Reasons of the Supreme Court of Canada by Justice Sopinka
List of reasons written by Justice John Sopinka during his time as Puisne Justice of the Supreme Court of Canada.
1988–1990
- United States v Cotroni, [1989] 1 SCR 1469 (Dissent)
- R v Hebert, [1990] 2 SCR 151 (Concurrence)
- Central Alberta Dairy Pool v Alberta (Human Rights Commission), [1990] 2 SCR 489 (Concurrence)
- R v Martineau, [1990] 2 SCR 633 (Concurrence)
- R v Askov, [1990] 2 SCR 1199 (Concurrence)
- Douglas/Kwantlen Faculty Assn v Douglas College, [1990] 3 SCR 570 (Concurrence)
1991–1993
- Reference re Provincial Electoral Boundaries (Sask), [1991] 2 SCR 158 (Concurrence)
- Reference Re Canada Assistance Plan (BC), [1991] 2 SCR 525 (Majority)
- R v Stinchcombe, [1991] 3 SCR 326 (Majority)
- R v Jobidon, [1991] 2 SCR 714 (Dissent)
- Reference Re Ng Extradition [1991] 2 SCR 858 (Dissent)
- R v Butler, 1992 (Majority)
- R v DeSousa, 1992 (Majority)
- Canada (Minister of Employment and Immigration) v Chiarelli, [1992] 1 SCR 711 (Majority)
- New Brunswick Broadcasting Co v Nova Scotia (Speaker of the House of Assembly), [1993] 1 SCR 319 (Concurrence)
- Amchem Products Inc v British Columbia (Workers' Compensation Board), [1993] 1 SCR 897 (Majority)
- R v Morgentaler [1993] 3 SCR 463 (Majority)
- Rodriguez v British Columbia (AG), [1993] 3 SCR 519 (Majority)
1994–1997
- Native Women's Assn of Canada v Canada, [1994] 3 SCR 627 (Majority)
- R v Mohan, [1994] 2 SCR 9 (Concurrence)
- R v Daviault [1994] 3 SCR 6 (Dissent)
- R v Burlingham, [1995] 2 SCR 206 (Concurrence)
- Egan v Canada, [1995] 2 SCR 513 (Concurrence)
- R v Park, [1995] 2 SCR 836 (Concurrence)
- R v Jorgensen, [1995] 4 SCR 55 (Majority)
- Adler v Ontario (AG), [1996] 3 SCR 609 (Concurrence)
- R v Badger, [1996] 1 SCR 771 (Concurrence)
- R v Feeney, [1997] 2 SCR 13 (Majority)
Note: This list is incomplete
gollark: Anyway, if you could make it past that to one of the content pages, they would each have their own loading screens, probably prompt you for the newsletter again, have more irrelevant shiny images, and have excessively large text and a UI designed for 3.5" mobile phone screens.
gollark: They would have close buttons but they would only work 50% of the time.
gollark: Oh, and ones asking for cookie consent and newsletter signup.
gollark: But there would also be a popup asking you to download the app, which would not actually work because I'm not making an app, as well as one asking you to add it to your home screen as a PWA.
gollark: Then it would load into a page containing a bunch of links to all the actual *content*, but each would have a vaguely nice-looking but irrelevant image to occupy half the page and also your internet connection.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.