Ulmus × hollandica 'Superba'

The hybrid elm cultivar Ulmus × hollandica 'Superba' is one of a number of intermediate forms arising from the crossing of the Wych Elm U. glabra with a variety of Field Elm U. minor. Boulger tentatively (1881)[1] and Green more confidently (1964)[2] equated it with a hybrid elm cultivated in the UK by Masters at Canterbury in the early 19th century, known as "Masters' Canterbury Seedling" or simply the Canterbury Elm. Loudon examined a specimen sent by Masters and considered it a hybrid,[3] calling it U. montana glabra major (not to be confused with U. major Smith, U. × hollandica 'Major').[4][5]

Ulmus × hollandica 'Superba'
'Superba', Magdeburg, 1907 (described here by its synonym, Ulmus praestans E. Schoch)
Hybrid parentageU. glabra × U. minor
Cultivar'Superba'
OriginEurope

Green (1964) also equated Masters' Canterbury Elm with Osborne's U. montana var. superba (originally Gill's Blandford Elm, U. montana superba), a wych cultivar with unusually large leaves described by Lindley in The Gardeners' Chronicle, 1845,[6][7] though Loudon had made no reference to large leaves.[2] Rehder (1915 & 1949) did not include this identification in his list of synonyms.[8][9]

An U. praestans E. Schoch, cultivated in Europe in the late 19th century and said by Krüssmann (1984) to have originated in Belgium, was equated by him with U. × hollandica 'Superba'.[10] A 1907 photograph shows an avenue of elms in Magdeburg, Germany, described as U. praestans E. Schoch, a "hybrid between U. scabra [U. glabra] and U. campestris [U. minor]" – i.e. as a form of U. × hollandica.[11] A 'Superba' was reputed by Louis Späth to have been "much esteemed as a street tree in Magdeburg" – presumably the clone in the photograph.[12] This suggests that Späth regarded U. praestans as synonymous with 'Superba'. A 'Superba' had appeared in Späth's catalogues from 1885,[12] from descriptions[13] probably the large-leaved U. montana superba of Morren, not U. praestans. Späth's catalogue of 1911–12 erroneously claimed that U. praestans E. Schoch was synonymous with Morren's U. montana superba.[14] Hartwig, who received specimens of U. praestans from Kiessling of the Magdeburg city nursery in 1908, said (1912) that "Ulmus montana superba, supposedly the same [as U. praestans], looks quite different when young, being wide with large, broad, dull green leaves, whereas U. praestans and U. glabra fastigiata show an elongated medium-sized shiny green leaf and densely pyramidal crown". He concluded that U. praestans was not Ulmus montana superba, but was indistinguishable in leaf or habit from U. glabra fastigiata Kirchner.[15] Späth admitted the error in an article in Möller's Deutsche Gärtner-Zeitung (1912),[16] confirming that U. praestans E. Schoch was a U. × hollandica hybrid, and implying that Morren's tree was a form of U. montana (Wych Elm). He corrected the error in his later catalogues, distinguishing between Morren's Ulmus montana superba and U. praestans E. Schoch (for which he adopted Henry's synonym Ulmus superba Henry), and marketing both cultivars in the interwar period.[17][12] U. superba Henry was a 'Superba' from Späth himself, planted at Kew in 1900, which Henry had described in 1913.[12] This confirms that Späth had also been marketing U. praestans as 'Superba' in the late 19th century. An undated herbarium specimen from Haarlem showing a hybrid cultivar labelled "U. × hollandica 'Superba' Rehd., received as U. praestans from Späth, Berlin" (see 'External links') matches Henry's description of Späth's tree planted in 1900 at Kew.

Any link between Canterbury Elm, Loudon's U. montana glabra major, in cultivation in England throughout the 19th century (see below), and U. praestans E. Schoch, in cultivation in Europe in the late 19th century, is unknown, but Loudon's description of a fast-growing hybrid like Huntingdon Elm, holding its leaves late, matches descriptions of U. praestans. Herbarium specimens of hybrid 'Superba' vary, however, suggesting that, in addition to Morren's U. montana superba, more than one U. × hollandica cultivar was given the name (see 'External links' below).

U. × hollandica 'Superba' was confirmed by Krüssmann in 1962 as a cultivar synonymous with U. praestans,[18][2] though he incorrectly equated it with Osborne and Morren's 'Superba'.[10]

Description

Descriptions of 'Superba' vary. Loudon described Ulmus montana glabra major, 'Canterbury Seedling', as a hybrid similar to Huntingdon Elm in bark and vigour, but more spreading in form, and holding its leaves late.[4]

Henry's description (1913) of Ulmus superba Henry is based on a tree at Kew from Späth, planted in 1900. Recognizing this clone as a hybrid, Henry listed it among what are now called U. × hollandica cultivars, as a rapidly growing, narrow, pyramidal tree with smooth bark and steeply ascending branches. It bore large smooth biserrate dark green leaves, 8–12 cm (3–4 in) long and 4–6 cm broad, very oblique at the base and similar to those of the Wych Elm, but with petioles 5–10 mm long. The flowers too resemble those of the Wych Elm. Henry noted that a tree grown at Kew labelled U. montana macrophylla fastigiata was "similar in all respects" to Späth's 1900 'Superba'.[12]

Späth (1930) described the U. × hollandica hybrid U. praestans Schoch, which he said was synonymous with the U. superba Henry that he himself had supplied to Kew, as "a vigorous tree with upswept branches and large dark green foliage, lasting long into the autumn".[17] Krüssman (1984), though he erroneously listed Morren's 'Superba' as a synonym, described U. × hollandica 'Superba' / U. praestans Schoch as a hybrid with leaves 8–12 cm with 15–18 pairs of veins (he includes a leaf-drawing), retained late into autumn, and an elliptic samarae 1.5–2 cm long with the seed nearly central.[10]

According to Fontaine (1968), the leaves of U. × hollandica 'Superba' are smaller than those of Huntingdon Elm, U. × hollandica 'Vegeta', and a lighter green, with yellow veins.[19] From his reference to Schleswig, where it was cultivated (see below), Fontaine may have been describing U. praestans Schoch.

Berndt (1915) reported that "U. montana superba, a tree known in the Magdeburg region as Ulmus praestans", was "easy to confuse with" the similarly fastigiate but less vigorous U. glabra fastigiata. The leaves of the former are "less broad and slightly lighter in colour, smoother, finer and more evenly veined".[20]

Pests and diseases

No cultivar called 'Superba' is noted to have any resistance to Dutch elm disease.

Cultivation

An "Ulmus montana glabra major, the Canterbury Seedling", was described at the Royal Victoria Park, Bath (Royal Avenue), in 1857[5] and 1902.[21]

A hybrid 'Superba' from Späth was introduced to the UK at Kew Gardens in 1900.[12] Given Späth's pre-1912 naming error, it is not clear whether one planting of U. montana superba at the Dominion Arboretum, Ottawa, Canada, in 1896, sourced from Späth,[22] was the hybrid or the wych 'Superba'. The specimen (no. 42304) maintained as part of a low hedge at Wakehurst Place, Sussex (2020), grown from a cutting from Ottawa donated in 1949, is, however, listed as the hybrid 'Superba',[23] suggesting that 1896 Ottawa planting may likewise have been the hybrid. Herbarium specimens show that three hybrid U. montana superba were sent by Späth to the Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh in 1902;[24] these may survive in Edinburgh, as it was the practice of the Garden to distribute trees about the city (viz. the Wentworth Elm); the current list of Living Accessions held in the Garden per se does not list the plant.[25]

Henry noted that a tree grown at Kew labelled U. montana macrophylla fastigiata was similar in all respects to Späth's 'Superba'.[12]

As well as the Magdeburg plantings and the post-war Späth distribution noted above, the Hesse Nursery of Weener, Germany, supplied U. praestans Schoch in the 1930s,[26] resuming supply of the cultivar after the Second World War.[27] Heybroek reported (1963) that 'Praestans' was regularly planted in Schleswig.[28]

A 'Superba' is not on any accessions list of identified surviving trees in the UK, save the specimen maintained as part of a low hedge at Wakehurst Place.

Fifty-four trees described as U. × hollandica 'Superba' were planted in Dalgas Boulevard, Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark, in 1920.[29][note 1]

Putative specimens in the UK

One putative specimen survives in the UK, a large hybrid elm in Stanmer Park Arboretum, Brighton, with 'Superba'-like steeply ascending branches, and leaves matching 'Superba' herbarium specimens.

  • Stanmer Park Arboretum elm, Brighton (2005)
  • Pressed leaves of same

An old narrowly pyramidal U. × hollandica with steeply ascending branches, which stood in Regent Road Park, Edinburgh, till 2017, had leaves that appeared to match the RBGE 1902 herbarium-specimen of U. montana superba (see 'External links' below).

  • Regent Road Park elm, Edinburgh
  • Same
  • Branching of same
  • Foliage
  • Bole
  • Samarae

Synonymy

Accessions
Europe

Notes
  1. A 1920 photograph of a newly-planted avenue in Dalgas Boulevard may show the trees.
gollark: That was the JS version, this new rewrite is in Rust and therefore 10000x better.
gollark: A shiny new version of `minoteaur`, the web notes thing I demoed a while ago.
gollark: The greatest struggle in programming: figuring out what to name your project. Or variables. In this case project.
gollark: Also, do ++supported_langs (in <#457999277311131649>) to reveal the power of TIO.run.
gollark: Great, I won't.

References
  1. Boulger, George Simonds (1881). McLaren, John (ed.). "On British Elms". Transactions of the Royal Scottish Arboricultural Society. Edinburgh. 9: 39. Retrieved 18 October 2017.
  2. Green, Peter Shaw (1964). "Registration of cultivar names in Ulmus". Arnoldia. Arnold Arboretum, Harvard University. 24 (6–8): 41–80. Retrieved 16 February 2017.
  3. Loudon, Arboretum et fruticetum Britannicum, 1838, p.1405
  4. Loudon, John Claudius (1838). Arboretum et fruticetum Britannicum. 3. p. 1404.
  5. Hanham, F. (1857). A Manual for the Park (Royal Victoria Park, Bath). Longman, London.
  6. "New and splendid ornamental elm - Ulmus montana superba". The Gardeners' Chronicle and Agricultural Gazette: 670. 1845.
  7. Lindley, J., 'The Elm', The Gardeners' Chronicle and Agricultural Gazette, 13 September 1845, p.628, col.3
  8. Rehder, Alfred (1915). "Neue order kritische Gehölze". Mitteilungen der Deutschen Dendrologischen Gesellschaft. 24: 215–219. Retrieved 18 October 2017.
  9. Rehder, Alfred. "Ulmaceae". Bibliography of cultivated trees and shrubs hardy in the cooler temperate regions of the Northern Hemisphere. Jamaica Plain, Massachusetts: The Arnold Arboretum of Harvard University. pp. 135–143. Retrieved 18 October 2017.
  10. Krüssmann, Gerd (1984). Manual of Cultivated Broad-Leaved Trees & Shrubs. 3. p. 410.
  11. Heinricy, B (1908). "Baumpflanzungen in den städten". Die Gartenkunst. 10: 50. Retrieved 17 June 2016.
  12. Elwes, Henry John; Henry, Augustine (1913). The Trees of Great Britain & Ireland. 7. pp. 1873–1874. Republished 2004 Cambridge University Press, ISBN 9781108069380
  13. Katalog (PDF). 108. Berlin, Germany: L. Späth Baumschulenweg. 1902–1903. pp. 132–133.
  14. Späth catalogue 1911/12, p.137
  15. Hartwig, Karl Gustav (1913). "Ulmus praestans". Mitteilungen der Deutschen Dendrologischen Gesellschaft. 22: 302.
  16. Spath, L (1912). "Ulmus praestans = U. montana superba". Möllers Deutsche Gärtner-Zeitung. 27 (15): 177. Retrieved 17 October 2017.
  17. Späth, Ludwig (1930). Späth-Buch, 1720-1930. Berlin: Self published. pp. 311–313, 351–352.
  18. Krüssmann, Gerd (1962). Handbuch der Laubgehölze. 2. p. 537.
  19. F. J., Fontaine (1968). "Ulmus". Dendroflora. 5: 37–55. Retrieved 30 August 2017.
  20. Berndt, C. (1915). "Notizen über Ulmen". Mitteilungen der Deutschen Dendrologischen Gesellschaft. 24: 288. Retrieved 18 October 2017.
  21. Inman, T. Frederic (1905). "The Elm". Proceedings of the Bath Natural History and Antiquarian Field Club. 10: 37. Retrieved 19 August 2016.
  22. Saunders, William; Macoun, William Tyrrell (1899). Catalogue of the trees and shrubs in the arboretum and botanic gardens at the central experimental farm (2 ed.). Ottawa. pp. 74–75.
  23. "ePIC - Detailed results from Living collection for ulmus". epic.kew.org. Retrieved 2017-10-19.
  24. Accessions book. Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh. 1902. pp. 45, 47.
  25. "List of Living Accessions: Ulmus". Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh. Retrieved 21 September 2016.
  26. Hesse, Hermann Albert (1932). Preis- und Sortenliste. pp. 96–97. Retrieved 18 January 2018.
  27. Hesse, Hermann A., Hauptkatalog 1956/57 (Weener, Ems, 1956); p.141-142
  28. Heybroek, Hans M. (1963). Iepen in Sleeswijk. p. 176. Retrieved 30 August 2017.
  29. Christensen, Tove (1990). "Roadside Trees - Stories of destiny Frederiksberg Allé and Dalgas Boulevard" (PDF). Dansk Dendrologisk Årsskrift. 8: 19–23.
  30. Schoch, G. von (1900). "Baumpflanzungen in den städten". Die Gartenkunst. 2: 66. Retrieved 17 June 2016.
  31. Beterams, J (1911). "Nochmals die wertvollen Ulmen". Mitteilungen der Deutschen dendrologischen gesellschaft. 20: 249–250. Retrieved 17 June 2016.

Broad-leaved U. x hollandica 'Superba'

Narrower-leaved U. x hollandica 'Superba' with samara, "received as U. praestans from Späth"


This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.