Trial of Oscar Pistorius

The trial of Oscar Pistorius for the murder of Reeva Steenkamp and several gun-related charges (The State vs Oscar Pistorius)[1][2] in the High Court of South Africa in Pretoria opened on 3 March 2014. On 11–12 September 2014, Judge Thokozile Masipa delivered a verdict that Pistorius was not guilty of murder, but guilty of the culpable homicide of Steenkamp and reckless endangerment with a firearm at a restaurant.[3][4] On 21 October 2014, Pistorius received a prison sentence of a maximum of five years for culpable homicide and a concurrent three-year suspended prison sentence for the separate reckless endangerment conviction.[5][6]

The State vs Oscar Pistorius
The Palace of Justice in Pretoria
Court	Gauteng Division of the High Court of South Africa in Pretoria
Decided	12 September 2014 (2014-09-12)
Transcript(s)	Judgment Appeal Judgment
Case history
Subsequent action(s)	Pistorius sentenced to 5 years in prison for culpable homicide (later resentenced to 6 then 15 years for murder)
Related action(s)	Multichoice (Proprietary) Limited and others v National Prosecuting Authority and another [2014] ZAGPPHC 37, Gauteng Division, Pretoria (South Africa) (broadcasting of proceedings)
Court membership
Judge(s) sitting	Thokozile Masipa

Pistorius is a leading South African runner, who won attention as an athlete with a disability competing at a high level, including at multiple Paralympic Games and the 2012 Summer Olympics. Steenkamp, a model, was Pistorius's girlfriend. In the early morning of Thursday, 14 February 2013, Steenkamp was shot and killed by Pistorius at his Pretoria home.[7][8][9] Pistorius acknowledged that he shot Steenkamp, but said that he mistook her for an intruder.[10] Pistorius was taken into police custody and was formally charged with murder in a Pretoria court on 15 February 2013.[11][12][13]

On 25 February 2014, Judge President Dunstan Mlambo ruled in the High Court in Pretoria that the entire trial could be broadcast live via audio and that parts of the trial could be broadcast live via television, namely the opening and closing arguments, the testimony of consenting state witnesses, the judgment, and the sentencing if applicable.[14][15][16]

In December 2015, the Supreme Court of Appeal overturned the culpable homicide verdict and found Pistorius guilty of murder. On 6 July 2016 Judge Masipa sentenced Pistorius to six years in prison for murder. On appeal by the state for a longer prison sentence, the Supreme Court of Appeal more than doubled Pistorius's prison term to 15 years with time served counting towards the sentence leaving 13 years and five months.[17]

Bail hearing

Cape Times billboard following the arrest of Pistorius in February 2013

The bail hearing commenced on 19 February 2013 before Chief Magistrate of Pretoria, Desmond Nair.[7][18] During the hearing, both prosecution and defence said that Pistorius had fired four shots through a locked toilet door, hitting Steenkamp, who was inside, three times.[19][20] Prosecutor Gerrie Nel claimed that Pistorius had put on his prosthetic legs, walked across his bedroom to the bathroom, and intentionally shot Steenkamp through the door.[19][21] Nel argued that the time required for this process was sufficient to establish the alleged murder as premeditated.[22] Pistorius said that he had thought Steenkamp was in the bed, and that the person in the toilet was an intruder.[19]

Chief investigating officer Hilton Botha said at the bail hearing that a witness had heard gunshots coming from Pistorius' home and then a female screaming followed by more gunshots; he initially said the witness was 600 metres (2,000 ft) away, but later said the distance was 300 metres (980 ft).[23] Botha also said the trajectory of the gunshots indicated that they had been fired downward and directly toward the toilet, seemingly conflicting with Pistorius' statement that he was not wearing his prosthetics at the time.[24] He acknowledged that procedural mistakes had been made during the crime scene investigation and that police had found no evidence inconsistent with the version of events presented by Pistorius, adding later that equally nothing contradicted the police version, either.[23][24] On 22 February 2013, Botha was removed from the case following revelations that he was facing attempted murder charges stemming from a 2009 incident. Botha was replaced by Vineshkumar Moonoo, described as "the most senior detective" in the South African Police Service.[25]

On the first day of the bail hearing, Magistrate Nair ruled that for the purposes of the bail hearing Pistorius was charged with a Schedule 6 criminal offence, which relates to serious crimes including premeditated murder and requires exceptional circumstances for release on bail.[26][27] On 22 February 2013, at the conclusion of the four-day bail hearing, Magistrate Nair said that the state had not convinced him that Pistorius posed a flight risk and fixed bail at R1 million (US$113,000).[28] On 4 June 2013 the court case was postponed to allow time for further investigation until a hearing at Pretoria Magistrate's Court on 19 August 2013,[29][30] when Pistorius was formally indicted on charges of murder and the illegal possession of ammunition. The indictment noted that even if Pistorius was mistaken in the identity of the person he shot, the intention was to kill.[31][32]

In late June 2013, Pistorius returned to training, reportedly looking much thinner and wearing a beard. His agent said that it was a very emotional experience for Pistorius and that returning had been a "bittersweet" moment for him.[33]

Trial

Dates for a trial to be held at the Gauteng Division of the High Court were initially set from 3 to 20 March 2014,[34] and later extended until 16 May 2014.[35] The court was set to adjourn after proceedings on 17 April 2014, returning on 5 May 2014, to accommodate scheduling conflicts of the prosecution.[36]

The murder trial commenced on 3 March 2014 in the High Court in Pretoria. Pistorius was also facing a charge of illegal possession of ammunition and two charges of firing a gun in a public space.[37][38][39][40] The trial was assigned to Judge Thokozile Masipa,[41] who appointed two assessors, Janette Henzen du Toit and Themba Mazibuko,[42] to help her evaluate the case and reach a verdict.[43] There was no jury, the jury system in South Africa being abolished during apartheid.[44]

Section 35 of the South African Bill of Rights provides that "Every accused person has a right to a fair trial, which includes the right... to be tried in a language that the accused person understands or, if that is not practicable, to have the proceedings interpreted in that language".[45] At the start of the trial, Judge Masipa told the court that the proceedings would be held in English with the assistance of interpreters, and confirmed that Pistorius spoke English.[46] Difficulties related to court interpreters have led to court delays, mistranslations and witnesses opting to testify in English rather than their first language.[47][48][49]

The opening statement of prosecutor Gerrie Nel noted that the murder case against Pistorius was based largely on circumstantial evidence, as there were no eyewitnesses to the incident.[47] Contrary to statements made in the bail hearing, the prosecution's case in the trial was that Pistorius was not wearing his prosthetic legs at the time of the shooting,[50][51][52] or when he broke the toilet door down afterwards.[53] Prosecution expert witness Christian Mangena, a police ballistics analyst, testified "the shooter was most likely not wearing prosthetic legs".[54][55][56] Prosecution expert witness Johannes Vermeulen, a police forensic analyst, testified Pistorius was not wearing his prosthetic legs when he broke the toilet door down with a cricket bat after the shooting.[57] Pistorius pleaded not guilty to all the charges against him, including murder and three gun-related charges.[58][59]

In his opening statement read out by Pistorius family lawyer Kenny Oldwage,[2] Pistorius said he believed Steenkamp was in bed when he shot at what he thought was an intruder behind the toilet door, and that he had spoken to her in bed shortly beforehand.[60] He admitted to killing Steenkamp, but denied the charge of murder.[10][61]

The lead defence advocate in the case was Barry Roux.[2][62] In South African criminal law, murder is defined as the intentional unlawful killing of another human being. The defence of Pistorius was that, in shooting at what he believed to be an intruder, he mistakenly believed he was acting in self-defence, and as self-defence excludes the unlawfulness requirement of criminal liability, an act in valid self-defence is lawful. Technically his defence amounted to a claim that he did not intend to act unlawfully. If he could raise a reasonable doubt in his favour that he was mistaken, as he claimed, he is entitled, under South African law, to an acquittal on the charge of murder. The court then considered whether this mistake was reasonable – one that a reasonable person, in his circumstances, may have made. If the court concluded that this was an unreasonable mistake, it would convict him of Culpable homicide (all other requirements assumed). Culpable homicide in South African criminal law is defined as the negligent unlawful killing of another human being – roughly the equivalent of the English and US manslaughter.[61]

Progress of the trial

On the first and second day of the trial, a witness testified to hearing sounds of arguing that lasted about an hour. Five witnesses testified to what were described as a woman's screams and gunshots on the night Steenkamp died.[63][64][65][66][67][68] On the morning of day three, the defence resumed the cross examination of witnesses claiming to have heard a woman's screams and gunshots. The defence sought to establish that this was in fact Pistorius screaming for help and that the "explosive sounds" heard was the door to the toilet being battered down. In the afternoon the prosecution continued with testimony relating to an incident when a shot was fired in a restaurant the year previously.[69][70][71][72]

On the fourth day, Pistorius' neighbour, Johan Stipp, a radiologist, testified that he found Pistorius praying over Steenkamp's body when he went over to help after being woken by what he described as the sound of gunshots and a woman screaming. Stipp testified that the first thing he remembered Pistorius saying when he saw him was "I shot her. I thought she was a burglar. I shot her." Stipp also testified that the light was on in the bathroom and he saw a figure moving as a woman screamed.[73][74][75][76]

On day five the court heard testimony from a former girlfriend of Pistorius and from a security guard at the estate where Pistorius lived, on duty the night of the events. The court adjourned until the following Monday 10 March 2014.[77][78][79][80] The trial entered its sixth day on 10 March. Pistorius vomited multiple times in court as the state pathologist delivered graphic testimony about the nature of Steenkamp's injuries.[81][82][83][84]

On 24 March, the court heard testimony about messages sent on iPhones between Pistorius and Steenkamp using WhatsApp. Ninety percent of them were described as loving and normal, but there were several from Steenkamp accusing Pistorius of jealousy and possessiveness. In one of them, sent less than three weeks before her killing, Steenkamp told Pistorius "I'm scared of you sometimes, of how you snap at me", and described his behaviour as "nasty".[85][86] The state rested their case on Tuesday 25 March, having called 20 witnesses from an original list of 107.[87]

On 28 March, the trial was postponed until 7 April as one of the assessors fell ill.[42][88] On 7 April, Pistorius began testifying in his own defence at the trial.[89][90] The cross examination of Pistorius lasted for five days, and ended on 15 April.[91][92][93][94][95][96] Re-examination by defence lasted less than ten minutes, in the course of which defence asked Pistorius to read from a Valentine card which Steenkamp had given the athlete. Steenkamp had written: "I think today is a good day to tell you that, I love you". Pistorius previously testified that he opened the card on Steenkamp's birthday in August 2013.[96][97]

Following further defence testimony the trial was adjourned until 5 May 2014.[98][99]

On 5 May, Johan Stander, manager of the estate where Pistorius lived, testified that Pistorius called at 3.18 am saying "Please, please come to my house. I shot Reeva, I thought she was an intruder. Please, please come quick." He went with his daughter and found Pistorius coming down the stairs with Steenkamp in his arms. "He was broken, he was screaming, he was crying, he was praying, I saw the truth that morning", he said.[100][101]

On 6 May, a married couple who lived next to Pistorius' house testified that they both heard a man crying loudly in a high-pitched voice and calling three times for help.[102] Another immediate neighbour testified that she heard a man crying, describing the sounds as a "cry of pain".[103] There was no hearing Wednesday 7 May, due to the South African general election. Defence lawyer Barry Roux indicated that he would be finished with witness testimony by Tuesday 13 May.[104]

On 8 May, professor Christina Lundgren, an anaesthesiologist, testified that estimates of the time Steenkamp last ate were not reliable. The defence also called Yvette van Schalkwyk, a social worker and probation officer assigned to Pistorius, who had contacted the defence after reading newspaper reports suggesting Pistorius was acting and that his emotional responses were insincere. She said that in February 2013 she sat with him in the cells during his bail appearance, where he vomited twice, cried eighty percent of the time, and was in mourning and suffering emotionally, and that Pistorius told her that he missed Steenkamp a great deal. "He loved her. .. He couldn't think what her parents must be going through" she said. Under cross-examination, Lundgren conceded that Pistorius had not told her he was sorry he killed Reeva.[105] The defence ballistics expert and former police officer Tom Wolmarans began his testimony.[106]

On 9 May, Wolmarans countered a suggestion from a prosecution ballistics expert that Steenkamp cowered with her hand over her head. "The left hand cannot have been against her head because there were no wounds and no brain tissue on the inside of her hand" he said.[107][108]

On 12 May, forensic psychiatrist Dr Merryl Vorster testified that Pistorius has a generalised anxiety disorder (GAD) and is a "distrusting and guarded" person hyper-vigilant about security, and also that in a fight or flight situation he is more likely to stand up to threatening situations than to flee, due to his disability.[109] The prosecution said they would bring an application for Pistorius' mental condition to be independently assessed under article 78 of the South African Criminal Procedure Act.[110]

On 13 May, the court heard concluding testimony from Vorster. Judge Masipa said she would rule the following day on the prosecution application to have Pistorius' mental condition evaluated.[111] On 14 May, Judge Masipa granted the prosecution's application for Pistorius to be referred for mental evaluation.[112]

On 20 May, Judge Masipa ordered evaluation to take place as an out-patient at Weskoppies Psychiatric Hospital in Pretoria weekdays between 9 am and 4 pm, starting 26 May and lasting up to thirty days.[113][114] The evaluation found that Pistorius was not mentally incapacitated to the extent where he could not tell right from wrong,[115] though it did say that he currently suffers from anxiety and post-traumatic stress disorder, and would need continuing psychiatric care or he could become suicidal.[116]

On 30 June, surgeon Gerald Versfeld, who amputated Pistorius' lower legs when he was 11 months old, testified about the effects of Pistorius walking or standing on his stumps.[117] Acoustic engineer Ivan Lin testified that tests suggested that if Steenkamp was screaming in Pistorius’ toilet, it was "very unlikely" that the screams would be audible or intelligible from 177 metres (581 ft) away, and that "although we can typically distinguish male and female screams, you cannot do so reliably, without exception".[118][119] Masipa also issued an order that police officers depose affidavits about a missing electrical extension cord.[120]

On 1 July, Lin conceded it was possible that state witnesses heard screams from the Pistorius house from up to 177 metres (581 ft) away. Peet van Zyl, Pistorius's agent, testified that Pistorius was in a "loving and caring relationship" with Reeva Steenkamp. Van Zyl described the sprinter as "hypervigilant", and said he rarely lost his temper.[121]

On 2 July, defence lawyer Roux read excerpts from a psychologist's report, which stated "Mr Pistorius has been severely traumatised by the events that took place on 14 February 2013, He currently suffers from a post-traumatic stress disorder, and a major depressive disorder ... The degree of anxiety and depression that is present is significant. He is also mourning the loss of Ms Steenkamp. Mr Pistorius is being treated and should continue to receive clinical care by a psychiatrist and a clinical psychologist for his current condition. Should he not receive proper clinical care, his condition is likely to worsen and increase the risk for suicide."[122] The report did not confirm a diagnosis of "Generalised Anxiety Disorder" by a witness called by the defence, "No evidence could be found to indicate that Mr Pistorius suffered from anxiety to the extent that it impaired his functioning prior to the incident in February 2013." The report found some jealousy but no evidence of abuse by Pistorius: "There is evidence to indicate that Mr Pistorius was genuine with his feelings towards Miss Steenkamp and that they had a normal loving relationship. He did become insecure and jealous at times but this was normal for the specific situation. He would express his displeasure and irritation but would try and sort it out later by talking with Miss Steenkamp. Although the relationship was still young, there were no signs of abusive coercion like those often found in these kinds of relationships."[122] Wayne Derman, professor of sport and exercise medicine at the University of Cape Town, testified that Pistorius was "hyper-vigilant" and restless.[123]

On 3 July, under cross-examination, Derman testified "You've got a paradox of an individual who is supremely able, and you've got an individual who is significantly disabled". Derman, who had treated Pistorius over six years while working with South African Olympic and Paralympic teams, said Pistorius' anxieties included concern about flying. "He has a specific fear of being trapped somewhere without being able to move very rapidly." and that on the night he killed Steenkamp,"fleeing was not an option" as Pistorius was not wearing his artificial legs. Prosecutor Nel suggested Derman could not give evidence against his patient. "The truth would come before my patient," Derman responded.[124]

On 8 July, the defence closed its case. Defence lawyer Barry Roux protested "We were unable to call a number of witnesses because they refused, and didn't want their voices heard all over the world."[125]

Closing arguments were heard on 7 and 8 August,[126] with prosecutor Nel stating that Pistorius concocted a "snowball of lies",[127] demanding that Pistorius face consequences for his actions[128] and in response defence lawyer Barry Roux stated that the timeline proves that Pistorius' story is true,[129] compared Pistorius' reaction to danger as being like that of an abused woman,[130] and that Pistorius should only ever have faced culpable homicide charges, not murder.[131]

Judge Masipa adjourned the trial until 11 September 2014 for the delivery of the verdict.[132][133]

Verdict

The court's verdict, which was arrived at unanimously by the judge and her two assessors,[134] was delivered by Judge Masipa over two days, with the formal verdict delivered on 12 September 2014.[135][136] On 11 September Judge Masipa dismissed much of the state's circumstantial evidence, while also describing Pistorius as a "very poor witness".[135][137][138] Judge Masipa said the state had not proved beyond a reasonable doubt that Pistorius was guilty of premeditated murder and also ruled out dolus eventualis, i.e. common murder,[3][139] accepting that "he did not subjectively foresee this as a possibility, that he would kill the person behind the door, let alone the deceased as he thought she was in the bedroom".[135][140] However, Judge Masipa said culpable homicide was a competent verdict, i.e. a lesser offence that is a possible alternative verdict.[135][141][142][143] She said a reasonable person in the same circumstances would have "foreseen the possibility that if he fired four shots whoever was behind the toilet [door] might be struck and die as a result". She said Pistorius "failed to take any steps to avoid the death",[137] "acted too hastily and used excessive force" and his actions were clearly negligent.[135][136][140][144] On 12 September Judge Masipa found Pistorius not guilty of murder but guilty of the culpable homicide of Steenkamp and guilty of reckless endangerment with a firearm at a restaurant in a separate incident. He was found not guilty of the charges relating to discharging a firearm through the sunroof of a car and illegal possession of ammunition.[3][135][136][145]

Pistorius was convicted of the following specific criminal offences:[4][135][144]

1. Culpable homicide, defined as "the unlawful negligent killing of a human being"[146][147]
2. Contravention of section 120(3)(b) of the Firearms Control Act, 2000 (reckless endangerment), namely to "discharge or otherwise handle a firearm, an antique firearm or an airgun in a manner likely to injure or endanger the safety or property of any person or with reckless disregard for the safety or property of any person"[148]

Judge Masipa adjourned the trial until 13 October 2014 for sentencing and granted Pistorius a bail extension.[149]

Reactions

According to media monitoring company ROi Africa, the majority of social media comments during the delivery of the verdict were critical of Judge Masipa after it became evident that Pistorius would not be found guilty of murder. Judge Masipa, who was given police protection from the beginning of the trial, was subjected to threats and personal attacks by people who disagreed with the verdict.[150][151]

Following Pistorius' sentencing Reeva Steenkamp's mother, June Steenkamp, claimed he was "sure to kill someone sooner or later".[152]

Sentencing

The sentencing hearing began on 13 October 2014.[153] Witnesses for the defence recommended a three-year community sentence (correctional supervision) with 16 hours of community service per month. State witness Zach Modise, acting national commissioner of Correctional Services, testified that being disabled Pistorius would be held in Pretoria Central Prison's hospital wing if he receives a prison sentence.[154] In a statement released on 15 October, Steenkamp's parents said they would not testify in the sentencing hearing and that they had decided not to proceed with a separate civil lawsuit. Steenkamp's cousin Kim Martin testified for the state about the impact on the family and asked the court to impose a prison sentence.[153][154][155][156] Closing arguments were heard on 17 October, when the defence argued against a prison sentence and the state requested a minimum prison sentence of 10 years.[156]

On 21 October 2014, Pistorius received a prison sentence of a maximum of five years for culpable homicide.[5][6][157] Part of the sentence may be served under correctional supervision;[158] after he has served a minimum of one-sixth of five years (10 months) in prison.[159][160][161] He also received a concurrent three-year prison sentence, which was suspended for five years, for the separate reckless endangerment conviction.[5][6][157]

Appeal and release

On 27 October 2014, prosecution spokesman Nathi Mncube confirmed that prosecutors would lodge an appeal against both the verdict and the sentence.[162][163] On 18 November 2014, Pistorius' lawyers said the State's appeal was fundamentally flawed, and must be dismissed.[164][165] On 10 December 2014, Judge Masipa gave prosecutors leave to appeal against the murder acquittal, but not the five-year sentence given for the lesser charge of culpable homicide. On 9 February 2015, prosecutors filed notice to appeal. With the defense expected to file papers in July 2015, the process was unlikely to complete before Pistorius was due to be released from direct imprisonment in August 2015.[166][167] On 13 March 2015, Judge Masipa dismissed the defence application to block prosecutors from appealing the culpable homicide verdict. She said that would be tantamount to reviewing her own decision to allow the appeal. It was not clear when the appeal would be heard.[168]

On 8 June 2015, South African Commissioner of Correctional Services Zach Modise said that the prison case management committee had recommended that Pistorius be released under correctional supervision on 21 August 2015 having served a sixth of his sentence.[169] This release was based on good behavior and the fact that he is not considered a danger to the community. Pistorius would remain under house arrest and correctional supervision, and may be required to perform community service as part of his continuing sentence. Regardless of his release from prison, Pistorius would not be allowed to return to official athletic competition until the whole five years of his sentence was complete.[170]

On 19 August 2015, two days before Pistorius was due to leave prison, the justice minister, Michael Masutha, sent the case to the parole review board, saying that the parole board should not have started considering parole until Pistorius had completed a sixth of his sentence. Legal experts said this was a novel interpretation of the law, and that parole boards generally considered parole in advance of the earliest release date.[171] Suggestions of improper political interference were made, after a tweet on the official Twitter page of the ruling party, the African National Congress, incorrectly referred to Pistorius as a "convicted murderer".[172][173][174] Pistorius' family said the parole review board would be sitting on 18 September 2015.[175][176]

On 14 September 2015, the defence filed papers arguing that the State was disputing judge Masipa's finding that Pistorius did not intend to kill Ms Steenkamp, and this was not allowed.[177][178]

The parole review board met on 18 September, but the decision was put off for two weeks. "They could not deal with all the matters at hand" according to Manelisi Wolela, spokesman for the Department of Correctional Services.[179][180]

On 22 September 2015, the Supreme Court of Appeal confirmed the appeal would be heard on 3 November 2015 by Judges Lex Mpati, Nonkosi Mhlantla, Eric Leach, Steven Majiedt and Elizabeth Baartman.[181]

On 5 October 2015, the parole review board referred the parole decision back to the original parole panel, stating that Pistorius should be "subjected to psychotherapy" as part of his parole conditions.[182][183] Pistorius' family questioned the legality of the delay, suggesting that he was not treated like other prisoners due to "the public, political and media hype", and stated that he was already receiving ongoing psychotherapy.[184] On 9 October 2015, the parole board met again and postponed a hearing until 15 October, stating the board would again consult the family of Reeva Steenkamp.[185][186][187] On 15 October 2015, the parole board confirmed Pistorius would be released to house arrest on 20 October 2015,[188] however Pistorius was released on 19 October 2015.[189]

Appeal Court and Constitutional Court appeals

South Africa's Supreme Court of Appeal heard the case on 3 November 2015. The prosecution argued that who was behind the toilet door was irrelevant; the defence countered that Pistorius genuinely believed his life was in danger when he opened fire.[190]

The court overturned the verdict of the trial court on 3 December 2015, upgrading the conviction to murder, finding that the lower court did not correctly apply the rule of dolus eventualis, and also that Pistorius was not justified in claiming that he thought his own life was in danger.[191][192]

On 8 December 2015, it was announced that Pistorius would continue to remain free on bail of 10,000 rand (under £500, US $686) since Judge Aubrey Ledwaba did not consider him to be a flight risk, though remaining under house arrest. He was to be allowed to leave home between 7 am and noon each day, but staying within a 20 km radius[193] of his uncle's mansion in Pretoria, to be enforced with the aid of an electronic monitoring device. He was required to give up his passport. Pistorius will appeal his murder conviction in South Africa's Constitutional Court.[194] Should the higher court not agree to hear the appeal, Pistorius would be back in court on 18 April 2016 for the start of the sentencing phase of his murder conviction.[195]

On 11 January 2016, Pistorius applied for leave to appeal to South Africa’s constitutional court,[196] his lawyers contended that the Supreme Court of Appeal had 'acted unlawfully and unconstitutionally' by rejecting factual findings of the original verdict,[197] and made mistakes in its application of the principle of dolus eventualis.[198] On 3 March 2016 the Constitutional Court denied the application.[199]

Re-sentencing

In December 2015, the Supreme Court of Appeal overturned the culpable homicide verdict and found Pistorius guilty of murder, believing Pistorius should have known that firing his gun would have killed whoever was behind the door, regardless of who he thought it was.[200] On 6 July 2016 Judge Thokozile Masipa sentenced Pistorius to six years in prison for murder, although the prosecution has called for 15 years, the minimum prison sentence in South Africa for murder.[200] Masipa argued that Pistorius had already served 12 months in prison for the culpable homicide conviction and was remorseful for his killing.[201] In November 2017, the South African Supreme Court of Appeal added 9 years to the sentence, for a total of 15 years, following a government appeal.[202] Pistorius will be eligible for parole in 2023.[203] Pistorius and his defense team are appealing this new ruling.[204]

Notable media coverage

Print media

Pistorius on the cover of Time in 2013

• Time published a cover story titled "Pistorius and South Africa's culture of violence" in the 11 March 2013 issue of the magazine.[205][206] The magazine cover contains text superimposed on an image of a barechested Pistorius with his running blades on, portraying his progression from man to superman to gunman.[207][208] Journalism professor at City University London Roy Greenslade described the cover image as "one of those striking cover images that bears all the hallmarks of being one that will live on for years to come".[209] The Sowetan listed the cover appearance date as one of the "key dates in his journey from internationally renowned athlete to a man on trial for murder".[210]
• Vanity Fair published a feature story about the incident titled "The Shooting Star and The Model" in the Crime section of their June 2013 issue.[211]
• On 4 March 2014, The Guardian published an article by South African crime novelist Margie Orford, "Oscar Pistorius trial: the imaginary black stranger at heart of the defence", describing how the case "taps into a painful narrative in which race, sex, power and violence converge".[212]
• In his Business Day column published on 13 March 2014, Caxton Professor of Journalism at Wits University Anton Harber states that the trial represents a turning point for local newspapers unable to compete with "the speed and conversational nature of electronic media". He also notes that the fact that the presiding judge has "her finger on the off button for live broadcast" is restraining the behaviour of the media.[213]
• Several cartoons about the case by award-winning South African cartoonist Zapiro have been published. A cartoon titled "St. Valentine's Day Shocker" published in the Mail & Guardian on 14 February 2013 depicts two scenarios, one portraying the culpable homicide version of events based on mistaken identity and the other portraying Pistorius as an Oscar-winning actor.[214] A cartoon titled "Reeva Steenkamp as Lady Justice in Oscar Pistorius Trial" published in The Times on 4 March 2014 depicts Steenkamp as Lady Justice running after Pistorius.[215] A cartoon titled "Legal Reasoning Behind Oscar Pistorius Verdict" published in The Times on 16 September 2014 depicts the ensuing public debate about the legal technicalities of the verdict.[216]
• A controversial Paddy Power advertisement captioned "money back if he walks" was published in British tabloid The Sun on 2 March 2014 as a publicity stunt. The UK Advertising Standards Authority found that Paddy Power breached the CAP Code and brought the advertising industry into disrepute after receiving a record number of 5,525 complaints that the advertisement made light of a murder trial, the death of a woman, domestic violence and disability.[217][218][219]
• On 12 September 2014 The New York Times compared the South African public's interest in the trial to that of Americans in the O. J. Simpson murder trial, reflecting "South Africa's complicated obsession with race, crime and celebrity".[220]
• On 23 October 2015 the South African Press Ombudsman concluded that a story published in August 2015 by the "Saturday Star" was "blatantly inaccurate and unfair to Pistorius" and directed the paper to publish an apology.[221] The South African Judiciary Inspectorate of Correctional Services (JICS) apologised to Pistorius for misleading statements made by a representative quoted in the media in August 2015.[222]

Radio, television, and film

• On 11 March 2013, BBC Three aired an hour-long documentary about the incident titled Oscar Pistorius: What Really Happened? Discovery International acquired the broadcasting rights to the programme, which will be titled Blade Runner: The Untold Story in the United States.[223][224]

• On 3 June 2013, Channel 5 aired two consecutive hour-long documentaries titled Why Did Oscar Pistorius Kill Our Daughter? and Pistorius Trial: The Key Questions.[225][226][227][228]

• On 29 January 2014, it was announced that South African satellite pay-channel DStv would launch a dedicated 24-hour channel providing in-depth coverage of the Oscar Pistorius trial on 2 March 2014. It was DStv's first pop-up channel covering a major news story.[229][230]

• In February 2014 eNCA aired a half-hour documentary special about Steenkamp's life titled Reeva: The Model You Thought You Knew.[231]

• An hour-long documentary titled Oscar Pistorius: Burden of Truth was aired during M-Net's Carte Blanche programme on 16 February 2014 and subsequently on the Crime & Investigation Network.[231][232]

• On 3 March 2014, Eyewitness News, along with sister radio brands 702 and CapeTalk, launched a digital pop-up radio station covering the Oscar Pistorius trial. The radio station was available on desktop and mobile, as well as on the Primedia Broadcasting audio streaming apps. The pop-up radio station was available during every day of the trial, concluding on the final day of sentencing on 21 October 2014.

• ESPN, a TV channel focussing on sports-related programming, covered the trial on their ESPN3 network.[233]

• On 16 June 2014, 48 Hours aired an hour-long documentary titled Oscar Pistorius: Shots in the Dark.[234]

• On 6 July 2014, Australia's Seven Network dedicated an hour-long episode of Sunday Night to a story titled Running Scared which was their own investigation into the likelihood of Pistorius' guilt. The story included Pistorius' own reenactments as well as audio recordings and animations of the scene, and gave much heavier weight to claims of his innocence.[235] The following day, many in South Africa, including Pistorius' family and legal team, slammed the broadcast, saying the reenactment footage had been illegally obtained. They claimed the footage was created solely for trial preparation and that the US company engaged to create it had breached contract by selling it to Seven Network.[236] Seven Network refused to apologise, stating that they stood by their decision to air the story and denying any involvement in illegal procurement of the footage. They reminded the public that Steenkamp's family participated in the creation of the story, citing their interviews that went to air.

• On 12 September 2014, SABC 3 broadcast an episode of Special Assignment titled Oscar Pistorius: The Verdict. The programme highlighted the missing white woman syndrome media phenomenon in South Africa, given the disproportionate coverage of the trial and the Leigh Matthews murder trial with the coverage relating to the deaths of black women named Zanele Khumalo and Betty Ketane respectively, in similar circumstances and time periods.[237]

• On 15 September 2014, BBC Three broadcast Oscar Pistorius: The Truth, a documentary produced by NBC News subsidiary Peacock Productions, including extensive interviews with Barry and June Steenkamp.[238]

Social media

• On 22 February 2013, technology news site, Memeburn analyzed Pistorius's bail hearing as it transpired on social media.[239]
• The Pistorius trial saw many South African journalists gain social media prominence as they reported from the courtroom. Writing for Memeburn, Lauren Granger explored the rise of Barry Bateman as the go to source for all things Pistorius and the Twitter explosion.[240]
• On 14 February 2014, South African comedian Trevor Noah posted on Twitter: "And the Oscar goes to – Jail". Noah received criticism from his followers and other South Africans. People who responded to this post include Top Billing presenter Janez Vermeiren, who responded: "@Trevornoah c'mon you are more than talented and have enough followers, you don't need to seek attention like this!"[241][242]
• On 23 February 2014, Pistorius's PR team launched a Twitter account called Factual Updates which operates under the Twitter handle @OscarHardTruth in order to provide new information regarding the case as the trial unfolds.[243] On 17 March 2014, Pistorius's media manager Anneliese Burgess released a statement saying the account would only be used to alert followers of media statements and articles and would be used as a stand-alone communication trial once the trial had concluded.[244]
• Writing in her Daily Maverick column published on 4 March 2014, Sisonke Msimang finds vibrancy and emerging self-confidence reflected in the local social media coverage of the trial. While the trial inevitably represents a fall from grace prompting international media accounts of a country 'at war with itself', South Africans are learning that such accounts are better told by themselves.[245]
• On 14 April 2014, former Sunday Times columnist, Jani Allan published an open letter to Pistorius on her blog.[246] The piece was republished by the Daily Maverick the following day.[247] Allan described Pistorius as a "faux hero" and compared him to Eugene Terre'Blanche. She also suggested that he had taken acting lessons in preparation for his court appearance. A spokesperson for the Pistorius family has denied this; "We deny in the strongest terms the contents of her letter in as far it relates to our client and further deny that our client has undergone any acting lessons or any form of emotional coaching."[248][249]

References

1. "In the Final Roll in the High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division of the High Court, Pretoria) this 3rd day of March 2014" (PDF). SAFLII. Archived from the original (PDF) on 9 March 2014. Retrieved 9 March 2014.
2. "INFOGRAPHIC: The State vs Oscar Pistorius". News24. 2 March 2014. Archived from the original on 11 March 2014. Retrieved 11 March 2014.
3. Germaner, Shain (12 September 2014). "Oscar: the verdict is in". The Star. Archived from the original on 12 September 2014. Retrieved 12 September 2014. On Thursday, Judge Thokosile Masipa indicated that Pistorius would not be found guilty of murder with direct intent or common murder (dolus eventualis). She ruled on Friday morning that the court's unanimous decision was that Pistorius was negligent for firing on Steenkamp. Thus, he was found guilty of culpable homicide.
4. "NPA reacts to Pistorius judgment". South African Government News Agency. 12 September 2014. Archived from the original on 15 September 2014. Retrieved 14 September 2014. In her ruling on Friday, Judge Thokozile Masipa instead found the Paralympian guilty of culpable homicide. She also found Pistorius guilty of reckless endangerment of people and property after a gunshot went off in a restaurant.
5. Germaner, Shain (21 October 2014). "Oscar gets 5 years for Reeva's death". The Star. Archived from the original on 21 October 2014. Retrieved 21 October 2014.
6. "Oscar Pistorius sentenced to 5 years in jail". News24. 21 October 2014. Archived from the original on 22 October 2014. Retrieved 21 October 2014.
7. "In full: Pistorius' affidavit to court". CNN. 21 February 2013. Retrieved 27 March 2013.
8. ""Blade Runner" Pistorius charged with murdering girlfriend". London. Reuters. 14 February 2013.
9. Bennett, Lucy (14 February 2013). "Paralympian Oscar Pistorius charged with murder". The New Zealand Herald. Retrieved 22 February 2013.
10. "Pistorius pleads not guilty on day one of murder trial". Business Day. 3 March 2014. Retrieved 11 March 2014.
11. Dolan, David (15 February 2013). "Blade Runner Pistorius sobs in court after murder charge". Reuters. Retrieved 22 February 2013.
12. Harding, Andrew (15 February 2013). "Oscar Pistorius weeps as court hears murder charge". BBC. Retrieved 22 February 2013.
13. Tolsi, Niren (15 February 2013). "Pistorius 'intentionally shot and killed Steenkamp'". Mail & Guardian. Retrieved 22 February 2013.
14. du Plessis, Charl (25 February 2014). "Oscar trial to be broadcast live, court rules". City Press. South Africa. Archived from the original on 23 April 2014. Retrieved 25 February 2014.
15. "Oscar Pistorius trial can be broadcast live on TV, court rules". The Guardian. 25 February 2014. Retrieved 26 February 2014.
16. ""The sub judice rule and the Oscar Pistorius case: Will the crime of contempt of court ex facie curiae become abrogated by disise?" De Rebus, July 2014:27 [2014] DEREBUS 138".
17. "Oscar Pistorius's murder sentence increased to 15 years". Retrieved 24 November 2017.
18. Antonie, Cecil; Kachroo, Rohit; Johnston, Ian (15 February 2013). "Prosecutor: 'Lee' Pistorius committed 'premeditated' murder of girlfriend". NBC News. Retrieved 22 February 2013.
19. Polgreen, Lydia (19 February 2013). "In Affidavit at Bail Hearing, Track Star Denies He Intended to Kill Girlfriend". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 28 February 2013.
20. "Pistorius bail hearing: What we know so far". Mail & Guardian. 20 February 2013. Retrieved 23 February 2013.
21. "'Rot in jail' protesters cry outside Pistorius bail hearing". Reuters. 19 February 2013. Retrieved 22 February 2013.
22. Davis, Rebecca (19 February 2013). "Pistorius bail hearing: Round One". Daily Maverick. Retrieved 19 February 2013.
23. Stein, Ginny (21 February 2013). "Defence seizes on police inconsistencies in Pistorius case". ABC News. Archived from the original on 3 August 2013. Retrieved 22 February 2013. Lawyers representing Oscar Pistorius have challenged police testimony accusing the South African sprinter of the premeditated murder of his girlfriend Reeva Steenkamp.
24. "Detective gives confused testimony in Pistorius case". CBC News. Associated Press. 20 February 2013. Archived from the original on 27 May 2013. Retrieved 22 February 2013. The detective leading the police investigation into Oscar Pistorius' fatal shooting of his girlfriend offered confusing testimony Wednesday, at one point agreeing with the athlete's defence that officers had no evidence challenging the runner's claim he accidentally killed her.
25. Stein, Ginny (22 February 2013). "Lead detective dumped from Pistorius case". ABC News. AU. Archived from the original on 2 September 2013. Retrieved 23 February 2013. The detective leading the investigation into accused murderer Oscar Pistorius has been dumped from the case following revelations he is facing charges of attempted murder.
26. "Blow for Pistorius in bail application". City Press. 19 February 2013. Archived from the original on 29 July 2013. Retrieved 22 August 2013. The Oscar Pistorius case will be regarded as a Schedule 6 offence for the purposes of his bail application.
27. "Oscar Pistorius bail hearing – day 1". News24. 19 February 2013. Archived from the original on 18 May 2013. Retrieved 22 August 2013. At this point in time, I cannot rule out premeditation. For the purposes of bail – we go Schedule 6.
28. Dolak, Kevin; Kanani, Bazi (22 February 2013). "Oscar Pistorius Granted Bail in Murder Case". ABC News. Archived from the original on 19 July 2013. Retrieved 22 February 2013. Oscar Pistorius was granted bail today in a South African court, meaning he can be released from jail for the six to eight months before his trial for the allegedly premeditated killing of his girlfriend Reeva Steenkamp.
29. Govender, Peroshni (4 June 2013). "Pistorius judge attacks 'scandalizing' media coverage". Reuters. Archived from the original on 19 July 2013. A South African judge postponed the murder trial of Oscar Pistorius on Tuesday and criticized the media for sensationalist reporting of the Olympic and Paralympic athletics star's shooting of his girlfriend on Valentine's Day.
30. "Pistorius case postponed until August". Pretoria: News24. SAPA. 4 June 2013. Archived from the original on 2 August 2013. Retrieved 4 June 2013. The case against murder accused paralympian Oscar Pistorius was postponed to 19 August [at] the Pretoria Magistrate's Court on Tuesday.
31. Imray Gerald (23 August 2013). "Oscar Pistorius Indicted For Murder in Killing of Reeva Steenkamp". Huffington Post. Pretoria, ZA. Archived from the original on 20 August 2013. Retrieved 24 August 2013. A woman screamed and then there was silence, according to South African prosecutors pressing a premeditated murder case against Oscar Pistorius. Next, the indictment says, witnesses heard gunshots and more screaming at the home of the Paralympic champion, who says he shot his girlfriend by mistake on Valentine's Day.
32. "Full document – Oscar Pistorius indictment". City Press. 19 August 2013. Archived from the original on 19 August 2013. Retrieved 24 August 2013. PDF version
33. Imray, Gerald (28 June 2013). "'Emotional' Pistorius resumes track routine". Salon. Associated Press. Archived from the original on 1 August 2013. A bearded and much skinnier Oscar Pistorius was 'overcome with emotion' as he pulled on his carbon fiber running blades for his first track training since the killing of girlfriend Reeva Steenkamp, his agent said.
34. Ross, Will (19 August 2013). "Oscar Pistorius South Africa murder trial set for March". BBC News. Archived from the original on 19 August 2013. Retrieved 19 August 2013. A date has been set for the trial of South African athlete Oscar Pistorius for the premeditated murder of his girlfriend Reeva Steenkamp at a hearing at Pretoria magistrates' court. The prosecutor in the case said the dates of 3 to 20 March had been mutually agreed for the trial.
35. "Oscar murder trial extended". Times Live. 23 March 2014. Retrieved 23 March 2014.
36. Cowell, Alan (16 April 2014). "Pistorius Trial to Adjourn Until May 5". The New York Times. Retrieved 16 April 2014.
37. Swails, Brent; Smith-Spark, Laura (30 October 2013). "South Africa's Oscar Pistorius to face two gun charges at murder trial". CNN. Retrieved 31 October 2013.
38. "Oscar Pistorius charged with two more gun offences". The Guardian. 20 November 2013. Retrieved 11 March 2014.
39. "Oscar Pistorius: The charges". BBC News. 11 April 2014. Archived from the original on 11 April 2014. Retrieved 11 August 2014.
40. "Media Q and A developed for Oscar Pistorius' trial Part 2: Understanding the gun-related charges against Oscar Pistorius" (PDF). Gun Free South Africa. March 2014. Retrieved 12 September 2014.
41. "Experienced, reserved judge for Pistorius trial". Mail & Guardian. 18 February 2014. Retrieved 25 February 2014.
42. "Anti-climax as Pistorius case postponed". News24. 28 March 2014. Retrieved 28 March 2014.
43. Venter, Zelda (13 February 2014). "Oscar trial judge appoints assessors". Pretoria News. Retrieved 27 February 2014.
44. Newcomb, Alyssa; Thom, Liezl (4 March 2014). "Oscar Pistorius Verdict in Hands of One Judge, Not a Jury". ABC News. Archived from the original on 22 March 2014. Retrieved 22 March 2014.
45. "Chapter 2: Bill of Rights". Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996. GCIS. Archived from the original on 5 October 2013. Retrieved 19 March 2014.
46. "Oscar Pistorius Murder Trial Day 1 Part 1 Oscar pleads not guilty". YouTube. Retrieved 19 March 2014. Masipa: ‘The accused is English-speaking?’, Nel: ‘Indeed, My Lady’.
47. Smith, David (3 March 2014). "Oscar Pistorius: a runaway interpreter, then the trial of the century begins". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 4 March 2014. Retrieved 18 March 2014.
48. Abreu, Valeska (14 March 2014). "Oscar trial lost in translation?". Pretoria News. Archived from the original on 19 March 2014. Retrieved 19 March 2014.
49. "Anger over Pistorius trial interpreters". The Sowetan. 14 March 2014. Archived from the original on 16 March 2014. Retrieved 19 March 2014.
50. Tay, Natasha (18 March 2014). "Oscar Pistorius Trial Day 12: Court readies to hear crucial questions that could decide the case". Yahoo Sports. NBC Sports. Archived from the original on 18 April 2014. Retrieved 18 April 2014. both defense and prosecution agree that the double amputee was on his stumps when he fired through the bathroom door – a point that was previously expected to be an issue of contention
51. Davis, Rebecca (25 March 2014). "The State's case against Oscar Pistorius". Daily Maverick. Archived from the original on 28 March 2014. Retrieved 18 April 2014. Most likely angle of shots suggested Pistorius not wearing prosthetics. Questions arising: Why did state claim at bail hearing that Pistorius was wearing his prosthetics, and now say he wasn’t?
52. Germaner, Shain (8 May 2014). "Ballistics expert recreates Oscar shooting". The Star. Archived from the original on 9 May 2014. Retrieved 13 May 2014. At first, he was asked to forensically determine if Pistorius had been on his stumps – and approximately a meter and a half away – when he shot through the cubicle door, but the state conceded these points at the beginning of trial.
53. "Pistorius not wearing prosthetics when he broke door: witness". Times LIVE. 12 March 2014. Archived from the original on 12 March 2014. Retrieved 19 April 2014. Pistorius was released on bail in late February, and at the bail hearing the state had proceeded from the assumption that the paralympian athlete had worn his prosthesis. This, Nel made plain on Wednesday, was not the state's argument in trial.
54. "Pistorius shot Reeva while on his stumps: Nel". Times LIVE. 12 March 2014. Archived from the original on 13 March 2014. Retrieved 17 April 2014. Vermeulen said, during questioning by Roux, expert evidence would indicate that Pistorius was also on his stumps when he shot through the door of his toilet at Reeva Steenkamp.
55. Smith, David (18 March 2014). "Pistorius was not wearing prosthetic legs when he fired gun, court told". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 19 March 2014. Retrieved 17 April 2014. Last year prosecutors alleged that Pistorius was wearing his prostheses when he fired through the door, claiming that the time he took to put them on was evidence of premeditated murder. In his statement, Pistorius claimed he was in a panic and ran to the bathroom on his stumps. The prosecution has since accepted this version.
56. Greene, Richard Allen (19 March 2014). "Oscar Pistorius could take stand next week in murder trial". CNN. Archived from the original on 17 April 2014. Retrieved 17 April 2014. After initially disagreeing over whether Pistorius, a double amputee, was wearing his prosthetics when he killed Steenkamp, the prosecution and defense now agree that he was not.
57. Davis, Rebecca (12 March 2014). "Pistorius Trial: Week 2, Day 3". Daily Maverick. Archived from the original on 18 March 2014. Vermeulen says the marks are consistent with Pistorius not having his legs on
58. "Oscar Pistorius pleads not guilty". News24. 3 March 2014. Retrieved 3 March 2014.
59. "Oscar Pistorius goes on trial for murder of Reeva Steenkamp – as it happened". The Guardian. 3 March 2014. Retrieved 4 March 2014.
60. "Pistorius neighbour 'heard fight'". BBC News. 7 March 2014. Retrieved 11 March 2014.
61. Grant, James (3 March 2014). "The Pistorius Defence". Criminal Law of South Africa. Archived from the original on 22 March 2014. Retrieved 22 March 2014.
62. Smith, David (28 February 2014). "Key players in the Oscar Pistorius trial". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 2 March 2014. Retrieved 14 March 2014.
63. Davis, Rebecca. "Oscar Pistorius murder trial: Day 1". The Daily Maverick. Archived from the original on 6 March 2014.
64. Davis, Rebecca. "Pistorius Trial: Day 2". The Daily Maverick. Archived from the original on 8 March 2014.
65. "Day 1: Inside the Oscar Pistorius trial". The Sowetan. Archived from the original on 5 March 2014.
66. "Day 2: Inside the Oscar trial". The Sowetan. Archived from the original on 5 March 2014.
67. "Pistorius pleads not guilty at Reeva Steenkamp murder trial". BBC News. 3 March 2014. Archived from the original on 5 March 2014.
68. "Pistorius neighbour 'heard fight'". BBC News. 4 March 2014. Archived from the original on 4 March 2014.
69. Davis, Rebecca. "Pistorius Trial, Day 3". The Daily Maverick. Archived from the original on 8 March 2014.
70. "Day 3: Inside the Oscar Pistorius trial". The Sowetan. Archived from the original on 7 March 2014.
71. "Pistorius trial: Athlete blamed for restaurant shooting". BBC. 5 March 2014. Archived from the original on 5 March 2014.
72. "Pistorius Pal: We Covered For Him". The Daily Beast. Archived from the original on 6 March 2014.
73. Davis, Rebecca. "Pistorius trial: Day 4". The Daily Maverick. Archived from the original on 7 March 2014.
74. "Day 4: Inside the Oscar Pistorius trial". The Sowetan. Archived from the original on 7 March 2014.
75. Harding, Andrew (6 March 2014). "Oscar Pistorius found praying over Reeva Steenkamp body". BBC News. Archived from the original on 6 March 2014. Retrieved 6 March 2014.
76. Smith, David. "Oscar Pistorius trial: doctor describes finding body of Reeva Steenkamp". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 6 March 2014.
77. Davis, Rebecca. "Pistorius Trial: Day 5". The Daily Maverick. Archived from the original on 7 March 2014.
78. "Day 5: Inside the Oscar Pistorius trial". The Sowetan. Archived from the original on 14 March 2014.
79. "Pistorius fired gun from car, ex-girlfriend tells trial". BBC News. 7 March 2014. Archived from the original on 8 March 2014.
80. Smith, David. "Oscar Pistorius fired gun through car sunroof in anger, says ex-girlfriend". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 8 March 2014.
81. "Day 6: Inside the Oscar Pistorius trial". The Sowetan. Archived from the original on 14 March 2014.
82. Davis, Rebacca. "Pistorius Trial: Day 6". The Daily Maverick. Archived from the original on 12 March 2014.
83. Alexander, Harriet; Laing, Aslinn (10 March 2014). "Oscar Pistorius murder trial: March 10 as it happened". The Daily Telegraph. London. Archived from the original on 10 March 2014.
84. Harding, Andrew (10 March 2014). "Oscar Pistorius sick during post-mortem evidence". BBC News. Archived from the original on 10 March 2014.
85. Greene, Richard Allen (24 March 2014). "Reeva to Oscar Pistorius: 'I'm scared of you sometimes'". CNN. Archived from the original on 24 March 2014.
86. "Oscar, Reeva messages 90% normal, loving – cop". News24. 24 March 2014. Archived from the original on 25 March 2014. Retrieved 25 March 2014.
87. "Oscar Pistorius Prepares to Testify". The Guardian. Retrieved 19 April 2014.
88. Lyall, Sarah; Cowell, Alan (28 March 2014). "Murder Trial of Pistorius Is Postponed After Illness". The New York Times. Retrieved 29 March 2014.
89. Davis, Rebecca. "Pistorius Trial: Week Five, Day One". The Daily Maverick. Archived from the original on 8 April 2014.
90. Davis, Rebecca. "Pistorius Trial. Week five - day two". Daily Maverick. Archived from the original on 16 May 2014.
91. "Oscar Pistorius Faces Final Day of Cross Examination". The Guardian. Retrieved 19 April 2014.
92. Davis, Rebecca. "Pistorius Trial. Week five - day three". Daily Maverick. Archived from the original on 4 May 2014.
93. Davis, Rebecca. "Pistorius Trial. Week five - day four". Daily Maverick. Archived from the original on 4 May 2014.
94. Davis, Rebecca. "Pistorius Trial. Week five - day five". Daily Maverick. Archived from the original on 4 May 2014.
95. Davis, Rebecca. "Pistorius Trial. Week six - day one". Daily Maverick. Archived from the original on 4 May 2014.
96. Davis, Rebecca. "Pistorius Trial. Week six - day two". Daily Maverick. Archived from the original on 4 May 2014.
97. "Oscar Pistorius trial sees Reeva Steenkamp Valentine's card". BBC News. 15 April 2014.
98. Davis, Rebecca. "Pistorius Trial. Week six - day three". Daily Maverick. Archived from the original on 19 April 2014.
99. Davis, Rebecca. "Pistorius Trial. Week six - day four". Daily Maverick. Archived from the original on 19 April 2014.
100. Withnall, Adam (5 May 2014). "Oscar Pistorius trial: Carice Viljoen tells court she feared athlete would 'shoot himself'". The Independent. London. Archived from the original on 6 May 2014.
101. Nicolson, Greg. "Pistorius Trial: Neighbours recount early morning horror". Daily Maverick. Archived from the original on 6 May 2014.
102. Torchia, Christopher; Imray, Gerald (6 May 2014). "Neighbors of Oscar Pistorius testify at murder trial". USA Today. Archived from the original on 6 May 2014.
103. "Oscar Pistorius' neighbours 'heard man crying loudly'". BBC News. 6 May 2014.
104. Davis, Rebecca. "Pistorius Trial: Week Seven, Day Two". Daily Maverick. Archived from the original on 6 May 2014.
105. " "Oscar Pistorius heartbroken after killing Reeva Steenkamp, trial hears".
106. Davis, Rebecca. "Pistorius Trial: Week Seven, Day Three". Daily Maverick. Archived from the original on 7 May 2014.
107. "Oscar Pistorius defense suggests Steenkamp wasn't cowering". CNN.
108. Davis, Rebecca. "Pistorius Trial: Week Seven, Day Four". Daily Maverick. Archived from the original on 10 May 2014.
109. "Oscar Pistorius 'Suffers From Anxiety Disorder'".
110. Davis, Rebecca. "Pistorius Trial: Week Eight, Day One". Daily Maverick. Archived from the original on 13 May 2014.
111. Davis, Rebecca. "Pistorius Trial: Week Eight, Day Two". Archived from the original on 14 May 2014.
112. Davis, Rebecca. "Pistorius Trial: Week 8, Day 3". Daily Maverick. Archived from the original on 15 May 2014.
113. "Oscar Pistorius to start mental evaluation next week". CBC News. 20 May 2014.
114. Davis, Rebecca. "Pistorius Trial: Week Nine, Day One". Daily Maverick. Archived from the original on 21 May 2014.
115. "Psych evaluation: Oscar Pistorius not mentally incapacitated during shooting". CNN.
116. "Oscar Pistorius Has PTSD and Is Suicidal, Psych Report Concludes".
117. "Oscar Pistorius found mentally sound".
118. "Oscar Pistorius and Reeva Steenkamp's screams under acoustic scrutiny". Archived from the original on 7 July 2014.
119. "Pistorius Trial: Week Ten, Day One".
120. "Oscar trial: Judge Masipa wants answers on missing cord".
121. "Oscar Pistorius loved Reeva Steenkamp, agent says". CNN.
122. "Oscar Pistorius traumatised and may be suicide risk, psychologist finds".
123. "Psych report says Oscar Pistorius is traumatized". USA Today. 2 July 2014.
124. "Oscar Pistorius is a paradox, physician tells trial". The Daily Telegraph. London. 3 July 2014.
125. "Pistorius witnesses refused to testify - Roux".
126. "Oscar Pistorius trial closing arguments end; verdict in 5 weeks". CNN. 8 August 2014.
127. "Oscar Pistorius concocted "a snowball of lies", court hears". Archived from the original on 11 August 2014.
128. "Pistorius murder trial ends, prosecutor demands 'consequences'".
129. "PISTORIUS TRIAL: DIFFERENCE IN EVENT TIMELINE". Archived from the original on 11 August 2014.
130. "Oscar Pistorius like an abused woman who snapped when he shot girlfriend, defence lawyer argues". Archived from the original on 12 August 2014.
131. Onishi, Norimitsu; Cowell, Alan (8 August 2014). "Oscar Pistorius Lawyers, in Closing Argument, Say Murder Charge Is Too Strong". The New York Times.
132. Kobedi, Palesa (8 August 2014). "Pistorius defence team pleads for leniency". SABC News. Archived from the original on 9 August 2014. Retrieved 9 August 2014.
133. Conway-Smith, Erin (8 August 2014). "Oscar Pistorius to learn fate on September 11". The Telegraph. London. Archived from the original on 9 August 2014. Retrieved 9 August 2014.
134. Rantao, Jovial (14 September 2014). "Our justice system is working well – here's the proof". Sunday Independent. Archived from the original on 15 September 2014. Retrieved 14 September 2014.
135. "Case No: CC113-2013 – Judgment" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 October 2014. Retrieved 16 September 2014.
136. Phipps, Claire (12 September 2014). "Oscar Pistorius verdict: judge to rule on culpable homicide – live". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 12 September 2014. The judge did not give her formal verdict on Thursday ... it was clear that Pistorius had acted unlawfully in shooting the person behind the door. A reasonable person would not have fired four shots into the toilet cubicle, because he would have foreseen the consequences: that somebody could be killed. Pistorius acted 'too hastily and used excessive force ... It is clear his conduct was negligent.'
137. Peck, Tom (11 September 2014). "Oscar Pistorius trial verdict: 'Is he a reasonable man?' The legal question that will seal athlete's fate". The Independent. London. Archived from the original on 11 September 2014. Retrieved 15 September 2014. 'He failed to take any steps to avoid the death.'
138. Germaner, Shain (11 September 2014). "Oscar not guilty of murder, says judge". IOL. Archived from the original on 11 September 2014. Retrieved 15 September 2014.
139. Williams, Helena (11 September 2014). "Oscar Pistorius trial verdict: What are the remaining possible outcomes?". The Independent. London. Archived from the original on 11 September 2014. Judge Masipa said on Thursday that the state has failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that Pistorius is guilty of premeditated murder, and also indicated that he could not be found guilty of a lesser murder charge.
140. "Oscar Pistorius trial: Murder verdicts ruled out". BBC News. 11 September 2014. Archived from the original on 11 September 2014. Retrieved 13 September 2014. 'Clearly he did not subjectively foresee this as a possibility, that he would kill the person behind the door, let alone the deceased as he thought she was in the bedroom at the time.' But Judge Masipa then adjourned for lunch before moving on to the charge of culpable homicide which suggests negligence without intention to kill and which could still mean a jail sentence. 'The accused knew there was a person behind the toilet door, he chose to use a firearm. Would a reasonable person in the same circumstances as the accused have foreseen the possibility that if he fired four shots whoever was behind the toilet might be struck and die as a result? She said the answer was yes. 'I am of the view that the accused acted too hastily and used excessive force. In the circumstances, it is clear that his conduct was negligent,' she said, before abruptly adjourning for the day.
141. "Culpable homicide a competent verdict – Oscar judge". News24. SAPA. 11 September 2014. Archived from the original on 12 September 2014. Retrieved 15 September 2014.
142. Riccobono, Anthony (11 September 2014). "Oscar Pistorius Not Guilty: Olympian Could Still Get Years In Jail On Other Charges". IBT. Archived from the original on 11 September 2014. Retrieved 15 September 2014.
143. Joubert, J.J., ed. (2009). "The verdict – 2.2 Competent verdicts (general rules)". Criminal Procedure Handbook. Claremont: Juta. p. 277. ISBN 9780702181818. Retrieved 13 September 2014.
144. Karimi, Faith; Greene, Richard Allen (13 September 2014). "Oscar Pistorius: Not guilty of murder, but not cleared yet". CNN. Archived from the original on 12 September 2014. Retrieved 12 September 2014.
145. Davies, Lisa (12 September 2014). "Oscar Pistorius is a convicted killer, but not a murderer". Sydney Morning Herald. Archived from the original on 13 September 2014. Retrieved 12 September 2014.
146. South African Criminal Law and Procedure. Juta and Company Ltd. 1996. p. 364. ISBN 9780702137730. Retrieved 12 September 2014.
147. S v. Naidoo and Others, Supreme Court of Appeal of South Africa, Case 321/2001
148. "Firearms Control Act 60 of 2000" (PDF). SAPS. Retrieved 12 September 2014.
149. "Oscar Pistorius granted bail extension". EWN. 12 September 2014. Archived from the original on 12 September 2014. Retrieved 12 September 2014.
150. du Plessis, Charl; Patta, Debora; Huisman, Bienne (14 September 2014). "State vs Oscar Pistorius: It's not over". City Press. Archived from the original on 21 September 2014. Retrieved 10 October 2014.
151. Conway-Smith, Erin (16 September 2014). "Judge who found Oscar Pistorius not guilty of murder under police protection". The Telegraph. London. Archived from the original on 24 September 2014.
152. "Oscar Pistorius 'Sure To Kill Someone Sooner Or Later,' Reeva Steenkamp's Mother Says". 26 October 2014.
153. Cowell, Alan (15 October 2014). "Payments by Oscar Pistorius Take Center Stage at Sentencing Hearing". The New York Times. Retrieved 15 October 2014.
154. Gifford, Gill (16 October 2014). "Oscar Trial: final sentencing arguments to happen on Friday". eNCA. Retrieved 17 October 2014.
155. Thom, Liezl (15 October 2014). "Parents of Oscar Pistorius' Homicide Victim Won't Testify Against Him". ABC. Retrieved 18 October 2014.
156. "Oscar Pistorius: Sentencing hearing concludes". Mail & Guardian. 17 October 2014. Retrieved 17 October 2014.
157. "Watch Masipa sentence Pistorius to five years in prison". News24. 21 October 2014. Retrieved 22 October 2014.
158. Macramalla, Eric (21 October 2014). "Macramalla: On the Pistorius sentence, prison time, and an appeal". TSN. Archived from the original on 23 October 2014. Retrieved 24 October 2014. Judge Masipa relied on Section 276(1)(i) of the Criminal Procedure Act, which provides for 'imprisonment from which such a person may be placed under correctional supervision in the discretion of the Commissioner or a parole board.' ... By invoking Section 276(1)(i), Judge Masipa set the stage for a possible early release.
159. "Correctional Supervision and Parole Boards". DCS. Archived from the original on 1 October 2014. Retrieved 22 October 2014. Section 276 1(i) of the Criminal Procedure Act. 1/6 of sentence must be served prior to placement under Correctional Supervision by the Commissioner. Sentence may not exceed 5 years.
160. Hawker, Dianne (21 October 2014). "House arrest or prison time for Oscar Pistorius?". eNCA. Archived from the original on 24 September 2015. Retrieved 22 October 2014.
161. "Pistorius' sentence was carefully chosen – expert". City Press. SAPA. 21 October 2014. Archived from the original on 28 October 2014. Retrieved 22 October 2014.
162. Imray, Gerald (24 October 2014). "Oscar Pistorius prosecutors consult with expert over whether to appeal". CTV News. Associated Press.
163. Smith, David (27 October 2014). "Oscar Pistorius prosecutors to appeal against verdict". The Guardian.
164. "Oscar lawyers brand State's appeal flawed, call for dismissal".
165. "Oscar Pistorius prosecution have no right to appeal manslaughter verdict, defence claims". The Daily Telegraph. London. 19 November 2014.
166. "Oscar Pistorius case: Judge Masipa allows appeal". BBC News. 10 December 2014.
167. Mooki, Omphitlhetse (12 February 2015). "Oscar: prosecution files appeal papers". IOL News. iol.co.za.
168. Mapenzauswa, Stella (13 March 2015). "Pistorius fails in bid to stop South Africa prosecutors from pursuing murder verdict". Reuters.
169. "Oscar Pistorius out on probation in August". BBC News. 8 June 2015. Retrieved 11 June 2015.
170. Laing, Aislinn (13 August 2015), Oscar Pistorius to be released from prison next week, London: The Telegraph, retrieved 14 August 2015
171. Maverick, Rebecca Davis for The Daily; network, part of the Guardian Africa. "How Oscar Pistorius's release from prison was blocked". the Guardian. Retrieved 22 August 2015.
172. "Legality of Oscar Pistorius' release clouded by public outcry, maybe political pressure". Retrieved 24 August 2015.
173. "Has politics intruded in the Pistorius case?". BBC News. 25 August 2015.
174. "Is Oscar Pistorius still in jail because of political point-scoring?". The Week. Retrieved 27 August 2015.
175. Tran, Mark. "Oscar Pistorius to stay in prison until at least mid-September". the Guardian. Retrieved 27 August 2015.
176. "Oscar Pistorius' parole case set for September - CNN.com". CNN. Retrieved 27 August 2015.
177. "Pistorius: I Cannot Afford A New Trial". Retrieved 18 September 2015.
178. eNCA. "Pistorius's parole decision made on Friday | eNCA". www.enca.com. Retrieved 18 September 2015.
179. Wellman, Alex (19 September 2015). "Pistorius 'not coming out now' relative claims as board delays release decision". Retrieved 19 September 2015.
180. "Oscar Pistorius' parole review delayed by two weeks: official". Retrieved 19 September 2015.
181. Pool, FILE: Oscar Pistorius at the High Court in Pretoria during sentencing procedures for shooting his girlfriend Reeva Steenkamp on 13 October 2014 Picture. "Oscar Pistorius's appeal set for 3 November". Retrieved 27 September 2015.
182. "Oscar Pistorius must remain in jail, review board says". BBC News. 5 October 2015. Retrieved 5 October 2015.
183. "Oscar Pistorius remains behind bars; release decision referred". 5 October 2015. Retrieved 5 October 2015.
184. "Oscar Pistorius family condemns failure to release him". BBC News. 6 October 2015. Retrieved 6 October 2015.
185. "Hearing on Pistorius's parole postponed". News24. 9 October 2015. Retrieved 10 October 2015.
186. "Oscar Pistorius parole hearing postponed". the Guardian. Retrieved 10 October 2015.
187. "Oscar Pistorius' legal wrangling over sentence drags on". ITV News. Retrieved 10 October 2015.
188. "Oscar Pistorius to be moved to house arrest". BBC News. Retrieved 15 October 2015.
189. "Oscar Pistorius has been released". News24. Retrieved 20 October 2015.
190. "Oscar Pistorius murder verdict sought by S Africa prosecutors". BBC News. Retrieved 3 November 2015.
191. "Oscar Pistorius guilty of murdering Reeva Steenkamp". BBC News. Retrieved 3 December 2015.
192. Johannesburg, Simon Allison in. "Oscar Pistorius set to go back to jail after appeal court's murder verdict". the Guardian. Retrieved 3 December 2015.
193. Phipps, Claire (8 December 2015). "Oscar Pistorius granted bail and will take murder appeal to constitutional court – as it happened". Reuters. Thomson Reuters. Retrieved 8 December 2015.
194. Torchia, Christopher; Chutel, Lynsey (8 December 2015). "Oscar Pistorius to remain under house arrest as he awaits murder sentence". CBC News. CBC/Radio Canada. Retrieved 8 December 2015.
195. Torchia, Christopher (8 December 2015). "Oscar Pistorius to Appeal to South Africa's Highest Court". ABC News. ABC News. Retrieved 8 December 2015.
196. Johannesburg, Agence France-Presse in. "Oscar Pistorius seeks leave to appeal against murder conviction". the Guardian. Retrieved 11 January 2016.
197. "Oscar Pistorius files to appeal murder conviction". Mail Online. Retrieved 11 January 2016.
198. "This is how appeal court went wrong: Pistorius's lawyer". Times LIVE. Retrieved 12 January 2016.
199. "Oscar Pistorius denied leave to appeal for Steenkamp murder". BBC News. Retrieved 5 March 2016.
200. "Pistorius sentenced to 6 years in prison for murder of Reeva Steenkamp". CNN. 6 July 2016. Retrieved 6 July 2016.
201. "Oscar Pistorius sentencing: Former athlete gets six year prison sentence for murdering Reeva Steenkamp". The Telegraph. 6 July 2016. Retrieved 6 July 2016.
202. "Oscar Pistorius' Murder Sentence increased to 15 years". NPR.org. Retrieved 26 February 2019.
203. Grierson, Jamie (24 November 2017). "South African court doubles Oscar Pistorius's prison sentence". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 26 February 2019.
204. Reuters (19 December 2017). "Oscar Pistorius to appeal against increased murder sentence". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 26 February 2019.
205. Perry, Alex (11 March 2013). "Pistorius and South Africa's culture of violence". Time. Retrieved 1 March 2013.
206. "Man Superman Gunman: Mar. 11, 2013". Time. Retrieved 1 March 2013.
207. "Pistorius on Time magazine cover". News24. SAPA. 28 February 2013. Archived from the original on 15 September 2014. Retrieved 15 September 2014.
208. Child, Katharine (2 March 2013). "Media ponders SA's violence". Daily Dispatch. Archived from the original on 8 September 2014. Retrieved 15 September 2014.
209. Greenslade, Roy (28 February 2013). "Time magazine's Pistorius cover". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 15 September 2014. Retrieved 15 September 2014.
210. "Oscar Pistorius timeline: From hero to zero". The Sowetan. SAPA. 9 September 2014. Archived from the original on 12 September 2014. Retrieved 15 September 2014.
211. Seal, Mark (1 June 2013). "The Shooting Star and The Model". Vanity Fair. Retrieved 20 May 2013.
212. Orford, Margie. "Oscar Pistorius trial: the imaginary black stranger at heart of the defence". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 7 March 2014.
213. Harber, Anton (13 March 2014). "Pistorius trial represents a turning point for the dailies". Business Day. Archived from the original on 14 March 2014. Retrieved 16 March 2014.
214. "St. Valentine's Day Shocker". Zapiro. 14 February 2013. Archived from the original on 18 February 2013. Retrieved 17 March 2014.
215. "Reeva Steenkamp as Lady Justice in Oscar Pistorius Trial". Zapiro. 4 March 2014. Archived from the original on 17 March 2014. Retrieved 17 March 2014.
216. "Legal Reasoning Behind Oscar Pistorius Verdict". Zapiro. 16 September 2014. Archived from the original on 19 September 2014. Retrieved 19 September 2014.
217. Jivanda, Tomas (2 March 2014). "Oscar Pistorius murder trial: Paddy Power prompts outrage by offering 'money back if he walks' bets". The Independent. London. Archived from the original on 3 March 2014. Retrieved 12 April 2014.
218. Withnall, Adam (19 March 2014). "Paddy Power Oscar Pistorius 'money back if he walks' ad broke rules and brought UK advertising into disrepute, ASA finds". The Independent. London. Archived from the original on 1 April 2014. Retrieved 12 April 2014.
219. "ASA Adjudication on Paddy Power plc". Advertising Standards Authority (United Kingdom). 19 March 2014. Archived from the original on 24 March 2014. Retrieved 12 April 2014.
220. Lyall, Sarah; Cowell, Alan (13 September 2014). "A Trial Concludes, but for South Africans, the Debate May Be Just Starting". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 13 September 2014. Retrieved 14 September 2014.
221. "The Press Ombudsman". www.presscouncil.org.za. Retrieved 26 October 2015.
222. "Oscar Pistorius :unprecedented apology from Judicial Inspectorate of Correction Services". Blasting News. Retrieved 1 November 2015.
223. London, Nick (11 March 2013). "Oscar Pistorius documentary for BBC 'involved huge challenges'". The Guardian. Retrieved 20 March 2013.
224. Ferreira, Thinus (20 March 2013). "Gripping Oscar, Reeva doccie to air in SA". Channel24. Retrieved 20 March 2013.
225. "Why Did Oscar Pistorius Kill Our Daughter?". Channel 5. Retrieved 4 June 2013.
226. Cahalan, Paul (2 June 2013). "Oscar Pistorius murder trial: Documentary set to undermine evidence on row on night Reeva Steenkamp was killed". The Independent. London. Retrieved 4 June 2013.
227. "Oscar Pistorius and Reeva Steenkamp 'fought a lot,' say model's parents". The Daily Telegraph. London. 3 June 2013. Retrieved 4 June 2013.
228. Anderson, Steve; Branagh, Ellen; Wylie, Catherine (4 June 2013). "Oscar Pistorius arrives in court to face murder charge over death of his girlfriend Reeva Steenkamp". The Independent. London. Retrieved 4 June 2013.
229. "24-hour Oscar Pistorius channel to launch". Eyewitness News. 29 January 2014. Retrieved 28 January 2014.
230. "24-hour pop-up channel planned for Oscar Pistorius trial". Times LIVE. 29 January 2014. Retrieved 3 July 2014.
231. Ferreira, Thinus (13 February 2014). "Oscar Pistorius murder trial will be SA's 'OJ Simpson'". News24. Retrieved 14 February 2014.
232. "Oscar Pistorius special report on Carte Blanche". Screen Africa. 13 February 2014. Archived from the original on 7 April 2014. Retrieved 6 April 2014.
233. Munson, Lester. "Prosecutor chides Oscar Pistorius". ESPN. Archived from the original on 11 April 2014.
234. "To mark 20th anniversary of O.J. Simpson case, CBS looks at the South African 'Trial of the Century'". Daily News. New York. 16 June 2014.
235. "New footage of Pistorius revealed". Retrieved 6 July 2014.
236. "Pistorius lawyers slam leaked Channel 7 footage". The Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved 7 July 2014.
237. "Oscar Pistorius: The Verdict". SABC. 12 September 2014. Archived from the original on 24 September 2015. Retrieved 21 October 2014.
238. "BBC Three to air exclusive Oscar Pistorius documentary". bbc.co.uk. 12 September 2014. Retrieved 15 September 2014.
239. Thomas, Stuart (22 February 2013). "Memeburn.com". Retrieved 11 September 2014.
240. Granger, Lauren (22 February 2013). "Barry Bateman and Oscar Pistorius: inside the Twitter explosion". Retrieved 11 September 2014.
241. Mbele, Gabi. "Trevor Noah gets flack for Pistorius joke". The Times. sowetanlive.co.za. Archived from the original on 13 April 2014. Retrieved 13 April 2014.
242. Mbele, Gabi. "Trevor Noah slammed for Pistorius joke". timeslive.co.za. Archived from the original on 6 April 2014. Retrieved 13 April 2014.
243. "Oscar Pistorius murder trial Twitter account promises 'hard truth'". QMI Agency. torontosun.com. Archived from the original on 11 November 2014. Retrieved 13 April 2014.
244. Burgess, Anneliese. "Communication protocol during this phase of the trial". oscarpistorius.com. Archived from the original on 30 March 2014. Retrieved 13 April 2014.
245. Msimang, Sisonke. "Telling our own stories: beyond Oscar Pistorius". Daily Maverick. Archived from the original on 11 March 2014.
246. "Letter to Oscar". janiallan.com. Retrieved 13 September 2014.
247. "Letter to Oscar". Retrieved 13 September 2014.
248. Tadeo, Maria (22 April 2014). "Oscar Pistorius trial: Athlete's family denies he took acting lessons before taking stand in court". The Independent. London. Retrieved 13 September 2014.
249. Stampler, Laura (22 April 2014). "Oscar Pistorius Denies Taking Pre-Trial Acting Lessons". TIME.com. Retrieved 13 September 2014.

Further reading

• Steenkamp, June. Reeva: A Mother's Story.

External links

• Trial of Oscar Pistorius at the Sowetan
• Trial of Oscar Pistorius at the Guardian
• Trial of Oscar Pistorius at the Daily Telegraph