Troglofauna

Troglofauna are small cave-dwelling animals that have adapted to their dark surroundings. Troglofauna and stygofauna are the two types of subterranean fauna (based on life-history). Both are associated with subterranean environments – troglofauna are associated with caves and spaces above the water table and stygofauna with water. Troglofaunal species include spiders, insects, myriapods and others. Some troglofauna live permanently underground and cannot survive outside the cave environment. Troglofauna adaptations and characteristics include a heightened sense of hearing, touch and smell.[1] Loss of under-used senses is apparent in the lack of pigmentation as well as eyesight in most troglofauna. Troglofauna insects may exhibit a lack of wings and longer appendages.

"Cave Dwellers" redirects here. For the film of the same name, see Ator 2 - L'invincibile Orion. For humans living in caves, see Cave dweller.
The microscopic cave snail Zospeum tholussum, found at depths of 743 to 1,392 m (2,438 to 4,567 ft) in the Lukina Jama–Trojama cave system of Croatia, is completely blind with a translucent shell

Ecological categories

Troglofauna are divided into three main categories based on their ecology:[2]

  • Troglobionts (or troglobites): species, or populations of species, strictly bound to subterranean habitats.
  • Troglophiles: species living mainly aboveground but also in subterranean habitats. These are further divided into eutroglophiles (aboveground species also able to maintain a permanent subterranean population) and subtroglophiles (species inclined to perpetually or temporarily inhabit a subterranean habitat, but strongly associated with aboveground habitats for some functions).
  • Trogloxenes: species only occurring sporadically in an underground habitat and unable to establish a subterranean population.

Environment

Troglofauna usually live in moderate cave regions.[3] The overall climates of these caves do not significantly change throughout the year. Humidity in such caves is generally high ranging from 95 to 100 percent; evaporation rates are low.

The cave ecosystem in which troglofauna reside can be divided into four zones: entrance, twilight, transition and deep cave.[4] The entrance zone is where the surface and underground environments meet. Light becomes scarcer in the twilight zone. The transition zone is almost completely dark; however some outside environmental effects can still be felt. Finally, the deep cave zone is completely dark, relatively stable, and exhibits no evaporation. Troglobites are usually found in the deep cave zone.

Diet and lifecycle

Troglofauna have adapted to the limited food supply and are extremely energy efficient. Food is found from "twigs, leaves, bacteria and epigean animals (including zooplankton)."[5] Food is also found from trogloxene carcasses, egg deposits, and faeces such as bat guano.[5] Troglofaunal beetles are predators and may feed on other troglofaunal animals rather than bacteria, twigs and guano.

Francis G. Howarth hypothesized on adaptations troglofauna have made to exist in the cave environment, postulating that troglofauna "have lost many of the water conservation mechanisms of surface relatives, and more nearly resemble permanently aquatic arthropods in water balance mechanisms, including cuticular permeability."[4] Troglofauna thrive in a humid environment and when a "chamber is too dry ... animals display either agitated or comatose behavior",[4] indicating they are highly susceptible to changes in temperature and humidity. To survive in an environment where food is scarce and oxygen levels are low, troglofauna often have very low metabolism. As a result, troglofauna may live longer than other terrestrial species.

Reproduction

Reproduction varies by species and may be infrequent,[3] but very little is known.

Evolution and dispersal

Troglofauna have evolved in isolation.[6] Stratigraphic barriers, such as rock walls and layers, and fluvial barriers, such as rivers and streams, prevent or hinder the dispersal of these animals.[3] Consequently, troglofauna habitat and food availability can be very disjunct and precluding a great range in diversity across the landscape.

Species
The cave beetle Leptodirus hochenwartii

Troglofaunal species include representatives of many animal groups, including gastropods, millipedes, spiders, pseudoscorpions, harvestmen, isopods, collembolans, diplurans, beetles and salamanders.[7] Troglofaunal gastropods are endemic to the U.S. and in Europe; they are mostly concentrated in the northeastern Mediterranean regions. Troglofaunal scorpions are mostly found in Mexican caves.[7] Troglobitic spiders are found more widespread in the U.S., Europe, and Japan.[7] However, they are also found in Mexico, Congo, Cuba, Australia, and the Philippines.

Troglofauna are found worldwide.[8] Troglofaunal salamanders are found in Europe and the U.S.

Approximately 90% of caves worldwide remain undiscovered due to lack of visible entrances and more habitat exists in fissures, vugs and other spaces above the watertable. Consequently, many species of troglofauna are yet to be discovered.

Discovery

In more recent times, more troglofaunal species are being identified. In Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks of Sierra Nevada mountains, California, scientists recently discovered 255 new caves, and 30 undescribed invertebrate species – "an extraordinary number for such a small area".[6]

Threats to troglofauna

Floodwaters can be detrimental to troglofaunal species, by dramatically changing the availability of habitat, food and connectivity to other habitats and oxygen. Many troglofaunal species are likely to be sensitive to changes in their environment and floods, which can accompany a drop in temperature that may adversely affect some animals.[9] Extreme winter temperatures may affect troglofaunal species near the surface. Birds and bats in caves prey on troglofauna. Troglofauna are likely to compete with each other for survival.

Humans also pose a threat to troglofauna. Mismanagement of contaminants (e.g. pesticides and sewage) may poison troglofaunal communities,[6] whilst removal of habitat, either directly or indirectly (e.g. rising watertable) is also a major threat.

gollark: > Starting next week, we’ll begin to use our in-product screens and our blog to raise awareness of anti-racist causes and encourage you to take concrete action, such as calling on local officials to advocate for police reform.If they *actually* add political nag screens to Discord-the-application and not just Discord-the-blog, I am probably going to need to... adjust my adblocker rules?
gollark: That's basically half of what Discord's about!
gollark: It talks about using "technology" to "proactively identify bad actors".
gollark: T&S is presumably not waiting for invites or... actually joining, just reading messages.
gollark: It says so in the blog post.

See also

References
  1. Phil Chapman (1982). "The Origins of Troglobites" (PDF). Proceedings of the University of Bristol Spelæological Society. 16 (2): 133–141.
  2. Sket, Boris (2008-06-01). "Can we agree on an ecological classification of subterranean animals?". Journal of Natural History. 42 (21–22): 1549–1563. doi:10.1080/00222930801995762. ISSN 0022-2933.
  3. Thomas L. Poulson & William B. White (1969). "The cave environment". Science. 165 (3897): 971–981. doi:10.1126/science.165.3897.971. PMID 17791021.
  4. Francis G. Howarth (1980). "The zoogeography of specialized cave animals: a bioclimatic model". Evolution. 34 (2): 394–406. doi:10.2307/2407402. JSTOR 2407402.
  5. Thomas C. Barr, Jr. (1967). "Observations on the ecology of caves". The American Naturalist. 101 (922): 475–491. doi:10.1086/282512. JSTOR 2459274.
  6. Kevin Krajick (September 2007). "Discoveries in the dark". National Geographic.
  7. Thomas C. Barr, Jr. & John R. Holsinger (1985). "Speciation in cave faunas". Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. 16: 313–337. doi:10.1146/annurev.es.16.110185.001525. JSTOR 2097051.
  8. Robert W. Mitchell (1969). "A comparison of temperate and tropical cave communities". The Southwestern Naturalist. 14 (1): 73–88. doi:10.2307/3669249. JSTOR 3669249.
  9. John Lamoreux (2004). "Stygobites are more wide-ranging than troglobites" (PDF). Journal of Cave and Karst Studies. 66 (1): 18–19.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.