Reasons of the Supreme Court of Canada by Justice Cory
This is a list of opinions written by Peter Cory, during his time as a Puisne Justice of the Supreme Court of Canada between 1 February 1989 and 1 June 1999.
1989–1999
- R. v. Storrey, [1990] 1 S.C.R. 241
- R. v. Askov, [1990] 2 S.C.R. 1199
- R. v. McCraw, [1991] 3 S.C.R. 72
- Canadian Council of Churches v. Canada (Minister of Employment and Immigration), [1992] 1 S.C.R. 236
- Rodriguez v. British Columbia (Attorney General) [1993] (dissent)
- R. v. Daviault, [1994] 3 S.C.R. 63
- R. v. Heywood, 1994
- R. v. Stillman, [1997] 1 S.C.R. 607
- Vriend v. Alberta, [1998] 1 S.C.R. 493 (with Iacobucci)
- Dobson (Litigation Guardian of) v. Dobson, [1999] 2 S.C.R. 753
Note: This list is incomplete
| Notable cases by era | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reasons by year |
| ||||
| Reasons by Justice |
| ||||
| Cases and Reasons by type of judgment | |||||
.svg.png){kind=small}
gollark: And ones which require some retroactive change like "let's all have become better at hygiene and gotten masks for everyone" or something obviously can't actually work.
gollark: If you have a better idea I'm sure someone will listen.
gollark: I mean, the UK initially went for an "ignore it and hope it goes away" sort of approach based on flawed modelling for flu, but then changed their strategy to the lockdown/social distancing one when updated models suggested this was a bad idea.
gollark: Like what? I'm pretty sure there has been thought about this.
gollark: What would you prefer, *no* lockdown (or much less of one) and significantly higher infection (and then death) rates?
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.