.