Ranked Ballot Initiative of Toronto

Ranked Ballot Initiative of Toronto (RaBIT) is a Canadian, grassroots, public policy and advocacy group that supports reforming the municipal electoral voting system in the city of Toronto from a first-past-the-post voting system to instant runoff voting.

Ranked Ballot Initiative of Toronto (RaBIT)
Formation2010
FounderDave Meslin
TypeGrassroots advocacy group
PurposePromoting electoral reform and Instant Runoff Voting in the city of Toronto
HeadquartersToronto, Ontario, Canada
Websiterabit.ca
Formerly called
Better Ballots

History

Founded by "community choreographer" Dave Meslin, RaBIT grew out of a series of community town hall meetings conducted under the name Better Ballots in the Spring of 2010.[1][2] Community members voted at these meetings for instant runoff voting as their preferred method of ballot reform from fourteen options, and enfranchisement for permanent residents of Toronto as the most popular choice of democracy-building overall. Following these consultations, RaBIT formed to advocate for ranked ballots to be put into law in time for the 2014 election.[3]

With the profile of electoral reform raised throughout the city, on August 25, 2010, a motion was put forward by Ward 29-Councillor Case Ootes requesting a review of potential changes to the Municipal Elections Act before requesting the change with the province.[4] The motion was approved with thirty-five councillors voting in favor, one councillor voting against, and nine councillors absent.[5]

Once the report was released, council formally requested enabling legislation from the Ontario Legislature in June 2013,[6] with twenty-six councillors supporting the motion and fifteen against. In response to the request and a RaBIT petition signed by over eight thousand people,[7] the Liberal MPP for Scarborough-Guildwood, Mitzie Hunter, introduced the Toronto Ranked Ballots Election Act in March 2014.[8] The bill passed the second reading, but died prematurely when the election was called. NDP MPP for Davenport Jonah Schein had introduced similar legislation just prior to Hunter's.[9]

During the 2014 provincial election campaign, Premier Kathleen Wynne announced that, if re-elected, the Liberal government would introduce legislation that would enable all Ontario municipalities to use ranked ballots if they so chose. The Globe and Mail applauded the announcement in an editorial, saying her announcement was "excellent news."[10] After the election, the Premier sent Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing, Ted McMeekin, a mandate letter that charged him with bringing forward legislation that would provide "municipalities with the option of using ranked ballots in future elections, starting in 2018, as an alternative to first-past-the-post."[11]

In spring 2015, Minister McMeekin announced a consultation process aimed at gathering input from the public on how the government should implement its promise to provide municipalities with the ability to use ranked ballots.[12] At the same time, the province launched a technical working group to discuss the issues surrounding implementation of ranked ballots at the municipal level with public servants and other stakeholders with the aim of informing the legislative drafting process. Andrew Coyne welcomed the change in his National Post column, saying that ranked ballots would encourage "more civil, less divisive campaigns."[13]

At Toronto City Council in October 2015, a motion was inserted into the Five-Year Review of the City of Toronto Act that sought to reverse council's previous request for the province to allow ranked voting. A number of councillors reversed their previous decisions in support of electoral reform and the motion passed 25-18.[14] Councillors against the motion decried the reversal for its "lack of public input" and called it a "setback for democratic reform and renewal."[15] The Ministry of Municipal Affairs said they were moving forward with providing the option of ranked ballot voting despite the council motion.[16]

In April 2016, Minister McMeekin announced proposed legislation to give municipalities the option to use ranked ballots in future municipal elections.[17] The Toronto Star Editorial Board praised the announcement, saying, "Queen’s Park did the right thing by ignoring a regressive and self-centred vote by Toronto city council and allow ranked ballots."[18] Shortly after the announcement, a Mainstreet Research poll was released that found 59 per cent of Torontonians supported ranked ballots.[19]

By June 2016, enabling legislation was passed in Bill 181, which also shortened the length of campaign periods, banned donations from unions and corporations, reformed campaign finance laws, clarified the rights of tenants and people with disabilities in elections, and laid out rules for administration, compliance, and candidacy.[20] The Department of Municipal Affairs and Housing also released a series of resources explaining the allocation of ranked ballots[21] and set rules for when and how municipalities should educate the public before an election that used them.[22]

While the enabling legislation allowing the use of ranked ballots by municipalities was enacted in June 2016, the legislation itself did little beyond permit their use, leaving much of the details around how ranked ballots were to be implemented to be determined by regulations that would be released at a later date. These much more detailed regulations were eventually released in September 2016.[23]

The release of these regulations prompted City of Toronto staff to draft a report to city council that would analyze these changes to the Municipal Elections Act and their potential impact. The report was completed in November 2016 and considered by Toronto City Council’s Executive Committee in a meeting on 1 December 2016. In this meeting, Councillor Paul Ainslie moved a motion to direct staff to look into the possibility of creating an independent citizen’s reference panel to consider whether the city should switch to ranked ballots for its elections. This motion was defeated by a vote of 6 to 3 with 4 members absent.[24]

A few days later, the matter was again considered, this time by full council in a meeting on 13 December. Councillor Ainslie moved the same motion which was defeated by a vote of 22 to 17 with 5 councillors absent.[25] Some councillors argued against the motion claiming that ranked ballots were hard to understand and that the current first-past-the-post system worked fine. This sparked a response from Toronto Star columnist, Edward Keenan, who argued that every councillor who voted against implementing a panel was either a "useless or actively bad" city councillor [23].

With this setback, RaBIT has shifted its focus from politicians to voters. RaBIT launched a new petition asking council to implement ranked ballots as soon as possible. RaBIT is also working to make ranked ballots an issue in the 2018 Toronto municipal election

Further reading

Keenan, Edward (October 26, 2010). "Ranked Thoughts on Voting Reform". In Meslin, Dave; Christina, Palassio; Wilcox, Alana (eds.). Local Motion: The Art of Civic Engagement in Toronto. Coach House Books. pp. 30–41. ISBN 978-1-55245-238-7.

gollark: I mean, I like the idea of some kind of challenges, but I feel like esoimplementing would be hard to do.
gollark: > IDEA: AutoBotRobot inventory system.> I'm thinking something where you can obtain items somehow, and g ive them to people.> So, thoughts on "how" the "inventory" thing should "work"?
gollark: One (1 (¹ (uno (eka (un (ein)))))).
gollark: Although internally they're just x/y/z and you call methods on world objects, or something.
gollark: x, y, z, dimension ID.

References
  1. http://search.proquest.com/docview/1357298831?
  2. http://tvo.org/transcript/102560b/video/programs/civics-101/dave-meslin-better-ballots
  3. http://tvo.org/transcript/2112988/video/programs/the-agenda-with-steve-paikin/dave-meslin-a-preferable-ballot
  4. http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-33371.pdf
  5. http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/cc/minutes/2010-08-25-cc52-mn.htm
  6. http://app.toronto.ca/tmmis/viewAgendaItemHistory.do?item=2013.GM22.15
  7. http://www.unlockdemocracy.ca/mah_event
  8. http://www.ontla.on.ca/web/bills/bills_detail.do?locale=en&BillID=2948&isCurrent=false&detailPage=bills_detail_the_bill
  9. http://www.ontla.on.ca/web/bills/bills_detail.do?locale=en&BillID=2940&isCurrent=false&ParlSessionID=40%3A2
  10. https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/editorials/ontario-points-the-way-with-ranked-ballots/article20898792/
  11. https://www.ontario.ca/page/2014-mandate-letter-municipal-affairs-and-housing#section-3
  12. https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/ontario-allowing-municipalities-to-use-ranked-ballots-in-2018-elections/article24661151/
  13. http://news.nationalpost.com/full-comment/andrew-coyne-ontario-municipals-get-alternative-to-first-past-the-post-in-next-election
  14. http://app.toronto.ca/tmmis/viewAgendaItemHistory.do?item=2015.EX8.1
  15. https://www.thestar.com/news/city_hall/2015/10/01/toronto-council-reverses-position-on-ranked-ballot.html
  16. https://www.thestar.com/news/city_hall/2015/10/02/toronto-council-reversal-on-ranked-ballots-criticized.html
  17. https://news.ontario.ca/mah/en/2016/04/ontario-to-introduce-ranked-ballot-option-for-municipal-elections.html
  18. https://www.thestar.com/opinion/editorials/2016/04/04/welcoming-more-choice-at-the-ballot-box-editorial.html
  19. http://toronto.ctvnews.ca/poll-majority-of-torontonians-support-ranked-ballots-in-municipal-elections-1.2847258
  20. http://www.mah.gov.on.ca/Page11112.aspx
  21. http://www.mah.gov.on.ca/Page11118.aspx
  22. http://www.ontariocanada.com/registry/view.do?postingId=21905&language=en
  23. https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-98545.pdf
  24. http://app.toronto.ca/tmmis/decisionBodyProfile.do?function=doPrepare&meetingId=10995#Meeting-2016.EX20
  25. http://app.toronto.ca/tmmis/viewAgendaItemHistory.do?item=2016.EX20.5
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.