Trivor
Trivor (Urdu: ترِووُر) is one of the high peaks of the Hispar Muztagh, a subrange of the Karakoram range in the Gilgit-Baltistan of Pakistan. Its height is often given as 7,728 metres, but this elevation is not consistent with photographic evidence.[1] The height given here is from a Russian 1:100,000 topographic map.[2]
| Trivor ترِووُر | |
|---|---|
  Trivor ترِووُر Location in Pakistan | |
| Highest point | |
| Elevation | 7,577 m (24,859 ft) Ranked 39th |
| Prominence | 980 m (3,220 ft) |
| Coordinates | 36°17′15″N 75°05′10″E |
| Geography | |
| Location | Gilgit District, Gilgit-Baltistan, Pakistan |
| Parent range | Hispar Muztagh |
| Climbing | |
| First ascent | 1960 by Wilfrid Noyce, Jack Sadler (British/US) |
| Easiest route | Northwest Ridge: glacier/snow/ice climb |
There have been only two successful climbs of this peak; the first ascent was in 1960 by a British-American party.[3][4]
Sources
- Jerzy Wala, Orographical Sketch Map of the Karakoram, Swiss Foundation for Alpine Research, Zurich, 1990.
- Jill Neate, High Asia: an illustrated history of the 7,000 metre peaks, The Mountaineers, 1989.
Notes
- http://www.viewfinderpanoramas.org/elevmisquotes.html#hispar Some Frequently Misquoted Elevations
- "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2008-04-27. Retrieved 2008-04-27.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link) Hispar area: expedition reports and maps
- http://www.alpine-club.org.uk/hi/ Himalayan Index
- Noyce, Wilfred (1963). To the unknown mountain. London: The travel book club.
gollark: Probably just that while people like the idea of better-compressed images, it's not very useful for a browser or whatever to implement it if no sites use it, and not very useful for a site to implement it if no browsers support it.
gollark: I'm not really sure.
gollark: No, at least in this field they're frequently made by large well-funded teams, but it just takes ages for support to be implemented anywhere.
gollark: I mean, apart from support, AVIF is not very good in terms of being supported by anything at all, but it's technologically superior.
gollark: Also, JPEG bad AVIF good.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.