Patel v Ali
Patel v Ali [1984] Ch 283 is an English contract law case, concerning the possibility of claiming specific performance of a promise after breach of contract.
| Patel v Ali | |
|---|---|
| Court | High Court |
| Citation(s) | [1984] Ch 283 |
| Case opinions | |
| Goulding J | |
| Keywords | |
| Remedies, specific performance | |
Facts
A vendor of a house became disabled after the sale. If she went through with the sale she would have lost the house. The buyer of the house demanded specific performance to convey the property.
Judgment
Goulding J refused to grant specific performance, and granted only damages. As a discretionary, equitable remedy, specific performance was refused on the ground that considerable hardship would be caused.
gollark: Ooo, a raid? Fun!
gollark: IRC *network*, technically speaking.
gollark: APIONET is bridged to the APIONET IRC server, you know!
gollark: I may have to somehow share code with the reminder system for this.
gollark: What is up with your botoform?
See also
- English contract law
- Sky Petroleum v VIP Petroleum [1974] 1 WLR 576
- Restatement (Second) of Contracts 1979 ยง364
Notes
References
External links
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.