Ulmus minor 'Umbraculifera Gracilis'

The Field Elm cultivar Ulmus minor 'Umbraculifera Gracilis' was obtained as a sport of 'Umbraculifera' by the Späth nursery of Berlin c.1897.[1][2][3] It was marketed by the Späth nursery in the early 20th century,[4] and by the Hesse Nursery of Weener, Germany, in the 1930s.[5]

Ulmus minor 'Umbraculifera Gracilis'
'Umbraculifera Gracilis', Royal Botanic Gardens, Edinburgh
SpeciesUlmus minor
Cultivar'Umbraculifera Gracilis'
OriginSpäth nursery, Berlin, Germany

Description

The tree is distinguished by its long oval crown,[2][6] but with thinner branches and smaller leaves than 'Umbraculifera'.[7]

  • 'Umbraculifera Gracilis', Bruntsfield Links, Edinburgh (1989)
  • 'Umbraculifera Gracilis', winter, Royal Botanic Garden, Edinburgh
  • Foliage, RBGE, October
  • Pressed leaves of Bruntsfield Links specimen
  • Bole, RBGE, showing graft-mark bottom right
  • Trunk and branching of Bruntsfield Links tree

Pests and diseases

The cultivar is susceptible to Dutch elm disease.

Cultivation

The only known surviving specimens are in the United States and Scotland (see 'Accessions' and 'Notable trees'). Henry (1913) mentions no example at Kew,[2] though a specimen had been planted there by 1902.[8] A specimen obtained from Späth stood in the Ryston Hall arboretum, Norfolk,[9] in the early 20th century.[10]

  • 'Umbraculifera Gracilis', Bruntsfield Links, Edinburgh (April 2015)
  • Same (October 2016)
  • Bark and foliage of same
  • Early autumn colour of same (2014)

Notable trees

Three trees supplied by Späth to the Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh (RBGE) in 1902 as U. campestris umbraculifera gracilis[11] survive in Edinburgh (2019). The two oldest, planted in the Garden itself (one of which is base-grafted), were long known by an updated version of Melville's name for them, U. plotii × U. carpinifolia [12] (:U. minor 'Plotii' × U. minor).[13] It is known that Melville renamed some of Späth's trees at RBGE in 1958.[14] These two were, according to one RBGE herbarium sheet, formerly called U. campestris umbraculifera (see 'External links'),[15] the name of the parent tree (not present in RBGE) of 'Umbraculifera Gracilis'. A herbarium specimen from Amsterdam labelled U. carpinifolia Gled. f. 'Gracilis' var. (Späth) Rehd. matches the Edinburgh trees.[note 1] Taken together, the evidence suggested that the three Edinburgh trees (the third, with smaller bole-girth, is on Bruntsfield Links) were the clone Späth supplied as U. campestris 'Umbraculifera Gracilis', an identification confirmed in 2016 by RBGE.[16] It is not known why Melville was permitted to disregard the trees' documented Central Asian provenance, and pronounce them hybrids of Plot Elm, a local variety of English field elm.

  • The second, ungrafted, RBGE 'Umbraculifera Gracilis' (1989)
  • Same (October 2016)

Synonymy
  • Ulmus carpinifolia var. gracilis: Krüssmann , Handbuch der Laubgehölze 2: 534, 1962.
  • Ulmus camp. umbraculifera nova[17]

Accessions

North America

Europe
  • Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, UK. Acc. nos. 19699358, 19699365

Nurseries

Europe
  • Centrum voor Botanische Verrijking vzw, Kampenhout, Belgium. ('Umbraculifera' listed separately to 'Umbraculifera Gracilis').[18]
  • Baumschulen Bauch GbR, Rheinbach, Germany. [19]

Notes
  1. Other herbarium leaf-specimens labelled U. carpinifolia Gled. cv. 'Gracilis' var. Späth, however, from Dahlem and Haarlem, appear to show a clone different from the Amsterdam specimen (see 'External links').
gollark: Perhaps it should see what the next 2 turns are like if it does different things, and pick the best one.
gollark: I'm not sure how improved gollariosity should work.
gollark: Defect iff this would not cause its opponent to defect next?
gollark: Clearly, what gollariosity SHOULD do is... something?
gollark: Gollariosity cooperates iff the opponent would cooperate in the same position. But this is actually suboptimal.

References
  1. Späth, L., Catalogue 104 (1899–1900; Berlin), p.133
  2. Elwes, Henry John; Henry, Augustine (1913). The Trees of Great Britain & Ireland. 7. p. 1893.
  3. kiki.huh.harvard.edu,
  4. Katalog (PDF). 108. Berlin, Germany: L. Späth Baumschulenweg. 1902–1903. pp. 132–133.
  5. Hesse, Hermann Albert (1932). Preis- und Sortenliste. pp. 96–97. Retrieved 18 January 2018.
  6. Green, Peter Shaw (1964). "Registration of cultivar names in Ulmus". Arnoldia. Arnold Arboretum, Harvard University. 24 (6–8): 41–80. Retrieved 16 February 2017.
  7. Krüssmann, Johann Gerd (1984). Manual of Cultivated Broad-Leaved Trees and Shrubs. 3. p. 406.
  8. Hand-list of trees and shrubs, excluding Coniferae, grown in Arboretum Kew Gardens (London, 1902), p.615
  9. rystonhall.co.uk/
  10. Ryston Hall Arboretum catalogue. c. 1920. pp. 13–14.
  11. Accessions book. Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh. 1902. pp. 45, 47.
  12. bioportal.naturalis.nl
  13. "Herbarium specimen - WAG.1853131". Botany catalogues. Naturalis Biodiversity Center. Sheet described as U. carpinifolia Gled. f. 'Gracilis' var. (Späth) Rehd. (Amsterdam specimen)
  14. bioportal.naturalis.nl
  15. "Herbarium specimen - L.1586788". Botany catalogues. Naturalis Biodiversity Center. Sheet described as U. carpinifolia Gled. × U. plotii Druce (RBGE specimen, 1958)
  16. "List of Living Accessions: Ulmus". Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh. Retrieved 21 September 2016.
  17. Späth, F. (1896). "Einige neue und seltene gehölze der Späth'schen Baumschule". Mitteilungen der Deutschen dendrologischen gesellschaft. 5: 28. Retrieved 21 December 2016.
  18. Centrum voor Botanische Verrijking vzw: Voorraadlijst, accessdate: November 2, 2016
  19. Baumschulen Bauch GbR: Sortimentsliste 2016-17, accessdate: November 2, 2016
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.