Rachel (1795 ship)

Rachel (or Rachael) was launched at Bristol in 1795. She spent most of her career as a constant trader, sailing to and from Nevis. A French privateer captured her in 1803 but a Liverpool letter of marque quickly recaptured her. She was wrecked in July 1811.

For other ships with the same name, see Rachel (ship).

History
United Kingdom
Name: Rachel
Owner: Prothero
Builder: Bristol
Launched: 1795
Fate: Wrecked 7 July 1811
General characteristics
Tons burthen: 270[1][2] (bm)
Sail plan: Brig

Career

Rachael first appeared in Lloyd's Register (LR) in 1795.[1] Subsequently, she made eleven voyages to Nevis.[2]

Year Master Owner Trade Source
1795 Murray Prothero Bristol–Saint Kitts LR
1800 Vernam (Vernon)
T.Powell		 Prothero Bristol–Nevis LR
1802 T.Powel;
G. Cooper		 Prothero Bristol–Nevis LR

Lloyd's List (LL) reported on 15 July 1803 that Rachael, Cooper, master, had been taken and retaken, while on her way from Nevis to Bristol. She had arrived at Liverpool.[3] The capture had been off Cape Clear,[4] and her recaptor was a Liverpool letter of marque.[2]

Year Master Owner Trade Source
1805 G.Cooper
W.Scarth		 Prothero Bristol–Nevis LR
1810 S.Bell, jr. Claxton & Company Bristol–Nevis LR
1811 S.Bell, jr.
J.Powell		 Claxton & Company Bristol–Nevis LR

Fate

Rachel, Power, master, was at Nevis when a gale hit the island between 6 and 9 July 1811.[5] She herself was wrecked on 7 July; her crew was saved.[2]

Citations and references

Citations

  1. LR (1795), "R" supple. pages, Seq.№R250.
  2. Farr (1950), p. 247.
  3. LL 15 July 1803, №4367.
  4. LL 19 July 1803, №4368.
  5. LL 23 August 1811, №4591.

References

  • Farr, Grahame E., ed. (1950). Records of Bristol Ships, 1800-1838 (vessels over 150 tons). 15. Bristol Record Society.
gollark: "If you didnt do anything wrong, then you shouldnt be worried" only works if you cast "not being happy with things" as "wrong", as well as "being associated with people who did "wrong" things", and expect that people will just never care about politics.
gollark: I agree that that can sometimes be a problem, but it also means people can actually suggest improvements or dislike things without fearing for their lives.
gollark: People might disagree with how you run things and that's really not a good reason to imprison/whatever them.
gollark: Or just anyone who happens to be *related* to dissidents, to some extent anyone made worse off by some poor decision made somewhere, someone who is *taken* to be a dissident even if they aren't somehow, people who are living in fear of being considered one, etc.Also, I do care about said dissidents, soooo...
gollark: The world is very interconnected these days so stuff happening elsewhere affects me somewhat. And I do also care about suffering being caused, even if that doesn't directly affect people in my country.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.