Seismic intensity scales

Seismic intensity scales categorize the intensity or severity of ground shaking (quaking) at a given location, such as resulting from an earthquake. They are distinguished from seismic magnitude scales, which measure the magnitude or overall strength of an earthquake, which may, or perhaps not, cause perceptible shaking.

Part of a series on
Earthquakes
  • Earth Sciences Portal

Intensity scales are based on the observed effects of the shaking, such as the degree to which people or animals were alarmed, and the extent and severity of damage to different kinds of structures or natural features. The maximal intensity observed, and the extent of the area where shaking was felt (see isoseismal map, below), can be used to estimate the location and magnitude of the source earthquake; this is especially useful for historical earthquakes where there is no instrumental record.

Ground shaking

Ground shaking can be caused in various ways (volcanic tremors, avalanches, large explosions, etc.), but shaking intense enough to cause damage is usually due to rupturing of the earth's crust known as earthquakes. The intensity of shaking depends on several factors:

  • The "size" or strength of the source event, such as measured by various seismic magnitude scales.
  • The type of seismic wave generated, and its orientation.
  • The depth of the event.
  • The distance from the source event.
  • Site response due to local geology

Site response is especially important as certain conditions, such as unconsolidated sediments in a basin, can amplify ground motions as much as ten times.

Isoseismal map for the 1968 Illinois earthquake, showing the extent of different levels of shaking. The irregularity of areas is due to ground conditions and the underlying geology.

Where an earthquake is not recorded on seismographs an isoseismal map showing the intensities felt at different areas can be used to estimate the location and magnitude of the quake.[1] Such maps are also useful for estimating the shaking intensity, and thereby the likely level of damage, to be expected from a future earthquake of similar magnitude. In Japan this kind of information is used when an earthquake occurs to anticipate the severity of damage to be expected in different areas.[2]

The intensity of local ground-shaking depends on several factors besides the magnitude of the earthquake,[3] one of the most important being soil conditions. For instance, thick layers of soft soil (such as fill) can amplify seismic waves, often at a considerable distance from the source, while sedimentary basins will often resonate, increasing the duration of shaking. This is why, in the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake, the Marina district of San Francisco was one of the most damaged areas, though it was nearly 100 km from the epicenter.[4] Geological structures were also significant, such as where seismic waves passing under the south end of San Francisco Bay reflected off the base of the Earth's crust towards San Francisco and Oakland. A similar effect channeled seismic waves between the other major faults in the area.[5]

History

The first simple classification of earthquake intensity was devised by Domenico Pignataro in the 1780s.[6] The first recognisable intensity scale in the modern sense of the word was drawn up by P.N.G. Egen in 1828; it was ahead of its time. However, The first modern mapping of an earthquake Intensities was made by Robert Mallet, an Irish engineer who was sent by the Imperial College in London to make a research right after the December 1857 Basilicata earthquake, known also as The Great Neapolitan Earthquake of 1857.[7] But The first widely adopted intensity scale, the Rossi–Forel scale, was introduced in the late 19th century It was a 10 grades scale.[8] In 1902, an Italian seismologist named Giuseppe Mercalli, created a new 12 grades scale named after his name. A very significant improvement was achieved, mainly by Charles Francis Richter during the 1950s, when (1) a correlation was found between seismic intensity and the Peak ground acceleraton - PGA (see the equation that Richter found for California).[9] (2) a definition of the strength of the buildings, and a subdivision into groups (called type of buildings) was made. Then, the evaluation of the seismic intensity was based upon the damage grade to a given type of structure. That gave the Mercalli Scale, as well as the followed European MSK-64 scale, the quantitative element, which represents the vulnerability of the building's type.[10] Since then, that scale was called the Modified Mercalli intensity scale - MMS and the evaluations of the Seismic Intensities became more reliable.[11]

In addition, more intensity scales have been developed and are used in different parts of the world:

Country/Region Seismic intensity scale used
 ChinaLiedu scale (GB/T 17742-1999)
 EuropeEuropean Macroseismic Scale (EMS-98)[12]
 Hong KongModified Mercalli scale (MM)[13]
 IndiaMedvedev–Sponheuer–Karnik scale
 IsraelMedvedev–Sponheuer–Karnik scale (MSK-64)
 JapanJMA Seismic Intensity Scale
 KazakhstanMedvedev–Sponheuer–Karnik scale (MSK-64)
 PhilippinesPHIVOLCS Earthquake Intensity Scale (PEIS)
 RussiaMedvedev–Sponheuer–Karnik scale (MSK-64)
 TaiwanCentral Weather Bureau Seismic Intensity Scale[14]
 United StatesModified Mercalli scale (MM)[15]
gollark: +choose Nobody Nobody
gollark: Why was I pinged?
gollark: ++search a
gollark: Someone on the haskell server made it. I am keeping it safe from those who would delete it to purge what they consider abominations unto Good Haskell.
gollark: ```haskellfizzbuzz ((\rec -> \case [] -> []; (x@((,) <$> (`rem`3) <*> (`rem`5) -> \case (0,0) -> "FizzBuzz"; (0,_) -> "Fizz"; (_,0) -> "Buzz"; _ -> show x -> x'):xs) -> x' : rec xs ,) -> (f, (fix f .). enumFromTo -> xs)) = xs```

See also

Notes
  1. Bormann, Wendt & Di Giacomo 2013, §3.1.2.1.
  2. Doi 2010.
  3. Bolt 1993, p. 164 et seq..
  4. Bolt 1993, pp. 170–171.
  5. Bolt 1993, p. 170.
  6. David Alexander (1993). Natural Disasters (First ed.). Springer Science+Business Media. p. 28. ISBN 978-0-412-04741-1.
  7. Robert Mallet, 1862., Great Neapolitan Earthquake of 1857. The First Principles of Observational. Seismology - Vol. 1.
  8. Bolt, B.A., Earthquakes, F&C, 1988, p.147
  9. where is the PGA for that given site with value of (cm/sec2) and is the Intensity value for that site. see: Charles F. Richter., 1958. Elementary Seismology. Freeman & Company, San Francisco & London, (Chapter 11) p.140.
  10. Lapajne, J., 1984. The MSK-78 Intensity Scale and Seismic Risk. Engineering Geology, 20:pp.105-112
  11. Bolt, B.A., Earthquakes, F&C, 1988, pp.146-152
  12. "The European Macroseismic Scale EMS-98". Centre Européen de Géodynamique et de Séismologie (ECGS). Retrieved 2013-07-26.
  13. "Magnitude and Intensity of an Earthquake". Hong Kong Observatory. Retrieved 2008-09-15.
  14. "Earthquake Preparedness and Response". Central Weather Bureau. Retrieved 2018-04-06.
  15. "The Severity of an Earthquake". U.S. Geological Survey. Retrieved 2012-01-15.

Sources
  • USGS ShakeMap Providing near-real-time maps of ground motion and shaking intensity following significant earthquakes.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.