Electoral (Amendment) Act 1974

The Electoral (Amendment) Act 1974 (No. 7/1974) was a law in Ireland which provided for parliamentary constituencies for the 21st Dáil Éireann.[1] It was a review of parliamentary constituencies passed in Ireland by the governing Fine GaelLabour Party National Coalition. It was intended to secure their re-election, but instead backfired disastrously resulting in a landslide victory for their main opponents in Fianna Fáil. Consequently, the word Tullymander – combining the name of the minister James Tully with the word "gerrymander" – was coined.

Background

The responsibility for drawing political boundaries was in the hands of the political parties and this had often been used for partisan advantage. The Minister for Local Government was directly responsible. Local Government minister James Tully's 1974 scheme proved to be more ambitious than most. By radically redrawing the boundaries in the Greater Dublin Area, mainly by creating a large number of three member constituencies rather than 4 or 5 member constituencies, it was hoped to capitalise on the relative weakness of the main opposition party Fianna Fáil in the capital. The hope was that both Fine Gael and Labour would win one seat each, leaving Fianna Fáil with a solitary seat in each constituency. This plan however relied on the Fianna Fáil vote remaining below the 40% mark in the Dublin area. In the event of it passing that figure, the danger was that Fianna Fáil could win two seats in each constituency even though other parties would have had a combined 60% of the vote. In practice, this is exactly what happened at the 1977 general election and the Tullymander scheme backfired.

A minor aspect of the constituency redrawing concerned the boundary of the constituencies of Meath and Louth. The Meath constituency had seen a population boom in the 1970s, as a result of improved economic performance. Therefore, an extra seat was to be expected. Tully himself was resident in Laytown at the time, and he tried to align the boundary of the Meath constituency so as to get extra votes from nearby expanding Drogheda included in Meath, and thereby bring in a second Labour TD in Meath.

The failure of this partisan scheme led to the creation of an independent Constituency Commission, chaired by a judge, starting with a special commission in 1980 under Justice Brian Walsh and on a statutory basis from 1997[2] to manage all future constituency boundary revisions.

This independent commission is constituted after each population census under the chairpersonship of a High Court or Supreme Court judge and is in charge of constituency definition in light of then current demographics.

Summary table of boundary changes

1973 Constituency No. of seats 1977 constituency No. of seats
Carlow–Kilkenny 5 Carlow–Kilkenny 5
Cavan 3 Cavan–Monaghan 5
Monaghan 3
Clare 3 Clare 3
Clare–Galway South 3 Galway East 4
Galway North-East 3
Galway West 3 Galway West 4
Cork Mid 4 Cork Mid 5
Cork City North-West 3 Cork City 5
Cork City South-East 3
Cork North-East 4 Cork North-East 4
Cork South-West 3 Cork South-West 3
Donegal North-East 3 Donegal 5
Donegal–Leitrim 3
Sligo–Leitrim 3 Sligo–Leitrim 3
Roscommon–Leitrim 3 Roscommon–Leitrim 3
Dublin County North 3
Dublin County North 4
Dublin County West 3
Dublin North-West 4
Dublin Finglas 3
Dublin Clontarf 3
Dublin North-East 4
Dublin Artane 3
Dublin North-Central 4
Dublin North-Central 3
Dublin Central 4 Dublin Cabra 3
Dublin South-Central 3
Dublin South-Central 4
Dublin Rathmines West 3
Dublin South-West 4
Dublin Ballyfermot 3
Dublin County Mid 3
Dublin South-East 3 Dublin South-East 3
Dublin County South 3 Dublin County South 3
Dún Laoghaire and Rathdown 4 Dún Laoghaire 4
Kerry North 3 Kerry North 3
Kerry South 3 Kerry South 3
Kildare 3 Kildare 3
Laois–Offaly 5 Laois–Offaly 5
Limerick East 4 Limerick East 4
Limerick West 3 Limerick West 3
Longford–Westmeath 4 Longford–Westmeath 4
Louth 3 Louth 4
Mayo East 3 Mayo East 3
Mayo West 3 Mayo West 3
Meath 3 Meath 4
Tipperary North 3 Tipperary North 3
Tipperary South 4 Tipperary South 3
Waterford 3 Waterford 4
Wexford 4 Wexford 4
Wicklow 3 Wicklow 3
gollark: Oh, yes, that too.
gollark: Trouble is that ECC stuff in CC currently is... not fast.
gollark: The door lock would then verify that the message was actually signed with the key, and the times are close enough.
gollark: The door lock or whatever would store the public key, the pocket computer the private key, and the pocket computer would constantly broadcast a message containing the current time, signed with its private key.
gollark: Just thinking about it, the most secure way might be a pocket computer sending sender-verified signals based on the current time.

See also

References

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.