The Humber Ferryman's case

Bukton v Tounesende or The Humber Ferryman's case (1348) B&M 358[1] is an English contract law case.

The Humber Ferryman's case
The River Humber
CourtCourt of King's Bench
Keywords
Contract, remedies

Facts

Nicholas Tounesende of Helle undertook to ferry John Bukton's horse across the Humber river. Tounesende overloaded the boat with horses and Bukton’s horse fell overboard. Bukton sued in tort, for trespass. There was no sealed document, and under previous law it had been required to sue for breach of a covenant. So Tounesende argued that the action should be brought in covenant. The King's Bench had travelled away from Westminster and had arrived in York.

Judgment

The King's Bench held the action could rightly be brought in tort. The claim was against the killing of the horse, and not merely the failure to transport it. Accordingly no documentary proof of a covenant was needed.

gollark: HR departments manage *people* - hiring them, firing them, bonuses, whatever - not supply chains.
gollark: I know what they do in businesses, I mean I don't understand what they would do in your hypothetical government, how this relates to centralised supply chain management, and why this would involve *less* power.
gollark: Yes, I know what HR stands for, I just have no idea what you mean by that in context.
gollark: What?
gollark: Not as much as it would be if one entity just did *all* economic planning.

See also

Notes
  1. J Baker and Milsom, Sources of English Legal History (1986) 358

References
    This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.